RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The study sought to investigate the profile and characteristics of suicide-related crisis presentations and factors associated with repeat presentations to a rural hospital Emergency Department (ED). METHOD: This retrospective cohort study examined suicide-related crisis presentation data from a rural ED for the years 2008-2018 inclusive. Descriptive statistical analyses included demographic characteristics and trends over time. Factors associated with increased likelihood to re-present to the ED for suicide-related crisis were identified using Odds Ratio analyses. RESULTS: First Nations People, adolescents and young adults were at increased risk of presentation. Suicidal crisis presentations had increased well beyond that which might be accorded to the catchment's population increase and almost a third of presentations involved individuals re-presenting in suicide-related crisis. Repeat presentation was positively associated with younger age, less acute triage category, discharge to the community and leaving the ED before/during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the importance of flagging, follow-up and support of rural repeat presenters to reduce further suicidal behaviours and presentation. Findings support the need for culturally safe and appropriate interventions and follow-up services. It is recommended to extend approach this to non-ED settings.
Assuntos
Suicídio , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ideação Suicida , Serviço Hospitalar de EmergênciaRESUMO
During the COVID-19 pandemic, focused protection strategies including selective lockdowns of the elderly were proposed as alternatives to general lockdowns. These selective restrictions would consist of isolating only those most at risk of COVID-19 hospitalization and subsequent use of healthcare resources. The proposal seems to have troubling implications, including the permissibility of selective lockdown on the basis of characteristics such as ethnicity, sex, disability, or BMI. Like age, these factors also correlated with an increased risk of hospitalization from COVID-19. In this paper, we argue that age has meaningful differences as a morally relevant characteristic in the justification for selective restrictions of liberty. Thus, it might justify selective freedom restrictions in a way in which other factors might not. We offer four moral domains that separate age from other proxies: empiricism, operationality, discrimination, and disparity.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Idoso , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Pandemias , Etnicidade , HospitalizaçãoRESUMO
Since the emergence of the Omicron variant in Australia in late 2021 there have been over 5.47 million cases and 4993 deaths, disproportionately impacting on people with social and structural disadvantage. However there has been increasing reluctance by governments to intervene to reduce the impact of COVID-19 transmission and its consequences. This commentary article provides a perspective on the support and guidance required to mitigate individuals and communities risk by using a harm reduction approach to highlight strategies that can reduce COVID-19 transmission and infection.