[Indocyanine green fluorescence to visualize the ureteric vascularization of kidney transplants: An exploratory study]. / Visualiser la vascularisation urétérale des transplants rénaux par fluorescence au vert d'indocyanine : étude exploratoire.

INTRODUCTION: Urinary complications after kidney transplantation are common and can compromise renal function. While they are mainly attributed to ischemic lesions of the ureter, there is no existing method to evaluate its vascularization during surgery. The aim of the study was to evaluate if indocyanine green, revealed by infra-red light andused to visualize tissue perfusion, could provide an appreciation of the ureter's vascularization during kidney transplantation. METHODS: This feasibility study was conducted over one month, on eleven consecutive kidney transplants. During transplantation, an injection of indocyanine green enabled the surgeon to visualize in real time with an infra-red camera the ureter fluorescence. Its intensity was reported on a qualitative and semi-quantitative scale. Occurrence of urinary complications such as stenosis or ureteral fistula were collected during 6 months. RESULTS: In all of the 11 cases (100%), the last centimeters of the ureters were not fluorescent. Three (27%) ureters were poorly or partiallly fluorescent. Out of these three cases, only one case of urinary fistula occurred, followed by ureteric stenosis. In the series, two fistulas (18%) and two ureteric stenoses (18%) occurred. No side effects were observed. The low number of events did not allow statistical analysis. CONCLUSION: Infra-red fluorescence of indocyanine green could be a simple and innovative way to appreciate the transplant's ureteric vascularization during kidney transplantation. It could help surgeons to identify the level of ureter section and to decide the anastomosis technique, in order to limit urinary complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Is it necessary to perform urine culture systematically prior to double J ureteral stent removal?] / Est-il nécessaire de faire systématiquement un ECBU avant l'ablation d'une sonde double J ?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of systematic urine culture before ureteric double j removal. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective audit was performed to assess the validity of our current clinical practice. A cohort of informed patients without clinical signs of urinary tract infection and without predefined risk factors were programmed for ureteral double j stent removal in an outpatient setting. Urine was sampled for culture immediately before the procedure. Patients had to complete a self-questionnaire 15 days following stent removal, inquiring about tolerance and complications which were to be analyzed according to the culture results. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of febrile urinary tract infection. RESULTS: Among the 56 participants, immediate preoperative urine culture revealed colonization in 9 patients (16.1%) and contamination in 6 patients (10.7%). A significant association was found between bacteriuria and double j placement following surgery with urinary tract injury (P<0.02) and diabetes (P<0.009). Two patients had fever including a man with sterile urine and a woman with Staphylococcus Aureus infection. No hospitalization was necessary. Twelve patients reported functional signs with lumbar pain being the most common. There was no significant association between functional signs and patients' clinical characteristics. CONCLUSION: This evaluation was not in favor of modifying our protocol of care i.e. the lack of performing neither antibiotic prophylaxis nor systematic urine culture before JJ ureteral stent removal in a selected population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Should we propose a systematic second transurethral resection of the bladder for all high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancers?]. / Faut-il proposer une seconde résection systématique pour toutes les tumeurs de vessie n'infiltrant pas le muscle vésical à risque élevé ?

OBJECTIVE: Quantify the rate of residual bladder tumor following systematic second look resection of pTa high-grade versus pT1 high-grade patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 2010 to July 2013, 53 patients with a non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer with high-risk of recurrence and progression underwent a second systematic resection in accordance with the current guidelines of the French Association of Urology (AFU). RESULTS: Among the 53 patients with a high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, histological examination of the initial resection identified: 17 pTa high-grade (32.1%) and 36 pT1 high-grade (67.9%). There was a significant difference between the 2 groups of patients (Ta high-grade versus T1 high-grade) concerning the rate of residual tumor on second look resection (11.8% versus 66.7%, P=0.0002). The predictive factors of residual tumor after second resection were the pT1 stage (P=0.0002), tumor multifocality (P=0.02) and presence of associated Cis (P=0.0005). CONCLUSION: The high rate of residual tumor in our series confirmed the importance of a systematic second look resection for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancers. However, for the pTa tumors without associated Cis, the interest of this second look seemed of less concern. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

Preoperative Risk Factors Associated With Urinary Complications After Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Only surgically irrelevant risk factors including sex, African-American ancestry, or exceptional U-stitch anastomosis have been identified to associate with urinary complications after kidney transplantation. The objective was to identify modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors associated with urinary complications after kidney transplantation. METHODS: A single-center study of 3,129 kidney transplants performed over 40 years was conducted to identify independent risk factors using χ2 tests and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: We identified the quality of the transplant's ureter, cystographic abnormalities in the recipient, and repeat transplantations as independent risk factors for overall urinary complications occurring after kidney transplantation in multivariable analysis. Obesity was associated with an increased risk of urinary fistula, while the presence of a JJ stent was associated with a reduced risk of urinary fistula. The risk of urinary surgical complications for kidney transplantations was reduced when the kidney was recovered from a living related compared to a deceased donor. CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors identified in the present study will allow candidates for kidney transplantation to be more informed and will also allow for surgical modifications to limit the occurrence of urinary complications.