Cardiac transplantation: candidate identification, evaluation, and management.

For more than 40 years, cardiac transplantation has been a treatment option for patients with severe heart failure in whom optimal medical management is no longer effective. Critical care nurses are integrally involved in the care of patients with severe heart failure who may benefit from cardiac transplantation and are in a special position to recognize potential candidates for transplantation. Understanding patient selection criteria, the evaluation process, and how patients are managed while awaiting transplantation is key to the knowledge and skills required. It is also important to understand the allocation of donor hearts as part of this process. The waiting period for a suitable donor heart can be long and a patient's condition may deteriorate, requiring an increase in pharmacologic bridges with intravenous inotropic agents or mechanical bridges with circulatory assist devices. Critical care nurses become important as a personal bridge to transplantation through their education of patients and families and helping them cope with their fears during the waiting period. Critical care nurses who possess knowledge of patient selection and organ allocation processes along with the skills of caring for this complex patient population can contribute to better outcomes for patients with heart failure who may be candidates for cardiac transplantation.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: a case study.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy is a rare, highly fatal demyelinating brain infection caused by the JC virus. This infection is associated with immunosuppressive agents and is emerging in the transplant population. There has never been a documented case of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in a transplant recipient receiving sirolimus. We present a study, in which the JC virus was found in a 68-year-old man who had received a postorthotopic heart transplant 3 years earlier and who was receiving sirolimus and prednisone for immunosuppression. We review the clinical presentation, diagnosis, current treatment options, and the outcomes of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in transplant recipients.

Aortic valve closure associated with HeartMate left ventricular device support: technical considerations and long-term results.

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve integrity is crucial for optimal left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. Pre-existing native aortic insufficiency, aortic valve incompetence acquired during support, as well as previously placed prosthetic aortic valves present unique problems for these patients. METHODS: We reviewed and analyzed data for 28 patients who underwent left ventricular outflow tract closure associated with HeartMate I (n =12) and HeartMate II (n = 16) LVAD insertion or exchange. Indications for valve closure, surgical technique, LVAD function, survival rates and complications were retrospectively analyzed. Survival rates were compared with those of HeartMate LVAD patients (n = 104) who did not undergo aortic valve closure. RESULTS: Indications for closure included native aortic valve insufficiency (10 patients), aortic valve deterioration after prolonged LVAD support (8 patients) and previously placed mechanical (9 patients) or bioprosthetic aortic prostheses (1 patient). There were 2 operative and 5 late deaths (mean 227 days post-operatively). Of the deaths, none were due to aortic valve closure. Actuarial survival was 78% at 1 year and 53% at 3 years, which was statistically better than for our patients with an intact aortic outflow (61% at 1 year, 45% at 3 years; p < 0.05). Five patients had transplants, 1 patient was successfully bridged to recovery, and 15 patients remain on LVAD support. No patient with outflow closure developed regurgitation, embolization or compromised LVAD support. CONCLUSION: Outflow tract closure in LVAD-supported patients is safe, often necessary and well tolerated.

HeartMate left ventricular assist system exchange: results and technical considerations.

The duration times of left ventricular assist system (LVAS) support have increased because of prolonged wait times for transplant and the more frequent use of devices for destination therapy. The HeartMate LVAS, the only device approved for bridge to transplant and destination therapy, has limited durability, making replacement increasingly necessary. Since 1996, we have exchanged 19 left ventricular assist devices in 15 patients (11 men: mean age, 57.1 years; range, 33-77 years). Most of the devices (14) were replaced with the HeartMate vented electric/extended-lead vented electric pump; five devices were exchanged for a HeartMate II LVAS. Bearing failure was the most frequent reason for exchange (15 of 19 pumps); four of the 19 pumps also had active device-related infections at the time of exchange. There were no early deaths (30 days). Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier) was 85% at 1 year, 67% at 2 years, and 56% at 3 years. Three patients had transplants (mean, 518 days); six patients died during support (mean, 934 days), and six patients remain on LVAS support (mean, 1,219 days). One patient has been on device for over 6 years. Left ventricular assist devices exchange is becoming increasingly likely and can be associated with acceptably low-operative mortality rates and good intermediate-term survival.