A phase I, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study on vorinostat in combination with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin in patients with refractory colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose of vorinostat in combination with fixed doses of 5-fluorouracil (FU), leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Vorinostat was given orally twice daily for 1 week every 2 weeks. FOLFOX was given on days 4 and 5 of vorinostat. The vorinostat starting dose was 100 mg twice daily. Escalation occurred in cohorts of three to six patients. Pharmacokinetics of vorinostat, FU, and oxaliplatin were studied. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled. Thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, gastrointestinal toxicities, and fatigue increased in frequency and severity at higher dose levels of vorinostat. Two of 4 evaluable patients at dose level 4 (vorinostat 400 mg orally twice daily) developed dose-limiting fatigue. One of 10 evaluable patients at dose level 3 (vorinostat 300 mg orally twice daily) had dose-limiting fatigue, anorexia, and dehydration. There were significant relationships between vorinostat dose and the area under the curve on days 1 and 5 (Pearson, < 0.001). The vorinostat area under the curve increased (P = 0.005) and clearance decreased (P = 0.003) on day 5 compared with day 1. The median C(max) of FU at each dose level increased significantly with increasing doses of vorinostat, suggesting a pharmacokinetic interaction between FU and vorinostat. Vorinostat-induced thymidylate synthase (TS) modulation was not consistent; only two of six patients had a decrease in intratumoral TS expression by reverse transcription-PCR. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose of vorinostat in combination with FOLFOX is 300 mg orally twice daily x 1 week every 2 weeks. Alternative vorinostat dosing schedules may be needed for optimal down-regulation of TS expression.

Capecitabine, oxaliplatin and radiotherapy: a phase IB neoadjuvant study for esophageal cancer with gene expression analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximal tolerated dose of capecitabine with oxaliplatin + radiotherapy in a phase I study of localized esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) administered on days 1, 15, and 29. Capecitabine administered twice daily 5 days weekly; dose levels (DL) were 1, 1000; 2, 1250; and 3, 1500 mg/m(2) with 50.4 Gy radiation. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicity was reached at DL 3. Carboxylesterase expression in day 2 tumor specimens and induction correlated with response (p

Phase I evaluation of carboplatin by use of a dosing strategy based on a targeted area under the platinum concentration-versus-time curve and individual glomerular filtration rate in cats with tumors.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a carboplatin dose calculation that is based on a targeted area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC(Target)) and individual glomerular filtration rate (GFR) accurately predicts carboplatin-associated myelotoxicoses in tumor-bearing cats, and to determine the maximum tolerated AUC(Target). ANIMALS: 32 cats with tumors. PROCEDURES: In each cat, plasma clearance of technetium Tc 99m-labeled diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid was measured to assess GFR. Carboplatin was administered IV. The dose was calculated by use of an equation as follows: Dose = AUC(Target) x 2.6 x GFR x body weight. Initial AUC(Target) was 2.0 min.mg.mL(-1) and was increased in increments of 0.50 min.mg.mL(-1) in cohorts of 3 cats. To assess myelotoxic effects, CBCs were performed weekly for > or = 4 weeks. Following identification of the maximum tolerated AUC(Target), additional cats were treated at that AUC(Target) and plasma platinum concentrations were measured in 6 cats. RESULTS: The AUC(Target) values ranged from 2.0 to 3.0 min.mg.mL(-1). Neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicosis, and the maximum tolerated AUC(Target) was 2.75 min.mg.mL(-1). Nineteen cats received this dose of carboplatin; 13 became neutropenic, but only 1 developed severe neutropenia (< 500 neutrophils/microL), and none had neutropenia-associated clinical signs. In the cats that had plasma platinum concentration determined, the difference between AUC(Target) and the measured value ranged from -0.23 to 0.31 min.mg.mL(-1) (median, 0.20 min.mg.mL(-1)). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In cats, carboplatin-associated myelotoxicoses were accurately and uniformly predicted by use of the proposed dosing strategy. The maximum tolerated AUC(Target) for a single dose of carboplatin was 2.75 min.mg.mL(-1).

