Effect of Anterograde Lavage via Temporary Loop Ileostoma on the Recovery of Bowel Function in Patients Receiving Stoma Closure: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The effect of anterograde lavage in patients with rectal cancer who underwent anterior resection and plan to receive stoma closure is unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of anterograde lavage on postoperative bowel function recovery in patients who underwent temporary loop ileostomy and stoma closure. DESIGN: This was a hospital-based retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: All consecutive patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer and were planning to receive stoma closure from March through December 2019 were included. INTERVENTIONS: The enrolled patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether they received anterograde lavage before stoma closure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short-term functional outcomes, including time to first passing of flatus, first defecation time, and recovery time to first meal, were compared between the groups. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, total cost of hospitalization, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 222 eligible participants were included in the analysis, including 114 in the lavage group and 108 in the nonlavage group. No statistically significant differences were found in age, sex ratio, or distance between the anastomotic line and dentate line. In the lavage group, patients' time to first passing of flatus (38 vs 42 h; p = 0.006), first defecation time (42 vs 48 h; p < 0.001), recovery time to first meal (48 vs 55.5 h; p < 0.001), and length of hospital stay (5 vs 7 d; p < 0.001) were significantly shorter than those in the nonlavage group, and the total cost of hospitalization was significantly lower than that of the nonlavage group (25,000 vs 28,000 RMB; p < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the incidence of postoperative complications between the 2 groups (p = 0.067). LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by its relatively small sample size and retrospective design with single-center participants. CONCLUSIONS: Anterograde lavage before stoma closure is safe and noninvasive. For patients receiving anterior resection and planning to have stoma closure, this procedure can potentially help recover bowel function more rapidly. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C51. EFECTO DEL LAVADO ANTERGRADO MEDIANTE ILEOSTOMA TEMPORAL EN ASA SOBRE LA RECUPERACIN DE LA FUNCIN INTESTINAL EN PACIENTES QUE RECIBEN CIERRE DE ESTOMA UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE RETROSPECTIVO: ANTECEDENTES:No está claro el efecto del lavado anterógrado en pacientes con cáncer de recto con resección anterior que planean recibir el cierre del estoma.OBJETIVO:Investigar el efecto del lavado anterógrado en la recuperación de la función intestinal posoperatoria en pacientes que se sometieron a ileostomía en asa temporal y cierre de estoma.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo basado en el hospital.AJUSTES:Centro de referencia terciario.PACIENTES:Todos los pacientes que se sometieron a una resección anterior por cáncer de recto y que planeaban recibir el cierre del estoma desde marzo hasta diciembre de 2019.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes inscritos se dividieron en dos grupos según si recibieron lavado anterógrado antes del cierre del estoma.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los resultados funcionales a corto plazo, incluido el tiempo de la primera evacuación de flatos, tiempo de la primera defecación y tiempo de recuperación hasta la primera comida, se compararon entre los grupos. Resultados secundarios incluyeron duración de la estancia hospitalaria, costo total de la hospitalización y complicaciones posoperatorias.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron en el análisis un total de 222 participantes elegibles, incluidos 114 en el grupo de lavado y 108 en el grupo de no lavado. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la edad, la proporción de sexos o la distancia entre la línea de anastomosis y la línea dentada. En el grupo de lavado, el tiempo de la primera evacuación de flatos de los pacientes (38 vs 42 h; p = 0,006), el tiempo de la primera defecación (42 vs 48 h; p < 0,001), el tiempo de recuperación hasta la primera comida (48 vs 55,5 h; p < 0,001) y la duración de la estancia hospitalaria (5 vs 7 días; p < 0,001) fueron significativamente más cortos que los del grupo de no lavado, y el costo total de la hospitalización fue significativamente menor que el del grupo de no lavado (25000 vs 28000 RMB; p < 0,001). No hubo diferencia significativa en la incidencia de complicaciones postoperatorias entre los dos grupos (p = 0,067).LIMITACIONES:Este estudio está limitado por su tamaño de muestra relativamente pequeño y su diseño retrospectivo con participantes de un solo centro.CONCLUSIONES:El lavado anterógrado antes del cierre del estoma es seguro y no invasivo. Para los pacientes que se someten a una resección anterior y planean cerrar el estoma, este procedimiento puede ayudar potencialmente a recuperar la función intestinal más rápidamente. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C51. (Traducción-Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon).

