Identification of target cells of human papillomavirus 18 using squamocolumnar junction organoids.

Human papillomavirus 18 (HPV18) is a highly malignant HPV genotype among high-risk HPVs, characterized by the difficulty of detecting it in precancerous lesions and its high prevalence in adenocarcinomas. The cellular targets and molecular mechanisms underlying its infection remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to identify the cells targeted by HPV18 and elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying HPV18 replication. Initially, we established a lentiviral vector (HPV18LCR-GFP vector) containing the HPV18 long control region promoter located upstream of EGFP. Subsequently, HPV18LCR-GFP vectors were transduced into patient-derived squamocolumnar junction organoids, and the presence of GFP-positive cells was evaluated. Single-cell RNA sequencing of GFP-positive and GFP-negative cells was conducted. Differentially expressed gene analysis revealed that 169 and 484 genes were significantly upregulated in GFP-positive and GFP-negative cells, respectively. Pathway analysis showed that pathways associated with cell cycle and viral carcinogenesis were upregulated in GFP-positive cells, whereas keratinization and mitophagy/autophagy-related pathways were upregulated in GFP-negative cells. siRNA-mediated luciferase reporter assay and HPV18 genome replication assay validated that, among the upregulated genes, ADNP, FHL2, and NPM3 were significantly associated with the activation of the HPV18 early promoter and maintenance of the HPV18 genome. Among them, NPM3 showed substantially higher expression in HPV-related cervical adenocarcinomas than in squamous cell carcinomas, and NPM3 knockdown of HPV18-infected cells downregulated stem cell-related genes. Our new experimental model allows us to identify novel genes involved in HPV18 early promoter activities. These molecules might serve as therapeutic targets in HPV18-infected cervical lesions.

Patient survey on cancer genomic medicine in Japan under the national health insurance system.

In Japan, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests have been reimbursed under the national health care system for solid cancer patients who have finished standard treatment. More than 50,000 patients have taken the test since June 2019. We performed a nation-wide questionnaire survey between March 2021 and July 2022. Questionnaires were sent to 80 designated Cancer Genomic Medicine Hospitals. Of the 933 responses received, 370 (39.7%) were web based and 563 (60.3%) were paper based. Most patients (784, 84%) first learned about CGP tests from healthcare professionals, and 775 (83.1%) gave informed consent to their treating physician. At the time of informed consent, they were most worried about test results not leading to novel treatment (536, 57.4%). On a scale of 0-10, 702 respondents (75.2%) felt that the explanations of the test result were easy to understand (7 or higher). Ninety-one patients (9.8%) started their recommended treatment. Many patients could not receive recommended treatment because no approved drugs or clinical trials were available (102/177, 57.6%). Ninety-eight patients (10.5%) did not wish their findings to be disclosed. Overall satisfaction with the CGP test process was high, with 602 respondents (64.5%) giving a score of 7-10. The major reason for choosing 0-6 was that the CGP test result did not lead to new treatment (217/277, 78.3%). In conclusion, satisfaction with the CGP test process was high. Patients and family members need better access to information. More patients need to be treated with genomically matched therapy.

Comprehensive genomic profiling from C-CAT database unveiled over 80% presence of oncogenic drivers in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma including BRAF, RAS family, NF1, and FGFR1.

OBJECTIVE: Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is considered a very aggressive carcinoma and has been difficult to treat with therapeutic strategies. This study examines the landscape of genomic alteration in ATC, including the BRAF V600E mutation, and its clinical implications. DESIGN, PATIENTS AND MESUREMENT: A retrospective observational study was conducted using collected at the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) in Japan, utilizing comprehensive genomic profiling data from 102 ATC cases. Additionally, AACR-GENIE data from 267 cases were analysed for validation. Statistical methods, including the conditional Kendall tau statistic and χ2 tests, were employed for survival analysis and gene mutation comparisons. RESULTS: Among 102 ATCs, BRAF, RAS, and other driver mutations were found in 83 cases (81.2%). The prevalence of BRAF V600E mutations was as high as 60%. Co-mutation analysis identified different genomic profiles in the BRAF, RAS, and wild-type groups. Despite the diverse molecular backgrounds, no significant differences in clinical variables and overall survival were observed. The analysis considering left-side amputation suggested that RAS mutations had a poorer prognosis. In the BRAF/RAS wild-type group, FGFR1 and NF1 were identified as driver mutations, with an accumulation of copy number variations and less TERT promoter mutations. This molecular subgrouping was also supported by the AACR-GENIE data. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive genomic analysis of ATC in Japan revealed distinct molecular subgroups, highlighting the importance of BRAF V600E mutations, particularly V600E, as potential therapeutic targets and suggest the relevance of tailor-made therapeutic strategies based on genomic profiling.

BRAF mutations and concurrent alterations in patients with soft tissue sarcoma.

BRAF alterations, including V600E and non-V600E mutations and fusions, in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) have been identified in a limited case series. Here, we aimed to evaluate the frequency of BRAF mutations and concurrent alterations in STS to understand their therapeutic action. In this retrospective analysis, we included data from 1964 patients with advanced STS who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling tests at hospitals in Japan between June 2019 and March 2023. The prevalence of BRAF and recurrent concurrent gene alterations were also investigated. BRAF mutations were detected in 24 (1.2%) of 1964 STS patients, with a median age of 47 (range 1-69) years. BRAF V600E was detected in 11 (0.6%) of the 1964 patients with STS, BRAF non-V600E mutations in 9 (4.6%), and BRAF fusions were detected in 4 (0.2%). BRAF V600E was identified in 4 (0.2%) cases of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. The most common concurrent alteration was CDKN2A (11 cases, 45.8%), and the frequency was equivalent to that of the BRAF V600E (5/11 cases, 45.5%) and non-V600E (5/9 cases, 55.6%) groups. Recurrent concurrent alterations, such as TERT promoter mutations (7 cases, 29.2%), were detected at the same frequency in the V600E and non-V600E groups. In contrast, TP53 alterations (4/9 cases, 44.4%) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-activating genes, including NF1, GNAQ, and GNA11 (3/9 cases, 33.3%), were identified as relatively higher in the non-V600E group than in the V600E group (each 1/11 case, 9.1%). We identified BRAF alterations at a rate of 1.2% in all patients with advanced STS. Among them, BRAF V600E and BRAF fusions account for 45.8% and 16.7%, respectively. Collectively, our findings support the clinical characteristics and therapeutic strategies for patients with BRAF-altered advanced STS.

Dramatic response to entrectinib in a patient with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor harboring novel SNRNP70-NTRK3 fusion gene.

Neurotropic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) gene rearrangements have been reported in limited cases of sarcomas; however, to date, there has been only one report of such rearrangements in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs). Herein, we describe a 51-year-old male patient with a buttock tumor arising from the sciatic nerve, which was diagnosed as MPNST with positive S-100 staining, negative SOX10 staining, and loss of trimethylation at lysine 27 of histone H3 (H3K27me3) confirmed by immunohistochemistry. Soon after the resection of the primary tumor, the patient was found to have pulmonary and lymph node metastases. Chemotherapy with eribulin and trabectedin showed limited effects. However, the patient responded rapidly to pazopanib, but severe side effects caused discontinuation of the treatment. RNA panel testing revealed a novel fusion gene between Small Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein U1 Subunit 70 (SNRNP70) gene and NTRK3 gene. Furthermore, loss of NF1, SUZ12, and CDKN2A genes was confirmed by DNA panel testing, which is compatible with a histological diagnosis of MPNST. SNRNP70 possesses a coiled-coiled domain and seems to induce constitutive activation of NTRK3 through dimerization. In fact, immunohistochemistry revealed diffuse staining of pan-TRK within tumor cells. Treatment with entrectinib, which is an NTRK inhibitor, showed a quick and durable response for 10 months. Although NTRK rearrangements are very rare in MPNST, this case highlights the importance of genetic testing in MPNST, especially using an RNA panel for the detection of rare fusion genes.

Japanese nationwide observational multicenter study of tumor BRCA1/2 variant testing in advanced ovarian cancer.

