Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Ano de publicação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care ; 13(2): 215-7, 2008 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18465487

RESUMO

We describe two unusual cases; both patients wish to continue using the Gynefix despite experiencing difficulty with the device. In case A, the marker string of the Gynefix(R) perforated the full thickness of the cervix and was visualized on the left lateral aspect of the cervix. Three months later the string had moved again and could no longer be visualized, but an ultrasound scan confirmed fundal implantation of the device. Case B demonstrates repeated late expulsion and failure of implantation of Gynefix. Appropriateness of ultrasound with reference to measurement of the distance SS (between the peritoneal surface of the uterine fundus and the first copper sleeve of the Gynefix), failure of implantation and problems with the new Gynefix introducer are discussed.


Assuntos
Colo do Útero , Expulsão de Dispositivo Intrauterino , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/efeitos adversos , Perfuração Uterina/etiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA