Rapid Autopsy to Define Dendritic Cell Spatial Distribution and T Cell Association in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Immunotherapy response is associated with the presence of conventional dendritic cells (cDCs). cDC type 1 (cDC1) is critically important for CD8+ T cell activation, cDC type 2 (cDC2) regulates CD4+ T cell responses, and mature regulatory cDCs may dampen T cell responses in the tumor microenvironment (TME). However, we lack a clear understanding of cDC distribution in the human TME, cDC prevalence in metastatic sites, and cDC differences in early- versus late-stage disease. Rapid autopsy specimens of 10 patients with lung adenocarcinoma were evaluated to detect cDCs and immune cells via multiplex immunofluorescence using 18 markers and 42 tumors. First, we found that T cells, cDC1, and cDC2 were confined to stroma, whereas mature regulatory DCs were enriched in tumor, suggesting unique localization-specific functions. Second, lung and lymph node tumors were more enriched in T cells and cDCs than liver tumors, underscoring differences in the TME of metastatic sites. Third, although the proportion of T cells and cDC1 did not differ in different stages, an increase in the proportion of cDC2 and macrophages in late stage suggests potential differences in regulation of T cell responses in different stages. Collectively, these findings provide new, to our knowledge, insights into cDC biology in human cancer that may have important therapeutic implications.

Detectable Lipidomes and Metabolomes by Different Plasma Exosome Isolation Methods in Healthy Controls and Patients with Advanced Prostate and Lung Cancer.

Circulating exosomes in the blood are promising tools for biomarker discovery in cancer. Due to their heterogeneity, different isolation methods may enrich distinct exosome cargos generating different omic profiles. In this study, we evaluated the effects of plasma exosome isolation methods on detectable multi-omic profiles in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and healthy controls, and developed an algorithm to quantify exosome enrichment. Plasma exosomes were isolated from CRPC (n = 10), NSCLC (n = 14), and healthy controls (n = 10) using three different methods: size exclusion chromatography (SEC), lectin binding, and T-cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain-containing protein 4 (TIM4) binding. Molecular profiles were determined by mass spectrometry of extracted exosome fractions. Enrichment analysis of uniquely detected molecules was performed for each method with MetaboAnalyst. The exosome enrichment index (EEI) scores methods based on top differential molecules between patient groups. The lipidomic analysis detected 949 lipids using exosomes from SEC, followed by 246 from lectin binding and 226 from TIM4 binding. The detectable metabolites showed SEC identifying 191 while lectin binding and TIM4 binding identified 100 and 107, respectively. When comparing uniquely detected molecules, different methods showed preferential enrichment of different sets of molecules with SEC enriching the greatest diversity. Compared to controls, SEC identified 28 lipids showing significant difference in NSCLC, while only 1 metabolite in NSCLC and 5 metabolites in CRPC were considered statistically significant (FDR < 0.1). Neither lectin-binding- nor TIM4-binding-derived exosome lipids or metabolites demonstrated significant differences between patient groups. We observed the highest EEI from SEC in lipids (NSCLC: 871.33) which was also noted in metabolites. These results support that the size exclusion method of exosome extraction implemented by SBI captures more heterogeneous exosome populations. In contrast, lectin-binding and TIM4-binding methods bind surface glycans or phosphatidylserine moieties of the exosomes. Overall, these findings suggest that specific isolation methods select subpopulations which may significantly impact cancer biomarker discovery.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Chemoradiation for Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.

OPINION STATEMENT: Limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) is a potentially curable disease. However, most patients develop disease relapse shortly after definitive treatment. The landmark trials IMpower133 and CASPIAN demonstrated a survival benefit with the addition of immunotherapy to first-line platinum/etoposide for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Therefore, it is critical to determine whether advancements in overall survival with immunotherapy can be translated earlier into the treatment paradigm for LS-SCLC. Decades of robust preclinical research into the synergism of radiation therapy and immunotherapy set the stage for the combination of these treatment modalities. Recently published data suggests tolerability of single agent immunotherapy concurrent with chemoradiation in LS-SCLC, along with promising efficacy. However, combination immunotherapy in the consolidation setting appears too toxic, although this may be reflective of the dosing schedule rather than inherent to any combination immune checkpoint blockade. Here, we review underlying mechanisms of synergy with the combination of radiation and immunotherapy, the safety and efficacy of respective treatment modalities, and the ongoing trials that are exploring novel therapeutic approaches for LS-SCLC. Pivotal trials in LS-SCLC are ongoing and anticipated to aid in understanding efficacy and safety of immunotherapy with concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy.

