[The role of chemotherapy in bladder cancer]. / Rôle de la chimiothérapie dans le cancer de la vessie.

The management of bladder cancer, initially exclusively surgical, was recently improved by the development of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy can thus be proposed as bladder instillations in order to prevent recurrences of non-muscle-invasive cancer (NMIC), and systemically in case of muscle-invasive cancer (MIC). Chemotherapy can then be administered prior to surgery (neoadjuvant), as a complement to surgery (adjuvant), as an alternative to surgery as part of a multimodality treatment, and alone in palliative intent in case of metastatic cancer. Renal function and general health status of the patient help the decision-making and the choice of the chemotherapy regimen, which should be validated during a multidisciplinary meeting and presented to the patient during a dedicated medical and paramedical appointment.

Organization of primary care pathway in head and neck oncology (short version): Organization of chemotherapy in head and neck oncology.

Chemotherapy may be indicated in head and neck cancer: as induction, associated with radiation therapy, or as a palliative solution, in case of local or locoregional progression if surgery and radiation therapy are contraindicated, and/or in case of metastatic progression. The most frequently used anticancer agents are platins, antimetabolites (5-fluorouracil, methotrexate) and taxanes. For several years now, in some indications, chemotherapy may be associated with targeted anti-EGFR antibody therapy. Prescription of chemotherapy and follow-up in head and neck cancer requires particular attention due to comorbidities related to alcohol abuse and smoking and frequent denutrition. Management thus requires close cooperation between the ENT physician, medical oncologists and radiation oncologists.

French Society of ENT (SFORL) guidelines for care pathway organization in head and neck oncology (short version). Early management of head and neck cancer.

Early management in oncology is based on coordination and high-quality exchange between the various health-care partners. The present guidelines are based on a literature search with levels of evidence. Treatment waiting time can be optimized by performing assessment as early as possible (Expert opinion), to limit the interval (ideally, less than 4 weeks) between first consultation and data collection. In the first specialist consultation, diagnostic work-up should be scheduled and the data required for management should be determined (Grade B). Work-up may be conducted on a day-care basis or with conventional admission (Expert opinion). The patient's medico-social context should be taken into account from the outset, with social work involvement whenever necessary (Expert opinion). Pain and nutritional management should be planned for (Grade A) and realistic therapeutic education be provided (Expert opinion). Community-hospital teamwork for supportive care should be optimized (Expert opinion). Management should be early and multidisciplinary, to shorten delay between diagnosis and treatment initiation.

Guidelines (short version) of the French Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Society (SFORL) on patient pathway organization in ENT: The therapeutic decision-making process.

OBJECTIVES: The authors present the guidelines of the French Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Society (SFORL) for patient pathway organization in head and neck cancer, and in particular for multidisciplinary team meetings. The present article concerns the therapeutic decision-making process. METHODS: A multidisciplinary work group was entrusted with a review of the scientific literature on the above topic. Guidelines were drawn up, based on the articles retrieved and the group members' individual experience. They were then read over by an editorial group independent of the work group. The final version was established in a coordination meeting. The guidelines were graded as A, B, C or expert opinion, by decreasing level of evidence. RESULTS: It is recommended that: an organ specialist should contribute to all multidisciplinary meetings on head and neck cancer; all members of the multidisciplinary meeting should have specific knowledge in head and neck cancer; any referring physician who does not follow the multidisciplinary meeting's advice should justify that decision; there should be sufficient time to prepare, discuss and sum up the cases dealt with in the multidisciplinary team meeting.