Dysregulation of purine nucleotide biosynthesis pathways modulates cisplatin cytotoxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

We found previously that inactivation of the FCY2 gene, encoding a purine-cytosine permease, or the HPT1 gene, encoding the hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase, enhances cisplatin resistance in yeast cells. Here, we report that in addition to fcy2Delta and hpt1Delta mutants in the salvage pathway of purine nucleotide biosynthesis, mutants in the de novo pathway that disable the feedback inhibition of AMP and GMP biosynthesis also enhanced cisplatin resistance. An activity-enhancing mutant of the ADE4 gene, which constitutively synthesizes AMP and excretes hypoxanthine, and a GMP kinase mutant (guk1), which accumulates GMP and feedback inhibits Hpt1 function, both enhanced resistance to cisplatin. In addition, overexpression of the ADE4 gene in wild-type cells, which increases de novo synthesis of purine nucleotides, also resulted in elevated cisplatin resistance. Cisplatin cytotoxicity in wild-type cells was abolished by low concentration of extracellular purines (adenine, hypoxanthine, and guanine) but not cytosine. Inhibition of cytotoxicity by exogenous adenine was accompanied by a reduction of DNA-bound cisplatin in wild-type cells. As a membrane permease, Fcy2 may mediate limited cisplatin transport because cisplatin accumulation in whole cells was slightly affected in the fcy2Delta mutant. However, the fcy2Delta mutant had a greater effect on the amount of DNA-bound cisplatin, which decreased to 50 to 60% of that in the wild-type cells. Taken together, our results indicate that dysregulation of the purine nucleotide biosynthesis pathways and the addition of exogenous purines can modulate cisplatin cytotoxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

A Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of selenomethionine in combination with a fixed dose of irinotecan in solid tumors.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I study to determine the recommended dose of selenomethionine (SLM) in combination with irinotecan that consistently results in a protective plasma selenium (Se) concentrations > 15 microM after 1 week of SLM loading. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A 3-3 standard escalation design was followed. SLM was given orally twice daily (BID) for one week (loading) followed by continuous once daily (QD) dosing (maintenance). Seven dose levels of selenomethionine were investigated. Irinotecan was given intravenously at a fixed standard weekly dose, starting on the first day of maintenance SLM. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were treated on study. Dose limiting diarrhea complicated by sepsis was noted in one of six patients at each of the dose-levels 1 and 7. Dose-levels > or = 5 (4,800 mcg/dose loading maintenance) resulted in day 8 Se concentrations >15 microM while dose-level 7 (7,200 mcg/dose loading and maintenance) resulted in day 8 Se concentrations > 20 muM. No significant variations in SN-38 or biliary index were noted between weeks 1 and 4 of treatment. Despite achieving target Se concentrations, gastrointestinal and bone marrow toxicities were common and irinotecan dose modification was prevalent. Objective responses were seen in two patients and nine patients had disease control for 6 months or longer. CONCLUSIONS: Selenomethionine can be escalated safely to 7,200 mcg BID x 1 week followed by 7,200 mcg QD in combination with a standard dose of irinotecan. No major protection against irinotecan toxicity was established; however, interesting clinical benefits were noted-supporting the investigation of this combination in future efficacy trials.

Polyamine catabolism in colorectal cancer cells following treatment with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and N1, N11 diethylnorspermine.

PURPOSE: Our previous studies showed that combined treatment of oxaliplatin and N(1), N(11) diethyl-norspermine (DENSPM) results in massive induction of spermidine/spermine N(1)-acetyltransferase (SSAT) mRNA and activity. Since oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) are used clinically in treatment of colorectal cancers, this study examines the effect of adding DENSPM to oxaliplatin/5FU combination on SSAT and spermine oxidase (SMO) in HCT-116 cells. METHODS: HCT-116 cells were treated with clinically relevant concentrations of drugs for 20 h followed by 24 h in drug free medium. SSAT and SMO mRNA and protein were assayed by QRT-PCR and Westerns respectively; polyamine pools were measured by HPLC. SSAT and SMO mRNA in tumor biopsies from patients with rectal cancer receiving oxaliplatin, capecitabine and radiation were measured by QRT-PCR. RESULTS: Oxaliplatin + 5FU + DENSPM produced significantly higher levels of SSAT and SMO mRNA, protein and activity than those seen with oxaliplatin+5FU with a significant depletion of cellular spermine and spermidine pools. Oxaliplatin/DENSPM was superior to 5FU/DENSPM in SSAT induction but similar for SMO. Oxaliplatin + DENSPM revealed synergistic growth inhibition at >IC(50) concentrations and antagonism at