Making the Rounds: Exploring the Role of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Advancements in the clinical practice of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are shifting treatment paradigms towards increasingly personalized approaches. Liquid biopsies using various circulating analytes provide minimally invasive methods of sampling the molecular content within tumor cells. Plasma-derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), the tumor-derived component of cell-free DNA (cfDNA), is the most extensively studied analyte and has a growing list of applications in the clinical management of NSCLC. As an alternative to tumor genotyping, the assessment of oncogenic driver alterations by ctDNA has become an accepted companion diagnostic via both single-gene polymerase chain reactions (PCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) for advanced NSCLC. ctDNA technologies have also shown the ability to detect the emerging mechanisms of acquired resistance that evolve after targeted therapy. Furthermore, the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) by ctDNA for patients with NSCLC after curative-intent treatment may serve as a prognostic and potentially predictive biomarker for recurrence and response to therapy, respectively. Finally, ctDNA analysis via mutational, methylation, and/or fragmentation multi-omic profiling offers the potential for improving early lung cancer detection. In this review, we discuss the role of ctDNA in each of these capacities, namely, for molecular profiling, treatment response monitoring, MRD detection, and early cancer detection of NSCLC.

Racial Disparities in Early-Stage NSCLC Treatment: A Call for Action.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with a 5-year survival rate of only 28%; however, when caught at an early stage, it can be cured with surgery or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Unfortunately, racial disparities may result in limited access to care for some patients. Liu and colleagues analyzed 64,999 cases of early-stage NSCLC treated between 2005 and 2017 from the Florida Cancer Registry and showed that Black patients had 36% lower odds of receiving curative-intent surgery compared with their White counterparts. This study highlights significant racial disparities in treatment patterns that must be addressed urgently. See related article by Liu and colleagues, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33:489-99.

Discrepancy Between Liquid Biopsy and Tumor Next-Generation Sequencing Due to Low Tumor Fraction in a Patient With Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Tumor next-generation sequencing (NGS) is the gold standard molecular testing for driver genomic alterations in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it requires a biopsy, which is an invasive procedure. In contrast, a liquid biopsy is a minimally invasive test that measures circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the plasma and can be also used for molecular profiling. We report a case of a patient with stage IV metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with a negative liquid biopsy for tumor-derived genomic alterations but positive tissue NGS for mutations, including a driver KRASG12C mutation. The discrepancy between the two results can be attributed to low levels of ctDNA determined by tumor fraction below 1%, which prevents the liquid biopsy assay from detecting genomic alterations when the tumor shedding into the blood is below the detection threshold. It is well known in the literature that false negative liquid biopsies are possible, but a significant finding this case highlights is the clinical importance of tumor fraction in a liquid biopsy report. We conclude that patients with a liquid biopsy with low tumor fraction need further testing with tumor NGS to determine the presence of driver genomic alterations.

Real-world comparison of the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab versus durvalumab in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease associated with high relapse rates and limited treatment options. Current standard of care treatment for extensive-stage disease includes combination chemotherapy plus immunotherapy. Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are preferred first-line treatments in combination with chemotherapy with both atezolizumab and durvalumab being equivalent options. Although both ICIs are listed as front-line options in clinical guidelines, there have been no head-to-head trials comparing durvalumab to atezolizumab. Therefore, it is unknown if either agent is superior with regards to efficacy or safety. METHODS: This retrospective, single-institution study examined patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer presenting to Moffitt Cancer Center between October 1st, 2018 to May 31st, 2023 who received either atezolizumab or durvalumab in combination with a platinum-doublet in the first-line setting. To be included in this analysis patients must have received at least two cycles of induction chemotherapy and ICI and one cycle of maintenance ICI. The primary outcome of this study was overall survival. The secondary outcomes include progression-free survival, immune-related adverse events, hospitalizations due to ICIs, and progression-free survival on second-line therapy (PFS2). RESULTS: Of the 101 patients included, 55 received durvalumab (54.5 %) and 46 received atezolizumab (45.5 %). The median overall survival in the durvalumab and atezolizumab arms were 14.7 versus 11.6 months, respectively (HR 0.59; 95 % CI, 0.38-0.92; P = 0.020). There was not a statistically significant difference in median progression-free survival between the two arms (6.3 versus 5.9 months, P = 0.344). Atezolizumab was associated with a numerically higher incidence of immune-related adverse events (47.8 % versus 32.7 %, P = 0.157) and hospitalization rates for those with an immune-related adverse event (36.4 % versus 16.7 %, P = 0.204). PFS2 was 2.3 months in the atezolizumab arm and 3.4 months in the durvalumab arm (HR 1.24; 95 % CI, 0.69-2.23; P = 0.466). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world retrospective study, durvalumab was associated with improved overall survival in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer consistent with previous findings from a similar study in a Chinese patient population. Although not statistically significant, there was a lower incidence of immune-related adverse events in the durvalumab arm as well as ICI-related hospitalizations. PFS2 was not statistically significant different between arms.

ctDNA for the Evaluation and Management of EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers a new paradigm in optimizing treatment strategies for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Its potential spans early-stage disease, influencing adjuvant therapy, to advanced disease, where it aids in identifying genomic markers and resistance mechanisms. This review explores the evolving landscape of utilizing liquid biopsies, specifically circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), in the management of NSCLC with EGFR mutations. While tissue-based genomic testing remains the cornerstone for clinical decision-making, liquid biopsies offer a well-validated, guideline-recommended alternative approach. Ongoing trials integrating ctDNA for EGFR-mutant NSCLC management are also discussed, shedding light on the potential of ctDNA in early-stage disease, including its applications in prognostication, risk stratification, and minimal residual disease detection post-curative intent treatment. For advanced disease, the role of ctDNA in identifying resistance mechanisms to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is explored, providing insights into disease progression and guiding treatment decisions. This review also addresses the challenges, including the limitations in sensitivity of current assays for disease recurrence detection, and calls for future studies to refine treatment approaches, standardize reporting, and explore alternative biofluids for enhanced sensitivity. A systematic approach is crucial to address barriers to ctDNA deployment, ensuring equitable access, and facilitating its integration into routine clinical practice.

A Multicenter Open-Label Randomized Phase II Study of Osimertinib With and Without Ramucirumab in Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Naïve EGFR-Mutant Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (RAMOSE trial).

PURPOSE: Preclinical studies demonstrated that dual inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathways delay the emergence of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and in trials with first-generation EGFR TKIs, the combination of EGFR VEGF pathway inhibitors prolonged progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS: The RAMOSE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03909334, HCRN LUN-18-335) is a randomized, open-label multicenter phase II study comparing osimertinib with ramucirumab (arm A) to osimertinib (arm B) for initial treatment of metastatic EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with 2:1 random assignment. The primary end point is PFS for evaluable patients; secondary end points include objective response rates (ORRs), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival, and safety. The stratification criteria were EGFR mutation type and the presence of CNS metastasis. RESULTS: At data cutoff on August 29, 2023, 160 patients consented, 147 patients received treatment, and 139 patients were evaluable with at least one scan. In this preplanned interim analysis, the median follow-up was 16.6 months. Among the evaluable patients, 57 PFS events occurred. The median PFS was 24.8 (A) versus 15.6 (B) months (hazard ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.93]; log-rank P = .023), 12-month PFS rate was 76.7% (A) versus 61.9% (B; P = .026). No significant difference was observed in the ORRs and DCRs between arms. Any-grade (G) adverse events (AEs) occurred in 100% (A) and 98% (B) of patients, with no G5 treatment-related AE (TRAE), one G4 TRAE (hyponatremia, A), and 53% (A) versus 41% (B) G3 TRAEs. AE-related discontinuation occurred in 13 patients (9.7% in A and 8.7% in B). The safety profile was in line with known safety of each drug. CONCLUSION: Ramucirumab plus osimertinib significantly prolonged PFS compared with osimertinib alone in patients with TKI-naïve EGFR-mutant NSCLC. The combination is safe and well tolerated.

ctDNA Monitoring for Small Cell Lung Cancer: Ready for Prime Time?

