The sex-dependent impact of adipose tissue and inflammation on chronic pain - A cross-sectional study from the all of us research program.

Emerging evidence suggests an association between chronic pain and elevated body fat. We sought to determine if individuals with higher body fat, measured by hip circumference (HC) and waist circumference (WC), are at risk for chronic pain when they demonstrate higher expression of inflammatory markers. We investigated the incidence and severity of pain in patients with varying WC/HC and inflammatory markers (C-Reactive Protein, IL-6, leptin) using the NIH-sponsored All of Us Database. For each inflammatory marker and sex, participants were divided into four groups based on combinations of normal/high marker levels and small/large WC/HC. We used statistical analysis to compare WC/HC and pain severity (mean NRS pain score) between groups of the same sex. In females, but not males, combinations of elevated CRP with large WC/HC exerted additive effects on the incidence of chronic pain (p < 0.01) and severe pain (p < 0.001), as well as on the severity of pain evaluated by the mean NRS pain score (p < 0.01). This relationship held true for females with high IL-6 or leptin and large WC or HC (p < 0.001 for chronic pain and severe pain incidence, and p < 0.05 for pain severity). Neither IL-6 nor leptin showed any significant impact on pain in males. Obesity status and CRP exert additive prognostic effects for chronic pain in females, but not in males. The concomitant evaluation of other inflammatory factors, such as IL-6 or leptin in females, may further augment the prediction of chronic pain. PERSPECTIVE: This article investigates the relationship between chronic pain, obesity, and inflammatory markers. It could help elucidating sex difference in pain mechanisms, as well as the risk factors for chronic pain, potentially improving patient diagnosis, follow-up and treatment.

Incidence and Prevalence of Pain Medication Prescriptions in Pathologies with a Potential for Chronic Pain.

BACKGROUND: Heightened risks of dependence, addiction, anxiolytic effects, or prescription overdose death due to long-term use of pain medication have increased awareness about extended pain medication use in chronic pain populations. The goal of this study was to evaluate the incidence and prevalence of pain medication prescriptions from 2012 to 2022 in common pathologies with a potential for chronic pain. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic health records from TriNetX (Cambridge, Massachusetts) Global Collaborative Network. For 10 distinct cohorts (total n = 9,357,584 patients), pain medication prescriptions were extracted for five classes, namely nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen, opioids, gabapentinoids, neuropathic mood agents, and muscle relaxants. Annual incidence and prevalence of each class of medication were evaluated for the past 11 yr. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2022, there was a significant increase in prescriptions of NSAIDs, except for patients with fibromyalgia, and persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS) type 2. Interestingly, over time, prescriptions of opioids in patients with complex regional pain syndrome, endometriosis, osteoarthritis, and PSPS type 2 increased, as did prescriptions of muscle relaxants for all cohorts except those with fibromyalgia. Incidence of prescriptions of neuropathic mood agents is high for patients with complex regional pain syndrome (both types) and PSPS type 2. Only for benzodiazepines did there seem to be a decline over the years, with a significantly decreased time trend in patients with complex regional pain syndrome type 1, fibromyalgia, and PSPS type 2. CONCLUSIONS: During the last 11 yr, an increase in incidence of NSAIDs and acetaminophen, opioids, neuropathic agents, and muscle relaxants was observed. Only prescriptions of benzodiazepines significantly decreased over time in specific cohorts. Overall, patients with PSPS type 2 and complex regional pain syndrome (both types) consume a broad variety of pain medication classes.

