Improvement in Echocardiographic Indexes of Systolic Heart Failure Post-Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: End-stage renal disease is a major risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, which can be partially eliminated by kidney transplantation. Systolic heart failure might be considered contraindication for kidney transplant, although some patients demonstrate myocardial recovery post-transplant. We aimed to identify and characterize the phenomenon of reverse myocardial remodeling in kidney transplanted patients. METHODS: The study is a retrospective cohort of patients undergoing kidney transplants between 2016 and 2019 (n = 604) at Rabin Medical Center. Patients were assessed according to availability of two echocardiographic examinations: pre- and post-kidney transplant. The change in estimated ejection fraction (EF) and possible predictors of myocardial recovery were examined. RESULTS: Data of 293 patients was available for the final analysis. Eighty-one (28%) patients had a LVEF improvement equal to or above 5%, whereas 36 (12%) patients had a LVEF improvement of 10% or more post-transplantation. Twenty-five patients (8.5%) had moderate or severe systolic heart failure with LVEF reduced to 40% or less at baseline. 13 of them (52%) had a LVEF improvement of ≥5%, and 10 patients (40%) had an improvement of ≥10% in their EF. Cox regression analyses identified female gender as the only independent variable associated with LVEF improvement of at least 10%. CONCLUSION: Renal transplantation might lead to improved LV systolic function in some patients.

Validation of an automated artificial intelligence system for 12­lead ECG interpretation.

BACKGROUND: The electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the most accessible and comprehensive diagnostic tools used to assess cardiac patients at the first point of contact. Despite advances in computerized interpretation of the electrocardiogram (CIE), its accuracy remains inferior to physicians. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered ECG system and compared its performance to current state-of-the-art CIE. METHODS: An AI-powered system consisting of 6 deep neural networks (DNN) was trained on standard 12­lead ECGs to detect 20 essential diagnostic patterns (grouped into 6 categories: rhythm, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), conduction abnormalities, ectopy, chamber enlargement and axis). An independent test set of ECGs with diagnostic consensus of two expert cardiologists was used as a reference standard. AI system performance was compared to current state-of-the-art CIE. The key metrics used to compare performances were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1 score. RESULTS: A total of 932,711 standard 12­lead ECGs from 173,949 patients were used for AI system development. The independent test set pooled 11,932 annotated ECG labels. In all 6 diagnostic categories, the DNNs achieved high F1 scores: Rhythm 0.957, ACS 0.925, Conduction abnormalities 0.893, Ectopy 0.966, Chamber enlargement 0.972, and Axis 0.897. The diagnostic performance of DNNs surpassed state-of-the-art CIE for the 13 out of 20 essential diagnostic patterns and was non-inferior for the remaining individual diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the AI-powered ECG model's ability to accurately identify electrocardiographic abnormalities from the 12­lead ECG, highlighting its potential as a clinical tool for healthcare professionals.

Establishing a Center for Innovation and Artificial Intelligence in a Tertiary Medical Center: Successes and Challenges.

BACKGROUND: The field of artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to significantly influence the future of medicine. With the accumulation of vast databases and recent advancements in computer science methods, AI's capabilities have been demonstrated in numerous areas, from diagnosis and morbidity prediction to patient treatment. Establishing an AI research and development unit within a medical center offers multiple advantages, particularly in fostering research and tapping into the immediate potential of AI at the patient's bedside. OBJECTIVES: To outline the steps taken to establish a center for AI and big data within an innovation center at a tertiary hospital in Israel. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of projects developed in the field of AI at the Artificial Intelligence Center at the Rabin Medical Center, examining trends, clinical domains, and the predominant sectors over a specific period. RESULTS: Between 2019 and 2023, data from 49 AI projects were gathered. A substantial and consistent growth in the number of projects was observed. Following the inauguration of the Artificial Intelligence Center we observed an increase of over 150% in the volume of activity. Dominant sectors included cardiology, gastroenterology, and anesthesia. Most projects (79.6%) were spearheaded by physicians, with the remainder by other hospital sectors. Approximately 59.2% of the projects were applied research. The remainder were research-based or a mix of both. CONCLUSIONS: Developing technological projects based on in-hospital medical data, in collaboration with clinicians, is promising. We anticipate the establishment of more centers dedicated to medical innovation, particularly involving AI.