Metformin and the risk of neurodegenerative diseases in patients with diabetes: A meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies.

AIMS: The association between metformin use and neurodegenerative disease (ND) onset remains controversial. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to determine the relationship between metformin use and ND risk based on data from population-based cohort studies. METHODS: Articles were systematically searched in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases. Pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs were obtained using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses and meta-regression were performed to identify the sources of heterogeneity and strengthen the results. RESULTS: Twelve population-based cohort studies involving 194,792 participants (94,462 metformin users and 100,330 metformin non-users) were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The pooled RR of NDs reached 0.77 (95% CI 0.67-0.88) when comparing metformin users with non-users. The effects were more prominent in long-term metformin users (≥4 years) (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.44) and studies from Asian countries (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.64-0.74). The effect estimates were stable when stratified by subtypes of NDs, study designs, and control definitions (p for interaction >0.05). Meta-regression did not identify the coefficients as the sources of heterogeneity (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that metformin use, especially long-term use, was associated with lower ND risk. However, because there was substantial heterogeneity among studies, high-quality randomized controlled trials are still needed to confirm this finding.

The use of acupuncture for advanced cancer care: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: To assess the up-to-date evidence of acupuncture for the management of cancer-related and cancer treatment-related outcomes among people with advanced cancer. DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analyses involving multidimensional outcomes. METHODS: The protocol of this systematic review has been registered in PROSPERO with the registration number CRD42020212982. Six databases (including Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SinoMed, ClinicalTrials.gov and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry) will be searched from inception through November 2020 to identify relevant interventional trials examining acupuncture management on multidimensional outcomes in patients with advanced cancer. Main outcomes will include cancer and treatment-related symptoms, quality of life, sleep quality and adverse events. DerSimonian & Laird random-effects meta-analysis will be applied to calculate pooled relative risks for binary data and pooled weighted mean differences (WMDs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) for continuous data. Trial quality ratings and risk of bias will be evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. DISCUSSION: The efficacy of acupuncture on advanced cancer care and outcomes has not yet been determined. Palliative care for patients with advanced cancer may involve multiple challenges that include physical and mental health care. This systematic review will offer updated and comprehensive evidence of acupuncture on specific outcomes induced by advanced cancer and cancer-related treatment, which can give high level clinical recommendations to improve patient care and clinical outcomes.

Effects of statin exposure and lung cancer survival: A meta-analysis of observational studies.

Statin exposure has been reported to improve survival in several cancers. However, studies evaluating the association between statins and prognostic outcomes in patients with lung cancer are conflicting and heterogeneous. Pubmed, EMBASE and reference lists of included studies were searched to identify studies investigating the association between statin exposure and lung cancer prognosis. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS) and secondary ones included cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of these outcomes were pooled using random-effects models. Thirteen studies with data from 99,297 individuals satisfying the inclusion criteria were identified. Studies were ranked to be at low to moderate risk of bias. Meta-analysis showed that statin exposure was significantly associated with improved OS (pooled HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.72-0.86), CSS (pooled HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.89) and RFS (pooled HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.81-0.89). Subgroup analyses showed that statin users after diagnosis of lung cancer had more survival benefit for OS (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.92) than those before diagnosis (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.81-0.90) and current users (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.62-1.02) (P for interaction <0.001). Besides, statin users were likely to have more survival benefits in stage IV lung cancer patients (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.74-0.79) than in mixed stage (I-IV or I-III) patients (P for interaction = 0.004). Statin exposure is associated with significantly improved survival in patients with lung cancer. Future studies are warranted to further demonstrate the therapeutic role of statins in specific lung cancer patients.

