Laparoscopic versus standard appendectomy outcomes and cost comparisons in the private sector.

Minimally invasive surgery has been proposed as the preferred treatment strategy for various gastrointestinal disorders due to shorter hospital stay, less pain, quicker return to normal activities, and improved cosmesis. However, these advantages may not be straightforward for laparoscopic appendectomy, and optimal management of remains controversial. One hundred forty-eight patients with clinical and radiologic diagnoses of acute appendicitis treated in two different hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. Seventy-eight patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy in hospital A and 70 patients underwent standard appendectomy in hospital B. Patients treated by either type of surgery were compared in terms of clinical and pathologic features, operation characteristics, complications, and costs. There were no significant differences between both groups in terms of clinical features, radiologic studies, complications, and final pathology findings (P > .05). Hospital stay was significantly shorter and bowel movements recovered quicker in the laparoscopy group. However, overall and operating room costs were significantly higher in patients treated by laparoscopy (P < .01). Our series show a subtle difference in terms of hospital stay and bowel movement recovery, favoring patients treated by laparoscopy. However, these results have to be carefully examined and weighed, because overall costs and operating room costs were significantly higher in the laparoscopy group.

Does CO2 pneumoperitoneum alter the ultra-structuture of the mesothelium?

BACKGROUND: Pneumoperitoneum may be responsible for ultra-structural alterations in the mesothelium during laparoscopy. To characterize the effect of pneumoperitoneum on the mesothelial cells with CO(2) and compressed air; and to compare to laparotomy and control group (anesthesia only). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty C-57 mice were divided in four groups of 10 animals each: CO(2), air, laparotomy, and control group. The animals were submitted to pneumoperitoneum at 8 mmHg during 30 min (CO(2) or compressed air). Five animals of each group were sacrificed 2 and 24 h after the procedure. Fragments of parietal peritoneum were collected and processed for scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: Control group revealed uninterrupted mesothelial cells, without any evidence of cellular limits; close contact between the cells; absence of intercellular clefts and presence of microvilli. In the laparotomy group, similar results to the control group, with decreased microvilli were noted. Air pneumoperitoneum was associated with alterations in the morphology of the mesothelial cells, clear cellular limits, and cells with spherical and fusiforme formats. CO(2) pneumoperitoneum showed mesothelial cells with clear cellular limits, predominantly spherical cellular format, and intercellular clefts that allowed the visualization of the exposed basal membrane. These alterations were more intense after 24 h. There was a statistical significance between CO(2) group (2 and 24 h) compared to the control group and laparotomy for cellular limits, intercellular clefts and microvilli, P < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: Pneumoperitoneum causes damage in the mesothelial ultra-structure, which differs from the laparotomy group. CO(2) pneumoperitoneum is more harmful to the mesothelium than the air.