[Academia-Industry Alliance: Recent Trend].

Industry-academia Collaboration is an academic activity within academia(educational institutions such as universities, research institutes, etc.)formed to research and develop new technologies, create new businesses and knowledge, and recruit outsourcing human resources. There is a collaboration between an industry(a private company, a group that engages in broad commercial activities and links research and development directly to economic activity)and academia. Amidst the dramatic changes in the environment surrounding the goals of research and development of new technologies and the creation of new businesses, there are changes in what academia can do complementarily. We will outline the changes and current situation, including the efforts of the Tohoku University Hospital.

Predictors of target lesion failure after treatment of left main, bifurcation, or chronic total occlusion lesions with ultrathin-strut drug-eluting coronary stents in the ULTRA registry.

BACKGROUND: Data about the long-term performance of new-generation ultrathin-strut drug-eluting stents (DES) in challenging coronary lesions, such as left main (LM), bifurcation, and chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions are scant. METHODS: The international multicenter retrospective observational ULTRA study included consecutive patients treated from September 2016 to August 2021 with ultrathin-strut (<70 µm) DES in challenging de novo lesions. Primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF): composite of cardiac death, target-lesion revascularization (TLR), target-vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), or definite stent thrombosis (ST). Secondary endpoints included all-cause death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), target vessel revascularization, and TLF components. TLF predictors were assessed with Cox multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Of 1801 patients (age: 66.6 ± 11.2 years; male: 1410 [78.3%]), 170 (9.4%) experienced TLF during follow-up of 3.1 ± 1.4 years. In patients with LM, CTO, and bifurcation lesions, TLF rates were 13.5%, 9.9%, and 8.9%, respectively. Overall, 160 (8.9%) patients died (74 [4.1%] from cardiac causes). AMI and TVMI rates were 6.0% and 3.2%, respectively. ST occurred in 11 (1.1%) patients while 77 (4.3%) underwent TLR. Multivariable analysis identified the following predictors of TLF: age, STEMI with cardiogenic shock, impaired left ventricular ejection fraction, diabetes, and renal dysfunction. Among the procedural variables, total stent length increased TLF risk (HR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1-1.02 per mm increase), while intracoronary imaging reduced the risk substantially (HR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.12-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrathin-strut DES showed high efficacy and satisfactory safety, even in patients with challenging coronary lesions. Yet, despite using contemporary gold-standard DES, the association persisted between established patient- and procedure-related features of risk and impaired 3-year clinical outcome.

Thrombogenicity and endothelial progenitor cells function during Acute myocardial infarction - comparison of Prasugrel versus Ticagrelor.

BACKGROUND: Thrombin generation (TG), platelet function and circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have an important role in the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease (CAD). To date, the effect of novel P2Y12 inhibitors on these aspects has mostly been studied in the sub-acute phase following myocardial infarction. OBJECTIVES: Comparing the effects of prasugrel and ticagrelor on TG and EPCs in the acute phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: STEMI patients were randomized to either ticagrelor or prasugrel treatment. TG, platelet reactivity and EPCs were evaluated prior to P2Y12 inhibitor loading dose (T0), and one day following (T1). RESULTS: Between December 2018 - July 2021, 83 consecutive STEMI patients were randomized to ticagrelor (N = 42) or prasugrel (N = 41) treatment. No differences were observed at T0 for all measurements. P2Y12 reactivity units (PRU) at T1 did not differ as well (prasugrel 13.2 [5.5-20.8] vs. ticagrelor 15.8 [4.0-26.3], p = 0.40). At T1, prasugrel was a significantly more potent TG inhibitor, with longer lag time to TG initiation (7.7 ± 7.5 vs. 3.9 ± 2.1 min, p < 0.01), longer time to peak (14.1 ± 12.6 vs. 8.3 ± 9.7 min, p = 0.03) and a lower endogenous thrombin potential (AUC 2186.1 ± 1123.1 vs. 3362.5 ± 2108.5 nM, p < 0.01). Furthermore, EPCs measured by percentage of cells expressing CD34 (2.6 ± 4.1 vs. 1.1 ± 1.1, p = 0.01) and CD133 (2.3 ± 1.8 vs. 1.4 ± 1.5, p = 0.01) and number of colony forming units (CFU, 2.1 ± 1.5 vs. 1.1 ± 1.0, p < 0.01) were significantly higher in the prasugrel group. CONCLUSION: Among STEMI patients, prasugrel as compared to ticagrelor was associated with more potent TG inhibition and improved EPCs count and function.

