Prospective External Validation of Three Preoperative Risk Scores for Prediction of New Onset Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is associated with early and late morbidity and mortality of cardiac surgical patients. Prophylactic treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been recommended to improve outcome in cardiac surgical patients at high risk of developing POAF. Reliable models for prediction of POAF are needed to achieve that goal. This study attempted to externally validate 3 risk models proposed for preoperative prediction of POAF in cardiac surgical patients: the POAF score, the CHA2DS2-VASc score, and the Atrial Fibrillation Risk Index. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of 1416 adult patients who underwent nonemergent coronary artery bypass graft and/or valve surgery in a single cardiac surgical center between February 2014 and September 2015. A risk score for each of the 3 prediction models was calculated in each patient. All patients were followed for up to 2 weeks, or until hospital discharge, to observe the primary outcome of new onset AF requiring treatment. Discrimination was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves. Calibration was assessed using the Pearson χ goodness-of-fit test and calibration plots. Utility of the score to implement AF prophylaxis based on the risk of POAF, in comparison to strategies of treating all patients, or not treating any patients, was assessed via a net benefit analysis. RESULTS: Of the 1416 patients included in this study, 478 had the primary outcome (33.8%). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for prediction of POAF in the population subsets for which the scores were validated were as follows: 0.651 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.621-0.681) for the POAF score, 0.593 (95% CI, 0.557-0.629) for the CHA2DS2-VASc score (P < .001 versus POAF score, P < .222 versus Atrial Fibrillation Risk Index), and 0.563 (95% CI, 0.522-0.604) for the Atrial Fibrillation Risk Index (P < .001 versus POAF score). The calibration analysis showed that the predictive models had a poor fit between the observed and expected rates of POAF. Net benefit analysis showed that AF preventive strategies based on these scores, and targeting patients with moderate or high risk of POAF, improve decision-making in comparison to preventive strategies of treating all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The 3 prediction scores evaluated in this study have limited ability to predict POAF in cardiac surgical patients. Despite this, they may be useful in preventive strategies targeting patients with moderate or high risk of PAOF in comparison with preventive strategies applied to all patients.

Investigating the role of neuropathic pain relief in decreasing gait variability in diabetes mellitus patients with neuropathic pain: a randomized, double-blind crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: Subjects with diabetes mellitus (DM) develop gait dysfunction contributing to falls, reluctance to perform activities and injuries. Neuropathic pain (NeP) related to diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is associated with increased gait variability that may contribute to gait dysfunction. We used a portable device (GaitMeter™) and related gait and balance measures to measure gait parameters in painful DPN (PDPN) subjects prior to and during analgesia. Our hypothesis was that PDPN subjects would have decreased gait step variability when receiving pharmacological relief of NeP. METHODS: DPN subjects with at least moderate NeP were assessed in a randomized, double-blind crossover study of pregabalin versus placebo. The outcome measure was variability in step length and step velocity. Testing for Timed Get-Up-and-Go Test, Tinetti Mobility Scales, Sway Testing, a Physiological Profile Approach, and fall-related surveys were also performed. DPN severity was quantified using the Utah Early Neuropathy Score. RESULTS: PDPN subjects developed increased, rather than decreased, step length and step velocity variability during pregabalin treatment. There were no significant differences between cohorts for other physiological gait and balance testing. Non-significant NeP relief occurred in the pregabalin phase of study as compared with placebo. There was a negative relationship for step length with pain severity. CONCLUSION: Analgesia did not decrease gait variability in PDPN patients, and in fact, increased gait variability was seen during pregabalin treatment. Other important relationships of gait dysfunction with PDPN should be sought.

Changes in insulin resistance following antidepressant treatment mediate response in major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance (IR) is a potential predictor of antidepressant treatment response. AIMS: We assess changes in IR after antidepressant treatment and whether these changes have any effect on treatment response. Also, to see whether changes in IR mediates relationship between C-reactive protein (CRP) and antidepressant efficacy. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of an 8-week, open-label clinical trial with 95 adults experiencing a major depressive episode. Response to vortioxetine was measured using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Generalized estimating equation models were utilized for this intent-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: When adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index, there was a significant increase in IR following treatment in the overall sample (p = 0.035). This finding was detected in treatment non-responders (p = 0.019), whereas it was not observed in responders (p = 0.329). Mediation analysis revealed that change in IR during treatment was responsible for change in MADRS as well as the relationship between baseline CRP and treatment response. CONCLUSIONS: Exacerbation of IR during antidepressant treatment mediated non-response. Conversely in treatment responders IR reduced. Like previous studies, baseline CRP moderated treatment response. This relationship was also mediated by changes in IR. These findings further elucidate the role of IR in terms of antidepressant response as well as potentially explain inflammation's relationship with the latter.

