EPR and ENDOR Investigation of Rhodosemiquinone in Bacterial Reaction Centers Formed by B-Branch Electron Transfer.

In photosynthetic bacteria, light-induced electron transfer takes place in a protein called the reaction center (RC) leading to the reduction of a bound ubiquinone molecule, Q(B), coupled with proton binding from solution. We used electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and electron-nuclear double resonance (ENDOR) to study the magnetic properties of the protonated semiquinone, an intermediate proposed to play a role in proton coupled electron transfer to Q(B). To stabilize the protonated semiquinone state, we used a ubiquinone derivative, rhodoquinone, which as a semiquinone is more easily protonated than ubisemiquinone. To reduce this low-potential quinone we used mutant RCs modified to directly reduce the quinone in the Q(B) site via B-branch electron transfer (Paddock et al. in Biochemistry 44:6920-6928, 2005). EPR and ENDOR signals were observed upon illumination of mutant RCs in the presence of rhodoquinone. The EPR signals had g values characteristic of rhodosemiquinone (g(x) = 2.0057, g(y) = 2.0048, g(z) ∼ 2.0018) at pH 9.5 and were changed at pH 4.5. The ENDOR spectrum showed couplings due to solvent exchangeable protons typical of hydrogen bonds similar to, but different from, those found for ubisemiquinone. This approach should be useful in future magnetic resonance studies of the protonated semiquinone.

Light induced EPR spectra of reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides at 80K: Evidence for reduction of Q(B) by B-branch electron transfer in native reaction centers.

Photosynthetic reaction centers (RCs) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides capture solar energy by electron transfer from primary donor, D, to quinone acceptor, Q(B,) through the active A-branch of electron acceptors, but not the inactive B-branch. The light induced EPR spectrum from native RCs that had Fe(2+) replaced by Zn(2+) was investigated at cryogenic temperature (80K, 35 GHz). In addition to the light induced signal due to formation of D(+•)Q(A) (-•) observed previously, a small fraction (~5%) of the signal displayed very different characteristics: (1) The signal was absent in RCs in which the Q(B) was displaced by the inhibitor stigmatellin. (2) Its decay time (τ=6 s) was the same as observed for D(+•)Q(B) (-•) in mutant RCs lacking Q(A,) which is significantly slower than for D(+•)Q(A) (-•) (τ=30 ms). (3) Its EPR spectrum was identical to that of D(+•)Q(B) (-•). (4) The quantum efficiency for forming the major component of the signal was the same as that found for mutant RCs lacking Q(A) (Φ =0.2%) and was temperature independent. These results are explained by direct photochemical reduction of Q(B)via B-branch electron transfer in a small fraction of native RCs.

Electron transfer in reaction centers of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. II. Free energy and kinetic relations between the acceptor states Q(-)A Q(-)B and QAQ(2-)B.

Thermodynamic equilibria and electron transfer kinetics involving the quinone acceptor complex in reaction centers from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides were investigated. We focussed on reactions involving the two-electron states QA Qn and QAQ~-, described by the scheme DQAQa~-D +X,~~A- , ~~a- ~k~ .~D+ "r~~ AK~'La2- - k~2~ k~lk O~ (2)D+~D The equilibrium partitioning between QA Q n and QAQ 2n- was determined spectroscopically from either the concentration of oxidized cytochrome c or the concentration of semiquinone after successive flashes of light.At pH < 9.5, QAQ2n - is stabilized relative to QAQn, while for pH > 9.5, QAQB is energetically favored.The reduction of QA, to form QAQ~, is not associated with a protonation step (pK< 8). However, the reduction of Q~, to form the final state QAQ~-, is accompanied by an uptake of a proton (pK >/10.7). The preferential interaction of a proton with QAQ2n - provides the driving force for the forward electron transfer.The shift toward the photochemically inactive state QAQa with increasing pH may serve as a feedback mechanism in photosynthetic organisms to limit the rise in intracellular pH. The electron-transfer rate constants were determined from the observed kinetics and the equilibria between the states QAQ2n - and QA Q n. The forward rate constant z-.A~2n~ was approximately proportional to the proton concentration, whereas kta2A~ depended only weakly on pH. The recombination kinetics of D +QAQ2n- was biphasic. The slow rate agreed with the predicted charge recombination via the intermediate state D +QAQff; the fast rate may be due to the recombination from a separate (conformational) state. The results of this work were combined with those of a previous study on reactions involving the one-electron precursor states QAQa and QAQn(Kleinfeld, D., Okamura, M.Y., and Feher, G. (1984) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 766, 126-140). The overall sequence for the protonation of the reaction center in response to successive reductions of the accept or complex involves the uptake of one proton for each electron transferred to QB- This sequential uptake initiates the formation of a proton gradient across the cell membrane.

Spectroscopic and kinetic properties of the transient intermediate acceptor in reaction centers of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides.

The photoreductive trapping of the transient, intermediate acceptor, I-, in purified reaction centers of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides R-26 was investigated for different external conditions. The optical spectrum of I- was found to be similar to that reported for other systems by Shuvalov and Klimov ((1976) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 400, 587--599) and Tiede et al. (P.M. Tiede, R.C. Prince, G.H. Reed and P.L. Dutton (1976) FEBS Lett. 65, 301--304). The optical changes of I- showed characteristics of both bacteriopheophytin (e.g. bleaching at 762, 542 nm and red shift at 400 nm) and bacteriochlorophyll (bleaching at 802 and 590 nm). Two types of EPR signals of I- were observed: one was a narrow singlet at g = 2.0035, deltaH = 13.5 G, the other a doublet with a splitting of 60 G centered around g = 2.00, which was only seen after short illumination times in reaction centers reconstituted with menaquinone. The optical and EPR kinetics of I- on illumination in the presence of reduced cytochrome c and dithionite strongly support the following three-step scheme in which the doublet EPR signal is due to the unstable state DI-Q-Fe2+ and the singlet EPR signal is due to DI-Q2-Fe2+. : formula: (see text), where D is the primary donor (BChl)2+. The above model was supported by the following observations: (1) During the first illumination, sigmoidal kinetics of the formation of I- was observed. This is a direct consequence of the three-sequential reactions. (2) During the second and subsequent illuminations first-order (exponential) kinetics were observed for the formation of I-. This is due to the dark decay, k4, to the state DIQ2-Fe2+ formed after the first illumination. (3) Removal of the quinone resulted in first-order kinetics. In this case, only the first step, k1, is operative. (4) The observation of the doublet signal in reaction centers containing menaquinone but not ubiquinone is explained by the longer lifetime of the doublet species I-(Q-Fe2%) in reaction centers containing menaquinone. The value of tau2 was determined from kinetic measurements to be 0.01 s for ubiquinone and 4 s for menaquinone (T = 20 degrees C). The temperature and pH dependence of the dark electron transfer reaction I-(Q-Fe2+) yields I(Q2-Fe2+) was studied in detail. The activation energy for this process was found to be 0.42 eV for reaction centers containing ubiquinone and 0.67 eV for reaction centers with menaquinone. The activation energy and the doublet splitting were used to calculate the rate of electron transfer from I- to MQ-Fe2+ using Hopfield's theory for thermally activated electron tunneling. The calculated rate agrees well with the experimentally determined rate which provides support for electron tunneling as the mechanism for electron transfer in this reaction. Using the EPR doublet splitting and the activation energy for electron transfer, the tunneling matrix element was calculated to be 10(-3) eV. From this value the distance between I- and MQ- was estimated to be 7.5--10 A.

Electron transfer in reaction centers of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. I. Determination of the charge recombination pathway of D+QAQ(-)B and free energy and kinetic relations between Q(-)AQB and QAQ(-)B.

The electron-transfer reactions and thermodynamic equilibria involving the quinone acceptor complex in bacterial reaction centers from R. sphaeroides were investigated. The reactions are described by the scheme: (Formula: see text). We found that the charge recombination pathway of D+QAQ(-)B proceeds via the intermediate state D+Q(-)AQB, the direct pathway contributing less than approx. 5% to the observed recombination rate. The method used to obtain this result was based on a comparison of the kinetics predicted for the indirect pathway (given by the product kAD-times the fraction of reaction centers in the Q-AQB state) with the observed recombination rate, kobsD+----D. The kinetic measurements were used to obtain the pH dependence (6.1 smaller than or equal to pH smaller than or equal to 11.7) of the free energy difference between the states Q(-)AQB and QAQ(-)B. At low pH (less than 9) QAQ(-)B is stabilized relative to Q(-)AQB by 67 meV, whereas at high pH Q(-)AQB is energetically favored. Both Q(-)A and Q(-)B associate with a proton, with pK values of 9.8 and 11.3, respectively. The stronger interaction of the proton with Q(-)B provides the driving force for the forward electron transfer.

Light-induced proton uptake by photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26.1. II. Protonation of the state DQAQB2-.

Proton uptake associated with the two-electron reduction of QB was investigated in reaction centers (RCs) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26.1 using pH-sensitive dyes. An uptake of two protons was observed at pH < or = 7.5, consistent with the formation of the dihydroquinone QBH2. At higher pH, the proton uptake decreased with an apparent pKa of approx. 8.5, i.e., to 1.5 H+/2 e- at pH 8.5. A molecular model is presented in which the apparent pKa is due to the protonation of either the carbonyl oxygen on QB or of an amino acid residue near QB (e.g., His-L190). Experimental evidence in favor of the protonation of the oxygen is discussed. The kinetics of the electron transfer from QA-QB- to QAQB2- and the associated proton uptake were compared at several pH values and temperatures. At pH 8.5 (21.5 degrees C) the rate constants for the proton uptake and electron transfer are the same within the precision of the measurement. At lower pH, the proton uptake rate constant is smaller than that for electron transfer. The difference between the rate constants is temperature dependent, i.e., it varies from 12 +/- 4% at 21.5 degrees C (pH 7.5) to 28 +/- 4% at 4.0 degrees C (pH 7.5). We show that the kinetics can be explained by a previously proposed model (Paddock, M. L., McPherson, P. H., Feher, G. and Okamura, M. Y. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 6803-6807) in which the uptake of two protons by doubly reduced QB occurs sequentially, one concomitant with and the other after electron transfer.

Damping of oscillations in the semiquinone absorption in reaction centers after successive flashes determination of the equilibrium between Q(-)AQB and QAQ(-)B.

A quantitative model for the damping of oscillations of the semiquinone absorption after successive light flashes is presented. It is based on the equilibrium between the states Q(A)-Q(B) and Q(A) Q(-B). A fit of the model to the experimental results obtained for reaction centers from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides gave a value of α = [Q(A)-Q(B)I/(IQ(A)-Q(Bl)+ [Q(A)Q(-B)I) = 0.065 +/- 0.005 (T= 21°C, pH 8).

Light-induced electrogenic events associated with proton uptake upon forming QB- in bacterial wild-type and mutant reaction centers.

Light-induced voltage changes (electrogenic events) were measured in wild-type and site-directed mutants of reaction centers (RCs) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides oriented in a lipid monolayer adsorbed to a Teflon film. A rapid increase in voltage associated with charge separation was followed by a slower increase attributed to proton transfer from solution to protonatable amino-acid residues in the vicinity of the QB site. In native reaction centers the proton-transfer voltage had a pH-dependent amplitude with two peaks at pH 4.5 and pH 9.7, respectively. In the Glu-L212-->Gln RCs the high-pH peak was absent, whereas in the Asp-L213-->Asn RCs the low-pH peak was absent and the high-pH peak was shifted to lower pH by about 1.3 pH units. The amplitudes of the electrogenic phases as a function of pH follow approximately the measured proton uptake from solution (P.H. McPherson, M.Y. Okamura, G. Feher, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, vol. 934, 1988, pp. 348-368) and are ascribed to proton transfer to amino acid residues upon QB- formation. The peak around pH 9.7 is ascribed to proton uptake predominantly by Glu-L212 and the peak around pH 4.5 to proton uptake predominantly by Asp-L213 or a residue strongly interacting with Asp-L213.

