RESUMO
Background and Aims: Administering liberal fluid raises concerns about pulmonary congestion postoperatively. Bedside ultrasonography is a valuable tool for the early detection of pulmonary congestion. In this study, we have used it to ascertain the impact of the duration of surgery and intraoperative fluid volume on the causation of pulmonary congestion. Our objective was to determine the incidence of pulmonary congestion as diagnosed by lung ultrasound in patients undergoing general anaesthesia with varied fluid administration. Methods: Seventy participants of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II, aged between 18 and 60 years, undergoing elective extrathoracic surgeries of over 3 h under general anaesthesia were included. Preoperative lung ultrasound was carried out in all patients, and a postoperative lung ultrasound was carried out at 1 h after extubation. The appearance of three or more "B"-lines was considered positive for lung congestion. Results: Significant differences (P < 0.001) were found in the duration of surgery and the appearance of B-lines in the postoperative period. Participants who developed B lines received, on average, 150% more fluid (1148.16 ± 291.79 ml) than those who did not (591.29 ± 398.42 ml) (P = 0.0240). Net fluid balance was also significantly different in patients who developed B lines (P = 0.0014). None of the patients developed symptoms of lung congestion postoperatively. Conclusion: Long duration of surgery under general anaesthesia (>3 h) with the administration of large volumes of intraoperative fluid and a large net fluid balance are associated with lung congestion as diagnosed by lung ultrasound.
RESUMO
Background and aim Respiratory Rate-Oxygenation (ROX) and modified ROX (mROX) indexes have been proposed to detect early high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy failure. We evaluated the utility and relationship of ROX and mROX indexes in COVID-19 patients started on HFNC oxygen therapy. Methods This pilot study collected data from adult COVID-19 patients requiring HFNC oxygenation from 29 Jan - 29 Jun 2021. The patients were divided into two cohorts based on HFNC therapy success. ROX and mROX were compared using statistical diagnostic testing, including receiver operating characteristics and area under the curve (AUC) using online Epitools (https://epitools.ausvet.com.au/) and MedCalc software (MedCalc Software Ltd, Ostend, Belgium, https://www.medcalc.org/); p<0.05 was considered significant. Results Twenty-seven patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria; 48.15% of therapy failed. The cohort's mean ± standard deviation age was 53.93 ± 10.67 years; 74.1% were male. The accuracy of predicting failure for mean ROX versus mROX at baseline and six-hour values was 59.81 versus 70.68 and 67.42 versus 74.88, respectively (all p>0.05). The AUC for ROX and mROX at baseline and at six hours were statistically indifferent. Only an mROX of 4.05 (mean value) and 3.34 (Youden's J cut-off) had a sensitivity plus specificity at 156% and 163%, respectively. Conclusion Both ROX and mROX at baseline and six hours had fair-to-good accuracies and AUC; the differences were insignificant. Both ROX and mROX had better accuracies at six hours. However, only mROX < 4.05 at six hours fulfilled the sensitivity plus specificity criteria to be a clinically valuable screener.