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the deadliest form of lung cancer and has few precision medicine approaches available. A recent study analyzed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in 33 patients with extensive-stage SCLC and showed that ctDNA levels and response patterns correlate strongly with clinical response and survival outcomes. See related article by Sivapalan et al., p. 2310.

Treatment Strategies for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Common EGFR Mutations: A Review of the History of EGFR TKIs Approval and Emerging Data.

The development of targeted therapies over the past two decades has led to a dramatic change in the management of EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While there are currently five approved EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for treating EGFR-mutant NSCLC in the first-line setting, therapy selection after progression on EGFR TKIs remains complex. Multiple groups are investigating novel therapies and drug combinations to determine the optimal therapy and treatment sequence for these patients. In this review, we summarize the landmark trials and history of the approval of EGFR TKIs, their efficacy and tolerability, and the role of these therapies in patients with central nervous system metastasis. We also briefly discuss the mechanisms of resistance to EGFR TKIs, ongoing attempts to overcome resistance and improve outcomes, and finalize by offering treatment sequencing recommendations.

Genomic approaches to cancer and minimal residual disease detection using circulating tumor DNA.

Liquid biopsies using cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are being used frequently in both research and clinical settings. ctDNA can be used to identify actionable mutations to personalize systemic therapy, detect post-treatment minimal residual disease (MRD), and predict responses to immunotherapy. ctDNA can also be isolated from a range of different biofluids, with the possibility of detecting locoregional MRD with increased sensitivity if sampling more proximally than blood plasma. However, ctDNA detection remains challenging in early-stage and post-treatment MRD settings where ctDNA levels are minuscule giving a high risk for false negative results, which is balanced with the risk of false positive results from clonal hematopoiesis. To address these challenges, researchers have developed ever-more elegant approaches to lower the limit of detection (LOD) of ctDNA assays toward the part-per-million range and boost assay sensitivity and specificity by reducing sources of low-level technical and biological noise, and by harnessing specific genomic and epigenomic features of ctDNA. In this review, we highlight a range of modern assays for ctDNA analysis, including advancements made to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. We further highlight the challenge of detecting ultra-rare tumor-associated variants, overcoming which will improve the sensitivity of post-treatment MRD detection and open a new frontier of personalized adjuvant treatment decision-making.

Osimertinib vs. afatinib as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with an EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutation.

Background: The optimal treatment sequencing for patients with metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a subject of debate. In the United States, osimertinib is the preferred EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in the first-line setting. However, small retrospective studies suggest that alternative EGFR TKI sequencing strategies may produce similar outcomes. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring an EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutation treated with osimertinib vs. afatinib as first-line therapy. Methods: This retrospective, single-institution study examined 86 patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with either afatinib (n=15) or osimertinib (n=71) in the first-line setting. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints included time on EGFR TKI, overall survival (OS), and the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Results: There was no difference in the PFS (median: 27.9 vs. 29.0 months, P=0.75), OS (P=0.18), and the median time on first-line EGFR TKI (23.9 vs. 15.2 months, P=0.10) between the afatinib and osimertinib groups, respectively. The number of AEs was also similar between the two treatment groups (P=0.17). Conclusions: In this real-world retrospective study, there were no differences in PFS or OS between patients treated with afatinib or osimertinib in the first-line setting. These findings should be further investigated in larger prospective studies.

Pre-radiotherapy ctDNA liquid biopsy for risk stratification of oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