Celecoxib and mucosal protection: translation from an animal model to a phase I clinical trial of celecoxib, irinotecan, and 5-fluorouracil.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea occurs secondary to mucosal inflammation and may be cyclooxygenase-2 mediated. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors may ameliorate chemotherapy-induced mucosal toxicity and enhance its antitumor effect. We investigated this hypothesis in the Ward colorectal cancer rat model and in a phase I clinical study. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In the Ward rat model, irinotecan was given daily x 3 or weekly x 4 with or without celecoxib. In the phase I clinical study, we planned to escalate the dose of irinotecan in the FOLFIRI regimen (irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin) with a fixed dose of celecoxib. Irinotecan was escalated in four dose levels: 180, 200, 220, and 260 mg/m2. Celecoxib was administered as 400 mg, twice daily starting on day 2 of cycle 1. Pharmacokinetics of irinotecan, SN-38, and SN-38G were obtained on days 1 and 14. A standard 3+3 dose escalation scheme was used. Plasma concentrations of irinotecan, SN-38, and SN-38G were measured using high-pressure liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Celecoxib ameliorated diarrhea, weight loss, and lethality and resulted in synergistic antitumor effect in the rat model. Twelve patients with advanced cancers were enrolled and evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Diarrhea was the cause for discontinuation in one. Grade 2 and 3 diarrhea occurred in three and two patients, respectively. One patient had DLT at dose level 2 (grade 3 diarrhea). Two had a DLT at DL3 (G3 emesis and myocardial infarct). Celecoxib had limited influence on the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan in this data set. CONCLUSIONS: Maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan in FOLFIRI schedule with celecoxib is 200 mg/m2.

Simultaneous modeling of concentration-effect and time-course patterns in gene expression data from microarrays.

BACKGROUND: Time-course and concentration-effect experiments with multiple time-points and drug concentrations provide far more valuable information than experiments with just two design-points (treated vs. control), as commonly performed in most microarray studies. Analysis of the data from such complex experiments, however, remains a challenge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Here we present a semi-automated method for fitting time profiles and concentration-effect patterns, simultaneously, to gene expression data. The submodels for time-course included exponential increase and decrease models with parameters, such as initial expression level, maximum effect, and rate-constant (or half-time). The submodel for concentration-effect was a 4-parameter Hill model. RESULTS: The method was applied to an Affymetrix HG-U95Av2 dataset consisting of 51 arrays. The specific study focused on the effects of two platinum drugs, cisplatin and oxaliplatin, on A2780 human ovarian carcinoma cells. Replicates were available at most time points and concentrations. Eighteen genes were selected, and after selection, time-course and concentration-effect were modeled simultaneously. CONCLUSION: Comparisons of model parameters helped to distinguish genes with different expression patterns between the two drug treatments. This overall paradigm can help in understanding the molecular mechanisms of the agents, and the timing of their actions.

Characterization of a clonal isolate of an oxaliplatin resistant ovarian carcinoma cell line A2780/C10.