Proton and electron transfer in bacterial reaction centers.

The bacterial reaction center couples light-induced electron transfer to proton pumping across the membrane by reactions of a quinone molecule Q(B) that binds two electrons and two protons at the active site. This article reviews recent experimental work on the mechanism of the proton-coupled electron transfer and the pathways for proton transfer to the Q(B) site. The mechanism of the first electron transfer, k((1))(AB), Q(-)(A)Q(B)-->Q(A)Q(-)(B), was shown to be rate limited by conformational gating. The mechanism of the second electron transfer, k((2))(AB), was shown to involve rapid reversible proton transfer to the semiquinone followed by rate-limiting electron transfer, H(+)+Q(-)(A)Q(-)(B) ifQ(-)(A)Q(B)H-->Q(A)(Q(B)H)(-). The pathways for transfer of the first and second protons were elucidated by high-resolution X-ray crystallography as well as kinetic studies showing changes in the rate of proton transfer due to site directed mutations and metal ion binding.

ENDOR studies of the intermediate electron acceptor radical anion I-. in Photosystem II reaction centers.

The EPR and ENDOR characteristics of the intermediate electron acceptor radical anion I-. in Photosystem II (PS II) are shown to be identical in membrane particles and in the D1D2 cytochrome b-559 complex (Nanba, O. and Satoh, K. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 109-112). These findings provide further evidence that the D1D2 complex is the reaction center of PS II and show that the pheophytin binding site is intact. A hydrogen bond between I-. and the protein (GLU D1-130) is postulated on the basis of D2O exchange experiments. The ENDOR data of I-. and of the pheophytin a radical anion in different organic solvents are compared and the observed differences are related to structural changes of the molecule on the basis of molecular orbital calculations (RHF-INDO/SP). The importance of the orientation of the vinyl group (attached to ring I) on electron transfer is discussed.

Electron nuclear double resonance of semiquinones in reaction centers of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides.

Replacement of Fe2+ by Zn2+ in reaction centers of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides enabled us to perform ENDOR (electron nuclear double resonance) experiments on the anion radicals of the primary and secondary ubiquinone acceptors (QA- and QB-. Differences between the QA and QB sites, hydrogen bonding to the oxygens, interactions with the protons of the proteins and some symmetry properties of the binding sites were deduced from an analysis of the ENDOR spectra.

Proton transfer pathways and mechanism in bacterial reaction centers.

The focus of this minireview is to discuss the state of knowledge of the pathways and rates of proton transfer in the bacterial reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Protons involved in the light driven catalytic reduction of a quinone molecule QB to quinol QBH2 travel from the aqueous solution through well defined proton transfer pathways to the oxygen atoms of the quinone. Three main topics are discussed: (1) the pathways for proton transfer involving the residues: His-H126, His-H128, Asp-L210, Asp-M17, Asp-L213, Ser-L223 and Glu-L212, which were determined by a variety of methods including the use of proton uptake inhibiting metal ions (e.g. Zn2+ and Cd2+); (2) the rate constants for proton transfer, obtained from a 'chemical rescue' study was determined to be 2 x 10(5) s(-1) and 2 x 10(4) s(-1) for the proton uptake to Glu-L212 and QB-*, respectively; (3) structural studies of altered proton transfer pathways in revertant RCs that lack the key amino acid Asp-L213 show a series of structural changes that propagate toward L213 potentially allowing Glu-H173 to participate in the proton transfer processes.