Conservative, surgical, and percutaneous treatment for mitral regurgitation shortly after acute myocardial infarction.

AIMS: Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) following acute myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with high mortality rates and has inconclusive recommendations in clinical guidelines. We aimed to report the international experience of patients with secondary MR following acute MI and compare the outcomes of those treated conservatively, surgically, and percutaneously. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective international registry of consecutive patients with at least moderate-to-severe MR following MI treated in 21 centres in North America, Europe, and the Middle East. The registry included patients treated conservatively and those having surgical mitral valve repair or replacement (SMVR) or percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) using edge-to-edge repair. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. A total of 471 patients were included (43% female, age 73 ± 11 years): 205 underwent interventions, of whom 106 were SMVR and 99 PMVR. Patients who underwent mitral valve intervention were in a worse clinical state (Killip class ≥3 in 60% vs. 43%, P < 0.01), but yet had lower in-hospital and 1-year mortality compared with those treated conservatively [11% vs. 27%, P < 0.01 and 16% vs. 35%, P < 0.01; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18-0.46, P < 0.01]. Surgical mitral valve repair or replacement was performed earlier than PMVR [median of 12 days from MI date (interquartile range 5-19) vs. 19 days (10-40), P < 0.01]. The immediate procedural success did not differ between SMVR and PMVR (92% vs. 93%, P = 0.53). However, in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates were significantly higher in SMVR than in PMVR (16% vs. 6%, P = 0.03 and 31% vs. 17%, P = 0.04; adjusted HR 3.75, 95% CI 1.55-9.07, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Early intervention may mitigate the poor prognosis associated with conservative therapy in patients with post-MI MR. Percutaneous mitral valve repair can serve as an alternative for surgery in reducing MR for high-risk patients.

The V-LAP System for Remote Left Atrial Pressure Monitoring of Patients With Heart Failure: Remote Left Atrial Pressure Monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with heart failure (HF) are at an increased risk of hospital admissions. The aim of this report is to describe the feasibility, safety and accuracy of a novel wireless left atrial pressure (LAP) monitoring system in patients with HF. METHODS: The V-LAP Left Atrium Monitoring systEm for Patients With Chronic sysTOlic & Diastolic Congestive heart Failure (VECTOR-HF) study is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label, first-in human clinical trial to assess the safety, performance and usability of the V-LAP system (Vectorious Medical Technologies) in patients with New York Heart Association class III HF. The device was implanted in the interatrial septum via a percutaneous, trans-septal approach guided by fluoroscopy and echocardiography. Primary endpoints included the successful deployment of the implant, the ability to perform initial pressure measurements and safety outcomes. RESULTS: To date, 24 patients have received implants of the LAP-monitoring device. No device-related complications have occurred. LAP was reported accurately, agreeing well with wedge pressure at 3 months (Lin concordance correlation coefficient = 0.850). After 6 months, New York Heart Association class improved in 40% of the patients (95% CI = 16.4%-63.5%), while the 6-minute walk test distance had not changed significantly (313.9 ± 144.9 vs 232.5 ± 129.9 meters; P = 0.076). CONCLUSION: The V-LAP left atrium monitoring system appears to be safe and accurate.

