Minimally Invasive Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Comparative Study.

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is now a routine therapy for advanced heart failure. Minimally invasive approach via thoracotomy for LVAD implantation is getting popular due to its potential advantage over the conventional sternotomy approach in terms of reduced risk at re-operation due to sternal sparing. We compared the approaches (thoracotomy and sternotomy) to determine the superiority. Minimally invasive approach involved fitting of the LVAD inflow cannula into left ventricle apex via left anterior thoracotomy and anastomosis of outflow graft to ascending aorta via right anterior thoracotomy. In the sternotomy approach, both the procedures were performed via sternotomy. Outcomes in patients after LVAD implantation were compared depending on these approaches for the surgery. Two hundred and five continuous flow LVAD implantations performed between July 2006 and June 2015 at a single center were divided based on surgical approach, that is, sternotomy (n = 180) and thoracotomy (n = 25) groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in relation to patient demographics, preoperative hemodynamic parameters, laboratory markers, or risk factors. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of postoperative hemodynamic parameters, laboratory markers, bleeding and requirement of blood products, intensive care unit, and hospital stay or complications of LVAD surgery. There were no significant differences in terms of long-term survival (Log-Rank P = 0.953), however, thoracotomy, compared to sternotomy approach, incurred significantly less requirement of temporary right ventricular assist (4 vs. 19.4%, P = 0.041). Minimally invasive bilateral thoracotomy approach for LVAD implantation in addition to benefits of sternal sparing avoids dilatation of right ventricle and reduces chances of right ventricular failure requiring temporary right ventricular assist.

Escalation of extracorporeal life support as a bridge to lung transplantation in end-stage lung disease.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to lung transplant (LTx) is not uncommon, but it is not commonplace yet. We present a case of a 45-year-old man with cystic fibrosis with recent deterioration in lung function who was initially supported with veno-venous (VV) ECMO. However, he subsequently required conversion to veno-veno-arterial (VVA) ECMO. After 21 days of support, he underwent double lung transplantation, with an uneventful postoperative course. This case shows that, in patients with end-stage respiratory failure awaiting lung transplantation, extracorporeal life support may require escalation to improve gas exchange and address circulatory requirements.

Salvage myocardial revascularisation in spontaneous left main coronary artery dissection with cardiogenic shock - the role of mechanical circulatory support.

Spontaneous left main coronary artery dissection is a rare cause of acute coronary events or sudden cardiac death, constituting less than 1% of all epicardial coronary artery dissections. It is often fatal and is mostly recognized at post-mortem examination in young victims of sudden death. More than 70% of the reported cases occurred in women, particularly during pregnancy and the peripartum period and those on oral contraceptives. The clinical presentation is highly variable and prognosis varies widely, depending predominantly on the speed of diagnosis. Treatment options include medical therapy, revascularization with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and mechanical circulatory support in cases of cardiogenic shock. We report a case of spontaneous dissection of the left main stem coronary artery, with extension into the left coronary territory, which occurred in a 41-year-old lady, complicated by profound cardiogenic shock requiring recovery with extracorporeal mechanical circulatory support after salvage myocardial revascularization.

Effect of donor cardiac arrest and arrest duration on outcomes of lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available about lung transplantation (LTx) from donors suffering cardiac arrest (CA) prior to actual donation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of LTx performed between January 2007 and September 2012 was done with the focus on CA in donors. The recipients were grouped depending on the history of donor CA and CA duration (downtime) as: No cardiac arrest ("NoCA"), CA downtime less than 20 min ("CA < 20"), and CA downtime equal to or more than 20 min ("CA > 20"). Early and mid-term outcomes after LTx were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: A total of 237 LTx were performed during the study period. One hundred eighty-eight patients received organs from "NoCA" donors, 25 from "CA < 20" donors, and 24 patients from "CA > 20" donors. There was a trend toward better overall cumulative survival in both CA groups (log rank p = 0.076) whereas the survival in the "CA > 20" group was significantly better than in the "NoCA" group in the subgroup analysis (log rank p = 0.045). Freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) also increased with increase in CA duration, although it did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Transplantation of lungs from donors with a history of CA is safe and feasible. Longer duration of cardiac arrest may improve the outcomes after the LTx in terms of survival and freedom from BOS.