A single cell clonal sub-line A2780/C10B that is 18-fold resistant to oxaliplatin and approximately threefold cross-resistant to cisplatin and exhibiting a metastasis associated cellular phenotype was characterized for mechanisms of resistance. The cell line exhibited a 50% reduction in the accumulation of both oxaliplatin and cisplatin relative to the parent line, while extensive decline in Pt-DNA adduct levels occurred only following oxaliplatin treatment. The basal GSH levels were fivefold higher in A2780/C10B compared to A2780 and had a fivefold elevation in gamma-GT suggesting this may be the mechanism involved in GSH elevation. The basal levels of ERCC-1, XPA and MRP-2 mRNA levels in A2780/C10B were not higher than those in A2780. The highly reduced Pt-DNA adduct formation only for oxaliplatin, but not cisplatin may be a reflection of the fact that at equimolar concentrations oxaliplatin makes fewer Pt-DNA adducts than cisplatin. The data indicate that multiple lesions occur in a single cell to produce the resistant phenotype.

Efficacy of increasing the therapeutic index of irinotecan, plasma and tissue selenium concentrations is methylselenocysteine dose dependent.

This study was designed to understand the basis for the efficacy of methylselenocysteine (MSC) in increasing the therapeutic index of irinotecan against human tumor xenografts. Nude mice bearing human head and neck squamous cells carcinoma xenografts (FaDu and A253) were treated orally with different doses of MSC and irinotecan. Plasma, tumor and normal tissue samples were collected at different times after MSC treatments and were analyzed for selenium (Se) concentration using electrothermal atomic absorption spectrophotometry. MSC is highly effective in modulating the therapeutic index of irinotecan. Enhanced irinotecan efficacy was greater in FaDu tumors (100% CR) than in A253 tumors (60% CR), and depended on MSC dose with a minimum effective dose of 0.01 mg/dx28. The highest plasma Se concentration was achieved 1h after a single dose and 28 d after daily treatments of MSC. The ability of FaDu tumors to retain Se was significantly better than A253 tumors, and the highest Se concentration in normal tissue was achieved in the liver. Peak plasma and tissue Se concentrations were functions of the dose and duration of MSC treatment. The MSC-dependent increase in Se level in normal tissues may contribute to the protective effect against irinotecan toxicity observed in those tissues. Intratumoral total Se concentration was not found to be predictive of the combination therapy response rates. There is a critical need to develop a method to measure the active metabolite of MSC, rather than total Se.

Platinum drug effects on the expression of genes in the polyamine pathway: time-course and concentration-effect analysis based on Affymetrix gene expression profiling of A2780 ovarian carcinoma cells.

PURPOSE: As a follow-up to our previous findings that platinum drugs induce a key enzyme in polyamine catabolism, gene expression profiling and mathematical modeling were used to define the effects of cisplatin and oxaliplatin on the expression of polyamine metabolic pathway genes in A2780 human ovarian carcinoma cells. METHODS: Time-course and concentration-effect experiments were each carried out with cisplatin or oxaliplatin in two separate experiments and cells subjected to gene expression profiling using Affymetrix array technology. Time-course data were modeled using exponential increase and decrease models. Concentration-effect data were modeled using a four parameter Hill model. RESULTS: Gene expression profiling of human ovarian carcinoma A2780 cells after exposure to either cisplatin or oxaliplatin indicates that the expression of several genes involved in polyamine pathway is affected by the platinum drugs. Mathematical/Statistical modeling of the data from time-course and concentration-effect experiments of gene expression from nine polyamine pathway genes represented on the HGU95Av2 chip, indicates that three biosynthetic pathway genes (SAMDC, ODC1 and SRM) are down-regulated and one catabolic pathway gene (SSAT) is up-regulated. Expression changes were similar for different probesets for a given gene on the array. Studies on the induction of SSAT by platinum drugs suggested by the Affymetrix data have been previously validated from this laboratory (Hector et al. in Mol Cancer Ther 3:813-822, 2004). Here, the effects of oxaliplatin exposure on SAMDC and ODC observed by Affymetix are validated with real time QRT-PCR. CONCLUSION: The data indicate a concerted effect of platinum drugs on the polyamine metabolic pathway with down-regulation in the expression of several enzyme genes involved in biosynthesis and many-fold up-regulation in expression of SSAT, an acetylating enzyme gene that is critically involved in polyamine catabolism and export.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of fixed-dose selenomethionine and irinotecan in solid tumors.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of irinotecan with fixed, nontoxic high dose of selenomethionine. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Selenomethionine was given orally as a single daily dose containing 2,200 mug of elemental selenium (Se) starting 1 week before the first dose of irinotecan. Irinotecan was given i.v. once weekly x 4 every 6 weeks (one cycle). The starting dose of irinotecan was 125 mg/m(2)/wk. Escalation occurred in cohorts of three patients until the MTD was defined. Pharmacokinetic studies were done for selenium and irinotecan and its metabolites. RESULTS: Three of four evaluable patients at dose level 2 of irinotecan (160 mg/m(2)/wk) had a dose-limiting diarrhea. None of the six evaluable patients at dose level 1 (125 mg/m(2)/wk irinotecan) had a dose-limiting toxicity. One patient with history of irinotecan-refractory colon cancer achieved a partial response. The long half-life of selenium resulted in a prolonged accumulation towards steady-state concentrations. No significant changes in the pharmacokinetics of CPT-11, SN-38, or SN-38G were identified; however, the coadministration of selenomethionine significantly reduced the irinotecan biliary index, which has been associated with gastrointestinal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Selenomethionine at 2,200 mug/d did not allow the safe escalation of irinotecan beyond the previously defined MTD of 125 mg/m(2). None of the patients receiving 125 mg/m(2) of irinotecan had grade >2 diarrhea. Unexpected responses and disease stabilizations were noted in a highly refractory population. Further escalation of selenomethionine is recommended in future trials to achieve defined protective serum concentrations of selenium.

