RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis (ON) of the femoral head occurs when cells of trabecular bone spontaneously die. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been introduced into the femoral head in an attempt to halt progression of the disease. The purpose of this study was to functionally compare MSCs in patients with ON of the femoral head with patients without. METHODS: Mesenchymal stem cells were isolated from 20 patients with corticosteroid-induced ON and 10 controls without. Colony-forming unit and proliferation assays were used to assess MSC proliferation. Mesenchymal stem cells were differentiated into bone, fat, and cartilage. Functional assays were used to quantify the differentiation capacity. RESULTS: Control MSCs demonstrated greater cellular growth potential and improved ability to differentiate into bone. CONCLUSION: The decreased ability to differentiate into bone may be a reason why patients treated with autologous MSC infusion fail regenerative treatment strategies and progress to collapse.
Assuntos
Necrose da Cabeça do Fêmur/terapia , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Mesenquimais , Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/fisiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Necrose da Cabeça do Fêmur/induzido quimicamente , Necrose da Cabeça do Fêmur/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
CASE: A patient presented with simultaneous left-sided distal biceps tendon rupture and a right-sided distal biceps complete musculotendinous junction tear after lifting a motorcycle. The left upper extremity was treated operatively with acute repair, and the right upper extremity was managed nonoperatively. At the final follow-up, the patient reported full strength and motion with Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and QuickDASH scores of 14.2 and 20.5, respectively. CONCLUSION: We report the first known case of simultaneous bilateral distal biceps injuries occurring at different anatomic locations. One side was operatively managed, whereas the other underwent conservative treatment. Both treatments resulted in a satisfactory patient outcome.
Assuntos
Traumatismos do Braço/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos dos Tendões/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos do Braço/cirurgia , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Traumatismos dos Tendões/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is well described for patellar instability, the utility of arthroscopy at the time of stabilization has not been fully defined. PURPOSE: To determine whether diagnostic arthroscopy in conjunction with MPFL reconstruction is associated with improvement in functional outcome, pain, and stability or a decrease in perioperative complications. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary MPFL reconstruction without tibial tubercle osteotomy were reviewed (96 patients, 101 knees). Knees were divided into MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy (n = 37), MPFL reconstruction with diagnostic arthroscopy (n = 41), and MPFL reconstruction with a targeted arthroscopic procedure (n = 23). Postoperative pain, motion, imaging, operative findings, perioperative complications, need for revision procedure, and postoperative Kujala scores were recorded. RESULTS: Pain at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively was similar between groups. Significantly improved knee flexion at 2 weeks was seen after MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy versus reconstruction with diagnostic and reconstruction with targeted arthroscopic procedures (58° vs 42° and 48°, respectively; P = .02). Significantly longer tourniquet times were seen for targeted arthroscopic procedures versus the diagnostic and no arthroscopic procedures (73 vs 57 and 58 min, respectively; P = .0002), and significantly higher Kujala scores at follow-up were recorded after MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy versus reconstruction with diagnostic and targeted arthroscopic procedures (87.8 vs 80.2 and 70.1, respectively; P = .05; 42% response rate). There was no difference between groups in knee flexion, recurrent instability, or perioperative complications at 3 months. Diagnostic arthroscopy yielded findings not previously appreciated on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 35% of patients, usually resulting in partial meniscectomy. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic arthroscopy with MPFL reconstruction may result in findings not previously appreciated on MRI. Postoperative pain, range of motion, and risk of complications were equal at 3 months postoperatively with or without arthroscopy. Despite higher Kujala scores in MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy, the relationship between arthroscopy and patient-reported outcomes remains unclear. Surgeons can consider diagnostic arthroscopy but should be aware of no clear benefits in patient outcomes.