The association between germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants (mutations: gBRCAm) and ovarian cancer risk is well established. Germline testing alone cannot detect somatic BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (sBRCAm), which is calculated based on the proportion of tumor BRCAm (tBRCAm) from tumor samples and gBRCAm. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) results mainly from genetic/epigenetic alterations in homologous recombination repair-related genes and can be evaluated by genomic instability status. In Japan, the prevalence of tBRCAm, sBRCAm, and HRD remains unclear. This multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study, CHaRacterIzing the croSs-secTional approach to invEstigate the prevaLence of tissue BRCA1/2 mutations in newLy diagnosEd advanced ovarian cancer patients (CHRISTELLE), evaluated the prevalence of tBRCAm, sBRCAm, and HRD in tumor specimens from newly diagnosed patients with ovarian cancer who underwent gBRCA testing. Of the 205 patients analyzed, 26.8% had a tBRCAm, including tBRCA1m (17.6%) and tBRCA2m (9.3%). The overall prevalence of tBRCAm, gBRCAm, sBRCAm, and HRD-positive status was 26.8%, 21.5%, 6.3%, and 60.0%, respectively. The calculated sBRCAm/tBRCAm ratio was 23.6% (13/55), and the prevalence of gBRCA variant of uncertain significance was 3.9%. These results suggest gBRCA testing alone cannot clearly identify the best course of treatment, highlighting the importance of sBRCA testing in Japan. The present results also suggest that testing for tBRCA and HRD should be encouraged in advanced ovarian cancer patients to drive precision medicine.

Homologous recombination inquiry through ovarian malignancy investigations: JGOG3025 Study.

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) network has clarified that ~50% of high-grade serous ovarian cancers show homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). However, the frequency of HRD in Japanese patients with ovarian cancer remains unclear. We aimed to identify the frequency of HR-associated gene mutations in Japanese patients with ovarian cancer. The JGOG3025 study is a multicenter collaborative prospective observational study involving 65 study sites throughout Japan. We recruited 996 patients who were clinically diagnosed with ovarian cancer before surgery from March 2017 to March 2019, and 701 patients were eligible according to the criteria. We used frozen tumor tissues to extract DNA and performed next-generation sequencing for 51 targeted genes (including 29 HR-associated genes) in 701 ovarian cancers (298 high-grade serous cases, 189 clear cell cases, 135 endometrioid cases, 12 mucinous cases, 3 low-grade serous cases, and 64 others). HRD was defined as positive when at least one HR-associated gene was mutated. The frequencies of HRD and tumor BRCA1/2 mutations were 45.2% (317/701) and 18.5% (130/701), respectively, in the full analysis set. Next, we performed multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients with HRD had adjusted hazard ratios of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.55-0.94) and 0.57 (95% CI, 0.38-0.86) for PFS and OS, respectively, compared with those without HRD (p = 0.016 and 0.007). Our study demonstrated that mutations in HR-associated genes were associated with prognosis. Further studies are needed to investigate the prognostic impact of each HR-associated gene in ovarian cancer.

Cells with stem-like properties are associated with the development of HPV18-positive cervical cancer.

The cellular origins of cervical cancer and the histological differentiation of human papillomavirus (HPV)-infected cells remain unexplained. To gain new insights into the carcinogenesis and histological differentiation of HPV-associated cervical cancer, we focused on cervical cancer with mixed histological types. We conducted genomic and transcriptomic analyses of cervical cancers with mixed histological types. The commonality of the cellular origins of these cancers was inferred using phylogenetic analysis and by assessing the HPV integration sites. Carcinogenesis was estimated by analyzing human gene expression profiles in different histological types. Among 42 cervical cancers with known HPV types, mixed histological types were detected in four cases, and three of them were HPV18-positive. Phylogenetic analysis of these three cases revealed that the different histological types had a common cell of origin. Moreover, the HPV-derived transcriptome and HPV integration sites were common among different histological types, suggesting that HPV integration could occur before differentiation into each histological type. Human gene expression profiles indicated that HPV18-positive cancer retained immunologically cold components with stem cell properties. Mixed cervical cancer has a common cellular origin among different histological types, and progenitor cells with stem-like properties may be associated with the development of HPV18-positive cervical cancer.

Human resources for administrative work to carry out a comprehensive genomic profiling test in Japan.

