Secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa based on prior biologic exposure: an efficacy and safety analysis from the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE phase III trials.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease associated with a substantial disease burden. Secukinumab has previously been reported to have sustained efficacy with a favourable safety profile in patients with moderate-to-severe HS. It is unknown whether prior biologic exposure affects the efficacy and safety of secukinumab. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe HS based on prior exposure to -biologics. METHODS: This was an analysis of the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE phase III trials of secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe HS. Patients were randomized at baseline to receive secukinumab every 2 (SECQ2W) or 4 weeks (SECQ4W), or placebo for 16 weeks. After week 16, patients on the SECQ2W and SECQ4W schedules remained on the same treatment regimen, while patients randomized to placebo were switched to either SECQ2W or SECQ4W up to week 52. Assessments based on prior exposure to biologics included Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR), abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count, flare rates, HS-related pain [numerical rating scale 30 (NRS30)], 55% reduction in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4-55), Dermatology Life Quality Index, EuroQol-5D and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 1084 patients were randomized in the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE trials and included in this analysis; 255 (23.5%) were biologic-experienced [SECQ2W (n = 80); SECQ4W (n = 81); placebo (n = 94)] and 829 (76.5%) were biologic-naïve [SECQ2W (n = 281); SECQ4W (n = 279); placebo (n = 269)]. At week 16, responses were more efficacious for secukinumab than for placebo with regard to HiSCR in patients who were biologic-experienced {SECQ2W 37.0% [odds ratio (OR) 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-3.08]; SECQ4W 38.8% [OR 1.67, 95% CI 0.86-3.22]; placebo 27.3%} and biologic-naïve [SECQ2W 45.6% (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.15-2.33); SECQ4W 45.4% (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.13-2.29); placebo 34.2%]. Similar results were observed for AN count, NRS30 and IHS4-55. The higher response seen at week 16 with secukinumab was sustained, with a trend toward improvement over time, through to week 52 in both subgroups. Additional efficacy was observed for quality-of-life assessments, and no differences in safety between subgroups were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of prior biologic exposure, secukinumab was efficacious in improving the signs and symptoms of HS. This finding positions secukinumab as the first option in patients who are biologic-naïve, as well as in patients who have previously been treated with other biologic therapy, based on individual patient needs.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin disease that causes painful boils. HS is common and affects about 0.4% of the world's population. Treating the condition is difficult, but drugs called 'biologics' can help to improve the symptoms. For example, secukinumab is a biologic drug that has been shown to be effective and well-tolerated for the treatment of HS. In this analysis, we investigated whether previous treatment with biologics could affect the effectiveness and tolerability of secukinumab. This analysis included data from two identical clinical trials (called SUNSHINE and SUNRISE) that recruited adult patients with HS who had moderate-to-severe disease. In these trials, patients took secukinumab 300 mg every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks for 1 year, or a placebo for 4 months and then switched to secukinumab until 1 year. At regular intervals, the effectiveness and tolerability of secukinumab were examined and the results were compared between patients who had previously used another biologic and patients who had never used a biologic before. After 16 weeks, patients who took secukinumab had better results than the patients who took a placebo, independent of previous biologic use. Secukinumab was still effective and had improved results over 1 year of treatment in both subgroups. Regardless of whether patients had previously been taking another biologic, secukinumab was just as tolerable as placebo and there were no new safety risks. Our analysis shows that secukinumab is effective and tolerable, regardless of whether patients have previously used another biologic drug.

Safety and efficacy of bimekizumab through 2 years in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: longer-term results from the BE SURE randomized controlled trial and the open-label extension from the BE BRIGHT trial.

