Individuals With Eosinophilic Esophagitis Are at Greater Risk of Later Psychiatric Disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Several gastrointestinal and allergic diseases have been linked to psychiatric disease, but there are limited data on psychiatric disease in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Our aim was to study the association between EoE and later psychiatric disorders. METHODS: This was a population-based nationwide cohort study. Individuals with EoE diagnosed during 1989-2017 in Sweden (n = 1,458) were identified through the ESPRESSO histopathology cohort that represents all gastrointestinal biopsy reports in Sweden's 28 pathology departments. Individuals with EoE were matched with up to 5 reference individuals on sex, age, county, and calendar year (n = 6,436). Cox proportional hazard modeling estimated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs). In a secondary analysis, we compared individuals with EoE with their siblings to adjust for intrafamilial confounding. RESULTS: The median age at EoE diagnosis was 39 years, and 76% of the enrolled individuals with EoE were male. During a median follow-up of 4 years, 106 individuals with EoE (15.96/1,000 person-years) developed a psychiatric disorder compared with 331 reference individuals (10.93/1,000 person-years), corresponding to an HR of 1.50 (95% confidence interval = 1.20-1.87). The increased risk was seen in the first 5 years of follow-up, but not thereafter. The highest relative risks were seen in individuals diagnosed with EoE in childhood. Compared with siblings, individuals with EoE were at an increased risk of psychiatric disease (HR = 1.62; 95% confidence interval = 1.14-2.31). EoE was linked to mood disorders, anxiety disorder, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. DISCUSSION: Individuals with EoE may be at greater risk of psychiatric disease than their siblings and the general population. This risk needs to be considered in clinical care to detect, prevent, and treat comorbidity.

Pregnancy Outcomes in Females with Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.

Introduction: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, allergic inflammatory disease of the esophagus. It has a peak incidence in the 2nd and 3rd decades of life. Despite this, little is known about pregnancy outcomes in patients with EoE. Methods: Using a validated histopathologic and nationwide population-based cohort for the diagnosis of EoE, we examined maternal and fetal outcomes, with preterm birth as the primary outcome, in females with EoE compared to matched controls. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using logistic regression. Results: Between 1992 and 2016, we identified 19 females with EoE who gave birth to 23 children (reference births: n = 115). There was 1 (4.3%) preterm birth in the EoE cohort versus 8 (7.0%) in the reference cohort (OR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.07-5.14). Secondary fetal outcomes included stillbirth, neonatal death, small for gestational age, low birth weight (LBW), and low Apgar score. Of these, LBW (<2,500 g) in patients with EoE compared to controls correlated to an OR of 12.42 (95% CI = 1.26-122.42); however, this finding was based on very low numbers. The remaining fetal outcomes were not significantly different between females with EoE and controls. Secondary pregnancy and maternal outcomes including induction of labor, instrumental delivery, gestational diabetes, or pre-eclampsia were not significantly different between patients with EoE and controls. Discussion/Conclusion: Overall in this nationwide cohort study, we did not find increased association of preterm birth in patients with EoE.

Mortality in Eosinophilic Esophagitis - a nationwide, population-based matched cohort study from 2005 to 2017.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of knowledge about mortality in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Therefore, this study aimed to examine the mortality in EoE. METHODS: A nationwide, population-based matched cohort study was conducted of all EoE patients in Sweden diagnosed between July 2005 and December 2017. Individuals with EoE (n = 1,625) were identified through prospectively recorded histopathology codes from all gastrointestinal pathology reports in Sweden, representing 28 pathology departments (the ESPRESSO study). Each individual with EoE was then matched with up to five reference individuals from the general population (n = 8,003) for age, sex, year of birth, and place of residence. We used the Cox proportional hazard modeling to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) while adjusting for other potential confounders. In sensitivity analyses, mortality in EoE patients was compared with mortality in their siblings. RESULTS: Through December 2017, 34 deaths were confirmed in EoE patients (4.60 per 1,000 person-years) compared with 165 in reference individuals (4.57 per 1,000 person-years). This rate corresponds to an aHR of 0.97 (95% CI = 0.67-1.40). HRs were similar in males (aHR = 1.00 [0.66-1.51]) and females (aHR = 0.92 [0.38-2.18]). We observed no increased risk in mortality due to esophageal or other gastrointestinal cancers in patients with EoE (aHR = 1.02 [0.51-2.02]).Mortality was similar in EoE patients and their siblings (aHR = 0.91 [0.44-1.85]). CONCLUSION: In this nationwide, population-based matched cohort study in Sweden, there was no increased risk of death in patients with EoE compared with their siblings and the general population.

Validation of the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis based on histopathology reports in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a relatively new diagnosis, where until recently a specific international classification of disease code was missing. One way to identify patients with EoE is to use histopathology codes. We validated the clinicopathological EoE diagnosis based on histopathology reports and patient charts to establish these data sources as the basis for a nationwide EoE patient cohort. METHODS: Through the Epidemiology Strengthened by histoPathology Reports in Sweden (ESPRESSO) study, we randomly selected 165 patients from five Swedish health care regions with a histopathologic diagnosis of EoE. Patients were assigned a histopathology diagnosis of EoE if they had ≥15 eosinophils per high-power field or, in the absence of eosinophil quantification, the pathologist interpreted the biopsy as consistent with EoE. Patient charts were scrutinized to see if the other diagnostic criteria were fulfilled. Of the 131 received patient charts, 111 (85%) had sufficient information to be included in the study. RESULTS: Of the 111 validated patients, 99 had EoE, corresponding to a positive predictive value of 89% (95% confidence interval = 82-94%). Dysphagia was the most common symptom (n = 78, 70%), followed by food impaction (n = 64, 58%) and feeding difficulties (n = 37, 33%). Twelve patients had coexisting asthma (11%) and 16 allergic rhinitis (14%). Seventeen patients underwent esophageal dilatation (15%), of which seven had more than one dilatation. Ninety-seven (87%) patients had a proton-pump inhibitor treatment ≤2 years before or after the diagnosis. Forty-two patients (38%) had been prescribed inhalation steroids and 64 (58%) had undergone esophageal radiology. CONCLUSION: Histopathology reports from the ESPRESSO cohort with esophageal eosinophilic inflammation are suggestive of EoE.