Comparison of Nine Instruments to Calculate Anticholinergic Load in a Large Cohort of Older Outpatients: Association with Cognitive and Functional Decline, Falls, and Use of Laxatives.

OBJECTIVE: A patient's risk for anticholinergic adverse effects is frequently estimated by instruments evaluating the drugs included in his medication profile. It remains unknown, however, which characteristics should be included in such an assessment instrument aiming to reliably predict adverse anticholinergic outcomes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: ESTHER cohort (Germany). PARTICIPANTS: Home-dwelling participants (N = 2,761) aged between 60 and 87 years. MEASUREMENTS: The association between anticholinergic load calculated with nine different instruments and four anticholinergic adverse outcomes was investigated in univariate and multivariate analyses. Therefore, linear models complemented with Kendall's tau rank correlation coefficients (ԏ) were applied for continuous outcomes and generalized linear models were used to derive odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for binary endpoints. RESULTS: Based on the respective identification criteria for anticholinergic drugs, the nine instruments identified between 245 (9%) and 866 (31%) anticholinergic drug users (mean age ± SD: 73 ± 6 years; Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score: 28.3 ± 2.07; Barthel Index: 97.1 ± 7.5; 291 reporting falls; 29 taking laxatives [surrogate for constipation]). In the multivariate analysis, only two instruments indicated a significant association between anticholinergic load and all four outcomes. The instrument considering the prescribed dose showed the strongest association with MMSE scores (ԏ = -0.10), falls (OR: 2.30; 95% CI: 1.50-3.52), and the use of laxatives (OR: 3.11; 95% CI: 1.04-9.36). CONCLUSIONS: Instruments most reliably predicted anticholinergicadverse events if they were either based on the drugs' serum anticholinergic activity and the suggestions of clinician experts or considered the actual prescribed dose.

Risk factors of adverse health outcomes after hospital discharge modifiable by clinical pharmacist interventions: a review with a systematic approach.

The present review assessed the evidence on risk factors for the occurrence of adverse health outcomes after discharge (i.e. unplanned readmission or adverse drug event after discharge) that are potentially modifiable by clinical pharmacist interventions. The findings were compared with patient characteristics reported in guidelines that supposedly indicate a high risk of drug-related problems. First, guidelines and risk assessment tools were searched for patient characteristics indicating a high risk of drug-related problems. Second, a systematic PubMed search was conducted to identify risk factors significantly associated with adverse health outcomes after discharge that are potentially modifiable by a clinical pharmacist intervention. After the PubMed search, 37 studies were included, reporting 16 risk factors. Only seven of 34 patient characteristics mentioned in pertinent guidelines corresponded to one of these risk factors. Diabetes mellitus (n = 11), chronic obstructive lung disease (n = 9), obesity (n = 7), smoking (n = 5) and polypharmacy (n = 5) were the risk factors reported most frequently in the studies. Additionally, single studies also found associations of adverse health outcomes with different drug classes {e.g. warfarin [hazard ratio 1.50; odds ratio (OR) 3.52], furosemide [OR 2.25] or high beta-blocker starting doses [OR 3.10]}. Although several modifiable risk factors were found, many patient characteristics supposedly indicating a high risk of drug-related problems were not part of the assessed risk factors in the context of an increased risk of adverse health outcomes after discharge. Therefore, an obligatory set of modifiable patient characteristics should be created and implemented in future studies investigating the risk for adverse health outcomes after discharge.

Urine Biomarkers of Tubular Renal Cell Damage for the Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery-A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perioperative course of urine levels of the renal damage biomarkers tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 (TIMP-2) and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) and to evaluate the predictive value of elevated TIMP-2 × IGFBP7 concentrations to predict acute kidney injury (AKI) early after cardiac on-pump surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 110 consecutive patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) between January and March 2014. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Urinary TIMP-2 × IGFBP7 levels were quantified using a commercially available kit at the following measurement points: before surgery, 1 hour after starting CPB, 4 hours after weaning from CPB, and 24 hours after weaning from CPB (time points 1-4). Postoperative AKI was defined according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria. AKI after cardiac surgery was diagnosed in 9 patients (8%). The perioperative course of TIMP-2 × IGFBP7 was significantly different in patients with and without postoperative AKI (p < 0.001). TIMP-2 × IGFBP7 levels were significantly higher in patients with AKI 1 hour after CPB start and 24 hours after weaning from CPB (p < 0.05). TIMP-2 × IGFBP7 levels >0.40 (ng/mL)2/1,000 measured at 1 hour after starting CPB were found to be the optimal cut-off, with a sensitivity of 0.778 and a specificity of 0.641. The negative predictive value was 0.972. CONCLUSIONS: Urine levels of TIMP-2 × IGFBP7 are predictive for AKI at an early time point (1 hour after starting CPB). Renal damage biomarkers such as TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 might be recommended as a supplement to traditionally used criteria of AKI prediction.