ENDOR spectroscopy reveals light induced movement of the H-bond from Ser-L223 upon forming the semiquinone (Q(B)(-)(*)) in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Proton ENDOR spectroscopy was used to monitor local conformational changes in bacterial reaction centers (RC) associated with the electron-transfer reaction DQB --> D+*QB-* using mutant RCs capable of photoreducing QB at cryogenic temperatures. The charge separated state D+*QB-* was studied in mutant RCs formed by either (i) illuminating at low temperature (77 K) a sample frozen in the dark (ground state protein conformation) or (ii) illuminating at room temperature prior to and during freezing (charge separated state protein conformation). The charge recombination rates from the two states differed greatly (>10(6) fold) as shown previously, indicating a structural change (Paddock et al. (2006) Biochemistry 45, 14032-14042). ENDOR spectra of QB-* from both samples (35 GHz, 77 K) showed several H-bond hyperfine couplings that were similar to those for QB-* in native RCs indicating that in all RCs, QB-* was located at the proximal position near the metal site. In contrast, one set of hyperfine couplings were not observed in the dark frozen samples but were observed only in samples frozen under illumination in which the protein can relax prior to freezing. This flexible H-bond was assigned to an interaction between the Ser-L223 hydroxyl and QB-* on the basis of its absence in Ser L223 --> Ala mutant RCs. Thus, part of the protein relaxation, in response to light induced charge separation, involves the formation of an H-bond between the OH group of Ser-L223 and the anionic semiquinone QB-*. These results show the flexibility of the Ser-L223 H-bond, which is essential for its function in proton transfer to reduced QB.

Trapped conformational states of semiquinone (D+*QB-*) formed by B-branch electron transfer at low temperature in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers.

The reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides captures light energy by electron transfer between quinones QA and QB, involving a conformational gating step. In this work, conformational states of D+*QB-* were trapped (80 K) and studied using EPR spectroscopy in native and mutant RCs that lack QA in which QB was reduced by the bacteriopheophytin along the B-branch. In mutant RCs frozen in the dark, a light induced EPR signal due to D+*QB-* formed in 30% of the sample with low quantum yield (0.2%-20%) and decayed in 6 s. A small signal with similar characteristics was also observed in native RCs. In contrast, the EPR signal due to D+*QB-* in mutant RCs illuminated while freezing formed in approximately 95% of the sample did not decay (tau >107 s) at 80 K (also observed in the native RC). In all samples, the observed g-values were the same (g = 2.0026), indicating that all active QB-*'s were located in a proximal conformation coupled with the nonheme Fe2+. We propose that before electron transfer at 80 K, the majority (approximately 70%) of QB, structurally located in the distal site, was not stably reducible, whereas the minority (approximately 30%) of active configurations was in the proximal site. The large difference in the lifetimes of the unrelaxed and relaxed D+*QB-* states is attributed to the relaxation of protein residues and internal water molecules that stabilize D+*QB-*. These results demonstrate energetically significant conformational changes involved in stabilizing the D+*QB-* state. The unrelaxed and relaxed states can be considered to be the initial and final states along the reaction coordinate for conformationally gated electron transfer.

Interactions between cytochrome c2 and the photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides: the cation-pi interaction.

The cation-pi interaction between positively charged and aromatic groups is a common feature of many proteins and protein complexes. The structure of the complex between cytochrome c(2) (cyt c(2)) and the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides exhibits a cation-pi complex formed between Arg-C32 on cyt c(2) and Tyr-M295 on the RC [Axelrod, H. L., et al. (2002) J. Mol. Biol. 319, 501-515]. The importance of the cation-pi interaction for binding and electron transfer was studied by mutating Tyr-M295 and Arg-C32. The first- and second-order rates for electron transfer were not affected by mutating Tyr-M295 to Ala, indicating that the cation-pi complex does not greatly affect the association process or structure of the state active in electron transfer. The dissociation constant K(D) showed a greater increase when Try-M295 was replaced with nonaromatic Ala (3-fold) as opposed to aromatic Phe (1.2-fold), which is characteristic of a cation-pi interaction. Replacement of Arg-C32 with Ala increased K(D) (80-fold) largely due to removal of electrostatic interactions with negatively charged residues on the RC. Replacement with Lys increased K(D) (6-fold), indicating that Lys does not form a cation-pi complex. This specificity for Arg may be due to a solvation effect. Double mutant analysis indicates an interaction energy between Tyr-M295 and Arg-C32 of approximately -24 meV (-0.6 kcal/mol). This energy is surprisingly small considering the widespread occurrence of cation-pi complexes and may be due to the tradeoff between the favorable cation-pi binding energy and the unfavorable desolvation energy needed to bury Arg-C32 in the short-range contact region between the two proteins.

