Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Sex Transm Infect ; 95(2): 133-139, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30322858

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In rural pregnant Indian women, multiple missed antenatal screening opportunities due to inadequate public health facility-based screening result in undiagnosed HIV and sexually transmitted bloodborne infections (STBBIs) and conditions (anaemia). Untreated infections complicate pregnancy management, precipitate adverse outcomes and risk mother-to-child transmission. Additionally, a shortage of trained doctors, rural women's preference for home delivery and health illiteracy affect health service delivery. To address these issues, we developed AideSmart!, an innovative, app-based, cloud-connected, rapid screening strategy that offers multiplex screening for STBBIs and anaemia at the point of care. It offers connectivity, integration, expedited communications and linkages to clinical care throughout pregnancy. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we evaluated the AideSmart! strategy for feasibility, acceptability, preference and impact. We trained 15 healthcare professionals (HCPs) to offer the AideSmart! strategy to 510 pregnant women presenting for care to outreach rural service units of Christian Medical College, Vellore, India. RESULTS: With the AideSmart! screening strategy, we recorded an acceptability of 100% (510/510), feasibility (completion rate) of 91.6% (466/510) and preference of 73%. We detected 239 infections/conditions (239/510, 46.8%) at the point-of-care, of which 168 (168/239; 70%) were lab confirmed, staged and treated rapidly. Of the 168 confirmed infections/conditions, 127 were anaemia, 11 Trichomonas and 30 hepatitis B virus (HBV) (25 resolved naturally, 5 active infections). Four infants (4/5; 80%) were prophylaxed for HBV and were declared disease-free at 9 months. Recruited participants were young; mean age was 24 years (range: 17-40) and 74% (376/510) were in their second trimester. Furthermore, 95% of the participants were retained throughout their pregnancy. CONCLUSION: The AideSmart! strategy was deemed feasible to operationalise by HCPs. It was accepted and preferred by participants, resulting in timely screening and treatment of HIV/STIs and anaemia, preventing mother-to-child transmission. The strategy could be reverse-innovated to any context to maximise its health impact.


Assuntos
Coinfecção/diagnóstico , Coinfecção/prevenção & controle , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Aplicativos Móveis , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Índia , Lactente , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/prevenção & controle , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/virologia , Cuidado Pré-Natal/métodos , População Rural , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Sífilis/prevenção & controle , Tricomoníase/diagnóstico , Tricomoníase/prevenção & controle , Adulto Jovem
2.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 13(8): 4169-72, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23098426

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The majority of women in rural India have poor or no access to cervical cancer screening services, although one-quarter of all cervical cancers in the world occur there. Several large trials have proven the efficacy of low-tech cervical cancer screening methods in the Indian context but none have documented the necessary components and processes of implementing this evidence in a low-resource setting. METHODS: This paper discusses a feasible model of implementation of cervical cancer screening programme in low-resource settings developed through a pilot research project carried out in rural Tamilnadu, India. The programme used visual inspection of cervix after acetic acid application (VIA) as a screening tool, nurses in the primary care centres as the primary screeners and peer educators within Self-Help Women groups to raise community awareness. RESULTS: The uptake of screening was initially low despite the access to a screening programme. However, the programme witnessed an incremental increase in the number of women accessing screening with increasing community awareness. CONCLUSIONS: The investigators recommend 4 key components to programme implementation in low-resource setting: 1) Evidence-based, cost-effective test and treatment available within the reach of the community; 2) Appropriate referral pathways; 3) Skilled health workers and necessary equipment; and 4) Optimisation of health literacy, beliefs, attitudes of the community.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Recursos em Saúde , Padrões de Prática Médica , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Adulto , Feminino , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Prognóstico , População Rural , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA