Effective growth hormone replacement with once-weekly somapacitan in Japanese children with growth hormone deficiency: Results from REAL4, a phase 3 clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Somapacitan is a long-acting growth hormone (GH) derivative developed for the treatment of GH deficiency (GHD). This study evaluates the efficacy and tolerability of somapacitan in Japanese children with GHD after 104 weeks of treatment and after switch from daily GH. DESIGN: Subanalysis on Japanese patients from a randomised, open-labelled, controlled parallel-group phase 3 trial (REAL4, NCT03811535). PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Thirty treatment-naïve patients were randomised 2:1 to somapacitan (0.16 mg/kg/week) or daily GH (0.034 mg/kg/day) up to Week 52, after which all patients received somapacitan. Height velocity (HV; cm/year) at Weeks 52 and 104 were the primary measurements. Additional assessments included HV SD score (SDS), height SDS, bone age, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) SDS, and observer-reported outcomes. RESULTS: At Week 52, observed mean HV was similar between treatment groups (10.3 vs. 9.8 cm/year for somapacitan and daily GH, respectively). Similar HVs between groups were also observed at Week 104: 7.4 cm/year after continuous somapacitan treatment (soma/soma) and 7.9 cm/year after 1-year somapacitan treatment following switch from daily GH (switch). Other height-related endpoints supported continuous growth. IGF-I SDS increased in both groups with mean IGF-I SDS within -2 and +2 during the study. Somapacitan was well tolerated, one mild injection site reaction was reported, with no reports of injection site pain. Patient preference questionnaires showed that most patients and their caregivers (90.9%) who switched treatment at Week 52 preferred once-weekly somapacitan over daily GH treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Somapacitan showed sustained efficacy in Japanese children with GHD over 104 weeks and for 52 weeks after switching from daily GH. Somapacitan was well tolerated and preferred over daily GH.

Weekly somapacitan had no adverse effects on glucose metabolism in adults with growth hormone deficiency.

PURPOSE: The long-term effects of long-acting growth hormone (LAGH) analogues on glucose metabolism in adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) are not known. We investigated the impact of LAGH somapacitan, administered once-weekly, on glucose metabolism in patients with AGHD. METHODS: In post hoc-defined analyses, we compared the effects of somapacitan with daily growth hormone (GH) and placebo on fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and beta-cell function (HOMA-ß) in patients with AGHD across a unique data set from three phase 3 randomized controlled trials (REAL 1, REAL 2 and REAL Japan). RESULTS: No new cases of diabetes mellitus were reported with somapacitan. Among GH-naïve patients (n = 120 somapacitan, n = 119 daily GH), higher changes from baseline in FPG, HOMA-IR and fasting insulin levels were observed with daily GH versus somapacitan at 34 weeks, but not at 86 weeks. HbA1c and HOMA-ß did not differ between groups at either timepoint. Among treatment-naïve patients, sex, age, fasting insulin, glucose tolerance status and body mass index did not influence changes in glucose metabolism. In previously treated patients (REAL 1 extension: n = 51 somapacitan, n = 52 daily GH; REAL 2: n = 61 and n = 31, respectively; REAL Japan: n = 46 and n = 16, respectively), the difference in changes from baseline were not statistically significant between somapacitan and daily GH for any glucose metabolism parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Somapacitan, compared with daily GH, did not adversely affect glucose metabolism up to 86 weeks in a large cohort of treatment-naïve or previously treated patients with AGHD. Trial registrations (date of registration): NCT02229851 (2 September 2014), NCT02382939 (3 March 2015), NCT03075644 (7 March 2017).

Somapacitan, a once-weekly reversible albumin-binding GH derivative, in children with GH deficiency: A randomized dose-escalation trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, local tolerability, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of escalating single doses of once-weekly somapacitan, a reversible, albumin-binding GH derivative, vs once-daily GH in children with GH deficiency (GHD). DESIGN: Phase 1, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, dose-escalation trial (NCT01973244). PATIENTS: Thirty-two prepubertal GH-treated children with GHD were sequentially randomized 3:1 within each of four cohorts to a single dose of somapacitan (0.02, 0.04, 0.08 and 0.16 mg/kg; n=6 each), or once-daily Norditropin® SimpleXx® (0.03 mg/kg; n=2 each) for 7 days. MEASUREMENTS: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles were assessed. RESULTS: Adverse events were all mild, and there were no apparent treatment-dependent patterns in type or frequency. Four mild transient injection site reactions were reported in three of 24 children treated with somapacitan. No antisomapacitan/anti-human growth hormone (hGH) antibodies were detected. Mean serum concentrations of somapacitan increased in a dose-dependent but nonlinear manner: maximum concentration ranged from 21.8 ng/mL (0.02 mg/kg dose) to 458.4 ng/mL (0.16 mg/kg dose). IGF-I and IGFBP-3, and change from baseline in IGF-I standard deviation score (SDS) and IGFBP-3 SDS, increased dose dependently; greatest changes in SDS values were seen for 0.16 mg/kg. IGF-I SDS values were between -2 and +2 SDS, except for peak IGF-I SDS with 0.08 mg/kg somapacitan. Postdosing, IGF-I SDS remained above baseline levels for at least 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: Single doses of once-weekly somapacitan (0.02-0.16 mg/kg) were well tolerated in children with GHD, with IGF-I profiles supporting a once-weekly treatment profile. No clinically significant safety/tolerability signals or immunogenicity concerns were identified.

Understanding burden of illness for child growth hormone deficiency.

PURPOSE: Research demonstrates that children and adolescents with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) are impacted in multiple ways beyond their short stature; however, there are no disease-specific measures to assess these impacts. The purpose of this study was to examine the burden of GHD on children and adolescents, and to conduct concept elicitation to develop a model of the impact of GHD to support a disease-specific outcome measure. METHODS: Four focus groups and 52 telephone interviews were conducted with children with GHD and parents/guardians of children with GHD to understand the experience and impacts from the child's perspective, reported by children or parent-observers about the impact on the child. The interviews and focus groups were conducted in Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Interview transcripts were analyzed thematically based on modified grounded theory principles. RESULTS: There were 73 descriptions of patient's experiences elicited from 70 respondents, as three respondents spoke for two children each. A majority of GHD descriptive narratives refer to boy children (n = 51, 69.9%) and a majority of children had taken GHD treatment (n = 64, 89%). Analysis identified four major areas of GHD impact: Signs and Symptoms (beyond short stature), Physical Aspects of Daily Life, Social Well-Being, and Emotional Well-Being. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of GHD in children and adolescents is considerable and not limited to short stature. The severity of GHD impact on children and adolescents appears to be variable and individualized, but these data indicate that early identification and growth hormone treatment may lead to fewer impacts.

Psychometric Validation of the Growth Hormone Deficiency-Child Treatment Burden Measure (GHD-CTB) and the Growth Hormone Deficiency-Parent Treatment Burden Measure (GHD-PTB).

PURPOSE: The aim was to evaluate the measurement properties of the Growth Hormone Deficiency-Child Treatment Burden Measure-Child (GHD-CTB-Child), a patient-reported outcome (PRO) for children aged 9 to < 13 years; the Growth Hormone Deficiency-Child Treatment Burden Measure-Observer (GHD-CTB-Observer), an observer-reported outcome (ObsRO) version completed by parents/guardians of children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) aged 4 to < 9 years; and the Growth Hormone Deficiency-Parent Treatment Burden Measure (GHD-PTB), a PRO that assesses the treatment burden of parents/guardians living with children with GHD aged 4 to < 13 years. METHODS: A non-interventional, multi-center, clinic-based study across 30 private practice and large institutional sites in the United States and the United Kingdom was conducted. The sample consisted of 145 pre-pubertal children aged 9 to < 13 years at enrollment with a physician confirmed GHD diagnosis as well as 98 parents/guardians of pre-pubertal younger children aged 4 to < 9 years at enrollment with a physician confirmed GHD diagnosis. The child sample consisted of 59 treatment-naïve children (no prior exposure to growth hormone [GH] therapy; were starting GH treatment at study start per standard of care) and 184 children already maintained on treatment for at least 6 months. At baseline, all study participants completed a paper validation battery including all measures needed to conduct the validation analyses. Follow-up assessments with children in the maintenance group and their caregiver/parent were conducted approximately 2 weeks post-baseline to evaluate test-retest reproducibility. To evaluate sensitivity to change and meaningful change thresholds, treatment-naïve participants in both child and parent/guardian populations were assessed within 1 week of report of minimal improvement between week 3 and week 11 and at week 12. Psychometric analyses were implemented following an a priori statistical analysis plan. RESULTS: Factor analyses confirmed the a priori conceptual domains and Overall score for each measure (GHD-CTB-Child and GHD-CTB-Observer domains: Physical, Emotional Well-being, and Interference; GHD-PTB domains: Emotional Well-being and Interference). Internal consistency was acceptable for all measures (Cronbach's alpha > 0.70). Test-retest reliability was acceptable for the Physical, Emotional, and Overall domains of the GHD-CTB versions, and the Emotional and Overall domains of the GHD-PTB (intraclass correlation coefficient above 0.70). All but one of the convergent validity hypotheses for the GHD-CTB versions and all hypotheses for the GHD-PTB were proven (r > 0.40). Known-groups validity hypotheses were significant for length of time to administer the injections in the GHD-CTB versions (p < 0.001 for Physical, Emotional, and Overall, and p < 0.01 for Interference) and whether parents/guardians versus child gave the injections more often for the Emotional domain of the GHD-PTB (p < 0.05). Associated effect sizes ranged from -0.27 to -0.57 for GHD-CTB versions and from -0.74 to -0.69 for the GHD-PTB, indicating that the measures are sensitive to change. Anchor-based patient and parent/guardian ratings of severity suggest preliminary meaningful change thresholds (GHD-CTB: 6 points for Physical score, 9 for Emotional, and 6 for Interference; GHD-PTB: 10 points for Emotional and 6 for Interference scores). CONCLUSIONS: The psychometric properties of the GHD-CTB-Child, GHD-CTB-Observer, and GHD-PTB support the validity of their use as PRO and ObsRO measures to capture the experiences associated with treatment burden for children with GHD and their parents/guardians in both clinical and research settings. The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT02580032 was first posted October 20, 2015.

Effective GH Replacement With Somapacitan in Children With GHD: REAL4 2-year Results and After Switch From Daily GH.

CONTEXT: Somapacitan is a long-acting GH derivative for treatment of GH deficiency (GHD). OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of somapacitan in children with GHD after 2 years of treatment and after the switch from daily GH. DESIGN: A randomized, multinational, open-labelled, controlled parallel group phase 3 trial, comprising a 52-week main phase and 3-year safety extension (NCT03811535). SETTING: Eighty-five sites across 20 countries. PATIENTS: A total of 200 treatment-naïve prepubertal patients were randomized and exposed; 194 completed the 2-year period. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized 2:1 to somapacitan (0.16 mg/kg/wk) or daily GH (0.034 mg/kg/d) during the first year, after which all patients received somapacitan 0.16 mg/kg/wk. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Height velocity (HV; cm/year) at week 104. Additional assessments included HV SD score (SDS), height SDS, IGF-I SDS, and observer-reported outcomes. RESULTS: HV was sustained in both groups between 52 and 104 weeks. At week 104, mean (SD) for HV between weeks 52 and 104 was 8.4 (1.5) cm/year after continuous somapacitan treatment and 8.7 (1.8) cm/year after 1 year of somapacitan treatment following switch from daily GH. Secondary height-related endpoints also supported sustained growth. Mean IGF-I SDS during year 2 was similar between groups and within normal range (-2 to +2). Somapacitan was well tolerated, with no safety or tolerability issues identified. GH patient preference questionnaire results show that most patients and their caregivers (90%) who switched treatment at year 2 preferred once-weekly somapacitan over daily GH treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Somapacitan in children with GHD showed sustained efficacy and tolerability for 2 years, and after switching from daily GH. Patients/caregivers switching from daily GH expressed a preference for somapacitan. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03811535.

Dose-exposure-IGF-I response of once-weekly somapacitan in adults with GH deficiency.

