RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sleep disorders affect up to 25% of the general population and are associated with increased risk of adverse perioperative events. The key sleep medicine topics that are most important for the practice of anesthesiology have not been well-defined. The objective of this study was to determine the high-priority sleep medicine topics that should be included in the education of anesthesia residents based on the insight of experts in the fields of anesthesia and sleep medicine. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional survey of experts in the fields of sleep medicine and anesthesia based on the Delphi technique to establish consensus on the sleep medicine topics that should be incorporated into anesthesia residency curricula. Consensus for inclusion of a topic was defined as >80% of all experts selecting "agree" or "strongly agree" on a 5-point Likert scale. Responses to the survey questions were analyzed with descriptive statistical methods and presented as percentages or weighted mean values with standard deviations (SD) for Likert scale data. RESULTS: The topics that were found to have 100% agreement among experts were the influence of opioids and anesthetics on control of breathing and upper airway obstruction; potential interactions of wake-promoting/hypnotic medications with anesthetic agents; effects of sleep and anesthesia on upper airway patency; and anesthetic management of sleep apnea. Less than 80% agreement was found for topics on the anesthetic implications of other sleep disorders and future pathways in sleep medicine and anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: We identify key topics of sleep medicine that can be included in the future design of anesthesia residency training curricula.
Assuntos
Anestesiologistas/educação , Anestesiologia/educação , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Internato e Residência , Medicina do Sono/educação , Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Competência Clínica , Consenso , Estudos Transversais , Currículo , Técnica Delphi , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Síndromes da Apneia do Sono/complicações , Síndromes da Apneia do Sono/diagnóstico , Síndromes da Apneia do Sono/fisiopatologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/efeitos adversosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Unplanned post-operative intubation (UPI) may be associated with significant morbidity and/or mortality after surgery. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the incidence and predictors of UPI in elderly patients who underwent general and vascular surgical procedures. METHODS: Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Data File was used to calculate the incidence of UPI in all elderly vascular and general surgery patients undergoing operations from 2005 to 2008. UPI was defined as a requirement for the placement of an endotracheal tube and mechanical or assisted ventilation because of the onset of respiratory or cardiac failure manifested by severe respiratory distress, hypoxia, hypercarbia or respiratory acidosis within 30 days of the index operation. Univariate factors associated with UPI were identified. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for UPI after controlling for known clinically relevant cofactors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of UPI as well as morbidity and mortality associated with UPI. RESULTS: Among 115 692 patients, 3.3% required UPI. Univariate predictors of UPI were older age group, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, low pre-operative functional status as well as emergency operation. UPI was associated with an 18-fold increased risk of death as well as significantly increased hospital length of stay. Multivariate analysis identified several predictors of UPI with re-operation having the greatest odds for UPI (OR = 4.5; 95% confidence interval = 4.29-4.86, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although the incidence of UPI in this elderly surgical cohort was low, it was associated with significant morbidity and mortality as well as prolonged hospital length of stay, underscoring the need for accurately identifying modifiable risk factors.
Assuntos
Intubação Intratraqueal/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Insuficiência Respiratória/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/etiologia , Fatores de Risco , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/métodosRESUMO
To evaluate the use of an aerosol box during video laryngoscopy intubation, we conducted a two-phase simulation-based study to assess if there were significant differences in time needed to safely intubate a patient with an aerosol box in place, as well as assess changes in laryngoscopists' hand motions as determined by changes in accelerometry. 20 anesthesiology providers from our institution participated in the first phase assessing the time to intubation. Use of the aerosol box led to statistically significant increases in intubation times (Wilcoxon-Signed Rank test p < 0.001, z-score = 3.921), with the calculated Pearson's correlation coefficient (r = 0.877) indicating a large effect size. An 8.5 - 11.5 second difference in median intubation times was maintained between corresponding attempts with versus without the aerosol box. 15 participants completed an optional post-assessment survey, with 10 of 15 respondents firmly stating they would not use the box in clinical practice. The hand accelerometry assessment included five anesthesiology providers from our institution. This revealed a statistically significant increase in trials with aerosol boxes for the left hand's general accelerometry with a medium effect size (p = 0.031; z = -1.873; r = -0.484), as well as for the right hand's general accelerometry with a large effect size (p < 0.001; z = -3.351; r = -0.865). Although the aerosol box is an interesting concept, its use is associated with increased time to intubation and a change in ergonomics, which may increase risk during airway management and represents a concern for patient safety.