Telemonitoring with TECCU of active Inflammatory Bowel Disease is Not Inferior to Standard Care: Short-term Results of a Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial of GETECCU.

BACKGROUND: Telemonitoring is not consistently superior to standard care for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), yet non-inferiority may be an acceptable outcome if remote care is more efficient. OBJECTIVE: To compare the remission time and quality of life of patients with an active IBD controlled by standard care or through the TECCU App (Telemonitoring of Crohn´s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis). METHODS: A 2-arm, randomized, multicentre trial with a non-inferiority design was performed at 24 Spanish hospitals on adult patients with IBD who initiated immunosuppressant or biological therapy. Patients were randomized into telemonitoring (G_TECCU) or standard care groups (G_Control). The follow-up schedule was based on telemonitoring contacts through the TECCU App in G_TECCU, and on in-person visits and telephone calls in G_Control, as in clinical practice. In both groups, treatment was adjusted according to the evolution of disease activity and medication adherence, which were measured through specific indices and biological markers at each check-up. The primary outcome was time in remission after 12-weeks, with quality of life, medication adherence, adverse events and patient satisfaction as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Of 169 patients enrolled, 158 were randomized, and 150 were analyzed per protocol: telemonitoring (n=71); control (n=79). After 12-week, the time in clinical remission was not inferior after telemonitoring (4.20 ±3.73 weeks) to that in the controls (4.32 ±3.28 weeks), with a mean difference between arms of -0.12 weeks (95% CI -1.25-,1.01), non-inferiority p=0.017). The mean reduction of CRP values was -15.40 mg/L (SD=90.15, P =0.195) in G_TECCU and -13.16 mg/L (SD=54.61, P =0.053) in G_control, without significant differences between the two arms (P=.726). Similarly, the mean improvement of FC levels was 832.3 mg/L (SD=1825.0, P=.003) in G_TECCU and 1073.5 mg/L in G_Control (SD=3105.7, P=.03), but differences were not significant (P=.965). Quality of life improved in both groups, with a mean rise in the IBDQ-9 score of 13.44 points in G_TECCU (SD=19.1; P<.001) and 18.23 points [SD=22.9]; P=.001) in G_Control. Moreover, the proportion of patients who adhered to their medication rose significantly from 35.2% (25/71) to 67.6% (48/71) in G_TECCU (P=.001) and from 45.6% (36/79) to 73.4% (58/79) in G_Control (P=.001). Satisfaction remained stable around 90%, although non-inferiority was not demonstrated for secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Telemonitoring patients with active IBD is not inferior to standard care to achieve and maintain short-term remission. TECCU may be an alternative follow-up tool if the improved health outcomes and costs are confirmed in the long-term. CLINICALTRIAL: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier NCT06031038; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06031038. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT: RR2-10.2196/resprot.9639.

Efficacy and safety of biological treatment for inflammatory bowel disease in elderly patients: Results from a GETECCU cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Biological therapies used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have shown to be effective and safe, although these results were obtained from studies involving mostly a young population, who are generally included in clinical trials. The aim of our study was to determine the efficacy and safety of the different biological treatments in the elderly population. METHODS: Multicenter study was carried out in the GETECCU group. Patients diagnosed with IBD and aged over 65 years at the time of initiating biological therapy (infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, ustekinumab or vedolizumab) were retrospectively included. Among the patients included, clinical response was assessed after drug induction (12 weeks of treatment) and at 52 weeks. Patients' colonoscopy data in week 52 were assessment, where available. Regarding complications, development of oncological events during follow-up and infectious processes occurring during biological treatment were collected (excluding bowel infection by cytomegalovirus). RESULTS: A total of 1090 patients were included. After induction, at approximately 12-14 weeks of treatment, 419 patients (39.6%) were in clinical remission, 502 patients (47.4%) had responded without remission and 137 patients (12.9%) had no response. At 52 weeks of treatment 442 patients (57.1%) had achieved clinical remission, 249 patients had responded without remission (32.2%) and 53 patients had no response to the treatment (6.8%). Before 52 weeks, 129 patients (14.8%) had discontinued treatment due to inefficacy, this being significantly higher (p<0.0001) for Golimumab - 9 patients (37.5%) - compared to the other biological treatments analyzed. With respect to tumor development, an oncological event was observed in 74 patients (6.9%): 30 patients (8%) on infliximab, 23 (7.14%) on adalimumab, 3 (11.1%) on golimumab, 10 (6.4%) on ustekinumab, and 8 (3.8%) on vedolizumab. The incidence was significantly lower (p=0.04) for the vedolizumab group compared to other treatments. As regards infections, these occurred in 160 patients during treatment (14.9%), with no differences between the different biologicals used (p=0.61): 61 patients (19.4%) on infliximab, 39 (12.5%) on adalimumab, 5 (17.8%) on golimumab, 22 (14.1%) on ustekinumab, and 34 (16.5%) on vedolizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Biological drug therapies have response rates in elderly patients similar to those described in the general population, Golimumab was the drug that was discontinued most frequently due to inefficacy. In our experience, tumor development was more frequent in patients who used anti-TNF therapies compared to other targets, although its incidence was generally low and that this is in line with younger patients based on previous literature.