Insulin resistance is associated with deficits in hedonic, self-reported cognitive, and psychosocial functional response to antidepressant treatment in individuals with major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: To assess the effect of insulin resistance (IR) on treatment response to the antidepressant, vortioxetine, in patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of an 8-week, open-label clinical trial. Ninety-five adults in a primary care setting experiencing a major depressive episode were included. Response to vortioxetine was measured using the THINC-integrated tool, Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS), the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ-5), and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). Generalized estimating equation models were utilized for data analysis. RESULTS: When adjusted for age, gender, dose, and BMI, there was a significant baseline IR by time interaction for SHAPS (p = 0.022), PDQ-5 (p = 0.037), and SDS (p = 0.013). Higher baseline IR predicted decreased early improvements in anhedonia. It also predicted poorer subjective assessments of cognition and increased functional impairment at the endpoint of treatment. For functional capacity (i.e. SDS) other covariates including severity of symptoms, illness course, other metabolic factors (e.g. cholesterol), and physical activity were included with no changes to the moderating effect of baseline IR. LIMITATIONS: This was a post-hoc analysis of a primarily non-diabetic sample. Also, only one agent was assessed. CONCLUSIONS: IR was a predictor of response to vortioxetine. This persisted after controlling for other factors including, but not limited to, BMI. These findings strengthen the link between depression and IR and may point to another novel metabolic predictor of response. These findings should be replicated using other antidepressants.

Novel therapeutic targets in mood disorders: Pentoxifylline (PTX) as a candidate treatment.

Numerous pharmacological treatments for mood disorders are currently available; however, rates of treatment resistance, relapse and recurrence remain high. Therefore, novel treatments acting outside of the conventionally targeted monoamine system are urgently needed to improve patient outcomes. Emerging and converging evidence suggests that immune dysfunction, oxidative stress, impaired cerebral blood flow (CBF) and decreased neurotrophic factors all contribute to mood disorder pathophysiology and are therefore treatment targets of interest. Pentoxifylline (PTX) is a phosphodiesterase inhibitor with potent anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects, with additional pleiotropic effects that lead to improved CBF and increases in brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels. The direct effect of non-specific phosphodiesterase inhibition may also improve alertness and cognitive function through enhancing second messenger systems. Replicated preclinical studies have demonstrated antidepressant-like effects in animal models. Small preliminary clinical trials have demonstrated promising results for antidepressant and procognitive effects, however, have yet to be replicated in larger mood disorder samples. Only one randomized clinical trial (RCT) specifically assessed the effects of adjunctive PTX in major depressive disorder (MDD), showing clinically and statistically significant antidepressant effects compared to placebo. No studies have assessed PTX in bipolar disorder (BD), where inflammation and altered CBF have also been strongly implicated. Taken together, PTX presents as a promising pleiotropic agent with several potential novel mechanisms of action meriting further evaluation in clinical trials to evaluate target engagement, antidepressant, procognitive and mood stabilizing effects.

Leptin mediates improvements in cognitive function following treatment with infliximab in adults with bipolar depression.

A potential role for leptin in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder (BD) has been proposed. We recently investigated the effects of the tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) antagonist infliximab in individuals with bipolar depression. Leptin is known to interact with the TNF-α system. Herein, we aimed to explore infliximab's effects on leptin and its relationship with brain structure and function. Sixty adults with bipolar depression were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, 12-week clinical trial of adjunctive infliximab (n = 29) and saline control (n = 31), which were administered intravenously at weeks 0, 2, and 6. Plasma concentrations of leptin, TNF-α and soluble TNF receptors (sTNFR) 1 and 2 were assessed at weeks 0, 2, 6, and 12. We observed a significant decrease in leptin levels in infliximab-treated patients, relative to placebo. Infliximab treatment also significantly reduced TNF-α and sTNFR2, but not sTNFR1 levels. Changes in sTNR2 levels at week 6 significantly determined changes in leptin at week 12 in infliximab-, but not placebo-treated participants. Improvements in verbal memory and increases in global cortical volume were associated with reduction in leptin levels in the treatment group. Mediation analysis indicated that cognitive improvement in infliximab-treated patients was mediated by reductions in leptin levels, which in its turn were determined by decreases in sTNR2 levels. In conclusion, infliximab treatment reduced plasma leptin levels in individuals with BD, through modulation of sTNFR2. Decreases in leptin signaling were associated with an increase in global cortical volume and better performance in a verbal memory task.