[The role of laparoscopy in surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer]. / Il ruolo della laparoscopia nel trattamento chirurgico del carcinoma pancreatico.

AIM: The authors reviewed their experience in surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer between 2003-2008. METHODS: Eighty two pancreatic cancer patients (median age 66.7 +/- 12.5) with obstructive jaundice were enrolled in our study: 36 (44%) had an endoscopic biliary stent; 46 patients (56%) were eligible for surgery: 14 received a curative surgery (pancreatoduodenal resection; 4 had a laparoscopic procedure) and 32 patients with non resectable tumor a palliative surgery: 18 had a gastro-jejunal with a biliary anastomosis (in 4 patients the hepatic-jejunal anastomosis was performed in laparoscopy), 6 had a gastro-jejunal anastomosis (2 laparoscopic procedure and 8 patients had only an explorative laparoscopy. RESULTS: The resectability rates was 17.1%. Median age in patients treated with endoscopic biliary stent was significantly higher than those underwent surgery (72.3 +/- 12.2 vs. 63.5 +/- 9.6; p < 0.05). Hospital length of stay in patients underwent radical surgery was significantly higher than those who received palliative surgery (18 +/- 6 vs. 10 +/- 5; p < 0.05). Morbility rate, including operative mortality of .3%, was 15.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy is largerly used in major oncologic surgery for several reasons: it minimized surgical manipulations and so post-operative complications. There is enough scientific evidence of low incidence of post-operative complications and long-term results compared to those achieved with traditional surgery.

Laparoscopic management of pancreatic cancer. Our experience.

AIM: Minimally invasive techniques have a definite role in the surgical treatment of several gastrointestinal tract cancers but there is still no widespread use of the laparoscopic approach for cancers of the head of the pancreas. The aim of this retrospective study is to review our experience from 2003 to 2013 in the management of pancreatic cancer with particular emphasis on the clinical application of minimally invasive techniques. METHODS: One hundred fifty-eight pancreatic cancer patients (median age 69,7±12,6 years) with obstructive jaundice were enrolled in our study. One hundred eighteen (74,7%) had an endoscopic biliary stent, 68 patients (43,03%) were eligible for surgery. Only 22 of the patients eligible for surgical intervention underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD): 14 had open PD and 8 had laparoscopic PD (LPD). Thirteen of the PD patients had a pylorus-preserving procedure (8 open and 5 laparoscopic procedures) whereas in 9 the pylorus was not preserved (6 open and 3 laparoscopic procedures). The other 46 patients had un-resectable tumors and 34 of them underwent palliative surgery consisting of gastrojejunal and hepatojejunal anastomosis (18 open and 6 laparoscopic procedures), and gastrojejunal anastomosis in 10 patients (4 open and 6 laparoscopic procedures). Ten patients had only explorative laparoscopy and 2 only explorative laparotomy. RESULTS: The resectability rate was 13,9%. The median age in patients treated with an endoscopic biliary stent was significantly higher than in those who underwent surgery (73,2±13,3 years vs 64,4±9,6 years; p < 0,05). Operative time in LPD patients was significantly longer than in PD patients (521±68 minutes vs 381±88 minutes; p<0.05). The hospital stay of patients who underwent PD was significantly longer than that of those who underwent palliative surgery (27±4 days vs 10±5 days; p < 0.05). in PD patients the morbidity rate was 22,72 % and the mortality rate 4.5%. CONCLUSIONS: In recent years laparoscopic surgery has become very important in oncologic surgery because it is minimally invasive and reduces postoperative complications and because there is sufficient evidence based data showing that results in terms of complications and survival are as good as the results of conventional surgery. However the learning curve for laparoscopic cancer surgery of the head of the pancreas is steep and our results indicate that in LPD operative time is significantly longer than in PD, and moreover the laparoscopic approach is not associated with a shorter hospital stay. Therefore LPD should be performed only in well-established laparoscopic and oncological centers with a multidisciplinary team. KEY WORDS: Laparoscopy, Pancreatic cancer, Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

[State of lucid delirium after orthotopic liver transplantation. Clinical case]. / Stato delirante lucido dopo trapianto ortotopico di fegato. Caso clinico.

Neuropsychiatric complications after liver transplantation are common and have an incidence ranging from 0.5% to 47% in several international reports. They are due to different causes (coagulation, haemodynamic or electrolyte disorders, infections, immunosuppressive drugs). In patients receiving cyclosporin and tacrolimus, headache, tremors, dysarthria, seizures and delirium are the most common disorders and are not always related to toxic drug concentrations or overdosage. We report the case of a liver transplant patient receiving cyclosporin who presented a state of lucid delirium with a mystic persecutory content. in the first few postoperative days. Cyclosporin was withdrawn and the patient switched to tacrolimus, initially combined with chlorpromazine and later with clotiapine. She rapidly improved and recovered completely within a few days. At follow-up the patient is doing well and can remember the episode of delirium perfectly well. Psychiatric evaluation preoperatively and during follow-up is important to recognize and treat these complications, which can prevent the full recovery of transplanted patients and also increase the cost of this procedure.