A Phase I study of weekly intravenous oxaliplatin in combination with oral daily capecitabine and radiation therapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: We conducted a Phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of neoadjuvant capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and radiation therapy (RT) in Stage II to III rectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Capecitabine was given orally twice daily Monday through Friday concurrently with RT. Oxaliplatin was given i.v. once weekly x 5 (for 5 weeks) starting the first day of RT. RT was given daily except on weekends and holidays at 1.8 Gy per fraction x 28. Escalation for capecitabine or oxaliplatin was to occur in cohorts of three patients until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined. Endorectal tumor biopsy samples were obtained before and on Day 3 of treatment to explore the effects of treatment on thymidine phosphorylase, thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, DNA repair, and apoptosis. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled on this study. Two of 6 patients at dose level (DL) 1 (capecitabine 825 mg/m2 orally (p.o.) given twice daily (b.i.d.); oxaliplatin 50 mg/m2/week) had a dose-limiting diarrhea. One of 6 patients at DL (-)1 (capecitabine 725 mg/m2 p.o., b.i.d.; oxaliplatin 50 mg/m2/week) experienced-dose-limiting diarrhea. Three of 11 patients who underwent resection had a complete pathologic response. No remarkable variations in rectal tumor biologic endpoints were noted on Day 3 of treatment in comparison to baseline. However, a higher apotosis index was observed at baseline and on Day 3 in complete pathologic responders (no statistical analysis performed). CONCLUSIONS: Capecitabine 725 mg/m2 p.o., twice daily in combination with oxaliplatin 50 mg/m2/week and RT 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions is the recommended dose for future studies.

Sequential administration of irinotecan and cytarabine in the treatment of relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

PURPOSE: Based on reported synergy of the topoisomerase-I (topo-I) inhibitor irinotecan with antimetabolites, irinotecan and cytarabine (Ara-C) were administered sequentially to patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) refractory to or relapsed following high-dose Ara-C and anthracycline therapy. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies were performed with the first irinotecan dose. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In vitro synergy of irinotecan followed by Ara-C was confirmed in a human AML cell line as a basis for the clinical trial. Irinotecan was administered daily for 5 days, with Ara-C 1 g/m2 12 h after each irinotecan dose. Irinotecan was initiated at 5 mg/m2, and the dose was escalated by 5 mg/m2 increments in cohorts of three patients and in individual patients. Pre-treatment samples were studied for topo-I activity and serial samples after the first irinotecan dose were analyzed for pharmacokinetics and for pharmacodynamic effects, including DNA damage and DNA synthesis rate. RESULTS: The irinotecan dose reached 15 mg/m2 in three-patient cohorts without reaching the maximum tolerated dose, and reached 30 mg/m2 in individual patients. The AUC and Cmax of both irinotecan and its active metabolite SN38 increased linearly in proportion to dose, and the mean half-lives of irinotecan conversion to SN38 and SN38 elimination were 6.2 h (CV 171%) and 7.2 h (CV 48%). Irinotecan rapidly induced DNA damage, and DNA synthesis inhibition varied among patients and treatment cycles. All courses resulted in rapid cytoreduction, and two patients achieved complete remission. Topo-I activity did not predict response. CONCLUSION: Irinotecan can be safely administered with Ara-C. This combination is active in refractory AML and warrants further study.