The optimal treatment for patients with oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. Some patients with oligometastatic disease can experience prolonged remission after locally consolidative radiation therapy (RT), while others harbor micrometastatic disease (below current limits of detection by imaging) that may benefit from further prioritization of systemic therapy. To better risk-stratify this population and identify the patients most likely to benefit from locally consolidative radiation therapy, we performed a multi-institutional cohort study of patients with oligometastatic NSCLC undergoing liquid biopsy analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Among this real-world cohort of 1,487 patients undergoing analysis (using the Tempus xF assay), a total of 1,880 ctDNA liquid biopsies along with paired clinical data were obtained across various timepoints. Approximately 20% (n=309) of patients had ctDNA obtained prior to RT and after their diagnosis of oligometastatic disease. Samples were de-identified and analyzed for mutational burden and variant frequencies of detectable deleterious (or likely deleterious) mutations in plasma. Patients with undetectable ctDNA before RT had significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival compared to patients with detectable ctDNA prior to RT. In patients that received RT, 598 pathogenic (or likely deleterious) variants were identified. ctDNA mutational burden pre-RT and ctDNA maximum variant allele frequency (VAF) pre-RT were both significantly inversely correlated with both progression-free (P = 0.0031 for mutational burden, P = 0.0084 for maximum VAF) and overall survival (P = 0.045 for mutational burden, P = 0.0073 for maximum VAF). Patients without detectable ctDNA prior to RT had significantly improved progression-free survival (P = 0.004) and overall survival (P = 0.03) compared to patients with detectable ctDNA prior to RT. These data suggest that in patients with oligometastatic NSCLC, pre-radiotherapy ctDNA analysis can potentially identify the patients most likely to benefit from locally consolidative RT and experience prolonged progression-free and overall survival. Similarly, ctDNA may be useful to identify those patients with undiagnosed micrometastatic disease, in whom it may be appropriate to prioritize systemic therapy.

Pre-radiotherapy ctDNA liquid biopsy for risk stratification of oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

The optimal treatment paradigm for patients with oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. Some patients with oligometastatic disease experience prolonged remission after locally consolidative radiation therapy (RT), while others harbor micrometastatic disease (below limits of detection by imaging) and benefit from systemic therapy. To risk-stratify and identify the patients most likely to benefit from locally consolidative RT, we performed a multi-institutional cohort study of 1487 patients with oligometastatic NSCLC undergoing liquid biopsy analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). In total, 1880 liquid biopsies were performed and approximately 20% of patients (n = 309) had ctDNA measured prior to RT and after their diagnosis of oligometastatic disease. Patients with undetectable ctDNA (pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in plasma using the Tempus xF assay) before RT had significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.004) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.030). ctDNA maximum variant allele frequency (VAF) pre-RT and ctDNA mutational burden pre-RT were both significantly inversely correlated with PFS (maximum VAF P = 0.008, mutational burden P = 0.003) and OS (maximum VAF P = 0.007, mutational burden P = 0.045). These findings were corroborated by multivariate Cox proportional hazards models that included eight additional clinical and genomic parameters. Overall, these data suggest that in patients with oligometastatic NSCLC, pre-RT ctDNA can potentially identify the patients most likely to benefit from locally consolidative RT and experience prolonged PFS and OS. Similarly, ctDNA may be useful to identify undiagnosed micrometastatic disease where it may be appropriate to prioritize systemic therapies.

Circulating Tumor DNA Monitoring on Chemo-immunotherapy for Risk Stratification in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Chemoimmunotherapy (chemoIO) is a prevalent first-line treatment for advanced driver-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with maintenance therapy given after induction. However, there is significant clinical variability in the duration, dosing, and timing of maintenance therapy after induction chemoIO. We used circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring to inform outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving chemoIO. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This retrospective study included 221 patients from a phase III trial of atezolizumab+carboplatin+nab-paclitaxel versus carboplatin+nab-paclitaxel in squamous NSCLC (IMpower131). ctDNA monitoring used the FoundationOne Tracker involving comprehensive genomic profiling of pretreatment tumor tissue, variant selection using an algorithm to exclude nontumor variants, and multiplex PCR of up to 16 variants to detect and quantify ctDNA. RESULTS: ctDNA was detected (ctDNA+) in 96% of pretreatment samples (median, 93 mean tumor molecules/mL), and similar ctDNA dynamics were noted across treatment arms during chemoIO. ctDNA decrease from baseline to C4D1 was associated with improved outcomes across multiple cutoffs for patients treated with chemoIO. When including patients with missing plasma or ctDNA- at baseline, patients with ctDNA- at C4D1 (clearance), had more favorable progression-free survival (median 8.8 vs. 3.5 months; HR, 0.32;0.20-0.52) and OS (median not reached vs. 8.9 months; HR, 0.22; 0.12-0.39) from C4D1 than ctDNA+ patients. CONCLUSIONS: ctDNA monitoring during induction chemoIO can inform treatment outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC. Importantly, monitoring remains feasible and informative for patients missing baseline ctDNA. ctDNA testing during induction chemoIO identifies patients at higher risk for disease progression and may inform patient selection for novel personalized maintenance or second-line treatment strategies.