The role of cardiopulmonary bypass in lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The risk-benefit for utilizing cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) in lung transplantation (LTx) remains debatable. This study compares outcomes after LTx utilizing different CPB strategies - elective CPB vs. off-pump vs. off-pump with unplanned conversion to CPB. METHODS: A total of 302 LTx performed over seven yr were divided into three groups: "off-pump" group (n = 86), "elective on-pump" group (n = 162), and "conversion" group (n = 54). The preoperative donor and recipient demographics and baseline characteristics and the postoperative outcomes were analyzed; 1:1 propensity score matching was used to identify patients operated upon using elective CPB who had risk profiles similar to those operated upon off-pump (propensity-matching 1) as well as those emergently converted from off-pump to CPB (propensity-matching 2). RESULTS: Preoperative group demographic characteristics were comparable; however, the "off-pump" patient group was significantly older. The "conversion" group had a significantly greater number of patients with primary pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary fibrosis, preoperative mechanical ventilation, and preoperative extracorporeal life support (ECLS). Postoperatively, patients from the "conversion" group had significantly poorer PaO2 /FiO2 ratios upon arrival in intensive care unit (ICU) and at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively, and they required more prolonged ventilation, longer ICU admission, and they experienced an increased need for ECLS than the other groups. Overall, cumulative survival at one, two, and three yr was significantly worse in patients from the "conversion" group compared to the "off-pump" and "elective on-pump" groups - 61.9% vs. 94.4% vs. 86.9%, 54.4% vs. 90.6% vs. 79.5% and 39.8% vs. 78.1% vs. 74.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). The "off-pump" group had significantly better PaO2 /FiO2 ratios, and a significantly shorter duration of ventilation, ICU stay, and hospital length of stay when compared to the propensity-matched "elective on-pump" group. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative outcomes and overall survival between the "converted" group and the propensity-matched "elective on-pump" group. CONCLUSIONS: Despite segregation of unplanned CPB conversion cases from elective on-pump cases, patients with comparable preoperative demographic/risk profiles demonstrated better early postoperative outcomes and, possibly, an improved early survival with an off-pump strategy. A considerable proportion of high-risk patients require intraoperative conversion from off-pump to CPB, and this seems associated with suboptimal outcomes; however, there is no significant benefit to employing an elective on-pump strategy over emergent conversion in the high-risk group.

Use of PTFE patch for pericardial closure after minimal invasive LVAD implantation.

The left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is now a routine therapy for advanced heart failure. The thoracotomy approach for LVAD implantation, in which the left ventricle is approached through a pericardial rent, is becoming popular. We demonstrate closure of the pericardial rent with a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch and its advantages.

Oxygenator in short-term LVAD circuit: a rescue in post-LVAD pulmonary complications.

Pulmonary complications after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, though infrequent, can be potentially catastrophic. A 62-year-old female with cardiogenic shock, supported on short-term LVAD, developed pulmonary oedema. An oxygenator was introduced into the LVAD circuit, which improved the gas exchange and, eventually, after weaning off the oxygenator, the patient received long-term LVAD. The introduction of an oxygenator into the short-term LAVD circuit is a lifesaving manoeuvre in such a situation. It offers freedom of introducing and removing the oxygenator into the LVAD circuit without opening the chest and competing for LVAD flow.

Lung transplantation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term survival, freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, and factors influencing outcome.

OBJECTIVES: Lung transplantation (LTx) remains the definitive treatment for end-stage lung failure, whereas chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) represents one of the main diagnoses leading to the indication for a transplant. We sought to assess long-term outcomes after LTx in patients diagnosed with COPD and analyze factors influencing outcome in this frequent patient cohort. METHODS: Between January 2007 and November 2013, a total of 88 LTx were performed in patients with COPD in our institution. Patients with emphysema associated with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency were excluded from this observation. The study design was a retrospective review of the prospectively collected data. A large number of pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables were analyzed including long-term survival and freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). Furthermore, impact of different variables on survival was analyzed. RESULTS: Preoperative donor data indicated a large proportion of marginal donors. While the overall cumulative survival after six yr was 57.4%, the results in terms of BOS-free survival in long-term follow-up were 39.7% after six yr. Patients with COPD were also associated with a low incidence (2.3%) of the need for postoperative extracorporeal life support (ECLS). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term results after LTx in patients with COPD are acceptable with excellent survival, freedom from BOS, and low use of ECLS postoperatively despite permanently increasing proportion of marginal organs used.

