Use of modern three-dimensional imaging models to guide surgical planning for local control of pediatric extracranial solid tumors.

INTRODUCTION: In complex pediatric surgical oncology, surgical planning is contingent upon data gathered from preoperative imaging. Three-dimensional (3D) modeling and printing has been shown to be beneficial for adult presurgical planning, though pediatric literature is less robust. The study reviews our institutional experience with the use of 3D image segmentation and printed models in approaching resection of extracranial solid tumors in children. METHODS: This is a single institutional series from 2021 to 2023. Models were based on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging studies, optimized for 3D imaging. The feasibility and creation of the models is reviewed, including specific techniques, software, and printing materials from our institution. Clinical implications for surgical planning are also described, along with detailed preoperative and intraoperative images. RESULTS: 3D modeling and printing was performed for four pediatric patients diagnosed with extracranial solid tumors. Diagnoses included Ewing sarcoma, hepatoblastoma, synovial sarcoma, and osteosarcoma. No intraoperative complications or discrepancies with the preoperative 3D-printed model were noted. No evidence of local recurrence was identified in any patient thus far. CONCLUSION: Our institutional series demonstrates a wide spectrum of clinical application for 3D modeling and printing technology within pediatric surgical oncology. This technology may aid in surgical planning for both resection and reconstruction, can be applied to a diverse breadth of diagnoses, and may potentially augment patient and/or family education about their condition.

University surgeons: An ideal community for unity amid national discourse.

The current sociopolitical landscape continues to infiltrate our house of surgery, leaving faculty, staff, and learners challenged by uncertainty while introducing downstream interference to cohesive health care delivery for our patients. National surgical associations must cultivate an ethos of unity and intellectual solidarity within the surgical community, thereby reinforcing a foundation for productive and respectful discourse. This is not a call for uniformity in thought but for unity in purpose, action, and mutual respect.

Early Lessons From Implementation of Holistic Review for Pediatric Surgery Fellowship Applicants.

PURPOSE: Holistic review (HR) considers applicants' unique identities and experiences rather than focusing on academic metrics. Though several residency programs have demonstrated increases in women and those underrepresented in medicine (URiM), this is the first study to examine HR in pediatric surgery (PS). METHODS: Using a retrospective review of applicants, demographic, academic, and non-academic metrics of traditional review (TR) [2015-2017] were compared to HR [2018-2022]. HR initiatives include expansion of faculty reviewers, implementation of a pre-screening rubric, and greater prioritization of non-academic factors. Chi-squared/Fisher's exact tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and two sample z-test for proportions were used where appropriate. RESULTS: For 635 applicants (TR: 268, HR: 367), the proportion offered interviews in the TR and HR cohorts were similar (31.7 vs 36%, p = 0.30). Candidates selected for interview pre- and post-HR most commonly graduated from residency programs affiliated with PS fellowships (56.5 vs 50%, p = 0.65). After HR implementation, no change in proportion of women interviewees (TR: 52.9 vs HR: 54.5%, p = 0.93) was observed. Though URiM residents applying to PS remained consistently low (TR: 14.6 vs HR: 10.9%, p = 0.21), significantly more received interviews with HR (30.8 vs 42.5%, p = 0.001). The median number of peer-review publications per interviewee increased (17 vs 22, p = 0.02) as did non-academic achievements (leadership, service, athletic awards, etc.) per applicant (1.0 vs 1.5, p = 0.104), though the latter did not reach significance, demonstrating similar qualification of interviewees in HR and TR. CONCLUSION: Holistic review of PS fellowship applications increased the proportion of URiM interviewees, despite a persistently low URiM proportion in the applicant pool. Furthermore, implementing HR did not sacrifice the caliber of interviewees, as publications and non-academic achievements increased by over 25% in the HR cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

The pediatric surgeon-scientist: An evolving Breed or endangered phenotype?

INTRODUCTION: National Institute of Health (NIH) funding is a "gold-standard" of achievement; we examined trends in NIH-funded pediatric surgeons. METHODS: NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT) was queried for American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) members (2012 vs 2022). Demographics and time-to-award (TTA) from fellowship were compared. Number of grants, funding allotment, award classification, administering institutes/centers, research type were studied. RESULTS: Thirty-eight (4.6%) APSA members were NIH-funded in 2012 compared to 37 (2.9%) in 2022. Of funded surgeons in 2022, 27% were repeat awardees from 2012. TTA was similar (12 vs 14years, p=0.109). At each point, awards were commonly R01 grants (40 vs 52%, p â€‹= â€‹0.087) and basic science-related (76 vs 63%, p = â€‹0.179). Awardees were predominantly men (82% in 2012 vs 78% in 2022, p=0.779) and White (82% in 2012 vs 76% in 2022, p=0.586). Median amount per grant increased: $254,980 (2012) to $364,025 (2022); by $96,711 for men and $390,911 for women. Median awards for White surgeons increased by $215,699 (p=0.035), and decreased by $30,074 for non-White surgeons, though not significantly (p=0.368). CONCLUSION: The landscape of NIH-funded pediatric surgeons has remained unchanged between time points. With a substantial number of repeat awardees, predominance of R01 grants, and a median TTA over a decade after fellowship graduation, the phenotypes of early career pediatric surgeon-scientists are facing academic endangerment.

Structural enrichment attenuates colitis-associated colon cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major public health concern and disproportionately impacts racial/ethnic minority populations in the US. Animal models are helpful in examining human health disparities because many stress-induced human health conditions can be recapitulated using mouse models. Azoxymethane (AOM)/ dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) treatment can be used to model colitis-associated cancers. While colitis-associated cancers account for only 2% of colon cancers, the AOM/DSS model is useful for examining links between inflammation, immunity, and colon cancer. Mice were housed in enriched and impoverished environments for 1-month prior to behavioral testing. Following behavioral testing the mice were subjected to the AOM/DSS model. While our analysis revealed no significant behavioral variances between the impoverished and enriched housing conditions, we found significant effects in tumorigenesis. Enriched mice had fewer tumors and smaller tumor volumes compared to impoverished mice. African Americans are at higher risk for early onset colorectal cancers in part due to social economic status. Furthermore, housing conditions and environment may reflect social economic status. Research aimed at understanding links between social economic status and colorectal cancer progression is important for eliminating disparities in health outcomes.