Global pediatric craniopharyngioma management modalities and outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric craniopharyngioma is a complex pathology, with optimal management involving a multidisciplinary approach and thoughtful care coordination. To date, no studies have compared various treatment modalities and outcomes described in different global regions. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review to compare demographics, clinical presentation, treatment approach and outcomes of children diagnosed with craniopharyngioma globally. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Search terms included "craniopharyngioma" and country-specific terms. Inclusion criteria included full-text studies published between 2000-2022, primarily examining pediatric patients 18-years old or younger diagnosed with craniopharyngioma, and reporting management and outcomes of interest. Data extracted included country of origin, demographical data, initial presentation and treatment modality, and outcomes. Descriptive statistics and between-group comparisons based on country of origin were performed. RESULTS: Of 797 search results, 35 articles were included, mostly originating from high-income countries (HIC) (n = 25, 71.4%). No studies originated from low-income countries (LIC). When comparing HIC to middle-income countries (MIC), no differences in patient demographics were observed. No differences in symptomatology at initial presentation, tumor type, surgical approach or extent of surgical resection were observed. HIC patients undergoing intracystic therapy were more likely to receive bleomycin (n = 48, 85.7%), while the majority of MIC patients received interferon therapy (n = 10, 62.5%). All MIC patients undergoing radiation therapy underwent photon therapy (n = 102). No statistically significant differences were observed in postoperative complications or mean follow-up duration between HIC and MIC (78.1 ± 32.2 vs. 58.5 ± 32.1 months, p = 0.241). CONCLUSION: Pediatric craniopharyngioma presents and is managed similarly across the globe. However, no studies originating from LICs and resource-poor regions examine presentation and management to date, representing a significant knowledge gap that must be addressed to complete the global picture of pediatric craniopharyngioma burden and management.

Are there any benefits for post-operative splinting after carpal tunnel release? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is a controversy on the effectiveness of post-operating splinting in patients with carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgery. This study aimed to systematically evaluate various outcomes regarding the effectiveness of post-operating splinting in CTR surgery. METHODS: Multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane, were searched for terms related to carpal tunnel syndrome. A total of eight studies involving 596 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The quality of studies was evaluated, and their risk of bias was calculated using the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) and Cochrane's collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials. Data including the visual analogue scale (VAS), pinch strength, grip strength, two-point discrimination, symptom severity score (SSS), and functional status scale (FSS) were extracted. RESULTS: Our analysis showed no significant differences between the splinted and non-splinted groups based on the VAS, SSS, FSS, grip strength, pinch strength, and two-point discrimination. The calculated values of the standardized mean difference (SMD) or the weighted mean difference (WMD) and a 95% confidence interval (CI) for different variables were as follows: VAS [SMD = 0.004, 95% CI (-0.214, 0.222)], pinch strength [WMD = 1.061, 95% CI (-0.559, 2.681)], grip strength [SMD = 0.178, 95% CI (-0.014, 0.369)], SSS [WMD = 0.026, 95% CI (- 0.191, 0.242)], FSS [SMD = 0.089, 95% CI (-0.092, 0.269)], and the two-point discrimination [SMD = 0.557, 95% CI (-0.140, 1.253)]. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings revealed no statistically significant differences between the splinted and non-splinted groups in terms of the VAS, SSS, FSS, grip strength, pinch strength, and two-point discrimination. These results indicate that there is no substantial evidence supporting a significant advantage of post-operative splinting after CTR.