Minimally invasive access for central extracorporeal life support: how we do it.

Central extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is an effective treatment method of cardiogenic shock patients with or without lung failure. However, complications like infection and bleeding are common. The classical implantation approach requires full sternotomy, mobilization of the heart, with the well-known risks of bleeding and mediastinal infections. We present our minimally invasive technique for central ECLS through a nonsternotomy incision. Minimized right-sided thoracotomy is performed. Flexible arterial and venous cannulas are tunneled toward the right thoracotomy incision through the eighth intercostal space. A sewing ring is secured to the right atrium and a tube graft is anastomosed to the ascending aorta. Following full-dose heparinization, the arterial cannula is inserted with the tip into the vascular graft of the ascending aorta and the venous cannula via the ring into the right atrium. After meticulous deairing, the central ECLS is set at full flow.

Gender differences in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device therapy as a bridge to transplantation: a risk-adjusted comparison using a propensity score-matching analysis.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate gender differences regarding outcome after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (cfLVAD) implantation. The study was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Included were 24 consecutive female cfLVAD recipients and 24 male recipients (62.5% HeartMate II, 37.5% HeartWare) who received their devices between July 2007 and May 2013. Subjects were matched using propensity score analysis based on age, diagnosis, body surface area, preoperative mechanical circulatory support, heart failure severity score (INTERMACS class), and comorbidities. Female patients were significantly sicker before operation. After propensity score matching, there were no statistically significant differences in demographics or clinical baseline characteristics between male and female LVAD recipients. Also, there was a trend towards a longer postoperative intensive care unit stay in the female group (median 9 days [interquartile range 5-17] versus 15 days [interquartile range 8-33]; P < 0.061) and higher postoperative bilirubin values (median 14 mmol/L [interquartile range 10-17] versus 21 mmol/L [interquartile range 13-30]). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of outcome (P < 0.569). The overall survival was comparable between the two groups (log rank P < 0.389). Half (50%) of female patients required inotropic support for more than 7 days compared with 21.7% in the male group (P < 0.048). Half (50%) of female recipients required short-term postoperative right ventricular assist device implantation compared with 16.7% in the male group (P < 0.014). In conclusion, cfLVAD implantation as a bridge to transplantation is associated with longer duration of inotropic support and higher requirement for postoperative mechanical right ventricular support in women with similar survival rates. Further studies are required to identify additional demographic and clinical factors that modulate outcomes and will enhance the ability to risk-stratify cfLVAD recipients.

First experience with the Synergy Micro-Pump in patients in INTERMACS class 1-2 as a bridge to transplantation: pushing the limits?

The Synergy Micro-pump is the smallest implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and provides partial flow support up to 4.25 L/min. It was shown that early intervention with this device can provide substantial benefits to patients with severe heart failure not yet sick enough for a full-support LVAD. However, as it can be inserted via small incisions with no need for sternotomy or cardiopulmonary bypass, it might be beneficial for selected high-risk patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Synergy Micro-pump in patients in INTERMACS class 1-2. From February 2012 to August 2013, 13 patients with severe heart failure were supported with the Synergy Pocket Micro-pump. Patients were divided into two groups according to INTERMACS class: the high-risk group (INTERMACS class 1-2) and the low-risk group (INTERMACS class 3-4). There were seven patients in INTERMACS class 1-2 and six in INTERMACS class 3-4. Patient demographics, perioperative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were compared. There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics, and mean support time was 108 ± 114 days in the high-risk group and 238 ± 198 days in the low-risk group. Also, there were no significant differences in perioperative characteristics or in the rate of postoperative adverse events. The overall survival was comparable between the two groups (one late death in each group, log-rank P = 0.608). Two patients from the high-risk group were upgraded to a full-support LVAD (P = 0.462) after 65 ± 84.9 days of mean support. One patient from the high-risk group and two patients from the low-risk group were successfully transplanted (P = 0.559). The use of the Synergy Micro-pump in INTERMACS 1-2 patients is feasible and is associated with similar postoperative outcome as in patients in INTERMACS 3-4. Carefully selected patients with severe heart failure could benefit due to the small size of the pump; however, further studies and medium-term follow-up are required.