Effects of statins on cancer mortality and progression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 95 cohorts including 1,111,407 individuals.

Statins have been implicated in the regulation of cell proliferation, apoptosis and tumor progression in cancer patients and statin use at the time of cancer diagnosis has been reported to be associated with reduced cancer risk and improved survival, irrespective of concomitant anti-cancer therapy. A systematic literature search of relevant databases through May 2015 was conducted to identify studies assessing the prognostic impact of statin use on prognostic outcomes in cancer patients. Literature search identified 95 cohort studies that met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of 55 articles showed that statin use was significantly associated with decreased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.70, 95% Cl 0.66 to 0.74) compared with nonusers. The observed pooled estimates were retained for cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.60, 95% Cl 0.47 to 0.77), progression-free survival (HR 0.67, 95% Cl 0.56 to 0.81), recurrence-free survial (HR 0.74, 95% Cl 0.65 to 0.83) and disease-free survival (HR 0.53, 95% Cl 0.40 to 0.72). These associations almost remained consistent across those outcomes when stratified by publication type, tumour location, study design, sample size, initiation of statins, disease stage, research country, follow-up duration or research hospital involved. Subgroup analyses according to initiation of statins showed postdiagnosis statin users (HR 0.65, 95% Cl 0.54 to 0.79) gained significantly more recurrence-free survival benefit than prediagnosis statin users (HR 0.86, 95% Cl 0.77 to 0.96) (p for interaction = 0.018). Statin therapy has potential survival benefit for patients with malignancy. Further large-scale prospective studies emphasising survival outcomes of individual cancer type are strongly encouraged.

Interleukin 22 protects colorectal cancer cells from chemotherapy by activating the STAT3 pathway and inducing autocrine expression of interleukin 8.

Resistance to chemotherapy is the major cause of colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment failure. The cytokine IL-22, which is produced by T cells and NK cells, is associated with tumorigenesis and tumor progression in cancers. However, the role of IL-22 in chemoresistance has not been investigated. We found that IL-22 levels in tumor tissues and peripheral blood were associated with chemoresistance and indicate poor prognosis for patients who received FOLFOX chemotherapy. In CRC cells, IL-22 was able to attenuate the cytotoxic and apoptosis-inducing effects of 5-FU and OXA by activating the STAT3 pathway and subsequently increasing the expression of anti-apoptotic genes. In addition, IL-22 conferred resistance to 5-FU and OXA by inducing IL-8 autocrine expression through STAT3 activation. Our findings identify IL-22 as a novel chemoresistance cytokine and may be a useful prognostic biomarker for CRC patients receiving FOLFOX chemotherapy.

Effects of a nurse-led eHealth programme on functional outcomes and quality of life of patients with stroke: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Stroke remains a leading cause of disability worldwide. Nurse-led eHealth programs have emerged as a potentially effective strategy to improve functional outcomes and quality of life in stroke survivors. However, the variability of study designs and outcomes measured across trials necessitates a pooled analysis to comprehensively assess the efficacy of these interventions. This protocol outlines the methodology for a pooled analysis that aims to synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating nurse-led eHealth interventions for stroke patients. Methods and analysis: This pooled analysis will be conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. We will include RCTs that evaluate nurse-led eHealth programs and report on functional outcomes or quality of life in stroke patients. Comprehensive searches of electronic databases including Pubmed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and PsycINFO will be conducted with a predefined search strategy. Study selection will involve screening titles and abstracts, followed by full-text review using explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction will be undertaken independently by two reviewers. The risk of bias will be assessed through the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Additionally, the quality of evidence for each outcome will be evaluated using the GRADE approach. Meta-analyses will be performed using random-effects models, and heterogeneity will be quantified using the I2 statistic. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Discussion and conclusions: This pooled analysis is poised to provide a nuanced understanding of the effectiveness of nurse-led eHealth programs in stroke rehabilitation, leveraging a thorough methodological framework and GRADE tool to ensure robustness and reliability of evidence. The investigation anticipates diverse improvements in patient outcomes, underscoring the potential of personalized, accessible eHealth interventions to enhance patient engagement and treatment adherence. Despite the challenges posed by the heterogeneity of interventions and rapid technological advancements, the findings stand to influence clinical pathways by integrating eHealth into standard care, if substantiated by the evidence. Our study's depth and methodological rigor possess the potential to initiate changes in healthcare policy, advocating for the adoption of eHealth and subsequent investigations into its cost-efficiency. Ultimately, we aim to contribute rich, evidence-based insights into the burgeoning field of digital health, offering a foundational assessment of its applications in stroke care. Our data is expected to have a lasting impact, not only guiding immediate clinical decisions but also shaping the trajectory of future healthcare strategies in stroke recovery. Systematic review registration: Identifier (CRD42024520100: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=520100).

Nurse-led digital health program for home blood pressure monitoring in stroke patients: protocol for a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Hypertension is a major risk factor for stroke recurrence in stroke patients. Home blood pressure monitoring, facilitated by digital health technologies and led by nurses, may improve blood pressure control in this high-risk population. However, the evidence is not yet conclusive. This study protocol outlines a pooled analysis of the current literatures to evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-led digital health programs for home blood pressure monitoring in stroke patients. Methods and analysis: We will conduct a comprehensive search of some major electronic databases (e.g., PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL) and trial registries for randomized controlled trials evaluating nurse-led digital health programs for home blood pressure monitoring in stroke patients. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, review full-text articles, extract data, and assess risk of bias using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0). The primary outcome measures will be changes in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure from baseline to the end of the intervention period. Secondary outcomes include adherence to the program, patient satisfaction, and stroke recurrence. Data will be pooled and analyzed using meta-analysis techniques, if appropriate. Discussion: This study will provide comprehensive evidence on the effectiveness of nurse-led digital health programs for home blood pressure monitoring in stroke patients. The findings could have substantial implications for clinical practice and health policy, potentially informing the development of guidelines and policies related to hypertension management and stroke prevention. Conclusion: By pooling the results of randomized controlled trials, this study will offer a robust evidence base to inform clinical practice and health policy in the context of stroke patients. Despite potential limitations such as heterogeneity among studies and risk of publication bias, the rigorous methodology and comprehensive approach to data synthesis will ensure the reliability and validity of the findings. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and potentially at relevant conferences. Registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/59XQA.

Impact of hormone replacement therapy on all-cause and cancer-specific mortality in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and dose‒response meta-analysis of observational studies.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality and all-cause mortality remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis to determine the effects of HRT on CRC mortality and all-cause mortality. METHODS: We searched the electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library for all relevant studies published until January 2024 to investigate the effects of HRT exposure on survival rates for patients with CRC. Two reviewers independently extracted individual study data and evaluated the risk of bias between the studies using the Newcastle‒Ottawa Scale. We performed a two-stage random-effects dose-response meta-analysis to examine a possible nonlinear relationship between the year of HRT use and CRC mortality. RESULTS: Ten cohort studies with 480,628 individuals were included. HRT was inversely associated with the risk of CRC mortality (hazard ratios (HR) = 0.77, 95% CI (0.68, 0.87), I2 = 69.5%, p < 0.05). The pooled results of seven cohort studies revealed a significant association between HRT and the risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.71, 95% CI (0.54, 0.92), I2 = 89.6%, p < 0.05). A linear dose-response analysis (p for nonlinearity = 0.34) showed a 3% decrease in the risk of CRC for each additional year of HRT use; this decrease was significant (HR = 0.97, 95% CI (0.94, 0.99), p < 0.05). An additional linear (p for nonlinearity = 0.88) dose-response analysis showed a nonsignificant decrease in the risk of all-cause mortality for each additional year of HRT use. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the use of HRT is inversely associated with all-cause and colorectal cancer mortality, thus causing a significant decrease in mortality rates over time. More studies are warranted to confirm this association.

Evaluating the efficacy of multi-incision and tube-dragging therapy combined with laser closure for high horseshoe-shaped anal fistula: Protocol of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: High horseshoe-shaped anal fistula (HHAF) is a complicated and challenging condition that presents considerable obstacles in treatment. We are presently investigating a novel surgical technique involving a combination of multi-incision and tube-dragging therapy, and laser closure (MITD-LaC) for the management of HHAF. Due to the current scarcity of rigorous evidence evaluating this approach, it is essential to perform a well-designed randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of this new method with incision and thread-drawing therapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled and interventional study. After preliminary screening of qualified outpatients, a total of 64 adult patients will be enrolled in the trial and randomly allocated to either the MITD-LaC group or the control group (n = 32 per group). These patients will receive either MITD-LaC or incision and thread-drawing therapy. The design aims to allow for a robust comparison between the two treatment modalities. The primary endpoint is the wound healing time, while secondary endpoints include postoperative anal pain at 1, 3, and 5 days (measured with visual analogue scale), fecal incontinence score within 30 days after operation (measured with Cleveland Clinic Florida incontinence score), and the occurrence of postoperative complications within 1 month after surgery, and quality of life up to six months postoperatively (evaluated by The Quality of Life in patients with Anal Fistula Questionnaire Score). DISCUSSION: This study represents the first randomized controlled trial evaluating the short-term outcomes of MITD-LaC, thereby aiming to contribute high-quality evidence to guide clinical practice. Moreover, this trial incorporates comprehensive outcome measures assessing both subjective and objective dimensions. Because of this multidimensional assessment, MITD-LaC offers a promising potential for broader application in the treatment of HHAF. Consequently, obtaining more definitive and authoritative evidence through scientifically rigorous clinical trials is of utmost importance in further validating this treatment approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We have submitted the clinical study protocol to the Ethics Committee, and it has been approved under ethical approval number 2021-1036-111-01. The results of the trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed academic journals and presentations at professional conferences. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2100053556.

Comparing the efficacy of dexamethasone implant and anti-VEGF for the treatment of macular edema: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of dexamethasone (DEX) implant, for the treatment of macular edema (ME) caused by retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and diabetic retinopathy (DR) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were comprehensively searched from inception to November 21, 2022, for studies evaluating the clinical efficacy of DEX implant for patients with retinal vein occlusion macular edema (RVO-ME) or diabetic macular edema (DME). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English were considered eligible. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was applied to assess the risk of bias in each study. Effect estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using the random effects model. We also conducted subgroup analyses to explore the sources of heterogeneity and the stability of the results. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 8 RCTs (RVO-ME [n = 2] and DME [n = 6]) assessing a total of 336 eyes. Compared with anti-VEGF therapy, DEX implant treatment achieved superior outcomes in terms of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (mean difference [MD] = -3.68 ([95% CI, -6.11 to -1.25], P = 0.003), and no heterogeneity was observed (P = 0.43, I2 = 0%). DEX implant treatment also significantly reduced central macular thickness (CMT) compared with anti-VEGF treatment (MD = -31.32 [95% CI, -57.92 to -4.72], P = 0.02), and there was a high level of heterogeneity between trials (P = 0.04, I2 = 54%). In terms of severe adverse events, DEX implant treatment had a higher risk of elevated intraocular pressure than anti-VEGF therapy (RR = 6.98; 95% CI: 2.16 to 22.50; P = 0.001), and there was no significant difference in cataract progression between the two groups (RR = 1.83; 95% CI: 0.63 to 5.27, P = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with anti-VEGF therapy, DEX implant treatment is more effective in improving BCVA and reducing ME. Additionally, DEX implant treatment has a higher risk of elevated intraocular pressure. Due to the small number of studies and the short follow-up period, the results should be interpreted with caution. The long-term effects of the two treatments need to be further determined. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospero Registration Number CRD42021243185.