BACKGROUND: BE SURE 1-year results demonstrated the superior efficacy of bimekizumab compared with adalimumab with no unexpected safety findings. OBJECTIVES: To provide efficacy and safety data over 2 years of bimekizumab treatment compared with adalimumab from BE SURE and the BE BRIGHT open-label extension (OLE) in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: The 56-week double-blinded BE SURE phase III randomized controlled trial randomized patients 1 : 1 : 1 to bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W), bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W to week 16 then every 8 weeks (Q8W), or adalimumab 40 mg every 2 weeks to week 24 then bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W. After completing BE SURE, patients could enter the ongoing BE BRIGHT OLE, with possible dosing adjustments based on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). The primary outcome in BE BRIGHT was incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); safety data are reported by study period through week 104. Efficacy data are reported for the intention-to-treat population through week 104 by initial randomization group, with ≥ 90% improvement from baseline PASI (PASI 90) and 100% improvement (PASI 100) as key outcomes. RESULTS: Of the patients randomized to bimekizumab, 158 were assigned to Q4W, and 161 to Q4W/Q8W. At week 104, PASI 90 was achieved by 91.2% and 89.7%, and PASI 100 was achieved by 72.3% and 68.1%, for Q4W and Q4W/Q8W, respectively; comparable to week 16 results. Among the 159 patients randomized to adalimumab, responses rapidly and substantially increased after the week 24 bimekizumab switch; at week 104, 96.9% and 70.2% of patients achieved PASI 90 and PASI 100 respectively. Through weeks 24-104, the three most common TEAEs in any bimekizumab-treated group were nasopharyngitis, oral candidiasis and upper respiratory tract infection. Rates of serious TEAEs were low. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical responses observed through week 16 of BE SURE in patients randomized to bimekizumab were sustained through 104 weeks of treatment, regardless of Q4W or Q8W maintenance dosing. Response rates were also sustained through week 104 in patients who switched from adalimumab to bimekizumab at week 24, and were similar to those observed in the bimekizumab groups. Bimekizumab was well tolerated with no new safety signals.

Once-daily roflumilast foam 0.3% for scalp and body psoriasis: a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase IIb study.

BACKGROUND: Scalp psoriasis affects most patients with psoriasis, but it can be difficult to treat. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily roflumilast foam 0.3% on scalp and body psoriasis. METHODS: In a phase IIb randomized controlled trial, adults and adolescents aged ≥ 12 years with scalp and body psoriasis were randomized (2 : 1) to roflumilast foam 0.3% or vehicle for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was scalp Investigator Global Assessment (S-IGA) success (score of 'clear' or 'almost clear' plus ≥ 2-grade improvement from baseline) at week 8. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. RESULTS: Significantly more roflumilast-treated patients (59.1%) than vehicle-treated patients (11.4%) achieved S-IGA success at week 8 (P < 0.001); differences favoured roflumilast as early as the first postbaseline visit at week 2 (P < 0.001). Significant improvements were also seen for secondary endpoints, including body IGA success, Scalp Itch Numeric Rating Scale and the Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index. The safety of roflumilast was generally similar to vehicle. Patients treated with roflumilast experienced low rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), with few discontinuations due to an AE. Few patients with skin of colour (11%) and few adolescents (0.7%) were included. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the further development of roflumilast foam for treating scalp and body psoriasis.

Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Onabotulinumtoxin A for the Treatment of Hailey-Hailey Disease.

BACKGROUND: Hailey-Hailey disease (HHD) can be treated with topical steroids, antibiotics, and invasive surgical procedures. Since sweating often exacerbates HHD lesions, the use of onabotulinumtoxin A could serve as an adjunctive treatment. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of onabotulinumtoxin A for the treatment of HHD. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled single center study was conducted. Six HHD patients who successfully completed this trial in addition to 1 patient who exited early are reported and discussed. Four of these patients received an initial injection of Btx-A and 3 received the placebo initially. RESULTS: All patients except 1 who received an initial or reinjection of Btx-A decreased 2 levels on a 4-point clinical severity scale at weeks 8 or 12 after treatment. Patient 6 received an initial placebo injection and maintained clearance for 6 months, while patients 5 and 7 did not have any improvement in their target lesions after a placebo injection. All patients who received a reinjection of Btx-A at the week 4 follow-up decreased by at least 1 level on the HHD severity scale. CONCLUSION: Btx-A is a safe treatment that is effective for most cases of HHD. The most severe cases of HHD may not respond to Btx-A as sole treatment. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(4): doi:10.36849/JDD.6857 Citation: Saal R, Oldfield C, Bota J, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of Onabotulinumtoxin A for the treatment of Hailey-Hailey disease. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(4):339-343. doi:10.36849/JDD.6857.

Integrating Precision Medicine into Medical Dermatology Clinical Practice: An Expert Consensus Panel.

