The BRCA2 c.68-7T > A variant is not pathogenic: A model for clinical calibration of spliceogenicity.

Although the spliceogenic nature of the BRCA2 c.68-7T > A variant has been demonstrated, its association with cancer risk remains controversial. In this study, we accurately quantified by real-time PCR and digital PCR (dPCR), the BRCA2 isoforms retaining or missing exon 3. In addition, the combined odds ratio for causality of the variant was estimated using genetic and clinical data, and its associated cancer risk was estimated by case-control analysis in 83,636 individuals. Co-occurrence in trans with pathogenic BRCA2 variants was assessed in 5,382 families. Exon 3 exclusion rate was 4.5-fold higher in variant carriers (13%) than controls (3%), indicating an exclusion rate for the c.68-7T > A allele of approximately 20%. The posterior probability of pathogenicity was 7.44 × 10-115 . There was neither evidence for increased risk of breast cancer (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.86-1.24) nor for a deleterious effect of the variant when co-occurring with pathogenic variants. Our data provide for the first time robust evidence of the nonpathogenicity of the BRCA2 c.68-7T > A. Genetic and quantitative transcript analyses together inform the threshold for the ratio between functional and altered BRCA2 isoforms compatible with normal cell function. These findings might be exploited to assess the relevance for cancer risk of other BRCA2 spliceogenic variants.

First description of an acinic cell carcinoma of the breast in a BRCA1 mutation carrier: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Acinic cell carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignant epithelial neoplasm characterized by the presence of malignant tubular acinar exocrine gland structures. Diagnosis is generally made in salivary glands and in the pancreas. ACC of the breast has been reported in few cases only. Carriers of inherited mutations in the BRCA1 gene are prone to the development of breast cancer, mainly invasive ductal or medullary type carcinomas. We describe for the first time a BRCA1 mutation carrier with a diagnosis of ACC of the breast. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient developed an invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) at the age of 40 years and an ACC in the contralateral breast at 44 years. Immunohistochemical examination of the ACC revealed a triple negative status (i.e., negativity for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 protein) and positivity for p53. Using a combination of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and sequencing analyses, the loss of the wild-type BRCA1 allele was detected in both the ACC and the IDC. In addition, two different somatic TP53 mutations, one in the ACC only and another one in the IDC only, were observed. CONCLUSION: Both the immunohistochemical and molecular features observed in the ACC are typical of BRCA1-associated breast cancers and suggest an involvement of the patient's germline mutation in the disease. The occurrence of rare histological types of breast cancers, including malignant phyllodes tumor, atypical medullary carcinoma and metaplastic carcinoma, in BRCA1 mutation carriers has been already reported. Our findings further broaden the spectrum of BRCA1-associated breast malignancies.

A novel BRCA1 splicing variant detected in an early onset triple-negative breast cancer patient additionally carrying a pathogenic variant in ATM: A case report.

The widespread adoption of gene panel testing for cancer predisposition is leading to the identification of an increasing number of individuals with clinically relevant allelic variants in two or more genes. The potential combined effect of these variants on cancer risks is mostly unknown, posing a serious problem for genetic counseling in these individuals and their relatives, in whom the variants may segregate singly or in combination. We report a female patient who developed triple-negative high grade carcinoma in the right breast at the age of 36 years. The patient underwent bilateral mastectomy followed by combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy (IMpassion030 clinical trial). Two years later she developed a skin recurrence on the right anterior chest wall. Despite intensive treatment, the patient died at 40-year-old due to disease progression. Gene panel testing of patient's DNA revealed the presence of a protein truncating variant in ATM [c.1672G>T; p.(Gly558Ter)] and of a not previously reported variant in the BRCA1 exon 22 donor splice site [c.5406+6T>C], whose clinical significance was unknown. The analysis of patient's RNA revealed the up-regulation of two alternative BRCA1 mRNA isoforms derived from skipping of exon 22 and of exons 22-23. The corresponding predicted protein products, p.(Asp1778GlyfsTer27) and p.(Asp1778_His1822del) are both expected to affect the BRCA1 C Terminus (BRCT) domain. The two variants were observed to co-occur also in the proband's brother who, in addition, was heterozygous for a common variant (c.4837A>G) mapped to BRCA1 exon 16. This allowed to ascertain, by transcript-specific amplification, the lack of functional mRNA isoforms expressed by the c.5406+6T>C allele and provided evidence to classify the BRCA1 variant as pathogenic, according to the guidelines of the Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) consortium. To our knowledge, excluding two cases detected following the screening of population specific recurrent variants, only one ATM/BRCA1 double heterozygote has been reported in the literature, being the case here described the one with the youngest age at cancer onset. The systematic collection of cases with pathogenic variants in more than one cancer predisposition gene is needed to verify if they deserve ad hoc counseling and clinical management.

Corrigendum: A novel BRCA1 splicing variant detected in an early onset triple-negative breast cancer patient additionally carrying a pathogenic variant in ATM: a case report.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1102184.].

Genetic and epigenetic analyses guided by high resolution whole-genome SNP array reveals a possible role of CHEK2 in Wilms tumour susceptibility.