Quinone (QB) reduction by B-branch electron transfer in mutant bacterial reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides: quantum efficiency and X-ray structure.

The photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from purple bacteria converts light into chemical energy. Although the RC shows two nearly structurally symmetric branches, A and B, light-induced electron transfer in the native RC occurs almost exclusively along the A-branch to a primary quinone electron acceptor Q(A). Subsequent electron and proton transfer to a mobile quinone molecule Q(B) converts it to a quinol, Q(B)H(2). We report the construction and characterization of a series of mutants in Rhodobacter sphaeroides designed to reduce Q(B) via the B-branch. The quantum efficiency to Q(B) via the B-branch Phi(B) ranged from 0.4% in an RC containing the single mutation Ala-M260 --> Trp to 5% in a quintuple mutant which includes in addition three mutations to inhibit transfer along the A-branch (Gly-M203 --> Asp, Tyr-M210 --> Phe, Leu-M214 --> His) and one to promote transfer along the B-branch (Phe-L181 --> Tyr). Comparing the value of 0.4% for Phi(B) obtained in the AW(M260) mutant, which lacks Q(A), to the 100% quantum efficiency for Phi(A) along the A-branch in the native RC, we obtain a ratio for A-branch to B-branch electron transfer of 250:1. We determined the structure of the most effective (quintuple) mutant RC at 2.25 A (R-factor = 19.6%). The Q(A) site did not contain a quinone but was occupied by the side chain of Trp-M260 and a Cl(-). In this structure a nonfunctional quinone was found to occupy a new site near M258 and M268. The implications of this work to trap intermediate states are discussed.

Isotope effect on electron transfer in reaction centers from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides.

Previous ENDOR studies on reaction centers from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides have shown the presence of two hydrogen-bonded protons associated with the primary, ubiquinone, acceptor Q(A). These protons exchange with deuterons from solvent (2)H(2)O. The effect of this deuterium substitution on the charge-recombination kinetics (BChl)(2) (+)Q(A) (-) --> (BChl)(2)Q(A) has been studied with a sensitive kinetic difference technique. The electron-transfer rate was found to increase with deuterium exchange up to a maximum Deltak/k of 5.7 +/- 0.3%. The change in rate was found to have an exchange time of 2 hr, which matched the disappearance of the ENDOR lines due to the exchangeable protons. These results indicate that these protons play a role in the vibronic coupling associated with electron transfer. A simple model for the isotope effect on electron transfer predicts a maximum rate increase of 20%, which is consistent with the experimental results.

Proton transfer in reaction centers from photosynthetic bacteria.

Proton transfer in the bacterial RC associated with the reduction of the bound QB to the dihydroquinone is an important step in the energetics of photosynthetic bacteria. The binding of two protons by the quinone is associated with the transfer of the second electron to QB at a rate of ca. 10(3) s-1 (pH 7). Mutation of three protonatable residues, GluL212, SerL223, and AspL213, located near QB to nonprotonatable residues (Gln, Ala, and Asn, respectively) resulted in large reductions (by 2 to 3 orders of magnitude) in the rate or proton transfer to QB. These mutations can be grouped into two classes: those that blocked both proton transfer and electron transfer (SerL223, and AspL213) and those that blocked only proton transfer (GluL212). These results were interpreted in terms of a pathway for proton transport in which uptake of the first proton, required for the transfer of the second electron, occurs through a pathway involving AspL213 and SerL223. Uptake of the second proton, which follows electron transfer, occurs through a pathway involving GluL212 and possibly AspL213. Acidic residues near QB affect electron transfer rates via electrostatic interactions. One residue, with a pKa of ca. 10 interacting strongly with the charge on QB (delta pKa greater than 2), was shown to be GluL212. A second residue with a pKa of ca. 6, which interacts more weakly with the charge on QB (delta pK approximately 1), could be either AspL210 or AspL213. Several possible mechanisms for proton transfer are consistent with the observed experimental results and proposed proton pathways. These involve proton transfers from individual amino acid residues or internal water molecules either as single steps or in a concerted fashion. The determination of the dominant mechanism will require evaluation of the energetics of the various steps.