The role of DNA polymerase eta in translesion synthesis past platinum-DNA adducts in human fibroblasts.

Cisplatin, a widely used chemotherapeutic agent, has been implicated in the induction of secondary tumors in cancer patients. This drug is presumed to be mutagenic because of error-prone translesion synthesis of cisplatin adducts in DNA. Oxaliplatin is effective in cisplatin-resistant tumors, but its mutagenicity in humans has not been reported. The polymerases involved in bypass of cisplatin and oxaliplatin adducts in vivo are not known. DNA polymerase eta is the most efficient polymerase for bypassing platinum adducts in vitro. We evaluated the role of polymerase eta in translesion synthesis past platinum adducts by determining cytotoxicity and induced mutation frequencies at the hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) locus in diploid human fibroblasts. Normal human fibroblasts (NHF1) were compared with xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XPV) cells (polymerase eta-null) after treatment with cisplatin. In addition, XPV cells complemented for polymerase eta expression were compared with the isogenic cells carrying the empty expression vector. Cytotoxicity and induced mutagenicity experiments were measured in parallel in UVC-irradiated fibroblasts. We found that equitoxic doses of cisplatin induced mutations in fibroblasts lacking polymerase eta at frequencies 2- to 2.5-fold higher than in fibroblasts with either normal or high levels of polymerase eta. These results indicate that polymerase eta is involved in error-free translesion synthesis past some cisplatin adducts. We also found that per lethal event, cisplatin was less mutagenic than UVC. Treatment with a wide range of cytotoxic doses of oxaliplatin did not induce mutations above background levels in cells either expressing or lacking polymerase eta, suggesting that oxaliplatin is nonmutagenic in human fibroblasts.

In vitro and in vivo irinotecan-induced changes in expression profiles of cell cycle and apoptosis-associated genes in acute myeloid leukemia cells.

OBJECTIVE: To study irinotecan (CPT-11)-induced changes in expression profiles of genes associated with cell cycle control and apoptosis in myeloid leukemia cells in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: HL60 cells were exposed to clinically achievable concentrations of 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), the active metabolite of CPT-11, and blood sampled from patients with acute myeloid leukemia and chronic myeloid leukemia in myeloid blast transformation treated with CPT-11. Gene expression changes were studied by cDNA microarray and correlated with biological responses by studying DNA distributions by flow cytometry. RESULTS: cDNA microarray analysis showed down-regulation and up-regulation of specific cell cycle-associated genes, consistent with loss of S-phase cells and temporary delay of G(1)-S-phase transition seen by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry showed that cells in S phase during SN-38 exposure underwent apoptosis, whereas cells in G(2)-M and G(1) were delayed in G(1) and entered S phase only 6 to 8 hours after drug removal, consistent with the observed changes in gene expression. Proapoptotic changes in gene transcription included down-regulation of antiapoptotic genes and up-regulation of proapoptotic genes. Many gene expression changes observed following in vitro SN-38 exposure were also seen following in vivo administration of 10 or 15 mg/m(2) CPT-11; notably, proapoptotic changes included reduced transcription of survivin pathway-associated genes and increased transcription of death receptor 5. CONCLUSION: CPT-11-induced changes in gene expression profiles in vitro and in vivo are consistent with temporary delay in G(1)-S transition and enhanced responsiveness to apoptosis, both of which may contribute to the synergistic interactions of this drug with antimetabolites.