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests have been nationally reimbursed in Japan since June 2019 under strict restrictions, and over 46,000 patients have taken the test. Core Hospitals and Designated Hospitals host molecular tumor boards, which is more time-consuming than simply participating in them. We sent a questionnaire to government-designated Cancer Genomic Medicine Hospitals, including all 12 Core Hospitals, all 33 Designated Hospitals, and 117 of 188 Cooperative Hospitals. The questionnaire asked how much time physicians and nonphysicians spent on administrative work for cancer genomic medicine. For every CGP test, 7.6 h of administrative work was needed. Physicians spent 2.7 h/patient, while nonphysicians spent 4.9 h/patient. Time spent preparing for molecular tumor boards, called Expert Panels, was the longest, followed by time spent participating in Expert Panels. Assuming an hourly wage of ¥24,000/h for physicians and ¥2800/h for nonphysicians, mean labor cost was ¥78,071/patient. On a monthly basis, more time was spent on administrative work at Core Hospitals compared with Designated Hospitals and Cooperative Hospitals (385 vs. 166 vs. 51 h/month, respectively, p < 0.001). Consequently, labor cost per month was higher at Core Hospitals than at Designated Hospitals and Cooperative Hospitals (¥3,951,854 vs. ¥1,687,167 vs. ¥487,279/month, respectively, p < 0.001). Completing a CGP test for a cancer patient in Japan is associated with significant labor at each hospital, especially at Core Hospitals. Streamlining the exchange of information and simplifying Expert Panels will likely alleviate this burden.

Clinical utility of Todai OncoPanel in the setting of approved comprehensive cancer genomic profiling tests in Japan.

Comprehensive cancer genome profiling (CGP) has been nationally reimbursed in Japan since June 2019. Less than 10% of the patients have been reported to undergo recommended treatment. Todai OncoPanel (TOP) is a dual DNA-RNA panel as well as a paired tumor-normal matched test. Two hundred patients underwent TOP as part of Advanced Medical Care B with approval from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare between September 2018 and December 2019. Tests were carried out in patients with cancers without standard treatment or when patients had already undergone standard treatment. Data from DNA and RNA panels were analyzed in 198 and 191 patients, respectively. The percentage of patients who were given therapeutic or diagnostic recommendations was 61% (120/198). One hundred and four samples (53%) harbored gene alterations that were detected with the DNA panel and had potential treatment implications, and 14 samples (7%) had a high tumor mutational burden. Twenty-two samples (11.1%) harbored 30 fusion transcripts or MET exon 14 skipping that were detected by the RNA panel. Of those 30 transcripts, 6 had treatment implications and 4 had diagnostic implications. Thirteen patients (7%) were found to have pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants and genetic counseling was recommended. Overall, 12 patients (6%) received recommended treatment. In summary, patients benefited from both TOP DNA and RNA panels while following the same indication as the approved CGP tests. (UMIN000033647).

Prognostic relevance of HRDness gene expression signature in ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma; JGOG3025-TR2 study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the homologous recombination repair pathway deficiency (HRD) in ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). METHODS: In the ovarian cancer data from The Cancer Genome Atlas, we identified genes differentially expressed between tumours with and without HRD genomic scars and named these genes "HRDness signature". We performed SNP array, RNA sequencing, and methylation array analyses on 274 HGSC tumours for which targeted sequencing of 51 genes and clinical data were available to generate JGOG3025-TR2 dataset. The HRDness signature was tested on external datasets, including the JGOG3025-TR2 cohort, by computational scoring and machine-learning prediction. RESULTS: High scores and positive predictions of the HRDness signature were significantly associated with BRCA alterations, genomic scar scores, and better survival. On the other hand, among cases with high scores and/or positive predictions, those with BRCA1 methylation showed poorer survival. In the JGOG3025-TR2 cohort, HRD status was significantly associated with the use of olaparib after relapse and progression-free survival after its initiation. CONCLUSIONS: The HRDness gene expression signature is associated with a good prognosis, while BRCA1 methylation is associated with a poor prognosis. The newly generated JGOG3025-TR2 dataset will be useful in future HGSC studies.

CDK12 alterations and ARID1A mutations are predictors of poor prognosis and therapeutic targets in high-grade salivary gland carcinoma: analysis of the National Genomic Profiling Database.

