The burden of constipation on quality of life: results of a multinational survey.

BACKGROUND: The impact of constipation on quality of life (QoL) may vary in different cultural or national settings. AIM: We studied QoL in a multinational survey to compare different social and demographic groups with and without constipation (defined according to Rome III criteria) and to detect country-specific differences among the groups studied. METHODS: Health-related QoL (HRQoL) was assessed with the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire in 2870 subjects in France, Germany, Italy, UK, South Korea, Brazil and USA. Results Respondents were mainly middle-aged, married or living together and part- or full-time employed. General health status, measured by the SF-36 questionnaire, was significantly worse in the constipated vs. non-constipated populations. RESULTS: were comparable in all countries. QoL scores correlated negatively with age. Constipated women reported more impaired HRQoL than constipated men. Brazilians were most affected by constipation as to their social functioning (35.8 constipated vs. 51.3 non-constipated) and general health perception (29.4 constipated vs. 54.4 non-constipated). CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in HRQoL between constipated and non-constipated individuals and a significant, negative correlation between the number of symptoms and complaints and SF-36 scores. The study detected a correlation of constipation with QoL and the influence of social and demographic factors on HRQoL in constipated people.

Placebo- and paracetamol-controlled study on the efficacy and tolerability of hyoscine butylbromide in the treatment of patients with recurrent crampy abdominal pain.

AIM: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of oral hyoscine butylbromide (hereafter hyoscine) 10 mg t.d.s., paracetamol 500 mg t.d.s. and their fixed combination against placebo in patients with recurrent crampy abdominal pain. METHODS: A total of 1637 patients were entered into a four-arm double-blind study. After a 1 week placebo run-in, they were randomized to 3 weeks of treatment with one of the four therapies with assessments after 1, 2 and 3 weeks. Pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale) and pain frequency (Verbal Rating Scale) were self-assessed daily. RESULTS: Pain intensity on the Visual Analogue Scale decreased in all treatment groups; the adjusted mean changes from baseline were 2.3, 2.4 and 2.4 cm for the hyoscine, paracetamol and combination groups, respectively, compared with 1.9 cm for the placebo group (all P < 0.0001). The Verbal Rating Scale also showed a statistically significant decrease of 0.7, 0.7 and 0.7 in the hyoscine, paracetamol and combination groups compared with 0.5 in placebo (all P < 0.0001). All treatments were well tolerated: 16%, 14%, 17% and 11% of patients on hyoscine, paracetamol, combination and placebo reported at least one adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Hyoscine, paracetamol and their fixed combination are effective in the treatment of recurrent crampy abdominal pain and well tolerated if used three times daily continuously for 3 weeks.

Prevalence and management of abdominal cramping and pain: a multinational survey.

BACKGROUND: Though functional gastrointestinal complaints are recognised as being common throughout the world, there have been few comparative studies of prevalence. AIM: To compare the prevalence and management of abdominal cramping/pain in nine countries. METHODS: In a two-stage community survey, approximately 1000 subjects were interviewed in each of nine countries to establish the demographics of individuals with abdominal cramping/pain (stage 1) followed by market research-driven interviews with >or=200 sufferers per country (stage 2). RESULTS: 9042 subjects were interviewed in stage 1. Mexico (46%) and Brazil (43%) had the highest prevalence of abdominal cramping/pain; Japan the lowest (10%). Abdominal cramping/pain was more common in women (12-55%) than in men (7-38%). About 1717 subjects participated in stage 2; 65% were women and the average age at symptom onset was 29 years. The frequency of episodes differed between countries, being highest in the US (61% suffered at least once in a week). Sufferers in the US and Latin America reported a higher usage of medications (around 90%) than those in Europe (around 72%). In most countries over-the-counter drugs were principally used. Antispasmodic drugs were most popular in Latin America and Italy, antacids in Germany and the UK. Drug therapy decreased the duration of episodes (by up to 81% in Brazil). CONCLUSIONS: The community prevalence, severity, healthcare seeking and medication usage related to abdominal cramping/pain are high overall, but vary considerably between countries.

Simultaneous assessment of bolus transport and contraction parameters in multiple-swallow investigations.