Limitations of the Anticholinergic Activity Assay and Assay-Based Anticholinergic Drug Scales.

OBJECTIVE: The anticholinergic activity (AA) assay is a common method to determine a patient's anticholinergic load. Several limitations, however, are expected when applying the AA assay to patients or using drug scales to estimate anticholinergic burden based on AA levels. This study aims to demonstrate common pitfalls in an experimental setting and outline their clinical consequences. METHODS: The AA was analyzed for five drugs with reported interaction with muscarinic receptors. Concentration-response curves were constructed for furosemide (weak anticholinergic), diphenhydramine (moderate anticholinergic), the strong anticholinergic amitriptyline and its metabolite nortriptyline, and the cholinergic pilocarpine. The Combination Index (CI) was used to assess the interaction of three drug combinations with amitriptyline. RESULTS: All compounds displaced the radioactive tracer from its receptor binding site in a concentration-dependent manner, and full displacement was reached for all compounds except furosemide (Emax 16%). The CI indicated that amitriptyline and thioridazine have antagonistic effects (CI = 1.46) at low and synergistic effects (CI = 0.88) at higher concentrations (p < 0.0001), whereas synergistic effects (CI = 0.47-0.48) were observed for amitriptyline in any concentration combined with pilocarpine (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: When the patient's anticholinergic load is estimated using AA levels, the actual exposure, combination of anticholinergic drugs, their active metabolites, and also drugs with an opposite pharmacologic action will contribute to AA levels, whereas weak anticholinergic drugs in therapeutic concentrations are rather negligible.

Different methods, different results--how do available methods link a patient's anticholinergic load with adverse outcomes?

PURPOSE: Anticholinergic drugs are known to cause physical and cognitive impairment, particularly in older patients. The total of all anticholinergic influences to which a patient is exposed is referred to as anticholinergic load. Because the anticholinergic load is defined in various ways, this review aimed to describe differences in the development and evaluation of available methods calculating the anticholinergic load. METHODS: From September 2014 to August 2015, two reviewers performed a literature search in PubMed considering relevant items of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. We aimed to identify articles which calculated the anticholinergic load with a scale or equation and investigated its association with patient-related outcomes. From the included studies, we descriptively analyzed the identification and scoring criteria of the scales and equations with a main emphasis on their association to the reported outcomes. RESULTS: Out of 465 articles, 55 were included referring to 12 scales and one equation. Main discrepancies were located in eight different identification criteria for anticholinergic drugs, two different scoring principles, and 118 tests used for assessing outcomes. The methods most frequently detecting a significant association between the anticholinergic load and outcomes took into account the drugs' dosages and anticholinergic potencies. Interestingly, none of the methods included the patient's susceptibility for anticholinergic effects and they only rarely considered modulators of drug exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Due to hugely varying tests for assessing outcomes, the methods are scarcely comparable. For a more valuable comparison, the anticholinergic load should be calculated with all scales and the equation and correlated with patient-related outcomes.

Family-portraits for daphnids: scanning living individuals and populations to measure body length.

A method has been developed and tested to determine the body length of living daphnids. The purpose of the method was the simple, accurate, repeatable, quick, and to the living organism, harmless measurement of body length of all individuals in a population to enhance the capability of observing population development over time. Generally, organisms are transferred to a petri dish and temporarily fixed by removing access medium. A picture of the petri dish is taken using an ordinary flatbed scanner. Pictures are manually analysed with purposely developed software. We found no significant impact of the method on either individual performance (growth and reproduction) or population development (abundance and structure) of daphnids in comparison to the previously used method for data gathering (sieving, counting and length measurement of a subsample via microscopy). The disadvantage of our method, an increased demand in time for picture analysis, is negligible compared to the advantages this method has. Data generated with the new method do represent the population structure more accurately than those data generated with the previously used method. Scanning organisms does also allow a retrospective quality control for generated data as pictures can securely be stored. The quality of the pictures is furthermore sufficient to include additional endpoints to the analysis (e.g., number and size of aborts, number and size of eggs in the brood pouch, spine length). Here, we present, test and discuss an alternative approach to automated image analysis for data gathering in single and multiple individual and species experiments.

Loss of peroxisome function triggers necrosis.

Disturbance of peroxisome function can lead to various degenerative diseases during ageing. Here, we show that in yeast deletion of PEX6, encoding a protein involved in a key step of peroxisomal protein import, results in an increased accumulation of reactive oxygen species and an enhanced loss of viability upon acetic acid treatment and during early stationary phase. Cell death of ageing-like yeast cells lacking PEX6 does not depend on the apoptotic key players Yca1p and Aif1p, but instead shows markers of necrosis. Thus, we conclude that loss of peroxisomal function leads to a form of necrotic cell death.