Extracorporeal Life Support in "Awake" Patients as a Bridge to Lung Transplant.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are sedated and mechanically ventilated, which increases risk of complications related to immobility and mechanical ventilation. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and highlight the benefits of a bridge to lung transplant (LTx) using "awake ECMO" support. METHODS: The peripheral venovenous or venoarterial ECMO was implanted at a bedside. A retrospective study of patients undergoing LTx between January 2007 and March 2013 was performed. Outcomes in patients supported on ECMO as a bridge to LTx and kept "awake" (Group 1) were compared with the rest of the LTx patients (Group 2). RESULTS: In this period, 249 LTx were performed and in them 7 patients were bridged to LTx using "awake ECMO" strategy. Two patients were awake at ECMO implantation and throughout the therapy, and two patients were on ventilator support at the time of ECMO implantation who were extubated later and maintained awake until LTx. The remaining three patients were awake for some time during the ECMO. There was no statistically significant difference in most donor characteristics and recipient baseline characteristics as well as post-LTx parameters between the two groups. One-year survival estimate was not different between the groups: Group 1, 85.7% vs. Group 2, 86.3% (log rank p = 0.99). CONCLUSION: In end-stage lung disease, the ECMO can be commenced in "awake" patients and patients can be awakened on ECMO. The "awake ECMO" strategy may avoid complications related to mechanical ventilation, sedation, and immobilization and provide comparable outcomes in the high-risk LTx patients.

Lung transplantation from donors outside standard acceptability criteria--are they really marginal?

Lung transplantation (LTx) from "extended donor criteria" donors may reduce significantly organ shortage. However, its influence on results remains unclear. In this study, we evaluate retrospectively the results of LTx from donors outside standard criteria: PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 300 mmHg, age over 55 years, and history of smoking > 20 pack-years. Two hundred and forty-eight patients underwent first time LTx in our institution between January 2007 and January 2013. Seventy-nine patients (Group I) received organs from "extended donor criteria" and 169 patients (Group II) from "standard donor criteria." Recipients' and donors' demographics, perioperative variables, and outcome were compared. Donors from Group I were significantly older [median (interquartile range)]: 52.5 (44;58) vs. 42 (28.5;48.5) years (P < 0.001) with lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio: 366 ± 116.1 455 ± 80.5 mmHg (P < 0.001), higher incidence of smoking history: 57.7% vs. 41.8% (P = 0.013), and more extensive smoking history: 24(15;30) vs. 10(3.75;14) pack-years (P < 0.001). Other parameters were comparable. Recipients' gender, diagnosis, percentage of patients operated on pump and receiving double LTx were also comparable. Recipients from Group I were significantly older: 50 (42;57) vs. 44 (29.5;53.5) years (P = 001). There were no differences observed in recipients' prevalence of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) grade 3 over first three postoperative days, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care and hospital length of stay, prevalence of rejection, and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). 90-day, 1-year, and 5-year survival (Group I vs. II) were also similar: 88.6% vs. 91.7%, 83.2% vs. 84.6%, and 59% vs. 68.2% (log rank P = 0.367). Carefully selected donor lungs from outside the standard acceptability criteria may expand existing donor pool with no detrimental effect on LTx outcome.

Pearls and pitfalls in short-term mechanical circulatory assist: how to avoid and manage complications.

In today's era, given the worsening risk profiles of patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the increasing number of complex cardiac surgeries, and the increasing number of patients undergoing thoracic organ transplantation, short-term mechanical circulatory assist (MCA) devices are indispensable. MCA devices are capable of supporting heart and lung function and have emerged as potentially lifesaving instruments, but may prove to be as hazardous as helpful due to their inherent tendency toward hemolysis, thromboembolism, and hemorrhage. Although MCA devices are being used regularly at some specialized centers, surgeries involving MCA are not as common as other routine cardiac surgeries, and even though professionals implanting and maintaining short-term MCAs are well acquainted with operating such devices, it is not uncommon to come across complications as a result of minor mistakes committed while dealing with them. Avoiding simple mistakes and taking proper precautions while implanting and maintaining these devices can prevent major catastrophes. We discuss commonly encountered problems and complications during the implantation and maintenance of short-term MCAs and offer reasonable and practical solutions. In addition, crucial issues such as anticoagulation, replacement of the device circuit, and management of the distal perfusion cannula are discussed. Continuous and efficient monitoring of the MCA device and the patient supported on MCA, together with anticipation and avoidance of complications, is key for successful short-term MCA support.