BACKGROUND: Precision medicine utilizes an individual’s genomics to improve diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy. The joint American Academy of Dermatology and National Psoriasis Foundation 2019 guidelines recognized the need to identify biomarkers that can predict the optimal biologic agent for an individual patient. This paper examines the current state of precision medicine in dermatology and how its use can improve outcomes in psoriasis. METHODS: A search of PubMed/MEDLINE using the terms precision medicine, personalized medicine, biomarkers, genomics, and dermatology was performed to identify relevant publications. An expert consensus panel was then convened to assign levels of evidence to each article using strength of recommendation taxonomy and create consensus statements requiring a two-thirds supermajority for agreement utilizing a modified Delphi approach. RESULTS: Thirteen articles met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were assigned levels of evidence. The panel created 10 consensus statements on how precision medicine can improve patient outcomes, all of which received a unanimous (6/6) vote. CONCLUSION: Choosing a biologic medication for psoriasis often relies on patient preference, provider preference, and a trial-and-error approach. Utilizing precision medicine tests such as Mind.Px can help providers identify biomarkers unique to a patient’s pathophysiology and choose the optimal medication through a targeted and evidence-based approach. Zakria D, Brownstone N, Armstrong AW, et al. Integrating precision medicine into medical dermatology clinical practice: an expert consensus panel. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(6):588-593. doi:10.36849/JDD.7432.

Efficacy and safety of apremilast in patients with mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis: Results of a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with mild-to-moderate psoriasis may have substantial quality-of-life impairment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate apremilast 30 mg twice daily for mild-to-moderate psoriasis. METHODS: Phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in adults with mild-to-moderate psoriasis inadequately controlled or intolerant to ≥ 1 topical psoriasis therapy (NCT03721172). The primary endpoint was the achievement of static Physician Global Assessment score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and ≥ 2-point reduction at week 16. RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-five patients were randomized (apremilast: 297; placebo: 298). The primary endpoint was met, with a significantly greater static Physician Global Assessment response rate observed at week 16 in the apremilast group compared with the placebo group (21.6% vs 4.1%; P < .0001). All secondary endpoints were met with the achievement of body surface area-75 (33.0% vs 7.4%), body surface area ≤ 3% (61.0% vs 22.9%), ≥ 4-point reduction in Whole Body Itch Numeric Rating Scale (43.2% vs 18.6%), Scalp Physician Global Assessment 0 or 1 and ≥ 2-point reduction (44.0% vs 16.6 %), and changes from baseline in body surface area, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (all P < .0001). The most commonly reported adverse events (≥ 5%) with apremilast were diarrhea, headache, nausea, nasopharyngitis, and upper respiratory tract infection, consistent with prior studies. LIMITATIONS: The study lacked an active-comparator arm. CONCLUSION: Apremilast demonstrated efficacy in mild-to-moderate psoriasis and safety consistent with the established safety profile of apremilast.

Open-Label Cohort Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Application of Glycopyrronium Cloth, 2.4% for Palmar Hyperhidrosis.

BACKGROUND: Hyperhidrosis of the palms has a significant negative impact on quality of life. There is no FDA-approved treatment; however, clinicians often use glycopyrronium cloth off-label for this indication despite the lack of published guidance on optimal method of application for treatment of palms. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of 4 different methods of application of glycopyrronium cloth to give clinicians guidance when treating palmar hyperhidrosis. STUDY DESIGN: This study, conducted completely virtually using live interactive telemedicine, compared application times of 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and overnight without occlusion and 30 minutes under occlusion. The primary endpoint was a decrease in the mean of the Hand Severity Score (HHS) after 4 weeks of once-daily application. Safety data, including local skin reactions and other adverse events, were tabulated by cohort. RESULTS: Of the application times and methods tested, 30 minutes without occlusion produced the greatest decrease in the HHS with an acceptable safety profile. The most common adverse event was unilateral mydriasis, which presumably occurred from inadvertent introduction of study drug into the eye despite multiple warnings to the subjects to avoid eye contact. A few subjects had adverse events presumably due to systemic absorption of the drug similar to those seen in the pivotal trials for treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis. CONCLUSION: Glycopyrronium cloth can be used successfully to treat palmar hyperhidrosis. Occlusion for 30 minutes had the poorest response presumably due to the increased sweating causing dilution of the study drug. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT04906655 J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(5):488-494. doi:10.36849/JDD.6688.

Evidence Threshold for a Precision Medicine Test that Predicts Optimal Response to a Biologic Agent in Patients With Psoriasis: A Consensus Panel.

Precision medicine approaches are receiving increased attention in dermatology, including inflammatory skin diseases. In psoriasis, a precision medicine treatment paradigm could temper the rapid increase in pharmacy costs that have resulted from a tremendous expansion in the number of available biologic drug options. However, without a clear and agreed upon proof of clinical utility in a real-world setting, costly new pharmacotherapies are often burdened with barriers to coverage by payers and ultimately, routine patient care. This panel was assembled to discuss the evidence threshold required to demonstrate the clinical utility of a precision medicine diagnostic that predicts the biologic therapeutic class for treating psoriasis patients. The panel reviewed clinical utility study designs and economic impact study designs aimed at delineating net savings and waste reduction. A psoriasis biologic precision medicine test could optimize pharmacotherapy management of psoriasis patients. The consensus opinion of this panel was that positive results from the study described here would prove the clinical utility of this precision medicine test. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(6):630-636. doi:10.36849/JDD.6864.