Effectiveness of pain medication tapering in chronic pain patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to inventory all outcome measures that are affected by tapering in chronic noncancer pain and to investigate the effectiveness of tapering. METHODS: A literature search was conducted from inception to April 2024 in MEDLINE via PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and PsycINFO. RESULTS: The initial database search identified 3969 articles, which were screened by two independent reviewers. Studies evaluating pain medication tapering in adults with chronic noncancer pain were eligible for inclusion. In total, 57 and 34 articles were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, respectively. Risk of bias assessment demonstrated poor, fair, and good quality in 30, 24, and three studies, respectively. Pain intensity was the most reported outcome measure, as reported in 28 studies. Furthermore, a random-effect three-level meta-analysis was performed. An overall effect size of 0.917 (95% confidence interval 0.61-1.22; P<0.001) was found, indicating a beneficial effect of tapering. In addition, a statistically significant improvement was demonstrated after tapering for pain intensity, headache disability, the number of headache days per month, anxiety, depression, the number of pills consumed per month, the number of days with medication intake per month, pain catastrophising, and pain interference. No statistically significant effect was observed for physical functioning, mental health-related quality of life, opioid use, pain self-efficacy, and physical health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review revealed a broad range of outcome measures affected by tapering. Owing to the high risk of bias of the included articles, the results of this meta-analysis must be interpreted with caution. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: CRD42023416343 (PROSPERO).

Predictors of Skip Laminotomy for Placement of Paddle Leads for Spinal Cord Stimulation.

OBJECTIVES: Placement of a standard paddle lead for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) requires a laminotomy for positioning of the lead within the epidural space. During initial placement, an additional laminotomy or laminectomy, termed a "skip" laminotomy, may be necessary at a higher level to pass the lead to the appropriate midline position. Patient and radiographic factors that predict the need for a skip laminotomy have yet to be identified. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants who underwent SCS paddle placement at Albany Medical Center between 2016 and 2017 were identified. Operative reports were reviewed to identify the paddle type, level of initial laminotomy, target level, and skip laminotomy level. Preoperative thoracic magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were reviewed, and spinal canal diameter, interpedicular distance, and dorsal cerebral spinal fluid thickness were measured for each participant when available. RESULTS: A total of 106 participants underwent thoracic SCS placement. Of these, 97 had thoracic MRIs available for review. Thirty-eight participants required a skip laminotomy for placement of the paddle compared with 68 participants who did not. There was no significant difference in demographic features including age, sex, body mass index, and surgical history. Univariate analyses that suggested trends were selected for further analysis using binary logistic regression. Level of initial laminotomy (odds ratio [OR] = 1.51, p = 0.028), spinal canal diameter (OR = 0.71, p = 0.015), and dorsal cerebrospinal fluid thickness (OR = 0.61, p = 0.011) were correlated with skip laminotomy. Target level (OR = 1.27, p = 0.138) and time from trial (1.01, p = 0.117) suggested potential association. The multivariate regression was statistically significant, X2(10) = 28.02, p = 0.002. The model explained 38.3% of the variance (Nagelkerke R2) and predicted skip laminectomy correctly in 73.3% of cases. However, for the multivariate regression, only a decrease in spinal canal diameter (OR = 0.59, p = 0.041) was associated with a greater odds of skip laminotomy. CONCLUSIONS: This study aims to characterize the patient and radiographic factors that may predict the need to perform a skip laminotomy during the initial placement of SCS paddles. Here, we show that radiographic and anatomic variables, primarily spinal canal diameter, play an important role in predicting the need for a skip laminotomy. Furthermore, we suggest that target level for placement and level of initial laminotomy also may contribute. Further investigation of the predictive factors for performing a skip laminotomy would help optimize surgical planning and preoperative patient selection and counseling.

Socioeconomic Determinants of Initiating Neuromodulation for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: Neuromodulation is an effective treatment for chronic pain; however, socioeconomic differences may influence decision-making to initiate this therapy. This review investigated potential differences in accessibility of neuromodulation for patients with chronic pain due to socioeconomic determinants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four electronic databases were used for this systematic review: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Risk of bias was assessed using the modified version of the Downs and Black checklist. The study protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023426035). RESULTS: The initial database search identified a total of 1118 unique studies, of which 36 were eventually included in the systematic review. Of the 36 included studies, six studies reported on education, 24 on employment status, ten on insurance, five on household income, and three on miscellaneous topics. Neuromodulation seems accessible for patients with different education levels and different types of insurance. Additionally, it is not restricted to patients who are (un)employed. When comparing patients who initiated neuromodulation with those who did not, a significantly higher number of patients in the top quartile for education were found in the group without neuromodulation. Regarding insurance, inconclusive evidence was found. CONCLUSIONS: Although neuromodulation was accessible for patients with varying levels of socioeconomic determinants, disparities were noted. When comparing the socioeconomic profiles of patients who receive neuromodulation and those who do not, education levels differ. Health-related inequality should be carefully monitored in chronic pain management with neuromodulation to ensure that potential disparities do not increase.

