Increased breadth and neutralization of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants after infection and vaccination: A serosurveillance study in pediatric patients of Southern Switzerland.

Little information is available about the nature of the immune response in children after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection or vaccination. The aim of this study is to define the seroprevalence and the features of the antibody response in children of Southern Switzerland during the different waves of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. By analyzing 756 sera collected from children aged 0 to 16 years admitted to the Institute of Pediatrics of Southern Switzerland during the prepandemic period (before March 2020) and the first four pandemic waves (between March 2020 and June 2022), we investigated binding titers, cross-reactivity, and neutralizing properties of the serum antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants. Seroprevalence varied from 6% during the first wave to 14% and 17% during the second and third waves, respectively, peaking at 39% during the fourth wave. The 96 seropositive cases were mostly asymptomatic (42.7%) or showed mild (20.8%) to moderate (32.3%) symptoms. Moderate symptoms and close contact with COVID-19-positive individuals were associated with a higher infection risk (P < 0.001). The antibody response was mainly driven by IgG directed to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of Wuhan-1 SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S). Children infected in the first three waves produced antibodies with up to 11-fold and 5.5-fold reduction in binding and neutralizing titers, respectively, against different SARS-CoV-2 variants, including Beta, Delta, and Omicron BA.1, BA.2, and BA.5. Such reductions were less pronounced in children infected during the fourth wave, who showed the highest frequency and titers of neutralizing antibodies against the same variants. Compared to infection, vaccination with a Wuhan-1-based messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine induced higher and heterogenous levels of antibodies cross-reacting to the different SARS-CoV-2 variants analyzed.   Conclusions: Despite the high burden of COVID-19 in Southern Switzerland, we observed an initial low seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in children, which increased in the later waves. The antibody response was poor in the first three waves and improved in the fourth wave, when children produced higher levels of neutralizing antibodies after vaccination or infection with Delta and/or Omicron variants. What is Known: • Children were marginally affected by the initial SARS-CoV-2 variants. • The number of infected and hospitalized children increased after the appearance of the Omicron variants. What is New: • Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in children of Southern Switzerland increased overtime. • Children produced higher levels of neutralizing antibodies after vaccination or infection with Delta and/or Omicron variants in the fourth wave compared to children infected in the first three waves.

Agreement of Different Drug-Drug Interaction Checkers for Proton Pump Inhibitors.

Importance: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are a widely prescribed class of drugs, potentially interacting with a large number of medicines, especially among older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Beyond summary of product characteristics (SPCs), interaction checkers (ICs) are routinely used tools to help clinicians in medication review interventions. Objective: To assess the consistency of information on drugs potentially interacting with PPIs as reported in their SPCs and different ICs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study was conducted using data from SPCs for 5 PPIs (omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole) and 5 ICs (ie, INTERCheck WEB, Micromedex, Lexicomp, Epocrates, and drugs.com). Information from the SPCs and the ICs were extracted between July 15 and 30, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the level of agreement among SPCs and the 5 ICs in identifying drugs potentially interacting with PPIs and attributing drug-drug interaction (DDI) severity categories. The level of agreement was computed using Gwet AC1 statistic on the 5 ICs and by comparing 4-sets and 2-sets of ICs. As a sensitivity analysis, the level of agreement in listing PPI-related DDIs was evaluated using Cohen κ and Fleiss κ coefficients. Results: Considering SPCs and the 5 ICs, a total of 518 potentially interacting drugs with omeprazole were reported, 455 for esomeprazole, 433 for lansoprazole, 421 for pantoprazole, and 405 for rabeprazole. As compared with the ICs, the SPCs reported a much smaller number of drugs potentially interacting with PPIs, with proportions ranging from 2.7% (11 potentially interacting drugs) for rabeprazole to 7.6% (33 potentially interacting drugs) for lansoprazole of the total identified drugs at risk of interaction with a PPI. The overall level of agreement among the 5 ICs for identifying potential interactions was poor (from 0.23 [95% CI, 0.21-0.25] for omeprazole to 0.27 [95% CI, 0.24-0.29] for pantoprazole and 0.27 [95% CI, 0.25-0.29] for rabeprazole). Similarly, the level of agreement was low in 4-set and 2-set analyses as well as when restricting the analysis to the potential DDIs identified as severe (range, 0.30-0.32). Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found significant disagreement among different ICs and SPCs, highlighting the need to focus on standardizing DDI databases. Therefore, to ensure evaluation and prevention of clinically relevant DDIs, it is recommended to revise multiple ICs and consult with specialists, such as clinical pharmacologists, particularly for patients with complex medical conditions.

SARS-CoV-2 infection and cognition in community-dwelling and nursing home residents in southern Switzerland.

Background: COVID-19 patients can report 'brain fog' and may exhibit cognitive symptoms for months after recovery (Cognitive COVID). However, evidence on whether and the extent to which SARS-CoV-2 infection impacts cognition irrespective of COVID-19 course and severity is limited to clinical samples and mainly comes from prognostic studies. We aimed to explore the association between serologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and cognitive functioning in community-based and institutionalized older adults, irrespective of COVID-19 symptoms. Methods: We conducted a case-control study nested into two cohorts in Southern Switzerland. Eligible subjects were Italian speaking older adults, without a previous diagnosis of dementia, who underwent serological testing for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies between November 2020 and July 2021. We manually selected age-, sex- and education-matched cases (i.e., individuals with a serologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection), with seronegative controls, and we conducted in-person neuropsychological assessments using validated, highly sensitive cognitive tests. Results: We completed 38 neuropsychological assessments in a mostly female sample of older adults (Mean age: 83.13 ± 8.95; 86.8% women). 17 were community dwelling individuals while 21 lived in a nursing home. As expected, socio-demographic characteristics of age, gender and educational level were similarly distributed between cases (n = 14) and controls (n = 24). In linear regression models, cases had significantly lower scores in cognitive tasks of memory (ß = -0.367, p = 0.023), attention (ß = 0.428, p = 0.008) and executive functions (ß = 0.326, p = 0.046). We found no significant difference in tests of language and spatial-temporal orientation (all p values > 0.05). Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with cognitive impairment in memory, attention, and executive functions in older adults. Our findings are consistent with mechanistic evidence of the neurotropism of the virus and provide empirical support for the "Cognitive COVID" construct also in non-clinical samples. With nearly 800 million COVID-19 cases (in April 2023), and many more infections worldwide, the clinical and public health implications of Cognitive COVID due to SARS-CoV-2 infection may be massive and warrant further epidemiological investigations.