A better understanding of scintigraphic findings may lead to a wider acceptance of esophageal transit studies. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to correlate standard manometric parameters with the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of liquid and semi-solid bolus transport. Twenty-nine patients were simultaneously investigated with esophageal scintigraphy and manometry. Single-swallow and sum-image data of six consecutive swallows were analyzed. No significant relationship between transit time and the velocity of the peristaltic wave could be identified, which suggests that factors other than peristaltic velocity (e.g., pharyngeal pump) essentially modulate esophageal transit. There was also no linear correlation between esophageal emptying and peristaltic amplitudes. Emptying was normal in patients with amplitudes greater than 30 mmHg and reduced in those with amplitudes less than 30 mmHg. This suggests that a threshold pressure greater than 30 mmHg is necessary to propel a test bolus adequately. Patterns in condensed images have been shown to specifically reflect the events in corresponding manometric recordings. Normal and different pathologic types of peristalsis presented analogous findings in both modalities. Thus, an analysis of the relationship between bolus transport and contraction parameters in simultaneous studies increases understanding of quantitative and qualitative scintigraphic results.

Drug treatment of chronic-intermittent abdominal cramping and pain: a multi-national survey on usage and attitudes.

BACKGROUND: Data on drug treatment of abdominal cramping and pain are sparse. AIM: To compare treatment of abdominal cramping and pain across countries worldwide. METHODS: A multi-national survey was conducted in the USA, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Germany, Belgium, Italy and the UK. In each country, approximately 210 people were interviewed on various aspects of drug treatment of their complaints. RESULTS: In total, 1717 participants were interviewed. Respondents from the Americas used more medication (approximately 90%) than those from Europe (approximately 70%). Over-the-counter remedies were much more used than prescription drugs (except for Mexico). Medication was mainly taken on demand to relieve a pain episode. In the Latin American countries, antispasmodics were most popular (up to 73%), in Germany antacids, and in the UK antacids and analgesics. Regarding expectations of treatment, 'fast onset of action' ranked the highest, followed by 'highly effective' and 'well tolerated'. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of people afflicted by abdominal cramping and pain use medication and take them on demand. Consequently, rapid onset of action is mentioned as most important. Antispasmodics are the class most frequently used with considerable variation from country to country.

Survey of laxative use by adults with self-defined constipation in South America and Asia: a comparison of six countries.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to the US and Europe, prevalence and laxative use for self-defined constipation among adults was previously reported to be unassociated with age among adults in South Korea and Brazil. AIM: To determine whether observations in South Korea and Brazil are reflective of other Asian and South American countries. METHODS: A total of 8100 adults from Argentina, Colombia, Indonesia and China completed a questionnaire identical to that previously used in South Korea and Brazil. RESULTS: Prevalence of constipation was similar to that reported for Brazil and South Korea and was 2.17-fold (95% CI: 1.71-2.64) higher amongst women than amongst men. Prevalence increased with age amongst all adults in Argentina and China and only among men in Colombia and Brazil. With the exception of Indonesia, the majority of those with constipation had symptoms at least once weekly, and for < or =3 years. Less than one-third of adults reported using laxatives to treat constipation. Laxative use was not associated with gender and increased with age in Argentina and Colombia. CONCLUSIONS: No clear geographical or cultural tendencies were observed in the prevalence of constipation and laxative use among the South American and Asian countries studied in this survey.

A multinational survey of prevalence and patterns of laxative use among adults with self-defined constipation.

BACKGROUND: While numerous studies report prevalence of constipation, use of laxatives is poorly understood. AIM: To conduct a survey in seven countries evaluating prevalence of constipation and laxative use in its treatment. METHODS: Thirteen thousand eight hundred seventy-nine adults [approximately 2000 each from US, UK, Germany (GE), France (FR), Italy (IT), Brazil (BR) and South Korea (SK)] completed questionnaires assessing occurrence, frequency, duration and laxative use for treating constipation. RESULTS: Overall, 12.3% of adults had constipation [range: 5% (GE) to 18% (US)] in the prior year. A greater percent of women from all countries and elderly from all except SK and BR reported constipation; odds ratios for constipation among women and elderly were 2.43 (95% CI: 2.18-2.71) and 1.5 (95% CI: 1.25-1.73) vs. men and young subjects. Among those with constipation, 16% (SK) to 40% (US) used laxatives. Laxative use was generally associated with increasing age, symptom frequency and lower income and education. A similar percentage of men and women with constipation reported using laxatives; a greater percentage of women used laxatives for a longer time. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of self-defined constipation and laxative use varies among countries. Prevalence is generally related to gender and age, whereas laxative use is related to age, but not to gender.