Irinotecan pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic alterations induced by methylselenocysteine in human head and neck xenograft tumors.

The combination of methylselenocysteine and irinotecan (CPT-11) is synergistic against FaDu and A253 xenografts. Methylselenocysteine/CPT-11 increased tumor cure rate to 100% in FaDu and to 60% in A253. In this study, the effect of methylselenocysteine on pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic profiles of genes relevant to CPT-11 metabolic pathway was evaluated to identify possible mechanisms associated with the observed combinational synergy. Nude mice bearing tumors (FaDu and A253) were treated with methylselenocysteine, CPT-11, and a combination of methylselenocysteine/CPT-11. Samples were collected and analyzed for plasma and intratumor concentration of CPT-11 and 7-ethyl-10-hydroxyl-camptothecin (SN-38) by high-performance liquid chromatography. The intratumor relative expression of genes related to the CPT-11 metabolic pathway was measured by real-time PCR. After methylselenocysteine treatment, the intratumor area under the concentration-time curve of SN-38 increased to a significantly higher level in A253 than in FaDu and was associated with increased expression of CES1 in both tumors. Methylselenocysteine/CPT-11 treatment, compared with CPT-11 alone, resulted in a significant decrease in levels of ABCC1 and DRG1 in FaDu tumors and an increase in levels of CYP3A5 and TNFSF6 in A253 tumors. No statistically significant changes induced by methylselenocysteine/CPT-11 were observed in the levels of other investigated variables. In conclusion, the significant increase in the cure rate after methylselenocysteine/CPT-11 could be related to increased drug delivery into both tumors (CES1), reduced resistance to SN-38 (ABCC1 and DRG1) in FaDu, and induced Fas ligand apoptosis (TNFSF6) in A253. No correlation was observed between cure rate and other investigated variables (transporters, degradation enzymes, DNA repair, and cell survival/death genes) in either tumor.

Oxaliplatin in combination with protracted-infusion fluorouracil and radiation: report of a clinical trial for patients with esophageal cancer.

PURPOSE: To identify a dose and schedule of oxaliplatin (OXP) to be safely administered in combination with protracted-infusion (PI) fluorouracil (5-FU) and external-beam radiation therapy (XRT) for patients with primary esophageal carcinoma (EC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility included therapeutically naïve EC patients with clinical disease stages II, III, or IV. Initial doses and schedules for cycle 1 consisted of OXP 85 mg/m(2) on days 1, 15, and 29; PI 5-FU 180 mg/m(2) for 24 hours for 35 days; and XRT 1.8 Gy in 28 fractions starting on day 8. At completion of cycle 1, eligible patients could undergo an operation or begin cycle 2 without XRT. Postoperative patients were eligible for cycle 2. Stage IV patients were allowed three cycles in the absence of disease progression. OXP and 5-FU increases were based on dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) encountered in cohorts of three consecutive patients. RESULTS: Thirty-eight eligible patients received therapy: 22 noninvasively staged as IV and 16 noninvasively staged as II and III. Thirty-six patients completed cycle 1, 29 patients started cycle 2, and 24 patients completed cycle 2. The combined-modality therapy was well tolerated, but DLT prevented OXP and 5-FU escalation. No grade 4 hematologic toxicity was noted. Eleven grade 3 and two grade 4 clinical toxicities were noted in eight patients. After cycle 1, 29 patients (81%) had no cancer in the esophageal mucosa. Thirteen patients underwent an operation with intent to resect the esophagus; five patients (38%) exhibited pathologic complete responses. CONCLUSION: OXP 85 mg/m(2) on days 1, 15, and 29 administered with PI 5-FU and XRT is safe, tolerable, and seems effective against primary EC. The role of OXP in multimodality regimens against EC deserves further evaluation.

Gene expression profiling of a clonal isolate of oxaliplatin-resistant ovarian carcinoma cell line A2780/C10.

