GEMA 5.3. Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma.

The Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma, better known by its acronym in Spanish GEMA, has been available for more than 20 years. Twenty-one scientific societies or related groups both from Spain and internationally have participated in the preparation and development of the updated edition of GEMA, which in fact has been currently positioned as the reference guide on asthma in the Spanish language worldwide. Its objective is to prevent and improve the clinical situation of people with asthma by increasing the knowledge of healthcare professionals involved in their care. Its purpose is to convert scientific evidence into simple and easy-to-follow practical recommendations. Therefore, it is not a monograph that brings together all the scientific knowledge about the disease, but rather a brief document with the essentials, designed to be applied quickly in routine clinical practice. The guidelines are necessarily multidisciplinary, developed to be useful and an indispensable tool for physicians of different specialties, as well as nurses and pharmacists. Probably the most outstanding aspects of the guide are the recommendations to: establish the diagnosis of asthma using a sequential algorithm based on objective diagnostic tests; the follow-up of patients, preferably based on the strategy of achieving and maintaining control of the disease; treatment according to the level of severity of asthma, using six steps from least to greatest need of pharmaceutical drugs, and the treatment algorithm for the indication of biologics in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma based on phenotypes. And now, in addition to that, there is a novelty for easy use and follow-up through a computer application based on the chatbot-type conversational artificial intelligence (ia-GEMA).

La Guía Española para el Manejo del Asma, mejor conocida por su acrónimo en español, GEMA, está a nuestra disposición desde hace más de veinte años. Veintiuna sociedades científicas o grupos relacionados, tanto de España como de otros países, han participado en la preparación y desarrollo de la edición actualizada de GEMA que, de hecho, se ha posicionado en la actualidad a nivel mundial como la guía de referencia sobre asma en lengua española.Su objetivo es prevenir y mejorar la situación clínica de las personas con asma, aumentando el conocimiento de los profesionales sanitarios involucrados en su cuidado. Su propósito es convertir la evidencia científica en recomendaciones prácticas sencillas y fáciles de seguir. Por lo tanto, no se trata de una monografía que reúna todo el conocimiento científico sobre la enfermedad, sino más bien de un documento conciso con lo esencial, diseñado para ser aplicado rápidamente en la práctica clínica de rutina. Las recomendaciones son necesariamente multidisciplinares, están desarrolladas para ser útiles y una herramienta indispensable para médicos de diferentes especialidades, así como para profesionales de enfermería y farmacia.Seguramente, los aspectos más destacados de la guía son las recomendaciones para: establecer el diagnóstico del asma utilizando un algoritmo secuencial basado en pruebas diagnósticas objetivas; el seguimiento de los pacientes, preferentemente basado en la estrategia de lograr y mantener el control de la enfermedad; el tratamiento según el nivel de gravedad del asma utilizando seis escalones, desde la menor hasta la mayor necesidad de medicamentos, y el algoritmo de tratamiento basado en fenotipos para la indicación de biológicos en pacientes con asma grave no controlada. A esto se suma ahora una novedad para su fácil uso y seguimiento a través de una aplicación informática basada en la inteligencia artificial conversacional de tipo chatbot (ia-GEMA).

The Response to Biologics is Better in Patients with Severe Asthma Than in Patients with Asthma-COPD Overlap Syndrome.

Although biologics have demonstrated to be effective in T2-high asthma patients, there is little experience with these drugs in asthma-COPD overlap (ACO). The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of biologics in these two conditions. We included 318 patients (24 ACO and 297 asthma) treated with monoclonal antibodies and followed for at least 12 months. Omalizumab was the most frequently employed biologic agent both in patients with ACO and asthma. Asthma control test (ACT) scores after at least 12 months of biologic therapy were not significantly different between groups. The percentage of patients with ≥1 exacerbation and ≥1 corticosteroid burst was significantly higher in ACO patients (70.8 vs 27.3 and 83.3% vs 37.5%, respectively), whereas the percentage of "controlled" patients (with no exacerbations, no need for corticosteroids and ACT ≥ 20) was significantly lower (16.7% vs 39.7%). In conclusion, this report suggests that patients with ACO treated with biologics reach worse outcomes than asthma patients.

Management of asthma in the emergency department: a consensus statement. / Documento de consenso para el manejo del paciente asmático en urgencias.

EN: The purpose of this consensus statement is to provide a tool to assist in the management of asthma in Spanish emergency departments and to improve care of patients with asthma. A multidisciplinary team of 3 emergency medicine specialists, 3 respiratory medicine specialists, and 3 allergy specialists made a list of clinical questions and chose 4 clinical practice guidelines on asthma management to prioritize when answering the questions. The team members first worked individually and then discussed their findings in a meeting to reach consensus about the content of the present statement. The recommendations and clinical algorithms in the statement contribute to detecting the asthmatic patient on arrival at the emergency department, establishing the diagnosis, following unified treatment criteria, and referring the patient to a respiratory medicine specialist, an allergy specialist, or a primary care physician, as appropriate. The definitions used in this statement provide a common language for asthma in the interest of helping to unify care practices in emergency departments. The diagnostic criteria, treatment guidelines, and criteria for discharging and admitting patients provided should be useful for managing asthma in Spanish emergency departments.

El presente documento de consenso se ha desarrollado con el objetivo de facilitar una herramienta para el manejo del paciente asmático en los servicios de urgencias españoles y mejorar la calidad asistencial. Un equipo multidisciplinar formado por tres especialistas en medicina de urgencias, tres especialistas en neumología y tres especialistas en alergología elaboró un listado de preguntas clínicas y utilizó cuatro guías de práctica clínica sobre el manejo del asma para responderlas. Después de un periodo de trabajo individual, se discutieron y consensuaron en una reunión los contenidos del presente documento. Las recomendaciones y los algoritmos incluidos en él van dirigidos a detectar al paciente asmático a su llegada al servicio de urgencias, establecer un diagnóstico correcto, unificar los criterios terapéuticos y realizar posteriormente una correcta derivación al neumólogo, alergólogo o al médico de atención primaria, según proceda. Las definiciones que se ofrecen en el presente documento proporcionan un lenguaje común que puede ayudar a unificar la actividad asistencial en los servicios de urgencias. Los criterios diagnósticos, las pautas de tratamiento y los criterios de alta y hospitalización recogidos en esta guía pueden ser de utilidad para el manejo del paciente asmático en los servicios de urgencias españoles.

[Inhaled therapy in asthma]. / Terapia inhalada en el asma.

Because of its advantages, inhaled administration of aerosolized drugs is the administration route of choice for the treatment of asthma and COPD. Numerous technological advances in the devices used in inhaled therapy in recent decades have boosted the appearance of multiple inhalers and aerosolized drugs. However, this variety also requires that the prescribing physician is aware of their characteristics. The main objective of the present review is to summarize the current state of knowledge on inhalers and inhaled drugs commonly used in the treatment of asthma. The review ranges from theoretical aspects (fundamentals and available devices and drugs) to practical and relevant aspects for asthma care in the clinical setting (therapeutic strategies, education, and adherence to inhalers).

Treatment of moderate-severe asthma: an alternative strategy to the guideline recommendations / Estrategia para el tratamiento del asma moderada-grave: una alternativa a la recomendada por las guías

No disponible

Documento de consenso para el manejo del paciente asmático en urgencias / Management of asthma in the emergency department: a consensus statement

El presente documento de consenso se ha desarrollado con el objetivo de facilitar una herramienta para el manejo del paciente asmático en los servicios de urgencias españoles y mejorar la calidad asistencial. Un equipo multidisciplinar formado por tres especialistas en medicina de urgencias, tres especialistas en neumología y tres especialistas en alergología elaboró un listado de preguntas clínicas y utilizó cuatro guías de práctica clínica sobre el manejo del asma para responderlas. Después de un periodo de trabajo individual, se discutieron y consensuaron en una reunión los contenidos del presente documento. Las recomendaciones y los algoritmos incluidos en él van dirigidos a detectar al paciente asmático a su llegada al servicio de urgencias, establecer un diagnóstico correcto, unificar los criterios terapéuticos y realizar posteriormente una correcta derivación al neumólogo, alergólogo o al médico de atención primaria, según proceda. Las definiciones que se ofrecen en el presente documento proporcionan un lenguaje común que puede ayudar a unificar la actividad asistencial en los servicios de urgencias. Los criterios diagnósticos, las pautas de tratamiento y los criterios de alta y hospitalización recogidos en esta guía pueden ser de utilidad para el manejo del paciente asmático en los servicios de urgencias españoles

The purpose of this consensus statement is to provide a tool to assist in the management of asthma in Spanish emergency departments and to improve care of patients with asthma. A multidisciplinary team of 3 emergency medicine specialists, 3 respiratory medicine specialists, and 3 allergy specialists made a list of clinical questions and chose 4 clinical practice guidelines on asthma management to prioritize when answering the questions. The team members first worked individually and then discussed their findings in a meeting to reach consensus about the content of the present statement. The recommendations and clinical algorithms in the statement contribute to detecting the asthmatic patient on arrival at the emergency department, establishing the diagnosis, following unified treatment criteria, and referring the patient to a respiratory medicine specialist, an allergy specialist, or a primary care physician, as appropriate. The definitions used in this statement provide a common language for asthma in the interest of helping to unify care practices in emergency departments. The diagnostic criteria, treatment guidelines, and criteria for discharging and admitting patients provided should be useful for managing asthma in Spanish emergency departments

La guía española del manejo del asma (GEMA 4.0) está obsoleta en lo que a vacunación antineumocócica se refiere. Respuesta de los autores / Obsolete anti-pneumococcal vaccination recommendations in the spanish guidelines for the management of asthma (GEMA 4.0): the authors reply

No disponible

[Role of toll-like receptors in respiratory diseases]. / Papel de los receptores toll-like en las enfermedades respiratorias.

There has been growing interest in the last 10 years in the study of innate immunity, in particular because of the possible role that toll-like receptors (TLR) may play in the pathogenesis of some respiratory disease such as for example, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and infections. TLR are a family of type 1 transmembrane proteins, responsible for recognizing molecular patterns associated with pathogens (PAMP, pathogen-associated molecular patterns), and expressed by a broad spectrum of infectious agents. This recognition leads to quick production of cytokines and chemokines which provides a long-lasting adaptive response to the pathogen. Currently, it is considered that the administration of drugs which modulate the activity of these receptors upwards or downwards may represent major therapeutic progress for handling these diseases. The aim of this review is to describe the different TLS, define their possible role in the pathogenesis of the main respiratory diseases and finally, speculate over the therapeutic possibilities which their modulation, agonist or antagonist, offers as possible therapeutic targets.

Discrepancias en la clasificación de los glucocorticoides inhalados entre GEMA y GINA / Discrepancies Between GEMA and GINA in the Classification of Inhaled Corticosteroids

No disponible

Tiotropium and risk for fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review with meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There are safety concerns regarding the use of anticholinergics in the COPD patient population. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the cardiovascular risk of regular use of inhaled tiotropium bromide in patients with COPD of any severity. METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, manufactures' trial register, and FDA databases, without language restriction. Primary outcomes were a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke during the treatment period. Relative risks (RR) were estimated using fixed-effects models and statistical heterogeneity was estimated with the I2 statistic. RESULTS: Nineteen randomized controlled trials (18,111 participants) were selected. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events (RR=0.96; 95% CI, 0.82-1.12, I2=6%). Among individual components of the composite outcome, tiotropium did not significantly increase the risk of cardiovascular death (RR=0.93; 95% CI, 0.73-1.20, I2=1%), nonfatal MI (RR=0.84; 95% CI, 0.64-1.09, I2=0%), and nonfatal stroke (RR=1.04; 95% CI, 0.78-1.39, I2=0%). A smoking history of > or = 55 pack-years presented a trend to a higher rate of cardiovascular adverse events in patients receiving tiotropium. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with control (placebo or salmeterol), tiotropium did not significantly increase the risk of adverse major cardiovascular events among COPD patients. Subgroup analysis suggested that smoking history can modify the risk of cardiovascular adverse events.