Wilms tumour (WT), the most frequent malignant childhood renal tumour, shows a high degree of genetic and epigenetic heterogeneity. Loss of imprinting on chromosome 11p15 is found in a large fraction of cases and mutations in a few genes, including WT1, CTNNB1, WTX, TP53 and, more recently, SIX1, SIX2 and micro RNA processing genes (miRNAPGs), have been observed. However, these alterations are not sufficient to describe the entire spectrum of genetic defects underlying WT development. We inspected data obtained from a previously performed genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array analysis on 96 WT samples. By selecting focal regions commonly involved in chromosomal anomalies, we identified genes with a possible role in WT development, based on the prior knowledge of their biological relevance, including MYCN, DIS3L2, MIR562, HACE1, GLI3, CDKN2A and CDKN2B, PALB2, and CHEK2. The MYCN hotspot mutation c.131C>T was detected in seven cases (7.3%). Full sequencing of the remaining genes disclosed 16 rare missense variants and a splicing mutation. Most of these were present at the germline level. Promoter analysis of HACE1, CDKN2A and CDKN2B disclosed partial methylation affecting HACE1 in a consistent fraction of cases (85%). Interestingly, of the four missense variants identified in CHEK2, three were predicted to be deleterious by in silico analyses, while an additional variant was observed to alter mRNA splicing, generating a functionally defective protein. Our study adds additional information on putative WT genes, and adds evidences involving CHEK2 in WT susceptibility.

Germline mutations of the POU6F2 gene in Wilms tumors with loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 7p14.

Wilms tumor (WT) is a kidney malignancy of childhood characterized by highly heterogeneous genetic alterations. We previously reported the molecular and cytogenetic characterization of a WT (Case 30) carrying an interstitial deletion in chromosome 7p14 between markers D7S555 and D7S668. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analyses had revealed that this same region was lost in 8 out of 38 examined WTs, suggesting that the identified interval contains a putative tumor suppressor gene. To confirm this hypothesis, in this work, we analyzed an additional 35 WTs, four of which showed LOH in the region of interest. Furthermore, we were able to more accurately define the extension of the deletion in Case 30, mapping it within an interval not exceeding 390 kb, proximally to D7S555. To date, only a single expressed gene, POU6F2 (the POU domain, class 6, transcription factor 2; also known as RPF1), has been recognized in this interval. Sequencing of the gene in the 12 WTs showing LOH and in a corresponding numbers of WT cases without LOH, led to the identification of two germline nucleotide substitutions. The first occurred in the 5'-untranslated region, while the second caused an amino acid change in a glutamine repeat domain. These mutations, whose occurrence was not observed in more than 100 control subjects, were detected in two patients showing the loss of the constitutionally wild-type allele in tumor DNA. Together with the finding of the expression of the POU6F2 mouse homolog in both fetal and adult kidney, our observations suggest that the gene is a tumor suppressor and is involved in hereditary predisposition to WT.

BRAF mutation analysis is a valid tool to implement in Lynch syndrome diagnosis in patients classified according to the Bethesda guidelines.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome (LS) is clinically defined by the Amsterdam criteria (AC) and by germline mutations in mismatch-repair (MMR) genes leading to microsatellite instability (MSI) at the molecular level. Patients who do not fulfil AC are considered suspected-Lynch according to the less stringent Bethesda guidelines (BG) and should be tested for MSI and MMR germline mutations. BRAF mutations have been proposed as a marker to exclude LS because they are generally absent in LS patients and present in sporadic colorectal cancer (sCRC) with MSI due to promoter hypermethylation of the MLH1 gene. Our aim was to verify whether BRAF mutations may improve the criteria to select patients for germline MMR mutation assessment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed 303 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded CRC samples including 174 sCRC, 28 patients fulfilling AC, and 101 suspected-Lynch patients fulfilling BG. We analyzed MSI and BRAF mutations in all CRC samples. MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 germline mutations were investigated in MSI patients fulfilling AC or BG. RESULTS: sCRC samples showed MSI in 20/174 (11%) cases. BRAF mutations were detected in 10/174 (6%) sCRC cases and were significantly correlated with MSI (P = 0.002). MSI was observed in 24/28 (86%) Amsterdam cases which were BRAF wild-type. MMR gene mutation was detected in 22/26 (85%) AC cases, all showing MSI. Suspected-Lynch cases carried MSI in 41/101 (40%) and BRAF mutations in 7/101 (7%) cases. MMR gene mutation was detected in 13/28 (46%) evaluable MSI patients of this group and only in cases characterized by a wild-type BRAF gene. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of BRAF mutations in CRC patients is not high but extremely correlated with MSI and risk categories as BG, whereas they are absent in LS patients. BRAF mutation detection can reduce the need for MMR gene analysis in a small (but not negligible) proportion of MSI patients (7%), with a positive impact on the financial and psychological costs of unnecessary tests.

WT1 gene analysis in sporadic early-onset and bilateral wilms tumor patients without associated abnormalities.

The WT1 gene is responsible for two different genetic conditions characterized by genitourinary anomalies and susceptibility to Wilms tumor (WT): the WAGR syndrome and the Denys-Drash syndrome. Although only rarely, WT1 constitutional mutations have been reported also in WT patients without congenital defects. Due to the high survival rates that characterize the disease, these individuals must be identified and counseled in relation to their risk to transmit a cancer-predisposing genetic lesion to their offspring. Recently, tumor bilaterality and early age of onset have been suggested to be risk factors for carrying germline WT1 mutations. The authors investigated 20 patients with sporadic WT, without evidence of congenital abnormalities, diagnosed before 2 years of age and/or with bilateral presentation, for the occurrence of WT1 mutations. Southern blot analyses identified homozygous whole-gene or intragenic deletions at the tumor level in three cases. However, none of the identified alterations was found to be present at the germline level. In addition, no mutation in the coding exons and flanking sequences of WT1 was detected in the remaining 17 cases. These results suggest that early age of diagnosis and bilaterality are not by themselves efficient predictors of germline WT1 alterations in WT patients without associated abnormalities.