Undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea syndrome as a treatable cause of new-onset sleepiness in some post-COVID patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Infection with COVID-19 can lead to persistent sequelae, such as fatigue, daytime sleepiness or disturbed sleep, that can remain for more than 12 weeks and that are summarized as post-COVID syndrome. The causes remain unclear. The present study investigated the presence of sleep disorders in patients with post-COVID syndrome using polysomnography. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with post-COVID syndrome and new-onset fatigue and sleepiness after a SARS-CoV2 infection underwent polysomnography in accordance with American Association of Sleep Medicine (AASM) standards as part of their clinical workup. Analysis was performed visually based on AASM criteria (scoring manual version 2.6, 2020). RESULTS: Polysomnography revealed a sleep efficiency of <80% in 50% of patients and a mean respiratory disturbance index (RDI) of 9.9 ± 15.4/h. Excluding central apneas, 12 patients (35%) had an RDI of ≥5/h, pointing to obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS; AASM 2014). Patients with a high RDI were significantly older (p = 0.01) and showed a trend towards a higher body mass index (p = 0.08) than patients with a normal RDI but had no other risk factors for OSAS. Six patients agreed to long-term treatment of their OSAS and all reported discontinuation of daytime symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Post-COVID symptoms such as daytime sleepiness, fatigue and memory and concentration problems may in part be a result of reduced sleep efficiency and sleep apnea in a relevant percentage of patients. This possibly treatable cause of the symptoms should be kept in mind in patients presenting with post-COVID syndrome.

[Adherence to CPAP Three Months after Starting Therapy in 1078 Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)]. / Therapieadhärenz drei Monate nach Einleitung einer nichtinvasiven CPAP-Therapie bei 1078 Patienten mit obstruktiver Schlafapnoe (OSA).

INTRODUCTION: Nocturnal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is considered the gold standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The CPAP therapy is a long-term treatment but does come with few possible side effects. The adherence to the therapy is frequently suboptimal. In this paper, adherence to therapy was assessed and typical problems were classified. METHODS: 1078 OSA patients received CPAP therapy after a diagnostic polygraphy (PG) or polysomnography (PSG). Adherence to therapy was followed up three months after treatment induction. The following therapy adherence groups were defined: 1. correctly calibrated CPAP and good adherence, 2. CPAP non-acceptance, after initial use, 3. CPAP intolerance use due to side effects, 4. discontinuation due to lack of motivation/low rates of symptoms. 5. mask intolerance, 6. CPAP failure due to a lack of perceived treatment effect, 7. Change to another non-invasive ventilation method, 8. No control carried out. RESULTS: Out of 1078 OSA patients a therapy control was performed in 830 patients (77%). Of these, 450 patients (54.2%) were placed in group 1, 216 patients (26 %) in group 2, 71 patients (8.5 %) in group 3, 35 patients (4.2 %) in group 4, 14 patients (1.7 %) in group 5, 3 patients (0.4 %) in group 6 and 41 patients (4.9%) in group 7. A mild obstructive index, low CPAP pressure and, as a trend, a low Epworth-Sleepiness score were predictors of CPAP failure. No significant predictors could be shown for adherence to therapy. DISCUSSION: An effective treatment use of 54% after 3 months is a suboptimal result. Predictors of CPAP failure were parameters that indicated that the patient was less symptomatic prior to therapy. Despite a large patient cohort, neither anthropometric nor PSG-data provided any significant CPAP adherence predictors. Rather, experiences in the first nights of use could be decisive. CPAP devices offer comfort settings that have to be personalised to patients' needs and wants. A large selection of different mask shapes requires experience and training in patient-centred mask fitting. A three-month follow-up appointment seems too long to discuss therapy problems with the patient in a timely manner. Telemedical options or short-term telephone appointments should be considered.

[Adherence to CPAP Three Months after Starting Therapy in 1078 Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)]. / Therapieadhärenz 3 Monate nach Einleitung einer nichtinvasiven CPAP-Therapie bei 1078 Patienten mit obstruktiver Schlafapnoe (OSA).

INTRODUCTION: Nocturnal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is considered the gold standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The CPAP therapy is a long-term treatment but does come with few possible side effects. The adherence to the therapy is frequently suboptimal. In this paper, adherence to therapy was assessed and typical problems were classified. METHODS: 1078 OSA patients received CPAP therapy after a diagnostic polygraphy (PG) or polysomnography (PSG). Adherence to therapy was followed up three months after treatment induction. The following therapy adherence groups were defined: 1. correctly calibrated CPAP and good adherence, 2. CPAP non-acceptance, after initial use, 3. CPAP intolerance use due to side effects, 4. discontinuation due to lack of motivation/low rates of symptoms. 5. mask intolerance, 6. CPAP failure due to a lack of perceived treatment effect, 7. Change to another non-invasive ventilation method, 8. No control carried out. RESULTS: Out of 1078 OSA patients a therapy control was performed in 830 patients (77 %). Of these, 450 patients (54.2 %) were placed in group 1, 216 patients (26 %) in group 2, 71 patients (8.5 %) in group 3, 35 patients (4.2 %) in group 4, 14 patients (1.7 %) in group 5, 3 patients (0.4 %) in group 6 and 41 patients (4.9 %) in group 7. A mild obstructive index, low CPAP pressure and, as a trend, a low Epworth- Sleepiness score were predictors of CPAP failure. No significant predictors could be shown for adherence to therapy. DISCUSSION: An effective treatment use of 54 % after 3 months is a suboptimal result. Predictors of CPAP failure were parameters that indicated that the patient was less symptomatic prior to therapy. Despite a large patient cohort, neither anthropometric nor PSG-data provided any significant CPAP adherence predictors. Rather, experiences in the first nights of use could be decisive. CPAP devices offer comfort settings that have to be personalised to patients' needs and wants. A large selection of different mask shapes requires experience and training in patient-centred mask fitting. A three-month follow-up appointment seems too long to discuss therapy problems with the patient in a timely manner. Telemedical options or short-term telephone appointments should be considered.