The clinical value of the endocarditis team: insights from before and after guidelines implementation strategy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary the "Endocarditis Team" (ET) on the course and outcome of infective endocarditis (IE) patients. METHODS: A retrospective before-after study, including hospitalized patients with definite IE, managed before (01.2013-12.2015) and after (01.2016-07.2019) the introduction of an ET. The primary outcomes were defined as 30-day and 1-year mortality and the secondary as conservative vs. invasive strategy, the interval from clinical suspicion of IE to the performance of echocardiography, utilization of multimodality evaluation, time to an invasive procedure, and the duration of hospitalization. RESULTS: Study population included 92 pre-ET and 128 post-ET implementation patients. Baseline characteristics were similar. During the post-ET period compared with pre-ET, we found higher rates of abscesses and extra-cardiac emboli (27.8% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.048); and a higher invasive procedures rate, including lead extraction (15.6% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.035) and noncardiac surgeries (14.8% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.05). Patients managed during the post-ET period had reduced short (8.5% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.048) and long-term mortality (Log-rank = 0.001). In multivariate analysis of risk factors for long-term mortality, period (pre- or post-ET) was not found to be significantly associated with the mortality. CONCLUSION: Establishment of an ET was associated with faster and more intensive evaluation of patients with IE. During the period of an ET activity, mortality rates were reduced compared with the previous period.

Impact of Calcium Channel Blockers on Aspirin Reactivity in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

PURPOSE: Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) do not reduce the risk of initial or recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) in patients diagnosed with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this current study was to evaluate the association between CCBs and aspirin resistance in patients with CAD. METHODS: Patients with stable CAD who were regularly taking aspirin (75-100 mg qd) for at least 1 month prior to enrollment in the study were included. The VerifyNow system was used for platelet function testing with high on-aspirin platelet reactivity (HAPR) defined as aspirin reaction units (ARU) >550. We compared patients treated with CCBs versus control group. RESULTS: Five hundred three patients with CAD were included in this study, and 88 were treated with CCBs. Mean age (67.9±9.7 in the CCB group vs. 66.5±11.4 in the control group), gender (77.3 male vs. 82.9%), rates of diabetes mellitus (34.7 vs. 36.9%), rates of CKD (23.5 vs. 23.5%), dyslipidemia (85.1 vs. 85.3%), and statin therapy (89.5 vs. 90.7%) were similar. The mean ARU was 465.4±70.0 for patients treated with CCBs versus 445.2±60.0 in controls (p=0.006). Similarly, 15.9% of CCB patients demonstrated HAPR compared to 7.0% (p=0.006). The administration of CCBs was independently associated with HAPR in a multivariate analysis (OR 1.72, 95% CI: 1.04-8.91, p=0.047) as well as in propensity score matched analysis (OR 1.56; CI: 1.22-1.93; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Usage of CCBs is positively correlated with aspirin resistance. These findings may suggest an adverse pharmacologic effect of CCBs among patients with stable CAD treated with aspirin.

The Association between Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease and High On-Aspirin Platelet Reactivity.

BACKGROUND: Multi-vessel coronary artery disease (MV-CAD) is correlated with worse clinical outcomes compared with single-vessel CAD (SV-CAD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between MV-CAD and high on-aspirin platelet reactivity (HAPR) in patients with stable CAD treated with aspirin. METHODS: The current study is an analysis of prospectively enrolled randomly selected patients with known stable CAD, who were taking aspirin (75-100 mg qd) regularly for at least one month, and had undergone coronary angiography at least 3 months prior to the enrollment to the study. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: acute coronary syndrome at the time of platelet function testing, active malignancy, acute infection, active inflammatory/rheumatic disease, major surgery in the past 6 months, chronic liver failure, treatment with oral anticoagulation, non-adherence with Aspirin and thrombocytopenia (<100 K/micl). Blood was drawn from the participants and sent for platelet function testing (VerifyNow, Instrumentation Laboratory Company, Bedford, Massachusetts, United States). MV-CAD was defined as >50% stenosis in ≥2 separate major coronary territories per coronary angiography. HAPR was defined as aspirin reaction units (ARU) >550. RESULTS: Overall, 507 patients were analyzed; age 66.7 ± 11.2, 17.9% women, 223 (44%) had MV-CAD. The rate of HAPR was significantly higher among patients with MV-CAD vs. SV-CAD (14.8% vs. 3.5%, p < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, a "dose response"-like association was found between the number of stenotic coronary arteries and the rate of HAPR (3.5%, 13.5 and 17.3% for SV-CAD, 2-vessel and 3-vessel disease, respectively). In a multivariate analysis adjusted for potential confounders, MV-CAD was found to be a strong independent predictor of HAPR [OR = 1.8 (95%CI: 1.05-4.7), p = 0.014]. CONCLUSIONS: A significant association between MV-CAD and HAPR was found. Additional studies designed to investigate the mechanisms of HAPR and different therapeutic options for this subset of patients are warranted.