Effect of Roflumilast Cream vs Vehicle Cream on Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: The DERMIS-1 and DERMIS-2 Randomized Clinical Trials.

Importance: Once-daily roflumilast cream, 0.3%, a potent phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy and was well tolerated in a phase 2b trial of patients with psoriasis. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of roflumilast cream, 0.3%, applied once daily for 8 weeks in 2 trials of patients with plaque psoriasis. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two phase 3, randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter trials (DERMIS-1 [trial 1; n = 439] and DERMIS-2 [trial 2; n = 442]) were conducted at 40 centers (trial 1) and 39 centers (trial 2) in the US and Canada between December 9, 2019, and November 16, 2020, and between December 9, 2019, and November 23, 2020, respectively. Patients aged 2 years or older with plaque psoriasis involving 2% to 20% of body surface area were enrolled. The dates of final follow-up were November 20, 2020, and November 23, 2020, for trial 1 and trial 2, respectively. Interventions: Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive roflumilast cream, 0.3% (trial 1: n = 286; trial 2: n = 290), or vehicle cream (trial 1: n = 153; trial 2: n = 152) once daily for 8 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy end point was Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) success (clear or almost clear status plus ≥2-grade improvement from baseline [score range, 0-4]) at week 8, analyzed using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by site, baseline IGA score, and intertriginous involvement. There were 9 secondary outcomes, including intertriginous IGA success, 75% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score, and Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale score of 4 or higher at baseline achieving 4-point reduction (WI-NRS success) at week 8 (scale: 0 [no itch] to 10 [worst imaginable itch]; minimum clinically important difference, 4 points). Results: Among 881 participants (mean age, 47.5 years; 320 [36.3%] female), mean IGA scores in trial 1 were 2.9 [SD, 0.52] for roflumilast and 2.9 [SD, 0.45] for vehicle and in trial 2 were 2.9 [SD, 0.48] for roflumilast and 2.9 [SD, 0.47]) for vehicle. Statistically significantly greater percentages of roflumilast-treated patients than vehicle-treated patients had IGA success at week 8 (trial 1: 42.4% vs 6.1%; difference, 39.6% [95% CI, 32.3%-46.9%]; trial 2: 37.5% vs 6.9%; difference, 28.9% [95% CI, 20.8%-36.9%]; P < .001 for both). Of 9 secondary end points, statistically significant differences favoring roflumilast vs vehicle were observed for 8 in trial 1 and 9 in trial 2, including intertriginous IGA success (71.2% vs 13.8%; difference, 66.5% [95% CI, 47.1%-85.8%] and 68.1% vs 18.5%; difference, 51.6% [95% CI, 29.3%-73.8%]; P < .001 for both), 75% reduction in PASI score (41.6% vs 7.6%; difference, 36.1% [95% CI, 28.5%-43.8%] and 39.0% vs 5.3%; difference, 32.4% [95% CI, 24.9%-39.8%]; P < .001 for both), WI-NRS success (67.5% vs 26.8%; difference, 42.6% [95% CI, 31.3%-53.8%] and 69.4% vs 35.6%; difference, 30.2% [95% CI, 18.2%-42.2%]; P < .001 for both). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 25.2% with roflumilast vs 23.5% with vehicle in trial 1 and 25.9% with roflumilast vs 18.4% with vehicle in trial 2. The incidence of serious adverse events was 0.7% with roflumilast vs 0.7% with vehicle in trial 1 and 0% with roflumilast vs 0.7% with vehicle in trial 2. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with chronic plaque psoriasis, treatment with roflumilast cream, 0.3%, compared with vehicle cream resulted in better clinical status at 8 weeks. Further research is needed to assess efficacy compared with other active treatments and to assess longer-term efficacy and safety. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT04211363, NCT04211389.