Phase II Randomized Trial of Carboplatin, Pemetrexed, and Bevacizumab With and Without Atezolizumab in Stage IV Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Who Harbor a Sensitizing EGFR Mutation or Have Never Smoked.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have never smoked or have tumors with mutations in EGFR generally derive minimal benefit from single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors. Prior data indicate that adding PD-L1 inhibition to anti-VEGF and cytotoxic chemotherapy may be a promising approach to overcoming immunotherapy resistance in these patients, however prospective validation is needed. This trial in progress (NCT03786692) is evaluating patients with stage IV NSCLC who have never smoked or who have tumors with sensitizing EGFR alterations to determine if a 4-drug combination of atezolizumab, carboplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab can improve outcomes compared to carboplatin, pemetrexed and bevacizumab without atezolizumab. METHODS: This is a randomized, phase II, multicenter study evaluating carboplatin, pemetrexed, bevacizumab with and without atezolizumab in 117 patients with stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC. Randomization is 2 to 1 favoring the atezolizumab containing arm. Eligible patients include: 1) those with tumors with sensitizing EGFR alterations in exons 19 or 21 or 2) patients who have never smoked and have wild-type tumors (ie, no EGFR, ALK or ROS1 alterations). Patients are defined as having never smoked if they have smoked less than 100 cigarettes in a lifetime. Patients with EGFR-mutated tumors must have disease progression or intolerance to prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), response rate, duration of response, and time to response. CONCLUSION: This phase II trial is accruing patients at U.S. sites through the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). The trial opened in August 2019 and accrual is expected to be completed in the Fall of 2024.

Circulating Tumor DNA Minimal Residual Disease Detection of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Curative Intent.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) minimal residual disease (MRD) is a powerful biomarker with the potential to improve survival outcomes for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Multiple groups have shown the ability to detect MRD following curative-intent NSCLC treatment using next-generation sequencing-based assays of plasma cell-free DNA. These studies have been modest in size, largely retrospective, and without thorough prospective clinical validation. Still, when restricting measurement to the first post-treatment timepoint to assess the clinical performance of ctDNA MRD detection, they have demonstrated sensitivity for predicting disease relapse ranging between 36% and 100%, and specificity ranging between 71% and 100%. When considering all post-treatment follow-up timepoints (surveillance), including those beyond the initial post-treatment measurement, these assays' performances improve with sensitivity and specificity for identifying relapse ranging from 82% to 100% and 70% to 100%, respectively. In this manuscript, we review the evidence available to date regarding ctDNA MRD detection in patients with NSCLC undergoing curative-intent treatment and the ongoing prospective studies involving ctDNA MRD detection in this patient population.

Overcoming KRAS-Mutant Lung Cancer.

More than 50 years after the discovery of RAS family proteins, which harbor the most common activating mutations in cancer, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first direct allele-specific inhibitor of mutant KRAS in lung cancer. We highlight the history of discovering RAS and decades of studies targeting KRAS-driven lung cancer. A landmark article by Shokat and colleagues in 2013 elucidated allosteric inhibition of this undruggable target and paved the way for the first-in-class direct KRASG12C inhibitor. Although these drugs have impressive 36%-45% objective response rates with a median duration of response of 10 months, many tumors do not respond, and diverse mechanisms of resistance have already been observed; this includes new KRAS alterations, activation of alternate RTK pathway proteins, bypass pathways, and transcriptional remodeling. These resistance mechanisms can be profiled using tissue-based and plasma-based testing and help to inform clinical trial options for patients. We conclude with a discussion of research informing ongoing clinical trials to rationally test promising treatments to thwart or overcome resistance to KRASG12C inhibitors and target other KRAS-altered lung cancers.

Immunotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Decade of Progress.

The treatment paradigm for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer has substantially changed with the discovery of immunotherapy. The incorporation of immunotherapy into treatment algorithms has resulted in better outcomes for patients, with fewer side effects compared with classic chemotherapeutic agents. Multiple treatment options are now available for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, ranging from single-agent immunotherapy to quadruple therapy, which involves dual immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy plus anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs. This article will review landmark studies that have led to U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of immunotherapy agents alone or in combination with chemotherapy or other immunotherapy drugs to treat advanced non-small cell lung cancer.