Gastrointestinal symptoms and complications in patients hospitalized due to COVID-19, an international multicentre prospective cohort study (TIVURON project).

BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies suggest that coronavirus disease (COVID-19) commonly involves gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and complications. Our aim was to prospectively evaluate GI manifestations in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. METHODS: This international multicentre prospective cohort study recruited COVID-19 patients hospitalized at 31 centres in Spain, Mexico, Chile, and Poland, between May and September 2020. Patients were followed-up until 15 days post-discharge and completed comprehensive questionnaires assessing GI symptoms and complications. A descriptive analysis as well as a bivariate and multivariate analysis were performer using binary logistic regression. p<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Eight hundred twenty-nine patients were enrolled; 129 (15.6%) had severe COVID-19, 113 (13.7%) required ICU admission, and 43 (5.2%) died. Upon admission, the most prevalent GI symptoms were anorexia (n=413; 49.8%), diarrhoea (n=327; 39.4%), nausea/vomiting (n=227; 27.4%), and abdominal pain (n=172; 20.7%), which were mild/moderate throughout the disease and resolved during follow-up. One-third of patients exhibited liver injury. Non-severe COVID-19 was associated with ≥2 GI symptoms upon admission (OR 0.679; 95% CI 0.464-0.995; p=0.046) or diarrhoea during hospitalization (OR 0.531; 95% CI 0.328-0.860; p=0.009). Multivariate analysis revealed that worse hospital outcomes were not independently associated with liver injury or GI symptoms. CONCLUSION: GI symptoms were more common than previously documented, and were mild, rapidly resolved, and not independently associated with COVID-19 severity. Liver injury was a frequent complication in hospitalized patients not independently associated with COVID-19 severity.

Post COVID-19 irritable bowel syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: The long-term consequences of COVID-19 infection on the gastrointestinal tract remain unclear. Here, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms and post-COVID-19 disorders of gut-brain interaction after hospitalisation for SARS-CoV-2 infection. DESIGN: GI-COVID-19 is a prospective, multicentre, controlled study. Patients with and without COVID-19 diagnosis were evaluated on hospital admission and after 1, 6 and 12 months post hospitalisation. Gastrointestinal symptoms, anxiety and depression were assessed using validated questionnaires. RESULTS: The study included 2183 hospitalised patients. The primary analysis included a total of 883 patients (614 patients with COVID-19 and 269 controls) due to the exclusion of patients with pre-existing gastrointestinal symptoms and/or surgery. At enrolment, gastrointestinal symptoms were more frequent among patients with COVID-19 than in the control group (59.3% vs 39.7%, p<0.001). At the 12-month follow-up, constipation and hard stools were significantly more prevalent in controls than in patients with COVID-19 (16% vs 9.6%, p=0.019 and 17.7% vs 10.9%, p=0.011, respectively). Compared with controls, patients with COVID-19 reported higher rates of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) according to Rome IV criteria: 0.5% versus 3.2%, p=0.045. Factors significantly associated with IBS diagnosis included history of allergies, chronic intake of proton pump inhibitors and presence of dyspnoea. At the 6-month follow-up, the rate of patients with COVID-19 fulfilling the criteria for depression was higher than among controls. CONCLUSION: Compared with controls, hospitalised patients with COVID-19 had fewer problems of constipation and hard stools at 12 months after acute infection. Patients with COVID-19 had significantly higher rates of IBS than controls. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04691895.

Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection: Results of the Prospective Controlled Multinational GI-COVID-19 Study.

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19) have been reported with great variability and without standardization. In hospitalized patients, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of GI symptoms, factors associated with their occurrence, and variation at 1 month. METHODS: The GI-COVID-19 is a prospective, multicenter, controlled study. Patients with and without COVID-19 diagnosis were recruited at hospital admission and asked for GI symptoms at admission and after 1 month, using the validated Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale questionnaire. RESULTS: The study included 2036 hospitalized patients. A total of 871 patients (575 COVID+ and 296 COVID-) were included for the primary analysis. GI symptoms occurred more frequently in patients with COVID-19 (59.7%; 343/575 patients) than in the control group (43.2%; 128/296 patients) (P < 0.001). Patients with COVID-19 complained of higher presence or intensity of nausea, diarrhea, loose stools, and urgency as compared with controls. At a 1-month follow-up, a reduction in the presence or intensity of GI symptoms was found in COVID-19 patients with GI symptoms at hospital admission. Nausea remained increased over controls. Factors significantly associated with nausea persistence in COVID-19 were female sex, high body mass index, the presence of dyspnea, and increased C-reactive protein levels. DISCUSSION: The prevalence of GI symptoms in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is higher than previously reported. Systemic and respiratory symptoms are often associated with GI complaints. Nausea may persist after the resolution of COVID-19 infection.

Hypertensive panesophageal pressurization in type II achalasia.

We present a case-report about a patient with type II achalasia. In the high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM), an atypical hypertensive panesophageal pressurizations were observed. Until now, the presence of hypertensive panesophageal pressurizations in type II achalasia was described in only one case-report. A POEM was performed. After the treatment, the patient presents a complete resolution of the symptoms. Control HRM showed a partial recovery of esophageal motility and the hypotonia of the gastro-esophageal junction.

Prognostic factors of liver cirrhosis mortality after a first episode of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. A multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is an infectious complication with a negative impact on survival of patients with cirrhosis. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the short- and long-term survival after a first episode of bacterial peritonitis and the associated prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter study of patients admitted to hospital for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis between 2008 and 2013. Independent variables related to mortality were analyzed by logistic regression. The prognostic power of the Child Pugh Score, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and the Charlson index was analyzed by ROC curve. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients were enrolled, 72% were males with a mean age of 63.5 years and a mean MELD score of 19 (SD ± 9.5). Mortality at 30 and 90 days and one and two years was 21%, 31%, 55% and 69%, respectively. Hepatic encephalopathy (p = 0.008, OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.4-8.8) and kidney function (p = 0.026, OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.13-16.7) were independent factors for short- and long-term mortality. MELD was a good marker of short- and long-term survival (area under the curve [AUC] 0.7: 95% CI 1.02-1.4). The Charlson index was related to long-term mortality (AUC 0.68: 95% CI 0.6-0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Short- and long-term mortality of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is still high. The main prognostic factors for mortality are impairment of liver and kidney function. MELD and the Charlson index are good markers of survival.

Hepatic glycogenosis: a diagnostic challenge.

Recently, several cases of hepatic glycogenosis (HG) have been reported. García-Suárez et al. described a young female patient with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes, right upper quadrant pain and elevated serum transaminases and GGT. After other causes of liver disease were excluded and a liver biopsy was performed, the patient was diagnosed with HG. HG is rare and can be misdiagnosed as steatohepatitis. To date, less than 20 cases have been reported in adults.

Ischemic colitis in an athlete: running is not always good for you.

Running is popular. Ischemic colitis has been reported in marathon runners. We present a case of an amateur runner who developed ischemic colitis after a relatively short run.

Economic impact of inflammatory bowel disease in Catalonia: a population-based analysis.

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has a major economic impact on healthcare costs. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the current healthcare expenditure associated with IBD in a population-wide study in Catalonia. Design: Retrospective observational study. Methods: All patients with IBD included in the Catalan Health Surveillance System (CHSS) were considered eligible. The CHSS compiles data on more than 7 million individuals in 2020 (34,823 with IBD). Data on the use of healthcare resources and its economic impact were extracted applying the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, Clinical Modification codes (ICD-10-CM codes). Health expenditure, comorbidities, and hospitalization were calculated according to the standard costs of each service provided by the Department of Health of the Catalan government. The data on the IBD population were compared with non-IBD population adjusted for age, sex, and income level. IBD costs were recorded separately for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Results: Prevalence of comorbidities was higher in patients with IBD than in those without. The risk of hospitalization was twice as high in the IBD population. The overall healthcare expenditure on IBD patients amounted to 164M€. The pharmacy cost represents the 60%. The average annual per capita expenditure on IBD patients was more than 3.4-fold higher (IBD 4200€, non-IBD 1200€). Average costs of UC were 3400€ and 5700€ for CD. Conclusion: The risk of comorbidities was twice as high in patients with IBD and their use of healthcare resources was also higher than that of their non-IBD counterparts. Per capita healthcare expenditure was approximately 3.4 times higher in the population with IBD. Trial registration: The study was not previously registered.

Economic impact of inflammatory bowel disease in Catalonia The manuscript includes data of the most recent epidemiologic data about the high economic impact of IBD in Catalonia.