Evaluation of a New Multiparameter Brain Probe for Simultaneous Measurement of Brain Tissue Oxygenation, Cerebral Blood Flow, Intracranial Pressure, and Brain Temperature in a Porcine Model.

BACKGROUND: A novel multiparameter brain sensor (MPBS) allows the simultaneous measurement of brain tissue oxygenation (ptiO2), cerebral blood flow (CBF), intracranial pressure (ICP), and brain temperature with a single catheter. This laboratory investigation evaluates the MPBS in an animal model in relation to established reference probes. METHODS: The study group consisted of 17 juvenile male pigs. Four MPBS and four reference probes were implanted per pig and compared simultaneously. The measured parameters were challenged by standardized provocations such as hyperoxia, dobutamine, and norepinephrine application, hypercapnia and hypoxia in combination with and without a controlled cortical impact (CCI) injury. Mean values over 2 min were collected for predefined time points and were analyzed using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: The protocol was successfully conducted in 15 pigs of which seven received CCI. ICP and ptiO2 were significantly influenced by the provocations. Subtraction of MPBS from reference values revealed a mean difference (limits of agreement) of 3.7 (- 20.5 to 27.9) mm Hg, - 2.9 (- 7.9 to 2.1) mm Hg, and 5.1 (- 134.7 to 145.0) % for ptiO2, ICP, and relative CBF, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The MPBS is a promising measurement tool for multiparameter neuromonitoring. The conducted study demonstrates the in vivo functionality of the probe. Comparison with standard probes revealed a deviation which is mostly analogous to other multiparameter devices. However, further evaluation of the device is necessary before it can reliably be used for clinical decision making.

Description of the response of a new multi-parametric brain sensor to physiological and pathophysiological challenges in the cortex of juvenile pigs.

AIM: Monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP), local cerebral blood flow (CBF) and oxygen is part of modern intensive critical care medicine. Preclinical evaluation of newly developed catheters that should monitor several parameters simultaneously is reported poorly in the literature. The goal of our study was (1) to evaluate a new multi-parametric sensor in brain tissue and (2) to establish a testing protocol using pathophysiological challenges that target measured parameters of the sensor and autoregulatory boundaries and could be used as preclinical standard protocol in future studies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We describe data from 12 new multi-parametric brain sensors (MPBS) that were implanted into 3 porcine brains and combined measurement of brain tissue oxygenation (ptiO2), ICP, CBF and brain temperature for the first time. Pigs were treated with a period of hyperoxygenation, hypercapnia, hypoxia, dobutamine, and norepinephrine. RESULTS: None of the 12 MPBS failed. Our testing protocol induced standardized pathophysiological changes that were picked up by the new MPBS as significant alterations in brain ptiO2, ICP and CBF. The magnitude of changes was >20% in most tested MPBS. CONCLUSION: An experimental protocol with pre-defined end-points for O2, CO2, blood pressure and cardiac output should be standardized and reported if new sensors for multi-parametric brain monitoring are evaluated. The use of several sensors per brain of only a few animals is sufficient to determine functionality of new sensors in vivo as basis for a larger study with reference sensors and brain injury.

Effects of early and late intravenous norepinephrine infusion on cerebral perfusion, microcirculation, brain-tissue oxygenation, and edema formation in brain-injured rats.

OBJECTIVES: Reduction of cerebral perfusion during the early phase after traumatic brain injury is followed by a later phase of normal to increased perfusion. Thus, pharmacologically elevating mean arterial blood pressure with the aim of improving cerebral perfusion may exert different time-dependent effects on cortical perfusion, microcirculation, tissue oxygenation and brain edema formation after traumatic brain injury. DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Experimental laboratory at a university hospital. SUBJECTS: A total of 37 male Sprague-Dawley rats subjected to a focal cortical contusion. INTERVENTIONS: At 4 or 24 hrs after focal traumatic brain injury, mean arterial blood pressure was increased to 120 mm Hg for 90 mins by infusing norepinephrine. In rats receiving physiologic saline, mean arterial blood pressure remained unchanged. In the first series, pericontusional cortical perfusion was measured using the laser Doppler flowmetry scanning technique before injury and before, during, and after the infusion period. In a second series, intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressure and intraparenchymal perfusion and tissue oxygen measured within the contused and pericontusional cortex were recorded continuously before, during, and after norepinephrine infusion. Changes in cortical microcirculation were investigated by orthogonal polarization spectral imaging. At the end of each experiment, hemispheric swelling and water content were determined gravimetrically. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At 4 and 24 hrs after traumatic brain injury, intravenous norepinephrine significantly increased pericontusional cortical perfusion, which was also reflected by an increase in diameters and flow velocities of pericontusional arterioles and venules. Cerebral perfusion pressure and intraparenchymal perfusion and tissue oxygen were significantly increased during norepinephrine infusion at 4 and 24 hrs. Hemispheric swelling and water content showed no difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: After cortical impact injury, early and late intravenous norepinephrine infusion pressure-dependently increased cerebral perfusion and tissue oxygenation without aggravating or reducing brain edema formation. Future studies are warranted to determine long-term changes of short and prolonged norepinephrine-induced increases in mean arterial blood pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure.