Effectiveness and safety of non-tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapy for anti-human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 antibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Our previous study showed that the effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors was attenuated in anti-human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) antibody-positive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of non-TNF inhibitors in anti-HTLV-1 antibody-positive patients with RA. METHODS: We reviewed patients with RA who received abatacept or tocilizumab as the first biologic agent. We used the data of patients treated with TNF inhibitors from our previous study to compare the effectiveness between the anti-HTLV-1 antibody-positive patients treated with TNF inhibitors and non-TNF inhibitors using the inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) method. RESULTS: A total of 359 patients were divided into anti-HTLV-1 antibody-negative and -positive patients of 332 and 27, respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed in the change in the clinical disease activity index between the anti-HTLV-1 antibody-positive and -negative patients. The results using the IPTW method showed a significant association between the non-TNF inhibitors treatment and a better response. None of the patients developed adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma or HTLV-1-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis during the 24 weeks. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that non-TNF inhibitors treatment is safety, and the effectiveness is not attenuated also in anti-HTLV-1 antibody-positive patients.

The Efficacy of Software to Help Patients Understand Drug for Adjuvant Treatment for Breast Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

We assessed the usefulness of ChemoCalc, a software package for calculating drug costs, in helping patients understand these costs. We randomly assigned, in a 1 : 1 ratio, 20 women who had undergone surgery for early breast cancer to a group that discussed adjuvant treatment with their physicians using the ChemoCalc software (ChemoCalc group) or a group that discussed adjuvant treatment without ChemoCalc (Usual Explanation group). The participants completed a five-grade evaluation questionnaire after these discussions. The primary endpoint was the intergroup comparison of the questionnaire scores regarding participants' understanding of their treatment-associated drug costs. Median age was not significantly different between the ChemoCalc group and Usual Explanation group (57 vs. 50, respectively; p=0.27). Patients in the ChemoCalc group had a significantly higher perceived level of understanding of the drug cost than those in the Usual Explanation group (5 [4-5] vs. 2.5 [1-5], respectively; p=0.002). Scores related to the patients' perception that understanding drug costs is an important part of breast cancer treatment were also higher in the ChemoCalc group than the Usual Explanation group (5 [2-5] vs. 3 [1-5], respectively; p=0.049). ChemoCalc was found to be useful for understanding drug costs.

Protocol for studying the efficiency of ChemoCalc software in helping patients to understand drug treatment costs for breast cancer: A multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 2 study.

Survival of patients with breast cancer can be prolonged by treatment with drugs, particularly new molecular-targeted drugs. However, these agents can be expensive and such treatments can be "an economic burden." In this ongoing trial, we aim to assess the usefulness of ChemoCalc, a software package for calculating drug costs, to help patients understand the financial outlays. In this multicenter, randomized controlled phase 2 trial, 106 patients with advanced breast cancer will be assigned to either the "ChemoCalc" or "Usual Explanation" group. Treatment using ChemoCalc will be discussed with patients in the ChemoCalc group, whereas standard treatments, without using ChemoCalc, will be discussed with patients in the Usual Explanation group. Subsequently, the participants will decide the treatment and complete a five-grade evaluation questionnaire; those in the Usual Explanation group will receive information about ChemoCalc. Investigators will report if patients subsequently decide to change treatments. The primary endpoint will be the scores of two key questions compared between the groups: "Did you understand the cost of treatment in today's discussion?" and "Do you think the cost of treatment is important in choosing a treatment?". The secondary endpoints will be to compare discrepancies between treatments recommended by physicians and those selected by patients, the time required for discussion, other questionnaire factors, and the relationship between Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity tool and treatment selection. This will be the first randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of software to help patients understand drug cost estimates and whether it subsequently affects treatment choice. This study will be conducted according to the CONSORT statement. All participants will sign a written consent form. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Clinical Research Review Board of Nagasaki University (19070801). The protocol (version 1) was designed and will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (1964) and the Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects (2017). The findings will be disseminated through scientific and professional conferences, and in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000039904. https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000041968.

Influence of Interferon-free Direct-acting Antiviral Therapy on Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence: A Landmark Time Analysis and Time-dependent Extended Cox Proportional Hazards Model Analysis.

Objective The influence of interferon (IFN)-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence remains unclear. Previous retrospective analyses revealed that the time interval between HCC curative treatment and IFN-free DAA induction is the critical factor affecting HCC recurrence. Thus, this study aimed to examine the influence of DAA therapy on HCC recurrence considering this interval. Methods Factors contributing to HCC recurrence were retrospectively analyzed using a landmark time analysis and time-dependent extended Cox proportional hazards model. Patients After screening 620 patients who were diagnosed with primary HCC from January 2001 to December 2016, 76 patients with early-stage (primary and solitary) disease who received curative treatment and were positive for serum hepatitis C virus RNA were included. Results HCC recurrence was observed in 8 of 17 (47.1%) patients who had received IFN-free DAA therapy and 45 of 59 (76.3%) who had not. No significant difference was seen between the IFN-free DAA (-) and IFN-free DAA (+) groups in the landmark time and time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model analyses. However, IFN-free DAA therapy tended to decrease the HCC recurrence rate after curative treatment for primary HCC in patients with chronic hepatitis. In addition, IFN-free DAA therapy tended to decrease the second HCC recurrence rate after treatment for the first HCC recurrence. Conclusion Our results, with a consideration of the time interval between HCC curative treatment and IFN-free DAA induction, showed that IFN-free DAA therapy was not associated with early-stage HCC recurrence after curative treatment.

Impact of Lesion Localization on Durability of Mitral Valve Repair in Infective Endocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Mitral valve (MV) repair for infective endocarditis (IE) is sometimes challenging. We investigated the durability of repair associated with the location of the infected lesion. METHODS: The study comprised 83 patients (55 ± 18 years; active, 66; healed, 17) who underwent MV repair at our institution. Patients were categorized into 5 types based on the location of the main lesion: type I, posterior leaflet (n = 36); type IIC, clear zone of anterior leaflet (n = 12); type IIR, rough zone of anterior leaflet (n = 28); and type III, annulus (n = 7). Type IIR was divided into 2 subgroups: IIR-large (>1 segment involvement, n = 9) and IIR-small (1 segment, n = 19). RESULTS: Follow-up was 95.2% completed for 7.2 ± 5.2 years. The rate of recurrent moderate or severe mitral regurgitation (MR) was 2.8% in type I, 0% in type IIC, 28.6% in type IIR, and 14.3% in type III. The freedom from recurrent moderate or severe MR was significantly lower in type IIR compared with the other types (63.1% ± 10.6% vs 96.8 ± 3.2% at 5 years, P < .001). Moreover, the recurrence rate was higher in type IIR-large (55.6%) than in type IIR-small (15.8%, P = .068). Type IIR was an independent predictor of recurrent MR (hazard ratio, 11.1, 95% confidence interval, 2.52-78.2; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The durability of MV repair for IE was satisfactory in posterior leaflet infection without annulus invasion and in clear zone infection of the anterior leaflet. However, rough zone infection of the anterior leaflet, especially with more than 1 segment involvement, was associated with a high risk of recurrent MR.

The effect of luseogliflozin on bone microarchitecture in older patients with type 2 diabetes: study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial using second-generation, high-resolution, peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT).

BACKGROUND: Older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have an increased risk of bone fracture independent of their bone mineral density (BMD), which is explained mainly by the deteriorated bone quality in T2DM compared to that in non-diabetic adults. Sodium-glucose co-transporter (SGLT) 2 inhibitors have been studied in several trials in T2DM, and the Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study showed an increased fracture risk related to treatment with the SGLT2 inhibitor canagliflozin, although no evidence of increased fracture risk with treatment with other SGLT2 inhibitors has been reported. The mechanism of the difference in the fracture risk between the SGLT2 inhibitors is unknown, but the differences among the SGLT2 inhibitors in the selectivity of SGLT2 against SGLT1 may affect bone metabolism, since among the SGLT2 inhibitors the selectivity of canagliflozin is lowest. We will investigate whether the SGLT2 inhibitor luseogliflozin, which has the higher SGLT2 selectivity, affects bone metabolism by using high-resolution, peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) which provides direct in vivo morphometric information about the bone microarchitecture. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single-center, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, parallel pilot trial. Eligible participants are older (age ≥ 60 years) individuals with T2DM with HbA1c levels at 7.0-8.9%. A total of 24 participants will be allocated to either the luseogliflozin group (taking luseogliflozin) or the control group (taking metformin) in a 1:1 ratio to compare the groups' changes in bone microarchitecture of the radius and tibia which are analyzed by HR-pQCT before and at 48 weeks after the administration of each medication. The laboratory data associated with glycemic control and bone metabolism will be collected every 12 weeks during the study. Recruitment began in June 2019. DISCUSSION: The reason that we use metformin as an active control is to avoid yielding differences in glycemic control between the luseogliflozin and control groups. Besides, metformin is considered to have a neutral effect on bone. This trial should reveal the effect of luseogliflozin on bone metabolism in older patients with T2DM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000036202) on 1 April 2019 and with the Japan Registry of Clinicla Trials (jRCTs071180061) on 14 March 2019.

Study protocol for efficacy and safety of steroid-containing mouthwash to prevent chemotherapy-induced stomatitis in women with breast cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2 study.

INTRODUCTION: Stomatitis is a frequent adverse event in patients undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer. Stomatitis can hamper oral nutrition resulting in malnutrition, reduce quality of life and introduce the need for dose reductions and interruption of chemotherapy; however, there is currently no standard approach for preventing chemotherapy-induced stomatitis. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of a dexamethasone-based elixir mouthwash for preventing chemotherapy-induced stomatitis in patients with early breast cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this multicenter, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial, we will randomly assign 120 women with early breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy to use of a dexamethasone-based elixir or standard oral care, to compare their preventive effects on chemotherapy-induced stomatitis. Patients will be assigned in a 1:1 ratio. Patients in the intervention group will receive chemotherapy, oral care and a dexamethasone-based elixir (10 mL 0.1 mg/mL; swish for 2 min and spit, four times daily for 9 weeks), and patients in the control group will receive chemotherapy and oral care. The primary endpoint is the difference in incidence of stomatitis between the two groups. The sample size allows for the detection of a minimum difference of 20% in the incidence of stomatitis between the two groups. Secondary endpoints are severity of stomatitis, duration of stomatitis, completion rate of chemotherapy and adverse events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All participants signed a written consent form, and the study protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Clinical Research Review Board of Nagasaki University (CRB7180001). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000030489).

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab for colchicine-resistant or colchicine-intolerant familial Mediterranean fever: study protocol for an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is an inherited disorder caused by a number of mutations of the Mediterranean fever (MEFV) gene, coding a protein named pyrin that acts as a major regulatory component of the inflammasome. The first-line drug for FMF treatment is colchicine, but 10% of patients with FMF do not respond well to colchicine. Although the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ), which is a recombinant, humanized, antihuman interleukin 6 (IL-6) receptor monoclonal antibody, has been reported to prevent FMF attacks, the effects of TCZ on individuals with colchicine-resistant or colchicine-intolerant FMF have not been evaluated in a randomized clinical trial. METHODS/DESIGN: In this phase III, investigator-initiated, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group trial, the efficacy and safety of TCZ will be compared with placebo in patients with colchicine-resistant or colchicine-intolerant FMF. The study will be conducted in nine centers in Japan. Participants (n = 24) will be randomly assigned to receive 162 mg of TCZ (n = 12) or placebo (n = 12) administered subcutaneously once weekly for 24 weeks. Rescue treatment will be allowed if rescue criteria are met. A primary endpoint is the number of fever attacks until 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints include the number of occurrences of accompanying symptoms during attacks; the time until a fever attack occurs; the duration of fever attacks; serum C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A; 36-item Short Form Health Survey; general evaluation by a physician (100-mm visual analogue scale); body temperature; the percentage of subjects who achieve FMF 50 at 12 weeks and 24 weeks; and pharmacodynamic assessment, including the measurement of serum TCZ level and soluble IL-6 receptor. DISCUSSION: The study is expected to produce evidence regarding the efficacy of a potential new therapeutic agent, TCZ, in improving the clinical course and outcome for patients with colchicine-resistant or colchicine-intolerant FMF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000028010 . Registered on 7 July 2017.

Early diagnosis using canonical discriminant analysis of innate immune receptor gene expression profiles in a murine infectious or sterile systemic inflammation model.

BACKGROUND: Infection in patients with systemic inflammation is difficult to diagnose with a single biomarker. We aimed to clarify the time course of change in the gene expression profile of innate immune receptors in infectious or sterile inflammation and to establish an early diagnostic method using canonical discriminant analysis (CDA) of the gene expression profile. METHODS: To compare infectious and sterile inflammation, we used cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) and 20% full-thickness burn injury (Burn) models. C57BL/6 mice underwent sham treatment (n = 9 × three groups), CLP (n = 12 × three groups), or Burn (n = 12 × three groups) injury. Mice were killed at 6, 12, and 24 hours after injury, and total RNA was extracted from whole blood. We used quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction to investigate gene expression of innate immune receptors Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), TLR4, TLR9, NLRP3 (nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3), and retinoic acid-inducible gene I. To evaluate all gene expression together as patterns, each value was standardized, and CDA was performed at each time point. RESULTS: Gene expression of TLR2 and TLR4 was already significantly increased in both CLP and Burn compared with sham mice at 6 hours after injury (p < 0.05). Gene expression of TLR9 was significantly decreased in CLP compared with sham and Burn mice at 12 hours and 24 hours after injury (p < 0.05) but not at 6 hours. Gene expression of NLRP3 was significantly increased in CLP and Burn compared with sham mice at 6 hours and 24 hours after injury (p < 0.05). In the CDA, each group showed distinctive gene expression patterns at only 6 hours after injury. Each group was clearly classified, and the classification error rates were 0% at all of the time points. CONCLUSIONS: Canonical discriminant analysis of the gene expression profile of innate immune receptors could be a novel approach for diagnosing the pathophysiology of complicated systemic inflammation from the early stage of injury.

Brief Report: Attenuated Effectiveness of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors for Anti-Human T Lymphotropic Virus Type I Antibody-Positive Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for the treatment of human T lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I)-positive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in an area endemic for HTLV-I infection. METHODS: We conducted an observational study of 585 RA patients in whom TNF inhibitors were newly introduced as a first biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug in an area in southwestern Japan that is endemic for HTLV-I infection. RESULTS: Fifty patients (8.5%) were anti-HTLV-I antibody-positive. The ages of the patients in this group were significantly higher at entry compared with the ages of patients who were anti-HTLV-I antibody-negative (n = 535). The median Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) was 5.21. Among the total group of patients, 82% were anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive. The persistence rate of TNF inhibitors at 24 weeks was 89%. The median DAS28-ESR was significantly decreased at 24 weeks in each group. The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response rate was significantly better in the anti-HTLV-I antibody-negative patients (P = 0.0277). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that anti-HTLV-I antibody status was significantly associated with the EULAR response rate and change in the DAS28-ESR and was prominent especially in the ACPA-negative subjects. No patients developed adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) or HTLV-I-associated myelopathy (HAM) during the 24-week treatment period. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of TNF inhibitors may be attenuated in anti-HTLV-I antibody-positive patients with RA. ATL and HAM did not develop when TNF inhibitors were used for 24 weeks, but the long-term risk is not known.