Correlating Evoked Electromyography and Anatomic Factors During Spinal Cord Stimulation Implantation With Short-Term Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: We examine ways intraoperative neuromonitoring during spinal cord stimulation (SCS) varies between a high-resolution investigational SCS (HR-SCS) paddle and a commercial paddle. Furthermore, the presence of evoked motor responses (eg, electromyography [EMG]) in painful regions during surgery is correlated to outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used HR-SCS to assess EMG response from 18 patients (NCT05459324). Maximum percentage change in root mean squared (maxRMS) EMG values was determined. Correlations were performed with magnetic resonance imaging measurements and patient outcomes collected preoperatively and at three months (numerical rating scale [NRS], McGill Pain, Beck Depression Inventory, Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], and Pain Catastrophizing Score). RESULTS: Of the 18 patients (12 women to six men; mean age 56 years; eight with neuropathic pain, eight with persistent spinal pain syndrome, two with complex regional pain syndrome), nine had a response at three months based on 50% reduction in NRS, 14 by achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on NRS, and 11 by reaching MCID on ≥three outcome metrics. The anterior posterior diameter (APD) of the spinal column at level of testing correlated with all three responses (p < 0.05). We examined RMS at muscles correlating with individual patient pain distributions and found correlations between RMS and MCID NRS and MCID ODI (p < 0.05). maxRMS in abductor hallucis correlated with improvement in NRS and ODI across the group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found that eliciting EMGs over the painful areas during surgery caused alleviation of pain intensity and disability. Obtaining stimulation of abductor hallucis (AH) was more predictive of pain improvement than any other muscle group, and APD alone correlated with improvements in pain intensity and holistic outcomes. These pilot data suggest that implanters should consider APD and EMG responses from painful regions and AH during surgery.

How Long Does Deep Brain Stimulation Give Patients Benefit?

INTRODUCTION: One of the most common questions patients ask when they are contemplating deep brain stimulation (DBS) is how long it will last. To guide physicians in answering this query, we performed a scoping review to assess the current state of the literature and to identify the gaps that need to be addressed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors performed a MEDLINE search inclusive of articles from January 1987 (advent of DBS literature) to June 2023 including human and modeling studies written in English. For longevity of therapy data, only studies with a mean follow-up of ≥three years were included. Using the Rayyan platform, two reviewers (JP and RM) performed a title screen. Of the 734 articles, 205 were selected by title screen and 109 from abstract review. Ultimately, a total of 122 articles were reviewed. The research questions we explored were 1) how long can the different components of the DBS system maintain functionality? and 2) how long can DBS remain efficacious in treating Parkinson's disease (PD), essential tremor (ET), dystonia, and other disorders? RESULTS: We showed that patients with PD, ET, and dystonia maintain a considerable long-term benefit in motor scores seven to ten years after implant, although the percentage improvement decreases over time. Stimulation off scores in PD and ET show worsening, consistent with disease progression. Battery life varies by the disease treated and the programming settings used. There remains a paucity of literature after ten years, and the impact of new device technology has not been classified to date. CONCLUSION: We reviewed existing data on DBS longevity. Overall, outcomes data after ten years of therapy are substantially limited in the current literature. We recommend that physicians who have data for patients with DBS exceeding this duration publish their results.

The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC)®: Updates on Clinical Pharmacology and Comorbidity Management in Intrathecal Drug Delivery for Cancer Pain.

INTRODUCTION: The International Neuromodulation Society convened a multispecialty group of physicians based on expertise with international representation to establish evidence-based guidance on using intrathecal drug delivery in chronic pain treatment. This Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC)® project's scope is to provide evidence-based guidance for clinical pharmacology and best practices for intrathecal drug delivery for cancer pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Authors were chosen on the basis of their clinical expertise, familiarity with the peer-reviewed literature, research productivity, and contributions to the neuromodulation literature. Section leaders supervised literature searches using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, BioMed Central, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, Current Contents Connect, Meeting Abstracts, and Scopus from 2017 (when the PACC last published guidelines) to the present. Identified studies were graded using the United States Preventive Services Task Force criteria for evidence and certainty of net benefit. Recommendations were based on the strength of evidence, and when evidence was scant, recommendations were based on expert consensus. RESULTS: The PACC evaluated the published literature and established evidence- and consensus-based expert opinion recommendations to guide best practices in treating cancer pain. Additional guidance will occur as new evidence is developed in future iterations of this process. CONCLUSIONS: The PACC recommends best practices regarding the use of intrathecal drug delivery in cancer pain, with an emphasis on managing the unique disease and patient characteristics encountered in oncology. These evidence- and consensus-based expert opinion recommendations should be used as a guide to assist decision-making when clinically appropriate.

The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC)®: Intrathecal Drug Delivery Guidance on Safety and Therapy Optimization When Treating Chronic Noncancer Pain.

INTRODUCTION: The International Neuromodulation Society convened a multispecialty group of physicians and scientists based on expertise with international representation to establish evidence-based guidance on intrathecal drug delivery in treating chronic pain. This Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC)® project, created more than two decades ago, intends to provide evidence-based guidance for important safety and efficacy issues surrounding intrathecal drug delivery and its impact on the practice of neuromodulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Authors were chosen on the basis of their clinical expertise, familiarity with the peer-reviewed literature, research productivity, and contributions to the neuromodulation literature. Section leaders supervised literature searches of MEDLINE, BioMed Central, Current Contents Connect, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PubMed from 2017 (when PACC® last published guidelines) to the present. Identified studies were graded using the United States Preventive Services Task Force criteria for evidence and certainty of net benefit. Recommendations are based on the strength of evidence or consensus when evidence is scant. RESULTS: The PACC® examined the published literature and established evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to guide best practices. Additional guidance will occur as new evidence is developed in future iterations of this process. CONCLUSIONS: The PACC® recommends best practices regarding intrathecal drug delivery to improve safety and efficacy. The evidence- and consensus-based recommendations should be used as a guide to assist decision-making when clinically appropriate.

The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC)®: Recommendations for the Mitigation of Complications of Neurostimulation.

INTRODUCTION: The International Neuromodulation Society convened a multispecialty group of physicians based on expertise and international representation to establish evidence-based guidance on the mitigation of neuromodulation complications. This Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC)® project intends to update evidence-based guidance and offer expert opinion that will improve efficacy and safety. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Authors were chosen on the basis of their clinical expertise, familiarity with the peer-reviewed literature, research productivity, and contributions to the neuromodulation literature. Section leaders supervised literature searches of MEDLINE, BioMed Central, Current Contents Connect, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PubMed from 2017 (when NACC last published guidelines) to October 2023. Identified studies were graded using the United States Preventive Services Task Force criteria for evidence and certainty of net benefit. Recommendations are based on the strength of evidence or consensus when evidence was scant. RESULTS: The NACC examined the published literature and established evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to guide best practices. Additional guidance will occur as new evidence is developed in future iterations of this process. CONCLUSIONS: The NACC recommends best practices regarding the mitigation of complications associated with neurostimulation to improve safety and efficacy. The evidence- and consensus-based recommendations should be used as a guide to assist decision-making when clinically appropriate.

Investigation of the intraoperative cortical responses to spinal motor mapping in a patient with chronic pain.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in spinal cord stimulation (SCS) surgery for chronic pain is shown to provide effective guidance during device placement. Electromyography (EMG) is used to determine the laterality of the paddle. In some SCS cases, laterality cannot be obtained via EMG due to patient physiology. Electroencephalography (EEG) is already used in IONM to monitor cortical responses. Here, we show proof-of-concept of assessing the responses of epidurally evoked EMGs simultaneously with EEGs to determine laterality during IONM using a high-resolution (HR) SCS paddle. An 8-column HR-SCS paddle was acutely placed at T9-T10 interspace in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. EMG signals from 18 muscle groups were recorded simultaneously with 60-channel EEG signals at various stimulation amplitudes (0-10 mA). Particular attention was paid to regions associated with pain including the somatosensory cortex (S1), prefrontal cortex (PFC), and motor cortex (M1). When left and right lateral contacts were stimulated at low amplitudes (1-2 mA), significant changes were seen in θ, α, and ß powers in the contralateral PFC but not in M1 or S1. There was a significant correlation between M1 and contralateral contacts in α power. At higher currents (7-8 mA), right-sided contacts resulted in α power change. We found significant differences in α, θ, and ß powers in PFC for contralateral stimulation of the lateral SCS contacts at low amplitudes and in α power at higher amplitudes. The changes in PFC suggest the potential of EEG for understanding a cortical mechanism of action of SCS and provide insight into the pathophysiology of chronic pain.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Here, we present proof of concept of assessing the responses of epidurally evoked electromyography simultaneously with scalp electroencephalography to determine whether both laterality and insights into pain mechanisms can be elucidated. With stimulation, significant changes were seen in θ, α, and ß band power in the contralateral prefrontal cortex and in α power in the motor cortex. We provide insight into the mechanism of action of SCS in preventing pain in this patient.

Role of Integrative Health on Neuropathic Pain.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients diagnosed with neuropathic pain experience continuous or intermittent spontaneous pain throughout their lives. Pharmacological treatments often provide limited relief; therefore, a multidisciplinary approach should be utilized to manage neuropathic pain. This review examines the current literature on integrative health modalities (anti-inflammatory diets, functional movement, acupuncture, meditation, and transcutaneous therapy) for treating patients with neuropathic pain. RECENT FINDINGS: The use of an anti-inflammatory diet, functional movement, acupuncture, meditation, and transcutaneous therapy in treating neuropathic pain has been investigated in prior literature with positive outcomes. However, there remains a large void in evidence-based knowledge and clinical applicability for these interventions. Overall, integrative health offers a cost-efficient and harmless way of creating a multidisciplinary approach to managing neuropathic pain. There are many complementary approaches to treating neuropathic pain as part of an integrative medicine approach. Research is needed to explore other herbs and spices not yet reported in the peer-review literature. Additionally, follow-on research is needed to understand the clinical applicability of the proposed interventions as well as the dose and timing of the interventions to predict response and duration.

Establishing Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Sleep Outcomes after Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Pain Disorders.

INTRODUCTION: As one of the most common medical conditions for which patients seek medical care, chronic pain can be debilitating. The relationship between chronic pain and sleep is thought to be bidirectional, suggesting that treatment of one can be beneficial to the other. There is mounting evidence that spinal cord stimulation (SCS) improves aspects of sleep. How meaningful that is to patients' lives has not been ascertained. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to further elucidate the effect of SCS on sleep by examining the relationship between pain outcome measures with the insomnia severity index (ISI) and to establish the minimally clinical important difference (MCID), which is defined as the smallest noticeable change that an individual perceives as clinically significant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively collected ISI, Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), Numerical Rating Scale, McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form, Oswestry Disability Index, Beck Depression Inventory, and Pain Catastrophizing Scale data both pre- and postoperatively for chronic pain patients who underwent SCS placement and had long-term outcomes. The ISI is a well-studied questionnaire used to assess an individual's level of insomnia. RESULTS: We correlated the ESS and ISI with pain outcome measures in sixty-four patients at a mean follow-up of 9.8 ± 2.9 months. The ISI showed correlations with disability as measured through the Oswestry Disability Index (p = 0.014) and depression as measured through the Beck Depression Inventory (p = 0.024). MCID values for the ISI were calculated using both anchor- and distribution-based methods. The minimal detectable change method resulted in an MCID of 2.4 points, standard error of measurement resulted in an MCID of 2.6 points, and the change difference resulted in an MCID of 2.45. The receiver operating characteristic method yielded an MCID of 0.5-point change with an area under the curve of 0.61. CONCLUSION: This study successfully established MCID ranges for the ISI outcome measure to help gauge improvement in insomnia after SCS. The ISI has ample evidence of its validity in assessment of insomnia, and MCID values of 2.4-2.6 correlate with improvement in disability and depression in our patients.

Artifacts Can Be Deceiving: The Actual Location of Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes Differs from the Artifact Seen on Magnetic Resonance Images.

INTRODUCTION: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a common treatment for a variety of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Recent studies have highlighted the role of neuroimaging in localizing the position of electrode contacts relative to target brain areas in order to optimize DBS programming. Among different imaging methods, postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been widely used for DBS electrode localization; however, the geometrical distortion induced by the lead limits its accuracy. In this work, we investigated to what degree the difference between the actual location of the lead's tip and the location of the tip estimated from the MRI artifact varies depending on the MRI sequence parameters such as acquisition plane and phase encoding direction, as well as the lead's extracranial configuration. Accordingly, an imaging technique to increase the accuracy of lead localization was devised and discussed. METHODS: We designed and constructed an anthropomorphic phantom with an implanted DBS system following 18 clinically relevant configurations. The phantom was scanned at a Siemens 1.5 Tesla Aera scanner using a T1MPRAGE sequence optimized for clinical use and a T1TSE sequence optimized for research purposes. We varied slice acquisition plane and phase encoding direction and calculated the distance between the caudal tip of the DBS lead MRI artifact and the actual tip of the lead, as estimated from MRI reference markers. RESULTS: Imaging parameters and lead configuration substantially altered the difference in the depth of the lead within its MRI artifact on the scale of several millimeters - with a difference as large as 4.99 mm. The actual tip of the DBS lead was found to be consistently more rostral than the tip estimated from the MR image artifact. The smallest difference between the tip of the DBS lead and the tip of the MRI artifact using the clinically relevant sequence (i.e., T1MPRAGE) was found with the sagittal acquisition plane and anterior-posterior phase encoding direction. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The actual tip of an implanted DBS lead is located up to several millimeters rostral to the tip of the lead's artifact on postoperative MR images. This distance depends on the MRI sequence parameters and the DBS system's extracranial trajectory. MRI parameters may be altered to improve this localization.

Incidence of Infections, Explantations, and Displacements/Mechanical Complications of Spinal Cord Stimulation During the Past Eight Years.

OBJECTIVES: The overall awareness and potential of real-world data have drastically increased in the medical field, with potential implications for postmarket medical device surveillance. The goal of this study was to evaluate real-world data on incidence of infections, explantations, and displacements/mechanical complications of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) during the past eight years and to forecast point estimates for the upcoming three years on the basis of the identified patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on electronic health records from 80 healthcare organizations within the TriNetX data base in the USA, data of 11,934 patients who received SCS as treatment for persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2 (PSPS T2) were extracted. Events of interest were explantations and displacements/mechanical complications of both the lead and implanted pulse generator (IPG), in addition to infection rates from 2015 to 2022. Mann-Kendall tests were performed to detect monotonic trends in the time series. Forecasts were conducted for the upcoming three years for every event of interest. RESULTS: Statistically significant increasing time trends were revealed for the annual incidence of IPG and lead displacements/mechanical complications in patients with PSPS T2 over the past eight years. These time trends were visible in both male and female patients and in smokers and nonsmokers. For annual incidence of explantations and infections, no significant time effect was observed. In 2025, the incidence of displacements/mechanical complications of the lead (3.07%) is predicted to be the highest, followed by explantations of the IPG (2.67%) and lead (2.02%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on real world data, device explantation was the most frequent event of interest, with negative peaks in the time series in 2016 and 2020, presumably due to the introduction of rechargeable pulse generators and to the COVID-19 pandemic, respectively.

Clinical Longevity of 106,462 Rechargeable and Primary Cell Spinal Cord Stimulators: Real World Study in the Medicare Population.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulators (SCS) are available with either primary cell (PC) or rechargeable cell (RC) batteries. Although RC systems are proposed to have a battery longevity upward of nine years, in comparison with four years for PC systems, there are few studies of longevity of SCS in the real world. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an observational, nonrandomized, retrospective study of Medicare beneficiaries who received neurostimulator implants in the outpatient hospital. This study used Medicare fee-for-service claims data from 2013 to 2020. The clinical longevity of the implantable pulse generator (IPG), defined as the duration from implant until removal for any reason, was compared between PC and RC devices. Life distribution analysis was used to approximate device lifespan. The secondary analysis separated removals into explant or replacements. The statistics were adjusted for relevant clinical covariates. RESULTS: A total of 25,856 PC and 79,606 RC systems were included in the study. At seven years after implant, 53.8% of PC IPGs and 55.0% of RC IPGs remained in use. The life distribution modeling analysis projected a median lifespan of 8.2 years for PC and 9.0 years for RC devices. The rate of explant was lower for PC devices (19.2%) than for RC devices (22.0%, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.96, p = 0.082), whereas the rate of replacements was higher for PC devices (33.7%) than for RC devices (29.5%, HR = 1.31, p < 0.001). An analysis of the battery type used in device replacements showed an increasing adoption of PC devices over time. CONCLUSIONS: This large, retrospective, real-world analysis of Medicare claims data demonstrated that the clinical longevity of neurostimulator devices is similar for PC and RC batteries. In the past, clinicians may have defaulted to RC devices based on the assumption that they provided extended battery life. Considering this longevity data, clinicians should now consider the choice between PC and RC devices based on other individual factors pertinent to the patient experience and not on purported longevity claims.

Holistic Treatment Response: An International Expert Panel Definition and Criteria for a New Paradigm in the Assessment of Clinical Outcomes of Spinal Cord Stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Treatment response to spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is focused on the magnitude of effects on pain intensity. However, chronic pain is a multidimensional condition that may affect individuals in different ways and as such it seems reductionist to evaluate treatment response based solely on a unidimensional measure such as pain intensity. AIM: The aim of this article is to add to a framework started by IMMPACT for assessing the wider health impact of treatment with SCS for people with chronic pain, a "holistic treatment response". DISCUSSION: Several aspects need consideration in the assessment of a holistic treatment response. SCS device data and how it relates to patient outcomes, is essential to improve the understanding of the different types of SCS, improve patient selection, long-term clinical outcomes, and reproducibility of findings. The outcomes to include in the evaluation of a holistic treatment response need to consider clinical relevance for patients and clinicians. Assessment of the holistic response combines two key concepts of patient assessment: (1) patients level of baseline (pre-treatment) unmet need across a range of health domains; (2) demonstration of patient-relevant improvements in these health domains with treatment. The minimal clinical important difference (MCID) is an established approach to reflect changes after a clinical intervention that are meaningful for the patient and can be used to identify treatment response to each individual domain. A holistic treatment response needs to account for MCIDs in all domains of importance for which the patient presents dysfunctional scores pre-treatment. The number of domains included in a holistic treatment response may vary and should be considered on an individual basis. Physiologic confirmation of therapy delivery and utilisation should be included as part of the evaluation of a holistic treatment response and is essential to advance the field of SCS and increase transparency and reproducibility of the findings.