Preoperative evaluation of pulmonary hypertension in lung transplant candidates: echocardiography versus right heart catheterization.

BACKGROUND: Right heart catheterization (RHC) and echocardiography are both routinely used for pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) assessment in lung transplantation (LT) candidates, although this is not mandated by current guidelines. We aimed to explore the performance of echocardiographic PASP as an indicator of pulmonary hypertension in LT candidates, in order to assess the necessity of RHC. METHODS: From a retrospective registry of 393 LT candidates undergoing RHC and echocardiography during 2015-2019, patients were assessed for the presence of pulmonary hypertension (PH), defined as mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) above 20 mmHg, according to two methods-echocardiography and RHC. The primary outcome was the correlation between the PASP estimated by echocardiography to that measured by RHC. Secondary outcomes were the prediction value of the echocardiographic evaluation and its accuracy. RESULTS: The mean value of PASP estimated by echocardiography was 49.5 ± 20.0 mmHg, compared to 42.5 ± 18.0 mmHg measured by RHC. The correlation between the two measurements was moderate (Pearson's correlation: r = 0.609, p < 0.01). Echocardiography PASP measurements were moderately discriminative to diagnose PH, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72 (95% CI 0.66-0.77). Echocardiographic overestimation of PASP of more than 10 mmHg was found in 35.0% of the patients, and underestimation was found in 11.6% of the patients. CONCLUSION: In the pre-surgical evaluation of LT candidates, echocardiographic estimation of PASP had moderate correlation and limited accuracy compared to the PASP measured by RHC. We thus recommend performing routine RHC to all LT candidates, regardless of the echocardiographic estimation of PASP.

Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support from the collaborative multicenter Mechanical Unusual Support in TAVI (MUST) Registry.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use and outcomes of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) utilized during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) from high-volume centers. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our international multicenter registry including 13 high-volume TAVI centers with 87 patients (76.5 ± 11.8 years, 63.2% men) who underwent TAVI for severe aortic stenosis and required pMCS (75.9% VA-ECMO, 19.5% Impella CP, 4.6% TandemHeart) during the procedure (prior to TAVI 39.1%, emergent rescue 50.6%, following TAVI 10.3%). The procedures were considered high-risk, with 50.6% having severe left ventricular dysfunction, 24.1% biventricular dysfunction, and 32.2% severe pulmonary hypertension. In-hospital and 1-year mortality were 27.5% and 49.4%, respectively. Patients with prophylactic hemodynamic support had lower periprocedural mortality compared to patients with rescue insertion of pMCS (log rank = 0.013) and patients who did not undergo cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the TAVI procedure had better short and long term survival (log rank <0.001 and 0.015, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Given the overall survival rate and low frequency of pMCS-related complications, our study results support the use of pMCS prophylactically or during the course of TAVI (bailout) in order to improve clinical outcomes in high-risk procedures or in case of acute life-threatening hemodynamic collapse.

Timing of Nonculprit Percutaneous Coronary Intervention after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

INTRODUCTION: Complete revascularization of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease (MVD) has recently shown to reduce risk of adverse cardiovascular events, including cardiovascular death. Optimal timing of revascularization of nonculprit lesions remains controversial. We aimed to measure cardiac outcomes related to duration between primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) of the culprit lesion and staged PCI (sPCI) of nonculprit lesions. METHODS: From a prospectively collected consecutive registry of 3,002 patients treated for STEMI by pPCI, 1,555 patients with MVD requiring sPCI were identified. Patients were placed into quartiles of duration to sPCI: 0-7 days (Q1), 7-22 days (Q2), 22-42 days (Q3), >42 days (Q4), excluding those who had complete revascularization at the index event. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) included all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and coronary artery bypass surgery. Cox regression and propensity score matching were performed correcting for confounding factors. RESULTS: The average age at presentation was 65.7 ± 11.5 years. 333 were female (21.4%). Mean time between pPCI and sPCI was 28.3 days (±24.8). Rates of MACE were Q1 - 16.5%, Q2 - 21.2%, Q3 - 25.8%, and Q4 - 30.1% (log-rank <0.001). Following regression analysis, sPCI remained an independent risk factor for MACE (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.226 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.129-1.331, p < 0.001]). There was no association between the time interval up to sPCI with all-cause death (HR = 1.022 [95% CI: 0.925-1.129, p = 0.671]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MVD are at increased risk of experiencing MACE after revascularization of nonculprit vessels with increasing time delay between pPCI and sPCI.