Predictors associated with successful weaning of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and mortality in adult patients with severe acute lung failure: Protocol of a pooled data analysis of cohort studies.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute lung failure (ALF) often necessitates veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO), where identifying predictors of weaning success and mortality remains crucial yet challenging. The study aims to identify predictors of weaning success and mortality in adults undergoing VV-ECMO for severe ALF, a gap in current clinical knowledge. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be searched for cohort studies examining the predictive factors of successful weaning and mortality in adult patients on VV-ECMO due to severe ALF. Risk of bias assessment will be conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for each included study. The primary outcomes will be successful weaning from VV-ECMO and all-cause mortality. Between-study heterogeneity will be evaluated using the I2 statistic. Sensitivity, subgroup, and meta-regression analyses will be performed to ascertain potential sources of heterogeneity and assess the robustness of our results. We will use the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) tool to recommend the level of evidence. DISCUSSION: This study seeks to provide clinically significant insights into predictors for weaning and mortality during VV-ECMO treatment for ALF, aiming to support clinical decisions and potentially influence health policy, thereby improving patient outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Given the absence of direct engagement with human subjects or access to personal medical records, ethical approval for this study is deemed unnecessary. The study findings will be shared at a scientific conference either at the global or national level. Alternatively, the results will be presented for publication in a rigorously peer-reviewed journal regarding critical care medicine.

Clinical efficacy of the bared external anal sphincter (BEAS) in high horseshoe-shaped anal fistulas: Protocol for a real-world, prospective cohort study.

Background: High horseshoe-shaped anal fistula (HHAF) is a complex disease that manifests in the perianal region and typically requires surgical intervention for treatment. However, the current therapeutic approaches are limited by the high rates of postoperative recurrence and anal incontinence. To overcome the limitations of traditional surgical approaches, we introduce the bared external anal sphincter (BEAS) technique. Our study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of BEAS surgery with that of the modified Hanley procedure in a real-world setting. Materials and methods: This single-centre, prospective cohort study will be conducted in a tertiary hospital in China and aims to evaluate the short-term clinical efficacy and safety of BEAS surgery and modified Hanley surgery in HHAF patients from March 2024 to March 2026. Data from the prospective database of this tertiary referral hospital will be used to obtain insights into the clinical outcomes of these surgical treatments. The primary outcome of this study will be the wound healing rate within six months, while the secondary outcomes will include the time to return to work, the maximum visual analogue scale pain score (VAS-PS) within 1-5 days postsurgery, and the Cleveland Clinic Florida Incontinence Score (CCF-IS) and Quality of Life in Anal Fistula Questionnaire Score (QoLAF-QS) at 1, 3, and 6 months postsurgery. Moreover, logistic regression analysis will be used to explore the risk factors for anal fistula recurrence after the BEAS procedure. Discussion: This will be the first cohort study to evaluate the differences in therapeutic outcomes between patients who undergo BEAS surgery and patients who undergo surgery via the modified Hanley procedure. By conducting a detailed observation of the efficacy and treatment results of these two surgical methods, this study aims to reveal the differences the clinical effectiveness of these approaches and to provide evidence-based support for future randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with mismatch-repair deficient or microsatellite instability-high advanced cancers: a meta-analysis of phase I-III clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Mismatch-repair deficient (dMMR) and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) cancers are associated with an increased number of somatic mutations, which can render tumors more susceptible to immune checkpoint blockade. However, a comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy profile of immune checkpoint inhibitors in this patient population across multiple cancer types is lacking. This study aims to address this knowledge gap by synthesizing data from Phase I-III clinical trials. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar from inception until June, 2024. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized comparative studies, and single-arm trials investigating immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with dMMR/MSI-H advanced cancers. The primary outcome was objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary outcomes included disease control rate (DCR), 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. Subgroup analyses were conducted for the primary outcome stratified by major study characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 10802 identified studies, 19 trials in 25 studies totaling 2052 participants met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled ORR was 41.7% (95% CI, 35.7%-47.7%). The pooled DCR was 68.9% (95% CI, 62.2%-75.7%). The pooled 12-month, 24-month and 36-month OS rates were 29.1% (95% CI, 19.9%-38.3%), 35.8% (95% CI, 23.6%-48.0%), and 35.8% (95% CI, 23.6%-48.0%), respectively. The pooled 12-month, 24-month and 36-month PFS rates were 46.4% (95% CI, 39.1%-53.8%), 67.0% (95% CI, 55.2%-78.8%), and 63.1% (95% CI, 37.3%-88.9%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The study establishes the therapeutic potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors in dMMR/MSI-H advanced cancers, highlighting the importance of MSI status in this context. Further head-to-head comparisons are needed to conclusively determine MSI's predictive power relative to proficient mismatch-repair/ microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) tumors.

