Mortality rate in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with frontline second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a retrospective analysis by the monitoring registries of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA).

The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has improved the overall survival of chronic myeloid leukemia patients in chronic phase (CP-CML) and reduced the rate of disease-related mortality. Conflicting results have been however reported between data emerged from sponsored clinical trials and from population-based registries. Moreover, no data are so far available for patients treated with frontline second-generation TKIs, excluding those from sponsored studies. We analyzed the mortality rate of 2315 CP-CML patients treated with frontline second-generation TKIs through the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) registries and compared it with the ISTAT mortality rate of the general population. The estimated differences show that the increased rate of mortality in CP-CML patients is less than 1% for the class 0-29 years, stable around 2% for the intervals 30-44 years and 45-59 years, and 1.4% for the interval 60-74 years; interestingly this rate is reduced for patients aged 75 years and more as compared to the general population (- 0.65%). The difference between potential and estimated deaths is higher among women in the age classes between 30 and 74 years.

A retrospective study on 73 elderly patients (≥75years) with aggressive B-cell non Hodgkin lymphoma: clinical significance of treatment intensity and comprehensive geriatric assessment.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical outcome of elderly (≥75years) patients with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) is not firmly established because few studies have specifically addressed this issue. In addition, the usefulness of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in B-NHL still needs to be deeply explored. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the prognostic factors of 73 patients aged ≥75years (median age: 78) with B-NHL treated by clinical judgment with curative anthracycline-based approaches (n=36) or with conservative treatments without anthracyclines (n=37). Analysis of clinical outcomes also included baseline CGA stratification. RESULTS: The curative approaches resulted in a better clinical outcome than conservative approaches [overall response rate: 91.2% vs. 69.7%, P=0.003; 2-year progression-free survival: 47.2% vs. 21.6%, P=0.006; and 2-year overall survival (OS): 58.3% vs 24.3%, P=0.003] with similar safety profiles. Independent of treatment type, patients classified as "fit" and "intermediate" by CGA presented with better OS compared to patients classified as "frail" (P<0.001). Patients classified as "fit" and "intermediate" who were receiving curative treatments presented with a significantly better OS when compared with those treated conservatively on the basis of clinical judgment. A curative anthracycline-based therapy (P=0.048), the response to treatment (P=0.017) and a "frail" condition (P=0.031) were the only factors affecting OS in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Present data indicates that even in elderly patients with B-NHL curative anthracycline-based therapies are more effective than conservative approaches. However, choice of treatment should rely more on objective than on subjective parameters. Therefore, further prospective trials are warranted to better define the CGA role in hematopoietic malignancies.