Refractory heart failure dependent on short-term mechanical circulatory support: what next? Heart transplant or long-term ventricular assist device.

Chronic heart failure is a progressive and eventually fatal illness. Although the disease cannot be cured and treatment is symptom oriented, most of the patients benefit from optimum medical treatment. Patients with rapid deterioration in chronic advanced heart failure refractory to medical treatment need inotropic support and may need intra-aortic balloon pump to maintain circulatory support, which of course cannot be prolonged beyond a certain limit. The outcome of heart transplant and long-term ventricular assist device (VAD) in such patients is poor. The short-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) offered to such patients not only provides effective circulatory support and stabilizes them hemodynamically, but also halts the ensuing or reverts the established end-organ failure. As the name suggests, the short-term MCS offers support for the short term, usually less than a month. Although some patients with acute heart failure experience recovery of myocardial function with short-term MCS support, others become dependent. These patients, stabilized and "stuck" with short-term MCS, can be "rescued" with long-term VAD or heart transplantation. Both the procedures, when done in this special situation, have their inherent advantages, disadvantages, and complications and hence need the careful consideration about the choice of the procedure. We have tried to elucidate this situation by considering the advantages and disadvantages of both options.

Distal limb perfusion: Achilles' heel in peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a temporary mechanical circulatory assist method that offers circulatory as well as respiratory support efficiently via peripheral access; however, it is liable to complications. Limb ischemia is one of the notorious complications of ECMO but can be avoided utilizing a proper distal limb perfusion method. A retrospective study of patients undergoing peripheral venoarterial (VA) ECMO for various reasons between June 2010 and December 2012 was performed. All patients were evaluated by our multidisciplinary team for suitability as candidates for ECMO. A peripheral VA-ECMO circuit was implanted via groin: inflow cannula in the femoral vein, an outflow cannula and distal-perfusion cannula, or an introducer sheath in the femoral artery. During the study period, 83 patients underwent various types of ECMO; 45 received peripheral VA-ECMO. Distal limb perfusion was achieved with an introducer sheath (6-8 Fr) in 13 cases and with a distal-perfusion cannula (10-12 Fr) in 32 cases. Nine (20%) patients developed signs of ischemia; five (11.2%) were treated conservatively, while four (8.8%) required surgical intervention. One patient required a below-knee amputation. The incidences of limb ischemia and limb ischemia requiring surgical intervention were significantly higher for the introducer sheath compared with the cannula (30.6 vs. 15.6% and 15.4 vs. 6.25%, respectively). Moreover, the patients supported on ECMO with a distal-perfusion cannula spent a significantly longer time on ECMO compared with the ones in whom an introducer sheath was used (11.9 ± 9.1 vs. 7.7 ± 4.3 days). The mean cannula size was significantly greater than the mean introducer sheath size (11.1 ± 1.3 vs. 7.0 ± 1.1 Fr). Use of a distal-perfusion cannula is a most reliable method of limb perfusion in peripheral VA-ECMO. The cannula can ensure adequate and smooth perfusion of the limb owing to its large caliber, its less turbulent flow, the ability it provides to monitor the flow, and the option to attach a side port.

Staged and effortless explantation of CircuLite Synergy micropump.

Synergy(®) micropump was implanted as a bridge to heart transplantation in a middle-age lady with chronic advanced heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy. After a good initial recovery, patient was discharged to ward, where her stay was prolonged due to non-healing operative wound over the micropump and recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding. After 3 months of therapy, the heart seemed to be recovered and the micropump was explanted. In view of the patient's bleeding tendency, the micropump was explanted in staged manner.

Use of left ventricular assist device for cardiomyopathy associated with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita.

Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC) is characterized by contractions of multiple joints present at birth. AMC is rarely associated with cardiomyopathy. We present a case of a young man with dilated cardiomyopathy associated with AMC admitted with rapidly deteriorating severe heart failure who was offered left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant.

Left ventricular assist device implantation with concomitant left ventricular reconstruction without patchplasty.

In this case report, we describe a 66-year-old patient with a massive LV aneurism which resulted after myocardial infarction. Due to severe LV function impairment, it was decided to perform left ventricular reconstruction surgery and, at the same time, left ventricular assist device implantation as a bridge to transplantation. The entire procedure was completed without using any patch material. The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged home after 18 days. After 1-year follow-up no adverse events were observed.