The efficacy of platinum drugs in the treatment of cancer is often restricted by the acquisition of tumor cell resistance subsequent to treatment. To better understand mechanisms involved in this phenomenon, a clonal subline (A2780/C10B) isolated from an oxaliplatin-resistant human ovarian carcinoma cell line (A2780/C10) was developed, as reported previously. This cell line is 18-fold resistant to oxaliplatin and shows a 3-fold cross resistance to cisplatin. Here, we report on the gene expression analysis using Affymetrix HG-U95Av2 oligonucleotide arrays of cells in log phase growth from both the parental cell line and drug-resistant variant. Probe level analysis was perfomed using the model based expression index (dChip) and robust multichip average (RMA) methods. Genes that were differentially expressed between the two groups were identified using the significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) method with a minimum false discovery rate <1%. We identified 43 genes that were overexpressed, and 39 underexpressed in the drug-resistant cell line. Collagen VI (COL6A3) was overexpressed 62-fold and the most highly up-regulated gene. This finding is consistent with other published data based on serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) profiling of cisplatin-resistant and sensitive ovarian carcinoma cells. Among the significant functional groups of overexpressed genes in our study were extracellular matrix genes (9 of 43) and those involved in signal transduction (7 of 43). Extracellular matrix genes included two matrix metalloproteinases (MMP3 and MMP12). Integrin alpha 1 (ITGA1) and WNT5A were also overexpressed. Genes that encode for extracellular matrix proteins were also among those found down-regulated in the resistant cell line. Several genes involved in the regulation of cell cycle and growth were found to be underexpressed, including the suppressor of cytokine signaling 2 (SOCS2), necdin (NDN), and glypicans (GPC3 and GPC4). The mRNA levels of six differentially expressed genes (COL6A3, MMP12, MMP3, WNT5A, NID, and HMGB2) were validated using real-time quantitative RT-PCR. The identification of these genes should aid in a better understanding of the pathways resulting in platinum drug resistance.

VX-710 (biricodar) increases drug retention and enhances chemosensitivity in resistant cells overexpressing P-glycoprotein, multidrug resistance protein, and breast cancer resistance protein.

PURPOSE: The pipecolinate derivative VX-710 (biricodar; Incel) is a clinically applicable modulator of P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and multidrug resistance protein (MRP-1); we studied its activity against the third multidrug resistance (MDR)-associated drug efflux protein, breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: VX-710 modulation of uptake, retention, and cytotoxicity of mitoxantrone, daunorubicin, doxorubicin, topotecan, and SN38 was studied in cell lines overexpressing Pgp, MRP-1 and wild-type (BCRP(R482)) and mutant (BCRP(R482T)) BCRP. RESULTS: In 8226/Dox6 cells (Pgp), VX-710 increased mitoxantrone and daunorubicin uptake by 55 and 100%, respectively, increased their retention by 100 and 60%, respectively, and increased their cytotoxicity 3.1- and 6.9-fold, respectively. In HL60/Adr cells (MRP-1), VX-710 increased mitoxantrone and daunorubicin uptake by 43 and 130%, increased their retention by 90 and 60%, and increased their cytotoxicity 2.4- and 3.3-fold. In 8226/MR20 cells (BCRP(R482)), VX-710 increased mitoxantrone uptake and retention by 60 and 40%, respectively, and increased cytotoxicity 2.4-fold. VX-710 increased daunorubicin uptake and retention by only 10% in 8226/MR20 cells, consistent with the fact that daunorubicin is not a substrate for BCRP(R482), but, nevertheless, it increased daunorubicin cytotoxicity 3.6-fold, and this increase was not associated with intracellular drug redistribution. VX-710 had little effect on uptake, retention, or cytotoxicity of mitoxantrone, daunorubicin, doxorubicin, topotecan, or SN38 in MCF7 AdVP3000 cells (BCRP(R482T)). CONCLUSIONS: VX-710 modulates Pgp, MRP-1, and BCRP(R482), and has potential as a clinical broad-spectrum MDR modulator in malignancies such as the acute leukemias in which these proteins are expressed.