BACKGROUND: Due to the diversity of histopathologic types in salivary gland carcinoma, genomic analysis of large cohorts with next-generation sequencing by histologic type has not been adequately performed. METHODS: We analysed data from 93 patients with salivary duct carcinoma and 243 patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling testing in the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database, a Japanese national genome profiling database. We visualised gene mutation profiles using the OncoPrinter platform. Fisher's exact test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test and Cox regression models were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: In salivary duct carcinoma, a population with CDK12 and ERBB2 co-amplification was detected in 20 of 37 (54.1%) patients with ERBB2 amplification. We identified five loss-of-function variants in genes related to homologous recombination deficiency, such as BRCA2 and CDK12. Cox survival analysis showed that CDK12 and ERBB2 co-amplification is associated with overall survival (hazard ratio, 3.597; P = 0.045). In salivary duct carcinoma, NOTCH1 mutations were the most common, followed by mutations in chromatin modification genes such as KMT2D, BCOR, KDM6A, ARID1A, EP300 and CREBBP. In the multivariate Cox analysis, activating NOTCH1 mutations (hazard ratio, 3.569; P = 0.009) and ARID1A mutations (hazard ratio, 4.029; P = 0.034) were significantly associated with overall survival. CONCLUSION: CDK12 and ERBB2 co-amplification is associated with a poor prognosis in salivary duct carcinoma. Chromatin remodelling genes are deeply involved in tumour progression in adenoid cystic carcinoma. One such gene, ARID1A, was an independent prognostic factor. In salivary duct carcinoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma, there might be minor populations with mutations that could be targeted for treatment with the synthetic lethality approach.

A case of refractory pelvic squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary that responded to nivolumab.

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a heterogeneous group of metastatic tumors with a usually unfavorable prognosis. A 33-year-old female was diagnosed with pelvic squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary. The tumor was p16-positive, suggesting that it was human papillomavirus (HPV)-related. The tumor progressed for 4 months after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (initial treatment) and was refractory to paclitaxel plus carboplatin (second-line therapy). Liquid-based cancer genomic profiling identified five pathogenic variants, including Neurofibromin1 (NF1) (p.T1690Mfs*5); however, due to the lack of domestic clinical trials, the patient could not receive genome-based molecular-target therapies. Simultaneously, nivolumab was administered to the patient post its approval in Japan for CUP. The tumor responded to nivolumab, accompanied by decreased levels of tumor markers. NF1 mutations and HPV-related carcinogenesis may be associated with a favorable response to nivolumab treatment. It may therefore serve as a potential treatment against cancers of unknown primaries.

Histone arginine methyltransferase CARM1 selective inhibitor TP-064 induces apoptosis in endometrial cancer.

Histone modification is the key epigenetic mechanism that regulates gene expression. Coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) is an arginine methyltransferase that catalyzes dimethylation of histone H3 (H3R17) at arginine 17. Lately, it has been suggested that CARM1 is associated with human carcinogenesis, and the CARM1-selective inhibitor, TP-064, has been shown to be a potential therapeutic agent for multiple myeloma. However, the physiological significance of CARM1 in endometrial cancer remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to explore the role of CARM1 and the effect of TP-064 in endometrial cancer. To this end, we analyzed CARM1 expression in endometrial cancer using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and examined the antitumor mechanism with CARM1 knockdown endometrial cancer cells. Moreover, we evaluated the therapeutic capability of TP-064 in endometrial cancer cells. CARM1 was remarkably overexpressed in 52 endometrial cancer tissues compared to normal endometrial tissues. The growth of CARM1 knockdown endometrial cancer cells was suppressed and CARM1 knockdown induced apoptosis. TP-064 also inhibited endometrial cancer cell growth and declined the number of endometrial cancer cell colonies. These data suggest that CARM1 may be a powerful therapeutic target for endometrial cancer.

Current status and issues related to secondary findings in the first public insurance covered tumor genomic profiling in Japan: multi-site questionnaire survey.

In June 2019, the Japanese National Health Insurance (NHI) system introduced coverage for two types of tumor genomic profiling (TGP): FoundationOneⓇ CDx (F1) and OncoGuide™ NCC OncoPanel System (NCCOP). TGP sometimes reveals germline variants that are potentially pathogenic as secondary findings (SFs). We conducted a questionnaire-based survey to find out the operational statuses of F1 and NCCOP at institutions where TGP was performed to elucidate issues related to SFs. Responses were received from 97 of 112 institutions (86.6%). As of May 31, 2020, 88 (90.7%) and 78 (80.4%) institutions started performing F1 and NCCOP, respectively. Since F1 only examines tumor samples, germline confirmatory testing is necessary to determine whether they are actually germline pathogenic variants (GPVs). When physicians are obtaining informed consent all but 2.3% of the patients requested SF disclosure. Conversely, when presumed germline pathogenic variants (PGPVs) were detected, 46.2% were not willing to receive confirmatory tests as they wanted to prioritize cancer treatment over SFs investigation, while only 23.3% underwent confirmatory tests. Problems in cancer genomic medicine reported by clinical genetics departments included short-staffing (n = 10), insufficient interdepartmental cooperation (n = 9), inconsistent understanding of genetics among healthcare professionals (n = 8), and low utilization rate of SFs due to lack of insurance coverage for confirmatory tests and post-test health checkups (n = 8). Solutions include; determining the appropriate timing to confirm patient intent on SF disclosure, covering confirmatory tests for PGPVs by the NHI, and establishing cooperation between the oncology and clinical genetics departments.

