A community health worker and mobile health app intervention to improve adherence to HIV medication among persons with HIV: the CHAMPS study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Persons with HIV (PWH) can now achieve a near-normal life expectancy due to antiretroviral therapy (ART). Despite widespread availability of ART in the United States (US), many of the country's approximate 1.1 million PWH are not achieving viral suppression due to poor ART adherence. Viral suppression rates are particularly low in Alabama (AL, 62%) and New York City (NYC, 67%). There is mixed evidence on the efficacy of community health workers (CHW) and mHealth interventions for improving ART adherence and viral suppression in PWH thus, we sought to combine these interventions and test the efficacy for improving health outcomes in PWH. METHODS: The CHAMPS study is a two-arm randomized controlled trial among 300 PWH with suboptimal primary care appointment adherence (n = 150 in AL and 150 in NYC) over the course of 12 months. Participants are randomly assigned to CHAMPS (intervention) or a standard-of-care (control) arm. Participants in the intervention arm are given a CleverCap pill bottle that syncs to the WiseApp to track medication adherence, reminds users to take their medication at a set time, and enables communication with CHW. All participants complete baseline, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up visits where surveys are administered and, CD4 and HIV-1 viral load are obtained through blood draw. DISCUSSION: Maintaining ART adherence has significant implications in HIV management and transmission. mHealth technologies have been shown to optimize the provision of health services, produce positive changes in health behavior, and significantly improve health outcomes. CHW interventions also provide personal support to PWH. The combination of these strategies may provide the necessary intensity to increase ART adherence and clinic attendance among PWH at highest risk for low engagement. Delivering care remotely enables CHW to contact, assess, and support numerous participants throughout the day, reducing burden on CHW and potentially improving intervention durability for PWH. The adoption of the WiseApp coupled with community health worker sessions in the CHAMPS study has the potential to improve HIV health outcomes, and will add to the growing knowledge of mHealth and CHW efforts to improve PWH medication adherence and viral suppression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04562649) on 9/24/20.

Remdesivir for Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Versus a Cohort Receiving Standard of Care.

BACKGROUND: We compared the efficacy of the antiviral agent, remdesivir, versus standard-of-care treatment in adults with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using data from a phase 3 remdesivir trial and a retrospective cohort of patients with severe COVID-19 treated with standard of care. METHODS: GS-US-540-5773 is an ongoing phase 3, randomized, open-label trial comparing two courses of remdesivir (remdesivir-cohort). GS-US-540-5807 is an ongoing real-world, retrospective cohort study of clinical outcomes in patients receiving standard-of-care treatment (non-remdesivir-cohort). Inclusion criteria were similar between studies: patients had confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, were hospitalized, had oxygen saturation ≤94% on room air or required supplemental oxygen, and had pulmonary infiltrates. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighted multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the treatment effect of remdesivir versus standard of care. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with recovery on day 14, dichotomized from a 7-point clinical status ordinal scale. A key secondary endpoint was mortality. RESULTS: After the inverse probability of treatment weighting procedure, 312 and 818 patients were counted in the remdesivir- and non-remdesivir-cohorts, respectively. At day 14, 74.4% of patients in the remdesivir-cohort had recovered versus 59.0% in the non-remdesivir-cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.03: 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34-3.08, P < .001). At day 14, 7.6% of patients in the remdesivir-cohort had died versus 12.5% in the non-remdesivir-cohort (aOR 0.38, 95% CI: .22-.68, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: In this comparative analysis, by day 14, remdesivir was associated with significantly greater recovery and 62% reduced odds of death versus standard-of-care treatment in patients with severe COVID-19. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04292899 and EUPAS34303.

Survey of HIV care providers on management of HIV serodiscordant couples - assessment of attitudes, knowledge, and practices.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) serodiscordant couples are at risk of sexual transmission of HIV between the infected and uninfected partner. We assessed New York area care providers for people living with HIV regarding attitudes, knowledge, and practice patterns toward fertility and conception in serodiscordant couples. Data were collected via a survey distributed in October 2013. Seventeen percent of respondents reported prescribing antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for a woman in a serodiscordant couple, and 38% percent of respondents reported having counseled serodiscordant couples on timed, unprotected intercourse without PrEP. Respondents who reported being "very" familiar with the data on HIV transmission in serodiscordant couples were more likely to report counseling their patients in timed, unprotected intercourse compared with those who reported less familiarity with the data (41% vs. 8%, p = 0.001). Although only 20% reported being "very" or "somewhat" familiar with the data on the safety of sperm washing with intrauterine insemination, those who did were more likely to have reported referring a patient for assisted reproductive technology (61% vs. 32%, p = 0.006). Effective patient counseling and referral for appropriate reproductive options were associated with knowledge of the literature pertaining to these options. This emphasizes the need for further provider education on reproductive options and appropriate counseling for serodiscordant couples.