Efficacy and safety of topical terbinafine 10% solution (MOB-015) in the treatment of mild to moderate distal subungual onychomycosis: A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Onychomycosis is a recalcitrant fungal nail infection. Topical antifungal agents may be preferred over systemic agents due to lack of systemic adverse effects. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of topical terbinafine 10% solution (MOB-015) for the treatment of distal and lateral subungual onychomycosis. METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind, phase III, North American study, patients with mild to moderate distal and lateral subungual onychomycosis involving 20% to 60% of at least 1 great toenail were randomized to once daily application of MOB-015 or matching vehicle for 48 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was complete cure, while the secondary efficacy variables were mycological cure and treatment success. Safety evaluations were also performed. RESULTS: At week 52, the mycological cure (negative culture and potassium hydroxide microscopy) rate in the MOB-015 and vehicle groups was 69.9% and 27.7%, respectively (P < .001), and complete cure (0% clinical disease involvement and mycological cure) was achieved in 4.5% and 0% of patients, respectively (P = .0195). At least 1 adverse event leading to discontinuation of treatment occurred in 2.8% of patients in the MOB-015 group and in 4.2% in the vehicle group. LIMITATION: The follow-up period after end of treatment may not be sufficient to accurately reflect cure in distal and lateral subungual onychomycosis. CONCLUSIONS: MOB-015 is a treatment option for onychomycosis with an adverse event profile similar to vehicle.

Serlopitant for psoriatic pruritus: A phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Pruritus, a common symptom of psoriasis, negatively affects quality of life; however, treatment of lesional skin does not consistently alleviate psoriatic itch. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of serlopitant, an oral, once-daily neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist, for treatment of psoriatic pruritus in a phase 2, randomized clinical trial (NCT03343639). METHODS: Patients (n = 204) were randomized to receive serlopitant, 5 mg, or placebo daily for 8 weeks. Eligible adult patients had plaque psoriasis for ≥6 months, plaques covering ≤10% of body surface area, pruritus for ≥4 weeks, and Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) score ≥7 at the initial screening. RESULTS: Participants (54.2% women) had a mean age of 47.5 years and 85.2% were white. Mean baseline WI-NRS scores were 8.3 for serlopitant and 8.1 for placebo. The WI-NRS 4-point response rate at 8 weeks (primary end point) was 33.3% for serlopitant vs 21.1% for placebo (P = .028); at 4 weeks the rates were 20.8% for serlopitant vs 11.5% for placebo (P = .039). Treatment-related adverse events were reported for 4.9% of serlopitant-treated and 4.0% of placebo-treated patients. LIMITATIONS: This was a phase 2 study with a small study population. Patients with severe psoriasis were excluded. CONCLUSION: Serlopitant significantly reduced pruritus associated with mild to moderate psoriasis, supporting continued development of serlopitant for this patient population.

Efficacy and safety of topical sofpironium bromide gel for the treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis: A phase II, randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial.

BACKGROUND: Primary axillary hyperhidrosis has limited noninvasive, effective, and well-tolerated treatment options. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the topical treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis with the novel anticholinergic sofpironium bromide. METHODS: A phase II, multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. Participants were randomized to 1 of 3 dosages or vehicle, with daily treatment for 42 days. Coprimary end points were the percentage of participants exhibiting ≥1-point improvement in the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Measure-Axillary (HDSM-Ax) score by logistic regression, and change in HDSM-Ax as a continuous measure by analysis of covariance. Pair-wise comparisons were 1-sided with α = 0.10. RESULTS: At the end of therapy, 70%, 79%, 76%, and 54% of participants in the 5%, 10%, 15%, and vehicle groups exhibited ≥1-point improvement in HDSM-Ax (P < .05). Least-square mean (SE) changes in HDSM-Ax were -2.02 (0.14), -2.09 (0.14), 2.10 (0.14), and -1.30 (0.14) (all P ≤ .0001). Most treatment-related adverse events were mild or moderate. LIMITATIONS: Not powered to detect changes in gravimetric sweat production. CONCLUSION: Sofpironium bromide gel produced meaningful reductions in hyperhidrosis severity and had an acceptable safety profile.

Long-term efficacy and safety of topical glycopyrronium tosylate for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis: Post hoc pediatric subgroup analysis from a 44-week open-label extension study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Glycopyrronium tosylate (GT) cloth, 2.4% is a topical anticholinergic approved in the United States for primary axillary hyperhidrosis in patients ≥9 years. This post hoc analysis evaluated long-term response (efficacy and safety) in pediatric patients (≥9 to ≤16 years) to GT in the 44-week, open-label extension (NCT02553798) of two, phase 3, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, 4-week trials (NCT02530281, NCT02530294). METHODS: In the double-blind trials, patients ≥9 years with primary axillary hyperhidrosis were randomized 2:1 to once-daily GT:vehicle. Those who completed the study could receive open-label GT for up to an additional 44 weeks. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and local skin reactions (LSRs). Descriptive efficacy assessments included gravimetrically measured sweat production, Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale response (≥2-grade improvement), and Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index. RESULTS: Of 43 pediatric patients completing either double-blind trial, 38 (88.4%) entered the open-label extension (age, years: 9 [n = 1], 12 [n = 2], 13 [n = 7], 14 and 15 [n = 9 each], 16 [n = 10]). The safety profile observed was similar to the double-blind trials. Most TEAEs (>95%) were mild/moderate, related to anticholinergic activity, and infrequently led to discontinuation (n = 1/38 [2.6%]). No pediatric patients experienced a serious TEAE. Most anticholinergic TEAEs did not require a dose modification and resolved within 7 days. Approximately, one-third of patients (n = 13/38 [34.2%]) had LSRs; most were mild/moderate in severity. Improvements in efficacy measures were maintained from the double-blind trials. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term, once-daily GT for up to 48 weeks (4-week double-blind plus 44 week open label) provides a noninvasive, well-tolerated treatment option for pediatric patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis.

Topical glycopyrronium tosylate for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis: Results from the ATMOS-1 and ATMOS-2 phase 3 randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Glycopyrronium tosylate (GT) is a topical anticholinergic developed for once-daily treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis. OBJECTIVE: Assess the efficacy and safety of GT for primary axillary hyperhidrosis. METHODS: ATMOS-1 and ATMOS-2 were replicate randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, 4-week phase 3 trials. Patients were randomized 2:1 to GT 3.75% or vehicle applied once daily to each axilla for 4 weeks. Coprimary endpoints were responder rate (≥4-point improvement from baseline) on item 2 (severity of sweating) of the Axillary Sweating Daily Diary (ASDD), which is a newly developed patient-reported outcome measure, and absolute change from baseline in axillary gravimetric sweat production at week 4. Safety evaluation included treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS: Pooled data, which are consistent with the individual trial results, show that significantly more GT-treated patients achieved an ASDD-Item 2 response than did those treated with vehicle (59.5% vs 27.6%), and they had reduced sweat production from baseline (-107.6 mg/5 min vs -92.1 mg/5 min) at week 4 (P < .001 for both coprimary end points). Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate and infrequently led to discontinuation. LIMITATIONS: Short trial duration and inherent challenges in gravimetrically assessing sweat production. CONCLUSIONS: GT applied topically on a daily basis over 4 weeks reduced the severity of sweating as measured by ASDD-Item 2, reduced sweat production as measured gravimetrically, and was generally well tolerated in patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis.

A Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled Phase 3 Study of Aminolevulinic Acid Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Actinic Keratoses on the Upper Extremities.

BACKGROUND: Blue-light aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) after broad-area application and 3-hour incubation is efficacious for actinic keratosis (AK) lesion clearance on upper extremities, with use of occlusive dressing significantly increasing efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To prove the safety and efficacy of ALA-PDT versus vehicle (VEH-PDT) in the spot treatment of multiple AKs on upper extremities. METHODS: Aminolevulinic acid or VEH was spot applied only to lesions on one upper extremity 3 hours before blue-light exposure. Treated extremity was covered with occlusive dressing during incubation. Identical treatment was repeated at Week 8 if AK lesions were present in the treated area. RESULTS: Thirty-one percent (42/135) of subjects treated with ALA-PDT had complete clearance at Week 12, compared with 13% (17/134) of the subjects treated with VEH-PDT (p = .0001). The mean AK lesion clearance rate for ALA-treated subjects at Weeks 8 and 12 was 53% and 69%, respectively, compared with 26% and 30% for the VEH-treated group (p < .0001, linear mixed model). Safety profile observed in this study is consistent with previous studies/reports in the literature, and the therapy was well tolerated overall. CONCLUSION: Aminolevulinic acid-PDT spot treatment using a 3-hour occluded incubation was superior to VEH-PDT for AK lesion clearance of the upper extremity.

