A 15-year review of characteristics and outcomes of patients leaving against medical advice.

PURPOSE: Discharging against medical advice can have significant, detrimental effects on burn patient outcomes as well as higher hospital readmission rates and healthcare expenditures. The goal of this study is to identify characteristics of patients who left against medical advice and suggest solutions to mitigate these factors. Data were collected at our American Burn Association verified Burn Unit over a 15-year period. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2022, 37 patients were identified as having left against medical advice from the burn unit. The average patient age was 37 years old with 64.9% being male, and 70.2% were identified as having a substance abuse history. The majority (51.4%) had Medicaid or State health insurance, 29.7% had no insurance, and 18.9% had private insurance. The mechanism of injury was most commonly frostbite (43.2%). The majority sustained < 1% total body surface area injuries. Most (83.7%) had social work and/or case management involved during their admission, and all (100%) had their involvement if the length of admission was greater than one day. Over half (59.5%) returned to the ED within 2 weeks with complications. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that patients discharging against medical advice from the burn unit suffered from smaller injuries, often due to cold related injuries. These patients had comorbid substance abuse or psychiatric histories, and the majority had Medicaid or state health insurance. Recruiting interdisciplinary care members, including social work, psychiatry, and addiction medicine, early may help these patients by encouraging completion of their hospital care and setting up crucial follow-up care.

Squamous Cell Carcinoma at Split Thickness Skin Graft Donor Site: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or keratoacanthoma (KA) development at split thickness skin graft donor sites is a documented but very rare entity. We describe a case in which a patient develops a lesion at his graft site seven weeks postoperatively. Upon pathological review, it was found to be SCC and was excised expediently thereafter. Notably, in reviewing the literature, these lesions tend to develop soon after the trauma of skin graft harvest with over half diagnosed within 3 months and a vast majority within 1 year of the operation. This is in contrast to Marjolin ulcers which take years to develop after the initial burn insult. Given the diversity of autograft indications in the reviewed literature, it seems unlikely that the burns themselves contribute to the development of SCC at the donor site. Our case highlights the need for routine surveillance of graft donor sites postoperatively with an emphasis on catching malignant sequelae.

Exploring the gender gap: Letters of recommendation to pediatric surgery fellowship.

BACKGROUND: Letters of recommendation (LoR) are considered one of the most important predictors of matching into a pediatric surgery fellowship. We determined if gendered differences exist in LoR written for resident candidates. METHODS: A retrospective review of blinded LoR to a fellowship program between 2015 and 2017 was performed. RESULTS: Of the 364 LoR reviewed for 49 female and 48 male applicants, male surgeons wrote 82.5% of letters. Male LoR contained more agentic terms (p = 0. 042), first name occurrences (p = 0.0082) and phrase "future success" (p = 0.015). Female letters included more socio-communal phrases (p = 0. 010) and 5% referenced a spouse's accomplishments vs. 0% of male letters. Male LoR contained more active possessive language (p-0. 027); ie: "he published", "he presented". We found no difference in an applicant's research experience (p = 0.06) or leadership qualities (p = 0. 067). CONCLUSION: Gender differences exist in LoR written for fellowship applicants applying to a highly competitive subspecialty.

Giant cell aortitis masquerading as intramural hematoma.

Giant cell aortitis is a rare cause of acute aortic syndrome. We describe the cases of two patients who had presented with chest pain, hypertension, and computed tomography angiographic evidence of mural thickening typical of thoracic aortic intramural hematoma. Although the patients' symptoms improved with hypertension control, elevated inflammatory markers and persistent fever to 103°F raised concern for an inflammatory etiology. Empiric steroids were administered, resulting in prompt cessation of fever and decreasing inflammatory markers. The findings from temporal artery biopsies were positive in both patients. Follow-up axial imaging after 2 weeks of steroid therapy revealed improvement in aortitis with decreased wall thickening. Giant cell aortitis should be considered in patients presenting with acute aortic syndrome in the setting of elevated inflammatory markers and noninfectious fever.

Gendered Differences in Letters of Recommendation for Transplant Surgery Fellowship Applicants.

BACKGROUND: No published study has explored gender differences in letters of recommendation for applicants entering surgical subspecialty fellowships. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of letters of recommendation to a transplant surgery fellowship written for residents finishing general surgery residency programs. A dictionary of communal and agentic terms was used to explore differences of the letters based on applicant's gender as well as the academic rank and gender of the author. RESULTS: Of the 311 reviewed letters, 228 were letters of recommendation written for male applicants. Male surgeons wrote 92.4% of the letters. Male applicant letters were significantly more likely to contain agentic terms such as superb, intelligent, and exceptional (p = 0.00086). Additionally, male applicant letters were significantly more likely to contain "future leader" (p = 0.047). Letters written by full professors, division chiefs, and program directors were significantly more likely to describe female applicants using communal terms like compassionate, calm, and delightful (p = 0.0301, p = 0.036, p = 0.036, respectively). In letters written by assistant professors, female letters of recommendation had significantly more references to family (p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Gendered differences exist in letters of recommendation for surgical fellowship applicants. This research may provide insight into the inherent gender bias that is revealed in letters supporting candidates entering the field.