European multicentre pilot survey to assess vitamin D status in rheumatoid arthritis patients and early development of a new Patient Reported Outcome questionnaire (D-PRO).

OBJECTIVE: To collect data on vitamin D (25(OH)D) serum levels in a large number of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients from different European countries, to investigate their relation with disease activity, disability, quality of life, and possibly to construct a new Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) questionnaire in order to self-estimate if they are at risk for vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency-related clinical implications (D-PRO). METHODS: This was a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) supported cross-sectional study (project No CLI064) which involved 625 RA patients (mean age 55±11years, mean disease duration 11±9years), 276 age and sex matched healthy subjects, and rheumatologists working in academic institutions or hospital centres, as well as PARE organizations (patient representatives) from 13 European countries. Serum samples for 25(OH)D level measurement were collected during winter time and analyzed in a central laboratory using chemiluminescence immunoassay (DiaSorin). Patient past medical history was recorded. RA patients were provided with three questionnaires: the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact Diseases score (RAID), the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and the new D-PRO questionnaire at the time of 25(OH)D serum sampling. D-PRO questionnaire consisted of three domains, Symptom Risk Score (SRS), Habitus Risk Score (HRS) and Global Risk Score (SRS+HRS=GRS), constructed with items possibly related to vitamin D deficiency. D-PRO was correlated with both clinical and PRO scores. DAS28-CRP was also evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed by non parametric tests. RESULTS: Mean serum concentration of 25(OH)D in RA patients (17.62±9.76ng/ml) was found significantly lower if compared to the levels obtained in matched controls (18.95±9.45ng/ml) (p=0.01), with statistically significant differences among several European countries. Negative correlations were found between 25(OH)D serum levels and DAS28-CRP (p<0.001), RAID (p=0.05) and HAQ (p=0.04) scores in the RA patients group. Negative correlations were also found in the cohort of enrolled RA patients between 25(OH)D serum concentrations and SRS (p=0.04), HRS (p=0.02) and GRS (p=0.02) domains of the D-PRO questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: This first multicentre European survey add new evidences that vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency is frequent in RA patients with statistically significant differences among several countries. Vitamin D serum concentrations seem to correlate negatively and significantly with the D-PRO Global Risk Score, clinimetric indexes for quality of life, disease activity and disability in present cohort of RA European patients.

Efficacy and safety of once-monthly ibandronate treatment in patients with low bone mineral density-ESTHER Study: 24 months of follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis is a major health and economic problem worldwide. The use of new drugs, such as ibandronate, is aimed at improving treatment of osteoporosis and currently poor compliance with BP therapy. OBJECTIVE: To investigate efficacy and safety of ibandronate applied monthly, orally, in women with low bone mineral density (BMD). METHODS: The prospective study was conducted in 34 centers in Serbia and included 77 women treated for 24 months with monthly ibandronate. The efficacy of treatment was assessed by change in bone mass values obtained by BMD measurement at the end of 24 months follow-up versus baseline and 12-months follow-up values. Compliance and safety, i.e. adverse effects (AE) were recorded. RESULTS: Participants were postmenopausal (96%), osteoporotic (79.7%) females, diagnosed by lumbar spine DXA measurement (81%), with history of prior BP therapy in 33.8% women. The physical activity level significantly increased to the substantial level of activity (5.2% vs. 21.3%, p = 0.003) during the study. After 12 and 24 months of treatment, BMD values significantly increased (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001). BP experienced patients improved more than BP naïve patients at both time points (p = 0.012 and p = 0.027, respectively). During the second 12 months of treatment the adherence was 96%; AE were recorded as mild gastrointestinal disturbances in 3.9%. CONCLUSION: Treatment by using ibandronate once monthly for 24 months was generally well tolerated and led to a significant increase in BMD in women with low BMD.