Best Approaches to Evaluation and Feedback in Post-Graduate Medical Education.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The objectives of this literature review are to appraise current approaches and assess new technologies that have been utilized for evaluation and feedback of residents, with focus on surgical trainees. RECENT FINDINGS: In 1999, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education introduced the Milestone system as a tool for summative evaluation. The organization allows individual program autonomy on how evaluation and feedback are performed. In the past, questionnaire evaluations and informal verbal feedback were employed. However, with the advent of technology, they have taken a different shape in the form of crowdsourcing, mobile platforms, and simulation. Limited data is available on new methods but studies show promise citing low cost and positive impact on resident education. No one "best approach" exists for evaluation and feedback. However, it is apparent that a multimodal approach that is based on the ACGME Milestones can be effective and aid in guiding programs.

High school principals' resources, knowledge, and practices regarding the returning student with concussion.

OBJECTIVE: To determine high school principals' self-reported resources, knowledge, and practices regarding the management of students returning to school following concussion. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey of public high school principals in the state of Ohio assessed respondent and school demographics, respondent concussion training, school resources, and monitoring and accommodation practices for students with concussion. RESULTS: Of the 695 eligible high school principals, 465 (66.9%) completed the survey. Over one-third of principals (37.2%) had some form of concussion training in the past year. Those with training were more likely to promote training of other school faculty (57.4% vs 30.6%, P < .001). Principals were asked to identify school personnel who are designated as case managers for students with concussion. Schools without a designated case manager were less likely to have an athletic trainer (P < .001) and had fewer students (median 424.5 vs 599) than schools with a case manager. Principals could list at least 1 faculty designee who communicates with health professionals more often for student-athletes than for nonathletes (P < .001). Most principals were willing to provide students with short-term academic accommodations, but 30.1% required a health professional's note prior to making any academic changes. Only 32% of principals reported providing families with a written academic plan following concussion. CONCLUSIONS: Schools differ in their resources and management strategies for students returning to school after concussion. Understanding these differences can help health professionals to overcome potential barriers in managing their school-aged patients with concussion.

Comparing patient and parent recall of 90-day and 30-day migraine disability using elements of the PedMIDAS and an Internet headache diary.

AIM: The aim of this article is to compare 90-day and 30-day recall of Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment (PedMIDAS) elements and headache frequency against daily entries from an Internet headache diary among pediatric patients and their parents. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, patients aged 10-18 years with episodic migraine or probable migraine completed a 90-day Internet-based headache diary that incorporated PedMIDAS questions. Following the 90-day diary period, patients and parents completed modified PedMIDAS instruments to assess 90-day and 30-day recall. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to measure recall reliability. The Kruskal-Wallis and Jonckheere-Terpstra tests were used to explore recall accuracy as it relates to each participant's self-reported confidence in recall and to patient age. RESULTS: Fifty-two subjects completed 90 consecutive diary entries. Comparing 30-day to 90-day recall of PedMIDAS elements, ICC scores improved by 26.2% (patients) and 17.5% (parents). Patients had better recall than their parents for all study measures. Self-reported confidence in recall and patient age had limited and inconsistent effects on recall accuracy. CONCLUSION: The optimal recall interval to assess migraine disability must balance recall accuracy with generalizability across a range of headache frequencies. When compared to daily diary entries, recall accuracy of PedMIDAS elements and headache frequency improves at 30 days compared to 90 days. Parent report of migraine disability should not be used as a replacement for patient report.

PedMIDAS-based scoring underestimates migraine disability on non-school days.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare daily Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment (PedMIDAS)-based scores for headaches occurring on school days vs non-school days and during the school year vs the summer holiday. BACKGROUND: The PedMIDAS is the only instrument validated to assess migraine disability among school-aged children. However, the PedMIDAS may underestimate disability during prolonged school holidays. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, migraine patients aged 10-18 years completed a 90-day Internet-based headache diary. For each headache day, they answered PedMIDAS-based questions and rated their headache intensity (scale 1-10). PedMIDAS-based scores, headache intensity ratings, and relative headache frequencies were compared for school days vs non-school days and for the school year vs the summer holiday. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients completed 4680 diary entries comprising 984 headache days. The headache frequencies and intensity ratings did not differ between time periods. However, the mean headache disability scores (as measured from PedMIDAS-based questions) were significantly different for school days (0.85) compared to non-school days (0.45), P < .001, and for the school year (0.73) compared to the summer holiday (0.46), P < .016. CONCLUSION: Given similar headache intensities and frequencies, daily PedMIDAS-based scores significantly underestimate headache disability on non-school days. Accordingly, PedMIDAS scoring during the school year may not be comparable to assessments done during the summer holiday. These potential differences must be considered when using the instrument as an outcome measure for clinical trials.

Nephrolithiasis associated with embolization material, Lipiodol®, following embolization of large renal angiomyolipoma.

Angiomyolipoma (AML) is a benign renal mass that can be treated with nephron sparing surgery or transarterial embolization. Embolization has been favored due to efficacy and safety profile. This case demonstrates a previously undocumented phenomenon of AML treated with transarterial embolization using Lipiodol® (Guerbet LLC, Princeton, NJ) resulting in nephrolithiasis and retention of Lipiodol® two years after original embolization. Although Lipiodol®-based embolization has not been shown to cause nephrolithiasis, it may have been the nidus for stone formation, and this is an important potential complication worthy of further study.