The impact of sarcopenia on the incidence of postoperative outcomes following spine surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Sarcopenia is considered to be an important predictor of adverse outcomes following spinal surgery, but the specific relationship between the two is not clear. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to systematically review all relevant studies to evaluate the impact of sarcopenia on spinal surgery outcomes. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for relevant articles published on or before January 9, 2023. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated in a random effects meta-analysis. The main outcome was the risk of adverse outcomes after spinal surgery, including adverse events and mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the impact of sarcopenia on spinal surgery outcomes. In addition, we also conducted a subgroup analysis and leave-one-out sensitivity analyses to explore the main sources of heterogeneity and the stability of the results. RESULTS: Twenty-four cohort studies, with a total of 243,453 participants, met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed that sarcopenia was significantly associated with adverse events (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.17-2.27, P < 0.001) but was no significantly associated with mortality (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.93-1.46, P = 0.180), infection (OR 2.24, 95% CI 0.95-5.26, P < 0.001), 30-day reoperation (OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.92-2.36, P = 0.413), deep vein thrombosis (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.69-4.61, P = 0.234), postoperative home discharge (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.26-1.37, P = 0.002) and blood transfusion (OR 3.28, 95% CI 0.74-14.64, P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: The current meta-analysis showed that patients with sarcopenia have an increased risk of adverse events and mortality after spinal surgery. However, these results must be carefully interpreted because the number of studies included is small and the studies are significantly different. These findings may help to increase the clinicians' awareness of the risks concerning patients with sarcopenia to improve their prognosis.

Risk factors of postoperative delirium following spine surgery: A meta-analysis of 50 cohort studies with 1.1 million participants.

Objectives: Postoperative delirium (POD) is considered to be a common complication of spine surgery. Although many studies have reported the risk factors associated with POD, the results remain unclear. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to identify risk factors for POD among patients following spinal surgery. Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for relevant articles published from 2006 to February 1, 2023 that reported risk factors associated with the incidence of POD among patients undergoing spinal surgery. The Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines were followed, and random effects models were used to estimate pooled odds ratio (OR) estimates with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for each factor. The evidence from observational studies was classified according to Egger's P value, total sample size, and heterogeneity between studies. Results: Of 11,329 citations screened, 50 cohort studies involving 1,182,719 participants met the inclusion criteria. High-quality evidence indicated that POD was associated with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease, older age (>65 years), patients experiencing substance use disorder (take drug ≥1 month), cerebrovascular disease, kidney disease, neurological disorder, parkinsonism, cervical surgery, surgical site infection, postoperative fever, postoperative urinary tract infection, and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Moderate-quality evidence indicated that POD was associated with depression, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) fitness grade (>II), blood transfusion, abnormal potassium, electrolyte disorder, length of stay, inability to ambulate and intravenous fluid volume. Conclusions: Conspicuous risk factors for POD were mainly patient- and surgery-related. These findings help clinicians identify high-risk patients with POD following spinal surgery and recognize the importance of early intervention.