Temporary Trends in Fever following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

OBJECTIVES: Fever following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a common phenomenon, attributed mostly to inflammatory response which may impact outcome. Systemic inflammatory response may be triggered by multiple factors, most associated with the TAVI procedure itself. However, there are no data regarding the incidence of fever following TAVI in contemporary era with newer generation devices. Our primary objective was to measure temporal trends in fever incidence and features following TAVI. METHODS: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of 802 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI at our institution between November 2008 and February 2018. We identified and characterized all patients who developed fever (>38.0°C from any cause) within the first 72 h following the procedure and analyzed incidence and characteristics stratified into 3 time frames: 2008-2014, 2014-2016, and 2016-2018. RESULTS: Following TAVI, 190 (23.7%) patients developed fever (mean age 82.3 ± 5.2 years, 64.2% female). An infectious etiology was evident in only 32.1% of cases. The frequency decreased gradually and significantly across timeframes (32.8, 23.6, and 14.5%, respectively, p < 0.001). In a multivariate regression analysis, 1st generation CoreValve (HR 1.91; CI 95% 1.2-3.04, p = 0.006) was found to be associated with higher incidence of fever in addition to female gender, vascular complications, transfemoral access, and reduced GFR. CONCLUSIONS: Fever incidence post TAVI decreased significantly throughout the last decade. The higher rate of fever in the early years of TAVI was likely associated with first-generation devices, vascular complications, and reduced GFR.

Thrombin Generation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: The optimal antithrombotic treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) that undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is controversial. Dual therapy (clopidogrel and a direct oral anticoagulant [DOAC]) is safer than triple therapy (warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel), while efficacy is unclear. We aimed to evaluate thrombin generation (TG) under dual and triple therapy. METHODS: A noninterventional prospective trial in patients with AF undergoing PCI. Patients received 4 weeks of triple therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel, and a DOAC followed by aspirin withdrawal. TG was measured in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-poor plasma (PPP) at 3 five to 21 points, day 1 after PCI (TIME 0), 4 weeks after PCI (TIME 1), and 2 weeks after aspirin withdrawal (TIME 2). RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (18 men, median age 78 years, 83% with acute coronary syndrome) were included. Endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) in PPP was high at TIME 0 compared with TIME 1 (ETP 3,178 ± 248 nM vs. 2,378 ± 222 nM, p = 0.005). These results remained consistent when measured in PRP. No significant difference in ETP was found before (TIME 1) and after aspirin withdrawal (TIME 2) although few patients had high ETP levels after stopping aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: TG potential is high immediately after PCI and decreases 4 weeks after PCI in patients receiving triple therapy. TG remains constant after aspirin withdrawal in most patients, suggesting that after 1 month the antithrombotic effect of dual therapy may be similar to triple therapy.

Temporal trends in short and long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions among cancer patients.

While mortality of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is known to have steadily decline over the last decades, data are lacking regarding the complex sub-population of patients with both coronary artery disease and cancer. A large single-center percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) registry was used to retrieve patients who had a known diagnosis of malignancy during PCI. Patients were divided into two groups according to the period in which PCI was performed (period 1: 2006-2011, period 2: 2012-2017). Cox regression hazard models were implemented to compare primary endpoint, defined as the composite outcomes of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (which include cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization) and secondary endpoint of all-cause mortality, between the two time periods. A total of 3286 patients were included, 1819 (55%) had undergone PCI in period 1, and 1467 (45%) in period 2. Both short- and long-term MACE and overall mortality were significantly lower in patients who underwent PCI at the latter period (2.3% vs. 4.3%, p < 0.001 and 1.1% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001 after 30 days and 24% vs. 30%, p < 0.001 and 12% vs. 22%, p < 0.001 after 2 years, respectively). However, in a multivariate analysis, going through PCI in the latter period was still associated with lower rates of overall mortality (HR 0.708, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.93, p = 0.014) but there was no significant difference in MACE (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75-1.42, p = 0.16). Patients with cancer undergoing PCI during our most contemporary period had an improved overall survival, but no significant differences were observed in the composite cardiovascular endpoints, compared to an earlier PCI period. The management of coronary patients with cancer disease remains challenging.

