Eosinophilic esophagitis is associated with increased risk of later inflammatory bowel disease in a nationwide Swedish population cohort.

BACKGROUND: Earlier studies on the possible association between eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have been contradictory. METHODS: Patients with biopsy-verified EoE diagnosed between 1990 and 2017 in Sweden (n = 1587) were age- and sex-matched with up to five general population reference individuals (n = 7808). EoE was defined using pathology reports from all 28 pathology centers in Sweden (the ESPRESSO study). Multivariate Cox regression then estimated hazard ratios for future IBD. IBD was defined based on the international classification of disease codes and histopathology codes. In secondary analyses, sibling comparators were used to further reduce potential familial confounding. Additionally, we performed logistic regression examining earlier IBD in EoE. RESULTS: During follow-up until 2020, 16 (0.01%) EoE patients and 21 (0.003%) general population reference individuals diagnosed with IBD, corresponding to a 3.5-fold increased risk of future IBD (aHR = 3.56; 95% CI 1.79-7.11). EoE was linked to Crohn's disease (aHR = 3.39 [95% CI 1.02-9.60]) but not to ulcerative colitis (aHR = 1.37; 95% CI 0.38-4.86). Compared to their siblings, patients with EoE were at a 2.48-fold increased risk of IBD (aHR = 2.48; 95% CI 0.92-6.70). Earlier IBD was 15 times more likely in EoE patients than in matched reference individuals (odds ratio, 15.39; 95% CI 7.68-33.59). CONCLUSION: In this nationwide cohort study, EoE was associated with a 3.5-fold increased risk of later IBD diagnosis. This risk increase may be due to shared genetic or early environmental risk factors, but also surveillance bias could play a role.

Oesophageal secretions reveal local food-specific antibody responses in eosinophilic oesophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is associated with elevated IgG4 in oesophageal tissue and serum. Previously, we showed brush-collected oesophageal secretions of EoE patients contained food antigen-specific antibodies IgA and IgG4. It is unknown whether other food-specific antibodies are present along the surface of the oesophagus in EoE. AIM: To identify whether immunoglobulins other than IgG4 and food-specific antibodies are elevated along the oesophageal mucosal surface in oesophageal secretions in EoE patients METHODS: Concentrations of total IgA, IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4, IgM and IgE were measured in oesophageal secretions from patients with active (n = 19) and inactive EoE (n = 9), and non-EoE controls (n = 10). Food-specific antibodies were measured using beads coupled to protein components from dairy, wheat and egg. Total immunoglobulin and cytokine and chemokine concentrations were measured in serum, saliva and oesophageal secretions of four patients with active EoE. RESULTS: Oesophageal secretions have a unique immune profile. Patients with active EoE had elevated IgG2, IgG4 and IgM concentrations in oesophageal secretions compared to those with inactive EoE. Food-specific IgG1, IgG2, IgG4 and IgM were significantly increased in patients with active EoE compared to inactive EoE and non-EoE patients. Furthermore, active patients with a known dairy trigger display higher dairy-specific IgG1, IgG2, IgG4, IgM, IgA and IgE. CONCLUSIONS: There is a distinct localised profile of immunoglobulins and food-specific antibodies found within oesophageal secretions in EoE. These findings expand our knowledge about the currently identified immune responses in EoE and suggest possible roles for multiple immunoglobulins and food-specific antibodies in the pathophysiology of EoE.

Food-specific antibodies in oesophageal secretions: association with trigger foods in eosinophilic oesophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Food antigens are clearly implicated in the induction and persistence of eosinophilic oesophagitis. Dietary elimination to identify triggers is tedious and expensive. Alternatives that can mitigate cost and improve patient quality of life during this process are needed. AIMS: To test the hypothesis that antibodies against foods that trigger eosinophilic oesophagitis are secreted into the oesophageal lumen where they can be collected by oesophageal brushings. METHODS: We evaluated food-specific immune responses within brushings in 68 patients undergoing endoscopy (12 controls, 13 resolved eosinophilic oesophagitis and 43 active eosinophilic oesophagitis). Seventeen participants identified their trigger foods via food elimination diets. Immunoglobulin A and immunoglobulin G4 antibodies against the four most common eosinophilic oesophagitis food triggers were measured using the ImmunoCAP assay in the oesophageal brushings. Food-specific antibody values were compared between active eosinophilic oesophagitis, resolved eosinophilic oesophagitis and controls. RESULTS: Patients with active eosinophilic oesophagitis (>15 eosinophils/hpf) demonstrated increased immunoglobulin A and immunoglobulin G4 levels to common eosinophilic oesophagitis triggers compared to controls (327 ± 380 vs 150 ± 130 for immunoglobulin A, and 1534 ± 3346 vs 178 ± 123 for immunoglobulin G4, P < 0.003). Specific trigger foods were associated with elevated immunoglobulin A and immunoglobulin G4 responses compared to foods that did not trigger oesophageal eosinophilia (733 ± 469 vs 142 ± 64, P < 0.001 immunoglobulin A and 2620 ± 3228 vs 526 ± 1050, P < 0.001 immunoglobulin G4). CONCLUSIONS: Food-specific antibodies are easily collected along the oesophageal lumen of eosinophilic oesophagitis patients. Further studies are needed to validate our preliminary findings to determine whether these antibodies can be used to guide elimination diet therapy.