Laboratory diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: A retrospective experience.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe complication of heparin therapy associated with thrombosis that requires a quick diagnosis. Therefore, laboratory assays must provide an accurate and swift answer. This work aims to evaluate the performances of an ELISA assay, especially when combined with 4T risk score, and a functional assay. METHODS: Data were collected for 894 patients treated by heparin who underwent anticoagulant switch because of HIT suspicion and were examined by a multidisciplinary expert team who confirmed or ruled out HIT diagnosis. All patients were tested for anti-PF4 IgG with Asserachrom HPIA IgG (ELISA), and 307 were tested with a platelet aggregation test done on platelet-rich plasma (PRP-PAT). The 4T risk score was available for 607 of them. RESULTS: HIT was diagnosed in 232 patients. 4T risk score had a 94.2% negative predictive value (NPV) for risk scores ≤3 and 77.3% for risk scores ≤5. The sensitivity of ELISA was 90.9%, its specificity 79.0%, and its NPV 96.1%. When combined with 4T risk score, its NPV reached 100% and 97% for risk scores ≤3 and ≤5, respectively. PRP-PAT sensitivity was 70.4%, and its specificity was 92.3%. Combination of ELISA and PRP-PAT had a 0.7% false-negative rate. CONCLUSION: This study shows that ELISA can rule out HIT with an excellent NPV, especially when combined with the 4T risk score. Nonetheless, it has low specificity; hence, it needs to be associated with a functional assay.

Characteristics and care of chronic hepatitis C treated with direct-acting antivirals in migrants.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatitis C is poorly documented in migrants. The published studies mainly concern the screening in this population and are limited to some countries in Europe and North America. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics and care of chronic hepatitis C in this population compared to the nonmigrant population, in the era of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). METHOD: We performed a retrospective analysis based on data presented at the multidisciplinary team meetings of our tertiary care center between 2015 and 2019. RESULTS: We included 277 migrant- and 1390 nonmigrant patients mono-infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and treated with DAAs. The majority of the migrants were from Eastern European countries. In multivariable analysis, BMI classes associated with more obesity (OR = 1.84; 95% CI, 1.37-2.49; P < 0.001) and therapeutic patient education (OR = 3.91; 95% CI, 2.38-6.49; P < 0.001) were positively associated with migrant status, whereas age (OR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.90-0.94; P < 0.001), female gender (OR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28-0.74; P = 0.002), modes of contamination with less drug use, transfusion history or nosocomial risk, as well more unknown mode (OR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.96; P = 0.031), alcohol consumption (OR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29-0.73; P = 0.001), types of structures with less care in a general hospital or health network of general practitioners and more care in a university hospital or primary addictology center (OR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.60-0.99; P = 0.046) and opioid substitution therapy (OR = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08-0.68; P = 0.008) were negatively associated with migrant status. The substained virologic response 12 was close to 97% in both groups. CONCLUSION: Despite multiple differences in characteristics and therapeutic care between the two populations, the chances of healing hepatitis C were the same among migrant- compared with nonmigrant patients.

Changes in the profile and therapeutic care of people who use drugs with HCV mono-infection: a retrospective study between 2015 and 2019 from a monocentric tertiary referent center in France.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: People who use drugs (PWUDs) are the main group at risk for hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission and a key population for hepatitis C elimination. Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings were set up in France in December 2014 within regional reference centers to supervise the prescriptions and delivery of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) to optimize the management of HCV infection. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the changes in the profile and therapeutic care of PWUDs with HCV mono-infection according to the evolution of MDT meetings in a regional tertiary reference center. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2019, overall 1912 HCV-infected patients presented at the MDT meetings, 547 were PWUDs with HCV mono-infection treated with DAAs. Five periods were defined according to the evolution of MDT meetings. The profile and management of PWUDs were compared among these five periods. RESULTS: Over time, the frequency of advanced stage of fibrosis decreased from 90.8 to 36.3% (P < 0.001), whereas the therapeutic care of the patients in primary addictology centers and networks of general practitioners increased from 17.4 to 55% (P < 0.001). The frequency of excessive alcohol consumption varied between 9.1 and 30% (P = 0.003) and that of opioid substitution therapy between 42.5 and 70% (P < 0.001). The Sustained virologic response assessed 12 weeks after the end of treatment rate was above 95% for the five periods. CONCLUSION: Between 2015 and 2019, the changes in the profile and management of PWUDs have followed the evolution of MDT meetings concerning patients with less advanced fibrosis and more therapeutic hepatitis C care made by the primary care centers.

Potential clinical impact of medication discrepancies at hospital admission.

BACKGROUND: Medication errors at the interfaces of care are highly prevalent. This study aims to identify unintentional medication discrepancies at hospital admission and to explore their potential clinical impact in elderly patients. METHOD: The study was conducted in an Internal Medicine Department. Patients ≥ 65 years admitted through the emergency department were eligible. Best possible medication histories, obtained from different sources by pharmacists, were compared to admission medication prescriptions to identify and correct unintentional discrepancies. A three-category scale was used to rate errors for their potential to cause harm: Level (L) 1 "no potential harm", L2 "monitoring or intervention potentially required to preclude harm", and L3 "potential harm". This scale was also designed to take into account patient's clinical characteristics and high-risk drugs. RESULTS: 256 patients were included. Mean age was 82.2 ± 7.2 years old. 85 patients (33.2%) had ≥ 1 unintentional discrepancies. Overall, there were 173 unintentional discrepancies. The 3 most common drug classes involved in errors were nervous system (22.0%), gastrointestinal (20.0%) and cardiovascular (18.0%) medications. The most common types of errors were "omission" (87.9%) and "incorrect dose" (8.1%). Among the unintentional discrepancies, 20.8% had the potential to require increased monitoring or intervention to preclude harm (L2) and 6.4% had the potential to cause clinical deterioration (L3). CONCLUSION: More than 25% of the identified errors presented a potential clinical impact. These results show that a combined intervention of pharmacists and physicians in a collaborative medication reconciliation process has a high potential to reduce clinical relevant errors at hospital admission.