RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Molecular alterations affecting microglia have been consistently associated with the inflammatory response. These cells can have pro- or anti-inflammatory activity, phenotypes thought to be regulated by epigenetic mechanisms. Still, little is known about the details on how epigenetic marks regulate the expression of genes in the context of an inflammatory response. METHODS: Through CUT&RUN, we profiled four genome-wide histone marks (HM) (H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K27ac, and H3K27me3) in lipopolysaccharide-exposed cells and compared their distributions to control cells. Transcriptomic profiles were determined through RNA-seq and differentially expressed genes were identified and contrasted with the epigenetic landscapes. Other downstream analyses were also included in this study. RESULTS: Our results illustrate an effectively induced M1 phenotype in microglial cells derived from LPS exposure. We observed differential bound regions associated with the genes classically involved in the inflammatory response in the expected direction according to each histone modification. Consistently, our transcriptomic analysis yielded a conspicuous illustration of the LPS-induced immune activity showing the up-regulation of Nf-κB-induced mRNAs (TNF-α, nfκbiz, nfκbia) and other important genes (Marco, Il-6, etc.). Furthermore, we integrated both omics profiles and identified an important reconfiguration of the genome induced by LPS. The latter was depicted by 8 different chromatin states that changed between conditions and that associated with unique clusters of differentially expressed genes, which not only represented regulatory elements, but also underlined distinct biological functions (inhibition of morphogenesis; changes in metabolism, homeostasis, and cytokine regulation; activation of the inflammatory response). CONCLUSION: This study exhibits important differences in the distribution of histone modifications in treated and control BV2 cells, constituting an epigenetic reconfiguration that leads to the inflammatory response. Also, it highlights the importance of these marks' regulatory role in gene expression and provides possible targets for further studies in the context of inflammation.