[Contribution and limits of lean management in the organization and working of a pathology department]. / Apports et limites du lean management dans l'organisation et le fonctionnement d'un service de Pathologie.

INTRODUCTION: In order to validate our strategy of continuous improvement and to identify new ways to increase performance, an evaluation of all the procedures was conducted in our department using the principles of lean management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Lean-6-sigma methodology (Gemba Walk, Value StreamMapping, spaghetti diagram, Kaizen workshop and priorization matrix) was used to analyze the procedures of the conventional and molecular sectors, and to identify bottlenecks, actions without added value and solutions. RESULTS: The audit identified bottlenecks in pre-analytical (registration), analytical (cytology, immunohistochemistry, sequencing, pathologists) and post-analytical processes (absence of secretaries, delivery of reports by mail). It underlined a suboptimal flow of people and materials, the heavy impact of an increasing work load (8%/year) in reception and microscopy even though we had outsourced, and an often critical work place schedule for technicians which prevent them from achieving tasks without added value (quality control, validation of methods and protocols) or even daily tasks (cutting, immunohistochemistry). After completing the 72 actions aimed at managing overproduction, improving working conditions and developing new activities, turn-around time was partially under control and the automation process was well advanced. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The audit validated our strategy of continuous improvement and advanced the standardization of our working conditions. Even if the turn-around time for reports was shortened, the audit initiated a positive medical and technical dynamic that should help us to implement the next steps of our reorganization (automation and extension of the department).

A prospective survey of air and surface fungal contamination in a medical mycology laboratory at a tertiary care university hospital.

BACKGROUND: Invasive filamentous fungi infections resulting from inhalation of mold conidia pose a major threat in immunocompromised patients. The diagnosis is based on direct smears, cultural symptoms, and culturing fungi. Airborne conidia present in the laboratory environment may cause contamination of cultures, resulting in false-positive diagnosis. Baseline values of fungal contamination in a clinical mycology laboratory have not been determined to date. METHODS: A 1-year prospective survey of air and surface contamination was conducted in a clinical mycology laboratory during a period when large construction projects were being conducted in the hospital. Air was sampled with a portable air system impactor, and surfaces were sampled with contact Sabouraud agar plates. The collected data allowed the elaboration of Shewhart graphic charts. RESULTS: Mean fungal loads ranged from 2.27 to 4.36 colony forming units (cfu)/m(3) in air and from 0.61 to 1.69 cfu/plate on surfaces. CONCLUSIONS: Strict control procedures may limit the level of fungal contamination in a clinical mycology laboratory even in the context of large construction projects at the hospital site. Our data and the resulting Shewhart graphic charts provide baseline values to use when monitoring for inappropriate variations of the fungal contamination in a mycology laboratory as part of a quality assurance program. This is critical to the appropriate management of the fungal risk in hematology, cancer and transplantation patients.