Tumor mutational burden measurement using comprehensive genomic profiling assay.

BACKGROUND: Tumors with a high number of mutations in the genome, or tumor mutational burden, are presumed to be more likely to respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, the optimal method to calculate tumor mutational burden using comprehensive genomic profiling assays is unknown. METHODS: Todai OncoPanel is a dual panel of a deoxyribonucleic acid panel and a ribonucleic acid panel. Todai OncoPanel deoxyribonucleic acid panel version 6 is an improvement over version 3 with increased number of targeted genes and limited targeting of intronic regions. We calculated tumor mutational burden measured by Todai OncoPanel deoxyribonucleic acid panel versions 3 and 6 using three different calculation methods: all mutations within the targeted region (target tumor mutational burden), all mutations within the coding region (all coding tumor mutational burden) and non-synonymous mutations (non-synonymous coding tumor mutational burden). We then compared them with whole exosome sequencing tumor mutational burden. In addition, 16 lung cancer patients whose samples were analyzed using Todai OncoPanel deoxyribonucleic acid version 3 were treated with anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 antibody monotherapy. RESULTS: When compared with whole exosome sequencing tumor mutational burden as the standard, tumor mutational burden measured by Todai OncoPanel deoxyribonucleic acid version 3 resulted in accuracy of 71% for all three calculation methods. In version 6, accuracy was 96% for target tumor mutational burden and all coding tumor mutational burden and 91% for non-synonymous coding tumor mutational burden. Patients with either partial response or stable disease had higher non-synonymous coding tumor mutational burden (6.7/Mb vs. 1.6/Mb, P = 0.02) and higher PD-L1 expression (40% vs. 3%, P = 0.01) and a trend toward higher target tumor mutational burden (9.2/Mb vs. 2.4/Mb, P = 0.09) compared with patients with progressive disease. CONCLUSIONS: Increase in targeted gene number and limiting intronic regions improved tumor mutational burden measurement by Todai OncoPanel when compared with whole exosome sequencing tumor mutational burden. Target tumor mutational burden may be the method of choice to measure tumor mutational burden.

Endometrial cancer with concomitant endometriosis is highly associated with ovarian endometrioid carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is assumed to be involved in ovarian cancer development, which is called endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC). Uterine endometrial cells may be the cell of origin of EAOC. Accumulated carcinogenic changes in the uterine endometrial cells may increase the risk of developing EAOC. To further understand the pathogenesis of EAOCs, we focused on the clinicopathological characteristics of EAOCs in endometrial cancer patients with concomitant endometriosis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 376 patients who were surgically treated for stage I-III endometrial cancer. Clinicopathological characteristics were compared between patients with and without endometriosis. Furthermore, the incidence of simultaneous endometrial and ovarian cancer (SEOC) and the histological characteristics of SEOC were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Among 376 patients with endometrial cancer, 51 had concomitant endometriosis. Patients with endometriosis were significantly younger and more frequently had endometrioid G1/G2 tumors than those without endometriosis. The incidence of SEOCs was significantly higher in endometrial cancer patients with endometriosis than those without it (p < 0.0001); notably, 12 of 51 endometrial cancer patients with endometriosis (24%) had SEOCs. All of the ovarian cancers in endometrial cancer patients with endometriosis were endometrioid carcinomas. Moreover, even in those without endometriosis, endometrioid carcinoma was the most common histological type of SEOC. CONCLUSION: We revealed that endometrial cancer patients with endometriosis had a high probability of SEOC and that endometrioid carcinoma was the most common histological subtype of SEOC regardless of the presence of endometriosis. For patients with endometrial cancer and endometriosis, careful examination of ovarian endometriotic lesions may be important to detect EAOCs.

Recurrent cervical cancer with PD-L1 amplification treated with nivolumab: A case enrolled in the BELIEVE trial.

Patients with cervical cancer benefiting from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are limited. Recently, PD-L1 amplification has been attracted attention as a reliable marker of ICIs. A 47-year-old woman with stage IIB cervical cancer experienced disease progression during postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer genomic profiling revealed that the tumor was microsatellite stable with PD-L1 amplification, therefore, nivolumab was administered by enrolling in the BELIEVE trial. Despite nivolumab treatment, remarkable disease progression was observed. At the beginning of nivolumab treatment, the patient already had multiple liver metastases with severe systemic inflammation as indicated by a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), both of which are negative predictive markers for ICI. Despite the presence of PD-L1 amplification, nivolumab was ineffective in cancer progression, which may be attributable to the presence of liver metastasis and high NLR. ICI is recommended to be administered at an early stage of cancer treatment to enhance its effectiveness.

Enhanced antitumor activity of combined lipid bubble ultrasound and anticancer drugs in gynecological cervical cancers.

Chemotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of patients with gynecological cancers. Delivering anticancer drugs effectively to tumor cells with just few side effects is key in cancer treatment. Lipid bubbles (LB) are compounds that increase the vascular permeability of the tumor under diagnostic ultrasound (US) exposure and enable the effective transport of drugs to tumor cells. The aim of our study was to establish a novel drug delivery technique for chemotherapy and to identify the most effective anticancer drugs for the bubble US-mediated drug delivery system (BUS-DDS) in gynecological cancer treatments. We constructed xenograft models using cervical cancer (HeLa) and uterine endometrial cancer (HEC1B) cell lines. Lipid bubbles were injected i.v., combined with either cisplatin (CDDP), pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), or bevacizumab, and US was applied to the tumor. We compared the enhanced chemotherapeutic effects of these drugs and determined the optimal drugs for BUS-DDS. Tumor volume reduction of HeLa and HEC1B xenografts following cisplatin treatment was significantly enhanced by BUS-DDS. Both CDDP and PLD significantly enhanced the antitumor effects of BUS-DDS in HeLa tumors; however, volume reduction by BUS-DDS was insignificant when combined with bevacizumab, a humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor mAb. The BUS-DDS did not cause any severe adverse events and significantly enhanced the antitumor effects of cytotoxic drugs. The effects of bevacizumab, which were not as dose-dependent as those of the two drugs used prior, were minimal. Our data suggest that BUS-DDS technology might help achieve "reinforced targeting" in the treatment of gynecological cancers.

Possible candidate population for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with advanced ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends and outcomes related to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) use for advanced ovarian cancer based on patient and tumor factors. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study queried the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program to examine women with stage III-IV high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma from 2010 to 2016. Propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to assess the age-, cancer stage-, and tumor extent-specific survival estimates related to NACT use. RESULTS: Utilization of NACT has significantly increased in older women (≥65 years; 48.4% relative increase), followed by stage IV disease (35.2% relative increase), and stage III disease (25.0% relative increase) (all, P-trend < 0.05). Women who received NACT had overall survival (OS) similar to those who had primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) in older women (hazard ratio [HR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-1.20, P = 0.284), stage IV disease (HR 0.96, 95%CI 0.84-1.10, P = 0.564), and more disease extent cases (T3/N1/M1, HR 1.06, 95%CI 0.84-1.32, P = 0.640). Moreover, NACT use was associated with decreased other cause mortality risk compared to PCS in the older women (sub-distribution HR 0.61, 95%CI 0.40-0.94, P = 0.025) and stage IV disease (sub-distribution HR 0.49, 95%CI 0.27-0.90, P = 0.021). In contrast, women who received NACT had decreased OS compared to those who had PCS in the younger group (HR 1.22, 95%CI 1.07-1.38, P = 0.004), stage III disease (HR 1.26, 95%CI 1.13-1.41, P < 0.001), and lesser disease extent cases (T3/N0/M0, HR 1.38, 95%CI 1.20-1.58, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that survival effect of NACT for advanced ovarian cancer may differ based on patient and tumor factors. In older women, stage IV disease, and greater disease extent, NACT was associated with similar OS compared to PCS.