Age as an Independent Predictor of Adult Spinal Cord Stimulation Pain Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an efficacious chronic pain treatment most commonly used in middle-aged patients. Results from previous studies that investigated SCS' effects in older patient populations have been equivocal. We examine whether SCS outcomes correlate with age. METHODS: We retrospectively examined prospectively collected outcomes from 189 patients who underwent SCS at Albany Medical Center between 2012 and 2020. The patients completed the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The mean percent change in each outcome was determined and compared via a regression analysis to determine relationships between patient age and each respective outcome metrics. Demographics were compared between patients aged under 65 versus those aged 65 and older via χ2 tests. RESULTS: All subjects demonstrated the expected improvement on NRS, BDI, PCS, and MPQ from baseline to 1-year follow-up, with several demonstrating statistically significant changes: NRS-worst pain (18.66%, p < 0.001), NRS-least pain (26.9%, p < 0.001), NRS-average pain (26.9%, p < 0.01), NRS-current pain (26.4%, p < 0.001), ODI (19.6%, p < 0.001), PCS (29.8%, p < 0.001), and MPQ (29.4%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between patients aged under 65 versus those aged 65 and older based on lead type (p = 0.454). Six patients (3.1%) had lead migration, one of whom was 65 or older. Regression analysis revealed improvements in MPQ-sensory and MPQ-affective scores as age increased (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.09; p = 0.046, R2 = 0.05, respectively). Age did not correlate with NRS, ODI, BDI, or PCS. Diagnosis, spinal level of SCS, and lead type were not found to influence any respective outcome measure based on covariate analysis. CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest study where age was correlated to specific pain, depression, and disability outcomes following SCS. We provide evidence that SCS outcomes are equivalent, or better, in older patients following SCS. Based on these findings, SCS is a viable option for treatment of chronic pain in elderly patient populations.

Botulinum Toxin as an Effective Treatment for Trigeminal Neuralgia in Surgical Practices.

BACKGROUND: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a common cause of craniofacial pain with many medical and surgical therapies, all of which are imperfect. We examine the use of botulinum toxin type-A (BTX-A) as an intermediary approach in surgical practices. METHODS: We retrospectively identified TN patients seen by both pain neurology and neurosurgery at our center. Demographics were collected. Pain intensity was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS) and compared from baseline to after BTX-A treatment via paired t test. Responder status was assessed, and success of BTX-A was determined for each cohort. Doses of common medications were compared between baseline visit and the most recent BTX-A administration visit. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients underwent BTX-A therapy for TN, 24 (77%) female and 7 (23%) male. Mean age was 62.5 ± 3.1 years and 29 (94%) identified as white. When divided into cohorts according to indication, 11 (35%) failed prior TN surgery, 9 (29%) either declined surgery or were poor surgical candidates, 4 (13%) had multiple sclerosis, 4 (13%) had trigeminal neuropathic pain, and 3 (10%) had atypical TN with pain in additional dermatomes outside the trigeminal distribution. Significant reductions in NRS from baseline to following initial BTX-A treatment were seen in the declined/high risk for surgery (p = 0.004) and those who failed prior TN surgery (p = 0.035) groups. No significant variation in demographics was found between any two groups (p > 0.05 for all). Finally, there was no significant reduction in total daily dose of gabapentin, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, baclofen, or lamotrigine in BTX-A responders (p > 0.05 for all). DISCUSSION: Indication is an important predictor for BTX-A, with classical TN patients exhibiting the highest response rates. This research highlights the viability of BTX-A as an important tool in the arsenal of providers seeking to treat TN in a minimally invasive manner.

Toward Generalizable Trajectory Planning for Human Intracerebral Trials and Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic neurosurgical techniques are increasingly used to deliver biologics, such as cells and viruses, although standardized procedures are necessary to ensure consistency and reproducibility. OBJECTIVE: We provide an instructional guide to help plan for complex image-guided trajectories; this may be of particular benefit to surgeons new to biologic trials and companies planning such trials. METHODS: We show how nuclei can be segmented and multiple trajectories with multiple injection points can be created through a single or multiple burr hole(s) based on preoperative images. Screenshots similar to those shown in this article can be used for planning purposes and for quality control in clinical trials. RESULTS: This method enables the precise definition of 3-D target structures, such as the putamen, and efficient planning trajectories for biologic injections. The technique is generalizable and largely independent of procedural format, and thus can be integrated with frame-based or frameless platforms to streamline reproducible therapeutic delivery. CONCLUSIONS: We describe an easy-to-use and generalizable protocol for intracerebral trajectory planning for stereotactic delivery of biologics. Although we highlight intracerebral stem cell delivery to the putamen using a frame-based stereotactic delivery system, similar strategies may be employed for different brain nuclei using different platforms. We anticipate this will inform future advanced and fully automated neurosurgical procedures to help unify the field and decrease inherent variability seen with manual trajectory planning.