Socio-economic and occupational outcomes of long-term survivors of gynaecological cancer: A French population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe socio-economic and professional outcomes in long-term survivors of cervical, endometrial or ovarian cancer, including return to work and problems related to obtaining loans and insurance. METHODS: Women with cervical, endometrial or ovarian cancers diagnosed from 2006 to 2013 were selected through the French gynaecological cancer registry of Côte d'Or, in a cross-sectional survey. Using a questionnaire established with the help of sociologists and psychologists, social and cancer-related work issues were collected among women aged less than 60 years at the time of cancer diagnosis. The socio-economic status was also assessed, at the time of the survey using the EPICES questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 92 gynaecological cancer survivors (CS) participated in this survey. Gynaecological CS reported a decrease in income since cancer diagnosis, difficulties obtaining loans, and a decrease in ability to work, both in the short term after treatment and at the time of survey, on average 6 years after diagnosis. Fatigue, emotional and cognitive difficulties were the reasons cited to explain the decreased ability to work, both immediately after treatment and in the long term. CONCLUSIONS: Gynaecological CS experienced many problems, such as decreased work capacity, decreased income and difficulty obtaining loans.

Long-Term Gynecological Cancer Survivors in Côte d'Or: Health-Related Quality of Life and Living Conditions.

BACKGROUND: The likelihood that health-related quality of life (HRQoL) could depend on factors other than clinical data increases with the duration of follow-up since diagnosis. The aim of this study was to identify determinants of long-term HRQoL in women with cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancer. Secondary objectives were to describe their living conditions (sexual function, psychological distress, social and professional reinsertion). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional survey, women diagnosed with cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers from 2006 to 2013 were selected through the French gynecological cancers registry of Côte d'Or. Validated questionnaires exploring HRQoL (short-form health survey; SF-12), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), social support (Sarason's Social Support Questionnaire), sexual function (Female Sexual Function Index), and living conditions (EPICES questionnaire) were used to assess HRQoL and its determinants. Social and professional reinsertion were also investigated using study-specific questionnaires. Determinants of HRQoL were identified using a multivariable mixed-regression model for each composite score of the SF-12. RESULTS: In total, 195 gynecological cancer survivors participated in the survey. HRQoL was deteriorated for almost all the SF-12 dimensions. The main determinants of poor HRQoL were comorbidities, deprivation, lack of availability and satisfaction with social support, and psychological outcomes. Thirty-four percent of survivors of gynecological cancer reported a negative impact of cancer on their work, and 73% reported an impaired ability to work after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term HRQoL of survivors of gynecological cancer is not impacted by stage of disease. Specific interventions should focus on issues that promote social and professional reintegration and improve HRQoL. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study shows that women with gynecological cancer have problems related to work and sexual dysfunction, even 5 years after diagnosis. The results of this study will help improve clinicians' awareness of the factors affecting the lives of gynecological cancer survivors, even long after diagnosis and treatment. They will also highlight for clinicians the areas that are of importance to gynecological cancer survivors, making it possible to guide management of these patients with a view to preventing deteriorated health-related quality of life after treatment. For the health authorities, the results of this study underline that more than 5 years after gynecological cancer, the initial stage of disease no longer affects quality of life, but there is a clear need for actions targeting socio-professional reintegration of survivors.

Prognostic Factors of Survival among Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer and Impact of Primary or Secondary Nature of Disease on Survival: A French Population-Based Study.

We aim to determine whether differences in survival exist between two populations of women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and to identify prognostic factors of survival after metastasis diagnosis. Data on women with MBC diagnosed between 2000 and 2011 were provided by the Côte d'Or Breast cancer registry. Survival rates and median overall survival (OS) after metastasis diagnosis were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors were determined in a Cox proportional hazard model. Overall, 282 women with primary MBC and 340 with secondary MBC were included. A 2-year survival rate was significantly better in women with primary MBC (50.8% [95% CI: 47.8-53.8%] versus 44.5% [95% CI: 41.8-47.2%]). However, median OS did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.1). The prognostic factors associated with worst survival were a triple-negative tumor type (p < 10-4 ), multiple metastases sites (p < 10-4 ), an older age at metastasis (p < 10-4 ), and a SBR grade G3 (p = 0.007). OS between women with primary MBC and women with secondary MBC does not seem to differ significantly. This population-based study provides original epidemiological data on French women without any selection bias inherent to hospital cohorts.

Determinants of quality of life among long-term breast cancer survivors.

PURPOSE: To identify the impact of clinical and socio-economic determinants on quality of life (QoL) among breast cancer (BC) survivors 5 years after diagnosis. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in women diagnosed in 2007 for primary invasive non-metastatic BC and identified through the Côte d'Or BC registry. QoL was assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC-QLQ-C30) and the breast cancer (EORTC-QLQ-BR23) questionnaires. Social support was assessed with Sarason's social support questionnaire, and deprivation was assessed by the EPICES questionnaire. Clinical variables were collected through the registry database. Determinants of QoL were identified using multivariable mixed model analysis for each SF-12 dimension. A sensitivity analysis was conducted with multiple imputations on missing data. RESULTS: Overall, 188 patients on 319 patients (59 %) invited to participate to the survey completed the questionnaires. Five years after breast cancer diagnosis, the disease stages at diagnosis, as well as the treatment received, were not determinants of QoL. Only the age at diagnosis and comorbidities were found to be determinants of QoL. CONCLUSIONS: Five years after BC diagnosis, disease severity and the treatment received did not affect QoL.

Age-related socio-economic and geographic disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the impact of socio-economic and geographic disparities on disease stage at diagnosis according to age in breast cancer (BC) patients. Secondary purpose was to describe survival METHODS: All women with primary invasive BC, diagnosed from 1998 to 2009 in the department of Côte d'Or were retrospectively selected using data from the Côte d'Or BC registry. European transnational ecological deprivation index (French European Deprivation Index) was used to measure the socio-economic environment. Relationships between socio-geographic deprivation and disease stage at diagnosis according to age were assessed by a multilevel ordered logistic regression model. Relative survival rates (RSRs) were given at 5 years according to tumour and patients characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 4364 women were included. In multivariable analysis, socio-economic deprivation was associated with disease stage at diagnosis. Women aged between 50 and 74 years and living in deprived areas were more often diagnosed with advanced tumour stages (stages II/III vs. I or stages IV vs. II/III) with odds ratio = 1.27 (1.01-1.60). RSRs were lowest in women living in the most deprived area compared with those living in most affluent area with RSR = 88.4% (85.9-90.4) and 92.6% (90.5-94.2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Socio-economic factors affected tumour stage at diagnosis and survival. Living in a deprived area was linked to advanced-stage BC at diagnosis only in women aged 50-74 years. This is probably due to the socio-economic disparities in participation in organized BC screening programmes. Furthermore, living in deprived area was associated with a poor survival rate.

HER2-positive invasive lobular carcinoma: a rare breast cancer which may not necessarily require anti-HER2 therapy. A population-based study.

BACKGROUND: HER2-positive (HER2 +) invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is rare and poorly characterised. In particular, patient outcomes compared to those associated with HER2 + invasive ductal cancer (IDC) and HER2-negative (HER2 -) ILC, as well as the benefits of anti-HER2 therapy, are not well established. METHODS: We analysed the data from the Côte d'Or Registry of Breast and Gynaecological Cancers (France) for all patients diagnosed with early-stage HER2 + ILC (62 cases), HER2 + IDC (833 cases) and HER2 - ILC (685 cases) between 1998 and 2015 to compare overall and disease-free survival (OS and DFS) between these groups in correlation with anti-HER2 therapy. RESULTS: ILCs were associated with older age, larger tumours, lower histological grades, higher hormonal receptor positivity rates and multifocality, and more common endocrine therapy. OS and DFS between the three groups did not differ. We found that anti-HER2 therapy was associated with a survival benefit in patients with HER2 + IDC. In contrast, the survival of HER2 + ILC patients was not improved by anti-HER2 treatment, remaining close to that of HER2 - ILC patients. CONCLUSION: HER2 + ILC seems not to be associated with better outcomes than HER2 + IDC but may not differ from HER2 - ILC in terms of survival.

For patients with breast cancer, geographic and social disparities are independent determinants of access to specialized surgeons. A eleven-year population-based multilevel analysis.

BACKGROUND: It has been shown in several studies that survival in cancer patients who were operated on by a high-volume surgeon was better. Why then do all patients not benefit from treatment by these experienced surgeons? The aim of our work was to study the hypothesis that in breast cancer, geographical isolation and the socio-economic level have an impact on the likelihood of being treated by a specialized breast-cancer surgeon. METHODS: All cases of primary invasive breast cancer diagnosed in the Côte d'Or from 1998 to 2008 were included. Individual clinical data and distance to the nearest reference care centre were collected. The Townsend Index of each residence area was calculated. A Log Rank test and a Cox model were used for survival analysis, and a multilevel logistic regression model was used to determine predictive factors of being treated or not by a specialized breast cancer surgeon. RESULTS: Among our 3928 patients, the ten-year survival of the 2931 (74.6 %) patients operated on by a high-volume breast cancer surgeon was significantly better (LogRank p < 0.001), independently of age at diagnosis, the presence of at least one comorbidity, circumstances of diagnosis (screening or not) and TNM status (Cox HR = 0.81 [0.67-0.98]; p = 0.027). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, patients who lived 20 to 35 minutes, and more than 35 minutes away from the nearest reference care centre were less likely to be operated on by a specialized surgeon than were patients living less than 10 minutes away (OR = 0.56 [0.43; 0.73] and 0.38 [0.29; 0.50], respectively). This was also the case for patients living in rural areas compared with those living in urban areas (OR = 0.68 [0.53; 0.87]), and for patients living in the two most deprived areas (OR = 0.69 [0.48; 0.97] and 0.61 [0.44; 0.85] respectively) compared with those who lived in the most affluent area. CONCLUSIONS: A disadvantageous socio-economic environment, a rural lifestyle and living far from large specialized treatment centres were significant independent predictors of not gaining access to surgeons specialized in breast cancer. Not being treated by a specialist surgeon implies a less favourable outcome in terms of survival.

Population-based study of breast cancer in older women: prognostic factors of relative survival and predictors of treatment.

BACKGROUND: A large proportion of women with breast cancer (BC) are elderly. However, there is a lack of information regarding BC prognostic factors and care in this population. The aims of this study were to assess the prognostic factors of relative survival (RS) among women with BC aged ≥ 75 years old and to identify the predictive factors of treatments administered to this population. METHODS: A population-based study was performed using data from the Cote d'Or breast and gynaecological cancer registry. Women aged 75 years and older with primary invasive BC and resident in Cote d'Or at the time of diagnosis made between January 1998 and December 2008 were retrospectively selected. Prognostic factors of RS were estimated in a generalized linear model with a Poisson error structure. RS rate for the whole population was given at 5 years. Logistic regression models were used to identify the predictors of the treatments administered. RESULTS: Six hundred and eighty-one women were included. Median age at diagnosis was 80. Comorbidities (p = 0.02), pT stage (p = 0.04), metastases (p =< 0.001), having a family doctor (p = 0.03) and hormone-receptor status (p = 0.006) were independent prognostic factors of RS. The RS rate at 5 years for the whole population was 78.2%, 95%CI = [72.2-83.0]. Age, pT stage, metastases, histoprognostic SBR grade, hormone receptor status and comorbidities were frequently found to be predictors of treatment with surgery alone, hormone therapy alone, breast conserving surgery plus adjuvant therapy and mastectomy plus adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Comorbid conditions adversely affect survival in older women with breast cancer. Moreover the results of this study showed that there are numerous predictors of the type of treatment administered, and that the most important were age and comorbidities.

Trends in endocrine therapy prescription and survival in patients with non-metastatic hormone receptor positive breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy: A population based-study.

PURPOSE: To identify prognostic factors of invasive-disease free survival (iDFS) in women with non-metastatic hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) in daily routine practice. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study using data from the Côte d'Or breast and gynecological cancer registry in France. All women diagnosed with primary invasive non-metastatic HR + BC from 1998 to 2015 and treated by endocrine therapy (ET) were included. Women with bilateral tumors or who received ET for either metastasis or relapse were excluded. We performed adjusted survival analysis and Cox regression to identify prognostic factors of iDFS. RESULTS: A total of 3976 women were included. Age at diagnosis, ET class, SBR grade, treatment, stage and comorbidity were independently associated with iDFS. Women who had neither surgery nor radiotherapy had the highest risk of recurrence (HR = 3.75, 95%CI [2.65-5.32], p < 0.0001). Receiving aromatase inhibitors (AI) was associated with a lower risk of recurrence (HR = 0.70, 95%CI [0.54-0.90], p = 0.055) compared to tamoxifen. Compared to women with no comorbidities, women with 1 or 2 comorbidities were more likely to receive AI (OR = 1.63, 95%CI [1.22-2.17], p = 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidities, age at diagnosis and previous treatment were associated with iDFS in non-metastatic HR + BC patients. This study also showed that women who received tamoxifen for their cancer experienced worse iDFS compared to women treated with AI.

Population-based study of ovarian cancer in Côte d'Or: prognostic factors and trends in relative survival rates over the last 20 years.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this population-based study was to assess independent prognostic factors in ovarian cancer using relative survival (RS) and to investigate changes in RS rates from 1982 to 2005. METHODS: Data on 748 patients with ovarian cancer were provided by the Côte d'Or gynaecologic cancer registry. The RS was estimated using a generalized linear model with a Poisson error structure. Relative survival and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were described at the following specific time points 1, 3 and 5 years. The effect of prognostic factors on survival was assessed with multivariate analyses of RS. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 12 years. The RS rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 81%, 55% and 44%, respectively. As compared with the period 1982-1989, an improvement in survival was found for the period 1998-2005: HR = 0.52[0.40-0.67]. Women who lived in urban areas had better RS: HR = 0.82[0.67-0.99]. Patients with epithelial types of ovarian cancer other than mucinous or endometrioid cancer had worse RS than those with serous histology. Age ≥ 70 years was associated with lower survival. CONCLUSIONS: Period of diagnosis, stage at diagnosis, histology, place of residence and age were independent prognostic factors for survival in ovarian cancer. An improvement in the survival rate was observed after 1998 but a significant improvement was limited to advanced stage cancers.

Breast cancer subtype of French women is not influenced by socioeconomic status: A population-based-study.

CONTEXT: The molecular subtype of breast tumours plays a major role in cancer prognosis and treatment options. Triple negative tumours (TN) carry the worst prognosis and affects most frequently women of low socioeconomic status (SES). Studies have shown that non-biologic factors, such as the socioeconomic status could have an influence on tumour biology. To this date no study has been done investigating this association in French women. The objective is to study the association between the SES and the molecular tumour subtype of breast cancer patients in the French county of Côte d'Or. This study benefits from the population data from the Côte d'Or breast cancer registry known for its strict quality control policy. METHODS: Invasive breast cancer cases between 2003 and 2013 were extracted from the Breast cancer registry database in Côte d'Or. A multivariate analysis was conducted using a hierarchical polytomous regression for the multinomial outcomes for the cancer subtype with HR+/HER2 as reference category. RESULTS: A total of 4553 cases were included in our study. There was no significant association found between SES and tumour subtype in French women at diagnosis. Women older than 75 years were less likely to have a TN and HR+/HER2+ breast cancer (OR = 0.66; CI95% = [0.46-0.94] and OR = 0.51; CI95% = [0.37-0.70] respectively). Women with TN tumour subtype had significantly less lymph node invasion when compared to HR+/HER2- subtype (OR = 0.71; CI95% = [0.54-0.92]). CONCLUSION: No significant association was found between socioeconomic status and molecular subtype. Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms associated with developing each tumour subtype.

The presence of LC3B puncta and HMGB1 expression in malignant cells correlate with the immune infiltrate in breast cancer.

Several cell-intrinsic alterations have poor prognostic features in human breast cancer, as exemplified by the absence of MAP1LC3B/LC3B (microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 ß)-positive puncta in the cytoplasm (which indicates reduced autophagic flux) or the loss of nuclear HMGB1 expression by malignant cells. It is well established that breast cancer is under strong immunosurveillance, as reflected by the fact that scarce infiltration of the malignant lesion by CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocytes or comparatively dense infiltration by immunosuppressive cell types (such as FOXP3(+) regulatory T cells or CD68(+) tumor-associated macrophages), resulting in low CD8(+):FOXP3(+) or CD8(+):CD68(+) ratios, has a negative prognostic impact. Here, we reveal the surprising finding that cell-intrinsic features may influence the composition of the immune infiltrate in human breast cancer. Thus, the absence of LC3B puncta is correlated with intratumoral (but not peritumoral) infiltration by fewer CD8(+) cells and more FOXP3(+) or CD68(+) cells, resulting in a major drop in the CD8(+):FOXP3(+) or CD8(+):CD68(+) ratios. Moreover, absence of HMGB1 expression in nuclei correlated with a general drop in all immune effectors, in particular FOXP3(+) and CD68(+) cells, both within the tumor and close to it. Combined analysis of LC3B puncta and HMGB1 expression allowed for improved stratification of patients with respect to the characteristics of their immune infiltrate as well as overall and metastasis-free survival. It can be speculated that blocked autophagy in, or HMGB1 loss from, cancer cells may favor tumor progression due to their negative impact on anticancer immunosurveillance.

Impact of age-related socio-economic and clinical determinants of quality of life among long-term breast cancer survivors.

OBJECTIVES: The main purpose of this study was to identify age-related socioeconomic and clinical determinants of quality of life among breast cancer survivors five years after the diagnosis. The secondary objective was to describe quality of life in the studied population according to age. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey in five-year breast cancer survivors was conducted in women diagnosed with breast cancer in 2007 and 2008 in Côte d'Or. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality of life was assessed with the SF-12, the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and the EORTC-QLQ-BR23 questionnaires. Socio-economic deprivation was assessed by the EPICES questionnaire. Social support was assessed by the Sarason questionnaire and clinical features were collected through the Côte d'Or breast cancer registry. Age-related determinants of quality of life were identified using multivariate mixed model analysis for each SF-12 dimension. RESULTS: Overall 396 women completed the questionnaires. Women aged <65 years had a better quality of life and a greater availability of social support than did women aged ≥65 years. Body mass index, relapse and EPICES were found to be determinants of quality of life in younger women (p<0.006). For older women, comorbidities and EPICES deprivation scores were predictors of low quality of life scores (p<0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Five years after breast cancer diagnosis, disease severity did not affect quality of life. The major determinants of quality of life in younger women were disease relapse and EPICES deprivation scores while those in older women were comorbidities and EPICES deprivation scores.

In breast cancer, are treatments and survival the same whatever a patient's age? A population-based study over the period 1998-2009.

AIM: The present study aimed to describe treatments, relative survival and prognostic factors in breast cancer patients according to age. METHODS: All women with primary invasive breast cancer, diagnosed from 1998 to 2009 in the department of Côte d'Or, were retrospectively selected. Variations in treatments administered according to age (<50 years, 50-74 years, >74 years) and period were assessed using Cochran-Armitage trend tests and χ(2) -tests, respectively. Prognostic factors according to age were estimated using a generalized linear model with a Poisson error structure. RESULTS: Overall, 4305 women were included. The oldest women (aged >74 years) were more likely than the youngest women to have comorbidities, advanced stage tumors, hormone receptor-positive tumors and be human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative. The use of breast conserving surgery plus adjuvant therapy decreased in older women (>74 years), whereas the proportions of women without treatments and with adjuvant hormone therapy increased with age. Multivariate relative survival analyses according to age showed an increased risk of death in women aged 50-74 years and >74 years with comorbidities compared with those without comorbidities; relative excess risks were 1.85 (1.13-3.02) and 3.23 (1.26-8.31), respectively. In contrast, a decreased risk of death was observed in women aged 50-74 years diagnosed by medical imaging compared with those diagnosed by clinical signs; relative excess risks 0.44 (0.22-0.89). CONCLUSION: Elderly women compared with the youngest women were diagnosed with more favorable tumor biology (hormone receptor-positive tumors, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative). However, survival was poor in elderly women who had comorbid conditions, did not attend screening mammography examinations and were undertreated.

Combined evaluation of LC3B puncta and HMGB1 expression predicts residual risk of relapse after adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

In spite of adjuvant chemotherapy, a significant fraction of patients with localized breast cancer (BC) relapse after optimal treatment. We determined the occurrence of cytoplasmic MAP1LC3B/LC3B (microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3B)-positive puncta, as well as the presence of nuclear HMGB1 (high mobility group box 1) in cancer cells within surgical BC specimens by immunohistochemistry, first in a test cohort (152 patients) and then in a validation cohort of localized BC patients who all received adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy (1646 patients). Cytoplasmic LC3B(+) puncta inversely correlated with the intensity of SQSTM1 staining, suggesting that a high percentage cells of LC3B(+) puncta reflects increased autophagic flux. After setting optimal thresholds in the test cohort, cytoplasmic LC3B(+) puncta and nuclear HMGB1 were scored as positive in 27.2% and 28.6% of the tumors, respectively, in the validation cohort, while 8.7% were considered as double positive. LC3B(+) puncta or HMGB1 expression alone did not constitute independent prognostic factors for metastasis-free survival (MFS) in multivariate analyses. However, the combined positivity for LC3B(+) puncta and nuclear HMGB1 constituted an independent prognostic factor significantly associated with prolonged MFS (hazard ratio: 0.49 95% confidence interval [0.26-0.89]; P = 0.02), and improved breast cancer specific survival (hazard ratio: 0.21 95% confidence interval [0.05-0.85]; P = 0.029). Subgroup analyses revealed that within patients with poor-prognosis BC, HMGB1(+) LC3B(+) double-positive tumors had a better prognosis than BC that lacked one or both of these markers. Altogether, these results suggest that the combined positivity for LC3B(+) puncta and nuclear HMGB1 is a positive predictor for longer BC survival.

[Breast cancer screening in thirteen French departments]. / Dépistage du cancer du sein dans treize départements français.

BACKGROUND: In France, breast cancer screening programme, free of charge for women aged 50-74 years old, coexists with an opportunistic screening and leads to reduction in attendance in the programme. Here, we reported participation in organized and/or opportunistic screening in thirteen French departments. POPULATION AND METHODS: We analyzed screening data (organized and/or opportunistic) of 622,382 women aged 51-74 years old invited to perform an organized mammography screening session from 2010 to 2011 in the thirteen French departments. The type of mammography screening performed has been reported according to women age, their health insurance scheme, the rurality and the socioeconomic level of their area or residence. We also represented the tertiles of deprivation and participation in mammography screening for each department. RESULTS: A total of 390,831 (62.8%) women performed a mammography screening (organized and/or opportunistic) after the invitation. These women were mainly aged from 55-69 years old, insured by the general insurance scheme and lived in urban, semi-urban or affluent areas. CONCLUSION: The participation in mammography screening (organized and opportunistic) in France remains below the target rate of 70% expected by health authorities to reduce breast cancer mortality through screening.

Attending breast cancer screening alone does not explain the detection of tumours at an early stage.

The goal of a screening programme is to allow tumour detection at an early stage when treatments are more effective and less invasive. We examined whether attending breast cancer (BC) screening alone can explain the discovery of tumours at an early stage. Women aged 50-74 years, with a first BC diagnosed from January 2006 to December 2008, were eligible. Patients' personal and family characteristics before their BC diagnosis were collected through a questionnaire. Their tumour characteristics were provided by the Côte d'Or BC registry and staging was performed according to the criteria of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) to provide early-stage (AJCC 0/1) and advanced-stage (AJCC 2/3/4) BC. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the predictive factors for the discovery of BC at an early stage. Data from 533 patients with a BC diagnosed from January 2006 to December 2008 were used. Among them, 353 patients (66.2%) had early-stage BC whereas 175 patients (32.8%) had advanced-stage BC. Patients attending mammography screening were more likely to have had early-stage BC (P=0.0003). Multivariate analyses showed that being aged 63-74 years (P=0.008) and having had a previous regular medical follow-up (P=0.02) were independent predictors for the discovery of an early-stage BC. Mammography screening certainly allowed the discovery of BC at an early stage when performed according to the recommended 2-year interval. The regular use of health services could also contribute towards the early detection of tumours and thus towards a reduction in BC mortality.

Population-based study of breast cancer screening in Côte d'Or (France): clinical implications and factors affecting screening round adequacy.

Factors affecting the adequacy of breast cancer screening rounds and the clinical implications of screening have been investigated in women aged 50-74 years. Questionnaires were sent to all eligible patients and to the family doctor of those patients who had died or were lost to follow-up at the time of the study. Unlike the tumour characteristics the patients' personal and family characteristics were also collected before the diagnosis. The clinical features of screening-detected tumours and those discovered on clinical signs or on metastasis were compared. On the basis of the time between two mammographies, we created the following four groups according to the recommended screening round: adequate, long, short and patients with no earlier mammography. Univariate and multivariate generalized logit models were obtained to determine factors affecting the adequacy of breast cancer screening rounds. Five hundred and thirty-three patients were included. Two hundred and seventy-seven (52%) had inadequate breast cancer screening rounds (long, short or no earlier mammography). The American Joint Committee on Cancer stage was less advanced (0/1) in screening-detected tumours and among tumours of patients with an adequate screening round (P=0.014). Multivariate analyses showed that patients with an earlier organized screening mammography (P<0.0001) and those with gynaecological follow-up (P=0.03) were more likely to have an adequate rather than an inadequate breast cancer screening round. Screening leads to the detection of early-stage tumours when it is performed according to the recommendations. Organizing mammography rounds as recommended is essential to optimize the benefits of breast cancer screening.