Remdesivir Versus Standard-of-Care for Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection: An Analysis of 28-Day Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Remdesivir is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and has been shown to shorten time to recovery and improve clinical outcomes in randomized trials. METHODS: This was the final day 28 comparative analysis of data from a phase 3, randomized, open-label study comparing 2 remdesivir regimens (5 vs 10 days, combined for this analysis [remdesivir cohort]) and a real-world retrospective longitudinal cohort study of patients receiving standard-of-care treatment (nonremdesivir cohort). Eligible patients, aged ≥18 years, had confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), oxygen saturation ≤94% on room air or required supplemental oxygen, with pulmonary infiltrates. Propensity score matching (up to 1:10 ratio) was used to ensure comparable populations. We assessed day 14 clinical recovery (determined using a 7-point ordinal scale) and day 28 all-cause mortality (coprimary endpoints). RESULTS: A total of 368 (remdesivir) and 1399 (nonremdesivir) patients were included in the matched analysis. The day 14 clinical recovery rate was significantly higher among the remdesivir versus the nonremdesivir cohort (65.2% vs 57.1%; odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.90; P = 0.002). The day 28 mortality rate was significantly lower in the remdesivir cohort versus the nonremdesivir cohort (12.0% vs 16.2%; OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-.95; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Remdesivir was associated with significantly higher rates of day 14 clinical recovery, and lower day 28 mortality, compared with standard-of-care treatment in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. These data, taken together, support the use of remdesivir to improve clinical recovery and decrease mortality from SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Users in New York City.

Incidence of HIV infection remains high in New York City and, while considerable attention has been paid to the scale-up of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) plays an important role in the HIV prevention continuum. We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical and demographic characteristics of individuals receiving HIV post-exposure prophylaxis at a large academic medical center in northern Manhattan. Post-exposure prophylaxis users were predominantly Latinx (52.8%) and/or African American (33.7%) men who have sex with men (72%), representing the underserved groups at highest risk of HIV infection. Many individuals (20%) requiring PEP presented to their clinician seeking initiation of PrEP. Frequent PEP users may be good candidates for PrEP but psychosocial barriers such as home environment and recreational drug use must be addressed for successful transitions. Patient counseling for at-risk groups should involve both PEP and PrEP screening and must be sensitized to the needs and cultures of the communities they serve.

CROI 2016: Advances in Antiretroviral Therapy.

The 2016 Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections highlighted exciting advances in antiretroviral therapy, including important data on investigational antiretroviral drugs and clinical trials. Clinical trials demonstrated benefits from a long-acting injectable coformulation given as maintenance therapy, examined intravenous and subcutaneous administration of a monoclonal antibody directed at the CD4 binding site of HIV-1, and provided novel data on tenofovir alafenamide. Several studies focused on the role of HIV drug resistance, including the significance of minority variants, transmitted drug resistance, use of resistance testing, and drug class-related resistance. Novel data on the HIV care continuum in low- and middle-income settings concentrated on differentiated HIV care delivery models and outcomes. Data on progress toward reaching World Health Organization 90-90-90 targets as well as outcomes related to expedited initiation of HIV treatment and adherence strategies were presented. Results from a trial in Malawi showed reduced rates of mother-to-child transmission among HIV-infected women who initiated antiretroviral therapy prior to pregnancy, and several studies highlighted the effect of antiretroviral therapy in pediatric populations. A special session was dedicated to the findings of studies of Ebola virus disease and treatment during the outbreak in West Africa.

CROI 2015: Advances in Antiretroviral Therapy.

The 2015 Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections included new and exciting advances in the realm of antiretroviral therapy. The Temprano trial demonstrated benefits from early antiretroviral therapy and isoniazid preventive therapy. Important data on investigational antiretroviral drugs were presented, including tenofovir alafenamide fumarate and BMS-955176, an HIV-1 maturation inhibitor. Novel data on the HIV care continuum from resource-rich and -limited settings highlighted persistent sex- and race-related disparities in care engagement, and the crucial need to bring HIV testing and care into the community to improve engagement across the care continuum. Life expectancy data from resource-limited settings reveal dramatic improvements across sub-Saharan Africa, although people with HIV still live 5 years to 10 years less than those without HIV, and new cost-effectiveness research revealed that the price of antiretroviral therapy itself remains a key driver of cost and cost-effectiveness calculations. Results from the PROMISE trial showed reduced rates of mother-to-child transmission among women who received antiretroviral therapy with 3 drugs compared with women who received zidovudine monotherapy, supporting current World Health Organization guidelines.

The anti-HIV activity of entecavir: a multicentre evaluation of lamivudine-experienced and lamivudine-naive patients.

BACKGROUND: Entecavir, an antiviral with potent anti-hepatitis B virus activity, was recently shown to have anti-HIV activity in three patients and the ability to select for the lamivudine-resistant HIV polymerase mutation M184V in a patient with prior antiretroviral therapy. OBJECTIVES: To further characterize entecavir's anti-HIV activity and identify risk factors for selection of the M184V. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We evaluated the virological characteristics of HIV and hepatitis B virus in 17 HIV-hepatitis B virus coinfected patients (10 antiretroviral therapy-naive and seven antiretroviral therapy-experienced) prior to and during entecavir monotherapy. Descriptive statistics were used to assess changes in HIV RNA and hepatitis B virus DNA. Variables associated with development of the M184V were determined by univariate analysis. RESULTS: Of the 17 patients, 13 (76%) demonstrated a reduction in HIV RNA by at least 0.5 log10 copies/ml. Of the remaining four patients, two had the M184V detected prior to entecavir therapy and the other two had wild-type HIV. The median reduction in HIV RNA for the cohort was 1.2 log10 copies/ml, which was similar in antiretroviral therapy-naive and antiretroviral therapy-experienced patients. The M184V mutation emerged in six patients receiving entecavir, including three antiretroviral therapy-naive patients. No other HIV mutations were consistently detected. Risk factors for the emergence of the M184V mutation were a decline in hepatitis B virus DNA (P = 0.04) and duration of entecavir use (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Entecavir monotherapy in HIV-hepatitis B virus coinfected patients, including antiretroviral therapy-naive patients, has significant anti-HIV activity and can result in the development of the M184V variant. Entecavir should not be used in such co-infected patients without concomitant antiretroviral therapy.