Validation of the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT©) using a longitudinal survey of biologic-treated patients with atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: The Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT©) is a brief patient self-administered instrument designed and validated to assess atopic dermatitis (AD) control; six AD symptoms and impacts are evaluated over the past week, including overall severity of symptoms, days with intense episodes of itching, intensity of bother, problem with sleep, impact on daily activities, and impact on mood or emotions. This study assessed the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the ADCT in a longitudinal context, and provided thresholds to identify meaningful within-person change. METHODS: Data were from a prospective, longitudinal patient survey study of real-world effectiveness of dupilumab in patients with AD. Eligible patients completed a baseline survey before starting dupilumab and were followed at Months 1, 2, 3, and 6 post-initiation as they became eligible. RESULTS: Psychometric analyses confirmed internal consistency; Cronbach's α coefficients were consistently above the threshold of 0.70 across each follow-up; item-to-total correlations were above the threshold of r ≥ 0.50. High correlations between the ADCT and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and skin pain supported construct validity, while known-group validity was shown on Patient Global Assessment of Disease (PGAD) overall well-being subgroups with worse AD-related overall well-being having higher mean ADCT total scores at all time points. The ability of the ADCT to detect change was confirmed; the threshold for meaningful within-person change was estimated to be 5 points. Finally, test-retest reliability was confirmed in subgroups of patients with stable PGAD responses. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that the ADCT is a valid and reliable tool for assessing AD control.

Tretinoin 0.05% Lotion for the Once-Daily Treatment of Moderate and Severe Acne Vulgaris in Females: Effect of Age on Efficacy and Tolerability

BACKGROUND: While it is generally considered to be a disease of adolescence, acne affects an increasing number of adults, especially women. Although data exist on the use of retinoids in adult females, there is no universal agreement as to the age of onset of adult female acne, or data on the efficacy and tolerability dependent on age. A novel tretinoin 0.05% lotion formulation has been shown to be effective and well-tolerated in acne patients with moderate or severe disease. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of once-daily tretinoin 0.05% lotion in women with moderate or severe acne categorized into different age groups (13-19, 20-29, and 30+ years). METHODS: Post hoc analysis of two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase 3 studies. Women (aged 13-19 years, N=357; 20-29 years, N=352; 30+ years, N=156) with moderate or severe acne were randomized (1:1) to receive tretinoin 0.05% lotion or vehicle, once-daily for 12 weeks. Efficacy assessments included changes in baseline inflammatory/noninflammatory lesions and treatment success (at least 2-grade reduction in Evaluator's Global Severity Score [EGSS] and 'clear'/'almost clear') and Quality of Life (QoL) using the validated Acne-QoL questionnaire. Safety and adverse events (AEs) where evaluated throughout; cutaneous tolerability assessed at each study visit using a 4-point scale (where 0=none and 3=severe). RESULTS: At baseline, 91.9% (N=794) of women in the post hoc analysis had moderate (EGSS=3) and 8.1% (N=70) severe (EGSS=4) acne, with the highest proportion of women (11.1%, N=39) having severe acne being aged 20-29 years. Baseline inflammatory lesion counts were similar across the three age ranges, with more comedonal lesions (44.5) in adolescent females (aged 13-19 years). Quality of life at baseline was much better in adolescent females and may be age-related for some domains (self-perception and role-social). At week 12, there appeared to be an age-related improvement in both inflammatory and noninflammatory lesion counts, and treatment success although the differences between groups were not significant. Mean percent reduction in inflammatory and noninflammatory lesion counts for each age group (13-19, 20-29, and 30+ years old respectively) were 55.3% (P=0.019 versus vehicle), 55.8% (P=0.080) and 63.5%; and 47.1% (P<0.001), 55.2% (P=0.002) and 59.0% (P=0.030). Treatment success for the 3 groups was achieved by 23.2% (P=0.023), 21.3%, and 30.7% of patients, respectively, at week 12; differences between age groups were not significant. Quality of Life improved in all age groups, although changes with tretinoin 0.05% lotion were only significant compared with vehicle in adult females aged 20-29 years (self-perception, role-emotional and acne symptoms); improvements in each domain score by week 12 were also greatest in this age group. The majority of AEs were mild and transient; the most common treatment emergent AEs were application site pain and dryness especially in the older adult females (aged 30+ years). Local cutaneous safety and tolerability assessments were generally mild and improved by week 12. There were transient increases in scaling, burning and stinging in the adolescent females, peaking at week 4; all mean scores were ≤0.6 where 1=mild. CONCLUSIONS: Tretinoin 0.05% lotion was significantly more effective than vehicle in achieving treatment success and reducing inflammatory and comedonal lesions in adult and adolescent females with moderate or severe acne. There appear to be age-related efficacy and tolerability benefits favoring adult females. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(12):1218-1225.

Systemic Therapies for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Expert Perspectives in Practice

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that affects around 13% of children and 7% of adults in the US. It can have a significant impact on the quality of life (QoL) of affected individuals due to pruritus and the visibility of lesions on the skin. AD is increasingly recognized as a systemic disease, since dysregulation of the adaptive and innate immune systems plays a key role in the underlying disease pathogenesis, which has important implications for how the condition is treated. Patients with moderate-to-severe disease who have failed to achieve disease control may benefit from systemic immunomodulatory treatments. Recently published expert perspectives outlined recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of moderate-to-severe AD in adults, reflecting evidence-based, practical recommendations to support allergists and dermatologists in selecting appropriate treatment in the era of biologic therapies. To help clinicians understand how these practical recommendations can be implemented into clinical practice, we describe two real life case studies of adult patients with AD. In these case studies, we demonstrate how AD severity, treatment response, and treatment failure can be assessed, and the role of emerging systemic treatments in the management of moderate-to-severe AD. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(2):122-129.

Efficacy of Dupilumab in Different Racial Subgroups of Adults With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Three Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trials

Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks the shared receptor subunit for interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13, is currently approved for the treatment of adults with inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). The efficacy and safety of dupilumab for AD among racial subgroups is unknown. This post hoc analysis from three phase 3 trials assessed the efficacy and safety of dupilumab vs placebo by racial subgroup (White, Asian, Black/African American). Data from LIBERTY AD SOLO 1 (NCT02277743), SOLO 2 (NCT02277769), and CHRONOS (NCT02260986) were pooled. Outcomes included mean and percent change from baseline to week 16 in the key therapeutic domains Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, as well as Investigator's Global Assessment and pain or discomfort assessed by the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions 3 level questionnaire. A total of 2,058 patients (White n=1,429, Asian n=501, Black/African American n=128) were included in the current analysis. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were balanced between treatment groups and racial subgroups. In the three trials, dupilumab significantly (P<0.0001) improved all assessed outcomes compared with placebo in the White and Asian subgroups. In the smaller Black/African American subgroup, dupilumab significantly (P<0.0001) improved EASI endpoints and mean changes in Peak Pruritus NRS and DLQI vs placebo, with positive numeric trends favoring dupilumab in all other endpoints. Dupilumab was generally well tolerated, with an acceptable safety profile in all racial subgroups. Serious adverse events occurred more frequently with placebo; treatment discontinuations due to adverse events were rare in all treatment groups. Significant clinical improvement and a favorable benefit-risk profile can be achieved with dupilumab treatment in patients of White, Asian, and Black/African American racial subgroups with moderate-to-severe AD inadequately controlled with topical medications. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02277743, NCT02277769, NCT02260986

Glycopyrronium tosylate in pediatric primary axillary hyperhidrosis: Post hoc analysis of efficacy and safety findings by age from two phase three randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: Hyperhidrosis in pediatric patients has been understudied. Post hoc analyses of two phase 3 randomized, vehicle-controlled, 4-week trials (ATMOS-1 [NCT02530281] and ATMOS-2 [NCT02530294]) were performed to assess efficacy and safety of topical anticholinergic glycopyrronium tosylate (GT) in pediatric patients. METHODS: Patients had primary axillary hyperhidrosis ≥ 6 months, average Axillary Sweating Daily Diary (ASDD/ASDD-Children [ASDD-C]) Item 2 (sweating severity) score ≥ 4, sweat production ≥ 50 mg/5 min (each axilla), and Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) ≥ 3. Coprimary end points were ≥ 4-point improvement on ASDD/ASDD-C Item 2 (a validated patient-reported outcome) and change in gravimetrically measured sweat production at Week 4. Efficacy and safety data are shown through Week 4 for the pediatric (≥ 9 to ≤ 16 years) vs older (> 16 years) subgroups. RESULTS: Six hundred and ninety-seven patients were randomized in ATMOS-1/ATMOS-2 (GT, N = 463; vehicle, N = 234); 44 were ≥ 9 to ≤ 16 years (GT, n = 25; vehicle, n = 19). Baseline disease characteristics were generally similar across subgroups. GT-treated pediatric vs older patients had comparable improvements in ASDD/ASDD-C Item 2 (sweating severity) responder rate, HDSS responder rate (≥ 2-grade improvement]), sweat production, and quality of life (mean change from Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI]/children's DLQI), with greater improvement vs vehicle. Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between subgroups, and most were mild, transient, and infrequently led to discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Topical, once-daily GT improved disease severity (ASDD/ASDD-C, HDSS), sweat production, and quality of life (DLQI), with similar findings in children, adults, and the pooled population. GT was well tolerated, and treatment-emergent adverse events were qualitatively similar between subgroups and consistent with other anticholinergics.