Caffeine self-administration, withdrawal, and adverse effects among coffee drinkers.

Twenty-two coffee drinkers (three to seven cups per day) underwent repeated double-blind trials to test for caffeine self-administration, withdrawal, and adverse effects. Each trial consisted first of a randomized crossover period of 1 day of decaffeinated coffee and 1 day of caffeinated coffee (100 mg) to assess withdrawal and adverse effects of caffeine. Next, subjects were given 2 days of concurrent access to the two coffees. The relative use of the two coffees was used to assess caffeine self-administration. Reliable caffeine self-administration occurred in three of 10 subjects in study 1 and seven of 12 subjects in study 2. Withdrawal symptoms were headaches, drowsiness, and fatigue. The major adverse effect from self-administration was tremulousness. The occurrence of headaches on substitution of decaffeinated coffee prospectively predicted subsequent self-administration of caffeine. These results indicate that some coffee drinkers exhibit signs of a caffeine dependence, ie, they self-administer coffee for the effects of caffeine, have withdrawal symptoms on cessation, and experience adverse effects.

Effect of instructions and nicotine on smoking cessation, withdrawal symptoms and self-administration of nicotine gum.

Seventy-seven smokers quit smoking and were randomly assigned to a 3 x 2 design contrasting instructions (told received nicotine gum versus told received placebo gum versus not told which gum received) and receipt of nicotine (received nicotine gum versus received placebo gum). Both being told one received nicotine and actual receipt of nicotine increased the number of days abstinent and decreased the number of cigarettes smoked (P less than 0.05). Receipt of nicotine but not instructions appeared to influence withdrawal (P = 0.06). Instructions but not receipt of nicotine appeared to influence craving (P = 0.08), gum self-administration (P = 0.06) and reported helpfulness of the gum (P = 0.02). Neither nicotine nor instructions influenced side-effects. Instructions and nicotine interacted in several ways. For example, nicotine appeared to increase abstinence in the blind and told placebo conditions more than in the told nicotine condition (P less than 0.05). Our results suggest the effects of instructions and nicotine 1) are not mutually exclusive, 2) vary across dependent variables and 3) can interact such that instructions modify the therapeutic and subjective effects of nicotine.

When mom or dad has cancer: markers of psychological distress in cancer patients, spouses, and children.

This study assessed anxiety/depression and stress response symptoms in adult cancer patients (n = 117), spouses (n = 76), and their children (n = 110, ages 6 to 30 years old) near the patients' diagnoses to identify family members at risk for psychological maladjustment. Patients' and family members' distress was related to appraisals of the seriousness and stressfulness of the cancer but not related to objective characteristics of the disease. Patients and spouses did not differ in anxiety/depression or in stress-response symptoms. Both stress-response and anxiety/depression symptoms differed in children as a function of age, sex of child, and sex of patient. Adolescent girls whose mothers had cancer were the most significantly distressed. Implications for understanding the impact of cancer on the family are highlighted.

Smoking history, instructions and the effects of nicotine: two pilot studies.

In Study 1, ten never-smokers, ten ex-smokers and nine current smokers received nicotine (2 mg) and placebo gum hourly for 4 hours on 2 consecutive days in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over protocol. Dysphoria from nicotine was greatest in never-smokers, intermediate in ex-smokers, and least in current smokers (p less than 0.05). On the third day, subjects were given concurrent access to the same gums and told to chew ad lib. Across all subjects, nicotine was an aversive stimulus (i.e., self-administered less than placebo). Nicotine was avoided most in never-smokers, intermediate in ex-smokers and least in current smokers (p less than 0.05). Study 2 used a similar protocol and compared the nine current smokers in Study 1 who were not told they would receive nicotine with eight informed smokers, i.e., smokers told they would receive nicotine. Although nicotine appeared to be a reinforcer more often in the informed smokers than in the uniformed smokers (63% vs. 22%), this result was not statistically significant. Our results suggest 1) past drug history can influence the stimulus effects of nicotine and 2) the effects of instructions on the response to nicotine may be less in experimental settings than in therapeutic settings.

Parental death in childhood: perceived vulnerability, and adult depression and anxiety.

College students who had experienced the death of a parent during their childhoods perceived themselves as more vulnerable to future losses than did a nonbereaved control group. Perceived vulnerability to loss was identified as a better predictor of adult anxiety and depression than was the early loss itself. Perceived vulnerability to loss is thus implicated in the development of adult psychopathology associated with early loss.