Alkaline-Encrusted Pyelitis Causing Renal Failure in a Transplant Kidney: Treatment with Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Urinary Acidification.

Background: Alkaline-encrusted pyelitis (AEP) is rare and most often stems from a triad of immunodeficiency, urogenital tract trauma, and alkaline urinary infection. Corynebacterium Group D2 is the most common organism. It results in encrusting calcifications that adhere to most of the urothelial lining of the pelvicaliceal system and ureter. Left unchecked, or unrecognized, the disease process can progress to renal compromise. Studies suggest that management is based on elimination of the bacterium, acidification of the urine, and elimination of calcified plaques and encrustations. Herein, we report a case of a 56-year-old woman who developed AEP in her second transplanted kidney, and detail the diagnosis and treatment of the uncommon, yet potentially devastating, disease. Case Presentation: A 56-year-old woman with a history of lupus, end-stage renal disease, who was on her second renal transplant presented with symptoms of urinary tract infection. Urine was consistently alkaline with cultures repeatedly growing urease-splitting Corynebacterium. Subsequent imaging showed large obstructing ureteral and renal stones concerning for AEP. She was treated with transplant kidney percutaneous nephrolithotomy, culture-specific antibiotics, and urinary acidification. Conclusion: Clinical presentation, urinalysis, culture, and renal imaging, often with CT, are the mainstays for diagnosing AEP. If not addressed, AEP can advance to renal failure. Management often includes a multimodal approach involving treatment and prevention of the underlying infection, urinary acidification, and percutaneous or endoscopic removal of obstructing and large burden stones and encrustation.

Initial Experience with the Use of a Robotic Stapler for Robot-Assisted Donor Nephrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Since the first description of robot-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for living donor renal transplantation, additional studies have noted outcomes comparable to traditional laparoscopic surgery. Urologists have embraced the technical advantages of the robotic approach, including improved dissection and more accurate graft preservation. With the advent of robotic stapling, we aim to demonstrate the feasibility of the use of robotic stapling for living-donor nephrectomies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten cases of da Vinci® EndoWrist® Stapler use during robot-assisted donor nephrectomy by a single surgeon are reported. Variables examined included patient anatomy, estimated blood loss (EBL), warm ischemia time (WIT), postoperative complications, and graft function at follow-up. The costs of the laparoscopic and robotic staplers at our institution are reported. RESULTS: One right and nine left nephrectomies were performed by a single surgeon. Eight living donors had a single renal artery and vein, while two had multiple renal arteries and renal veins. A single vascular stapler load (45-mm, white cartridge) was used for vessels in all cases. WIT was <6 minutes in each case, and EBL ranged from 13 to 100 mL. Sufficient length on the renal artery and vein was obtained to execute anastomoses in all cases. Only one patient had postoperative complications that were related to anesthesia. Graft function of recipients and postoperative renal function has been adequate to date. The cost of using the robotic stapler was $705 (EndoWrist Stapler), and the cost of the laparoscopic stapler (Endo GIA™ Stapler; Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) was $494.06. CONCLUSIONS: The use of robotic stapler is feasible in terms of patient safety, technique, postoperative outcomes, and cost in both left- and right-sided living-donor robotic nephrectomies. Further research is needed to confirm the benefit and safety of EndoWrist stapler use in robotic donor nephrectomies compared to laparoscopic stapler use.

Creating physicians of the 21st century: assessment of the clinical years.

Medical education has been under a constant state of revision for the past several years. The overarching theme of the curriculum revisions for medical schools across the USA has been creating better physicians for the 21st century, with the same end result: graduating medical students at the optimal performance level when entering residency. We propose a robust, thorough assessment process that will address the needs of clerkships, residents, students, and, most importantly, medical schools to best measure and improve clinical reasoning skills that are required for the learning outcomes of our future physicians. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) evaluates and accredits medical school graduates based on competency-based outcomes and the assessment of specialty-specific milestones; however, there is some evidence that medical school graduates do not consistently meet the Level 1 milestones prior to entering/beginning residency, thus starting their internship year underprepared and overwhelmed. Medical schools should take on the responsibility to provide competency-based assessments for their students during the clinical years. These assessments should be geared toward preparing them with the cognitive competencies and skills needed to successfully transition to residency. Then, medical schools can produce students who will ultimately be prepared for transition to their residency programs to provide quality care.

Specific headache factors predict sleep disturbances among youth with migraine.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of pediatric data addressing the complex relationship between primary headaches and sleep disturbances. Our study objective was to explore headache-related factors that predict sleep disturbance and to compare sleep complaints with other forms of headache-related disability among youth with migraines. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in patients 10-18 years old with migraine or probable migraine and without daily sleep complaints. The patients completed a 90-day internet-based headache diary. On headache days, patients rated headache intensity, answered Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment-based questions modified for daily scoring, and reported sleep disturbances that resulted as a direct effect of proximate headaches. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients generated 4680 diary entries, 984 patients (21%) involved headaches. Headache intensity (P = 0.009) and timing of headache onset (P < 0.001) were predictive of sleep disturbances. Three Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment-based items were also associated with sleep disturbances: partial school-day absence (P = 0.04), recreational activities prevented (P < 0.001), and decreased functioning during recreational activities (P < 0.001). Sleep disturbances correlated positively and significantly with daily headache disability scores (rpb = 0.35; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: We conclude that specific headache factors predict sleep disturbances among youth with primary headaches.