Outcomes of primary percutaneous cardiac intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction with a saphenous vein graft culprit.

BACKGROUND: Patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who have a history of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are at high risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Data on the risk of a saphenous vein graft (SVG)-infarct-related artery (IRA) compared to other culprit vessels are sparse. METHODS: The study was based on a prospectively collected registry of 2,405 consecutive patients with STEMI attending a tertiary medical center in 2001-2017. Patients with an SVG-IRA (n = 172) were compared with patients with native vessel disease (n = 2,333) for mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which included death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) at 1 month and 3 years. RESULTS: The SVG-IRA group was significantly older than the native vessel group (p = .05), with no between-group differences in rates of male patients (76 vs. 82%, p = .59), diabetes (24.2 vs. 26.2%, p = .73), and renal failure (18.8 vs. 9.2%, p = .25). Mortality was higher in the SVG-IRA group at 1 month (13.9 vs. 2.5%, p < .01) and 3 years (23.9 vs. 7.4%, p < .01). At 3 years, SVG-IRA was associated with the highest rates of MACE (55.6%), compared with native vessel disease. After correction for confounders, SVG-IRA remained an independent risk factor for MACE both at 1 month (HR-2.08, 95%CI 1.72-3.11, p < .01) and 3 years (HR-2.01, 95%CI 1.28-3.09, p < .01). CONCLUSION: Among patients treated with pPCI for STEMI, outcomes are worse when the culprit is an SVG.

Venous Thromboembolism Complicated with COVID-19: What Do We Know So Far?

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and is responsible for the ongoing 2019-2020 pandemic. Venous thromboembolism (VTE), a frequent cardiovascular and/or respiratory complication among hospitalized patients, is one of the known sequelae of the illness. Hospitalized COVID-19 patients are often elderly, immobile, and show signs of coagulopathy. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume a high incidence of VTE among these patients. Presently, the incidence of VTE is estimated at around 25% of patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit for COVID-19 even under anticoagulant treatment at prophylactic doses. In this review, we discuss present knowledge of the topic, the unique challenges of diagnosis and treatment of VTE, as well as some of the potential mechanisms of increased risk for VTE during the illness. Understanding the true impact of VTE on patients with COVID-19 will potentially improve our ability to reach a timely diagnosis and initiate proper treatment, mitigating the risk for this susceptible population during a complicated disease.

Prognostic significance of reticulated platelet levels in diabetic patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Levels of reticulated platelets (RP) increase during high platelet turnover conditions, and have been shown to correlate with diabetes mellitus (DM) status. Little is known regarding the prognostic significance of levels of RP among patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD). The study consisted of patients with SCAD and DM, who visited our cardiology outpatient clinic between June 2016 and February 2017. RP levels were measured at baseline as immature platelet fraction (IPF)%, using flow cytometry. Outcomes at 2 years consisted of bleeding events and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which included death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident and urgent revascularization. The study included 104 patients (mean age - 71.2 ± 9.5 years, 76.9% were male, and 83.7% had hypertension). IPF was significantly higher at baseline among patients who had suffered from a MACE (4.57% vs. 2.53%, p < .001), and lower in patients who had suffered from bleeding events, compared with those who had not (1.57% vs. 3.00%, p = .004). There were higher rates of MACE at higher IPF quartiles (p < .001, AUC-0.770), and higher rates of bleeding at the lowest quartiles (p = .007, AUC-0.781). In SCAD patients with DM, levels of RP are associated with a higher risk of MACE, and inversely correlated with the risk of bleeding.