Objective: Growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy in patients with adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) is individually titrated due to variable dose-responses among patients. The aim of this study was to provide clinical guidance on dosing and titration of the novel long-acting GH derivative somapacitan based on analyses of somapacitan dose-insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) responses in AGHD patients. Design: Analyses of dosing information, 4364 somapacitan concentration samples and 4880 IGF-I samples from 330 AGHD patients treated with somapacitan in three phase 3 trials. Methods: Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling was used to evaluate starting dose groups by age and oral oestrogen therapy, characterise the dose-IGF-I response in the overall AGHD population and patient subgroups, predict the IGF-I response to dose changes and simulate missed dosing. Results: The analyses supported the clinical recommendations of higher starting doses for younger patients and women on oral oestrogen replacement therapy. For patients switching from daily GH treatment, the mean maintenance dose ratio between somapacitan (mg/week) and somatropin (mg/day) was predicted to be 8.2 (observed interquartile range of 6.7-9.1). Simulations of IGF-I SDS profiles confirmed the appropriate time for IGF-I sampling to be 3-4 days after somapacitan dosing and supported somapacitan administration with up to 3 days delay in case of missed dosing. Subgroup analyses characterised the dose-exposure-IGF-I response in patient subgroups and indicated that dose requirements are mainly influenced by sex and oral oestrogen treatment. Conclusions: This study extends the knowledge of the somapacitan dose-IGF-I response and provides information on clinical dosing of once-weekly somapacitan in patients with AGHD.

Weekly Somapacitan is Effective and Well Tolerated in Children With GH Deficiency: The Randomized Phase 3 REAL4 Trial.

CONTEXT: Somapacitan, a once-weekly reversible albumin-binding GH derivative, is evaluated in children with GH deficiency (GHD). OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate efficacy and safety of somapacitan vs daily GH. METHODS: REAL4 is a randomised, multinational, open-labeled, active-controlled parallel group phase 3 trial, comprising a 52-week main trial and 3-year extension (NCT03811535). SETTING: Eighty-six sites across 20 countries. PATIENTS: 200 treatment-naïve patients were randomized and exposed. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized 2:1 to somapacitan (0.16 mg/kg/wk) or daily GH (Norditropin; 0.034 mg/kg/d), administered subcutaneously. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was annualized height velocity (HV; cm/y) at week 52. Additional assessments included HV SD score (SDS), height SDS, bone age, IGF-I SDS, patient-reported outcomes, and safety measures. RESULTS: Estimated mean HV at week 52 was 11.2 and 11.7 cm/y for somapacitan and daily GH, respectively. Noninferiority was confirmed. Changes in HV SDS, height SDS, bone age, and IGF-I SDS from baseline to week 52 were similar between treatment groups. At week 52, mean IGF-I SDS values were similar between treatment groups and within normal range (-2 to +2). Safety of somapacitan was consistent with the well-known daily GH profile. Low proportions of injection-site reactions were reported for somapacitan (5.3%) and daily GH (5.9%). Both treatments similarly reduced disease burden from baseline to week 52, whereas a greater treatment burden reduction was observed for somapacitan. CONCLUSIONS: Similar efficacy for somapacitan compared to daily GH was demonstrated over 52 weeks of treatment with comparable safety and mean IGF-I SDS levels in treatment-naïve children with GHD.

Absorption, metabolism and excretion of once-weekly somapacitan, a long-acting growth hormone derivative, after single subcutaneous dosing in human subjects.

Somapacitan is a reversible albumin-binding growth hormone (GH) derivative in clinical development for once-weekly administration in patients with adult GH deficiency (AGHD) and children with GH deficiency (GHD). To date, the use of somapacitan in AGHD or severe AGHD has been approved in the USA and Japan, respectively. This study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02962440) investigated the absorption, metabolism and excretion, as well as the pharmacokinetics (PK), of tritium-labelled somapacitan ([3H]-somapacitan). Seven healthy males received a single subcutaneous dose of 6 mg somapacitan containing [3H]-somapacitan 20 MBq. Blood, serum, plasma, urine, faeces, and expired air were collected for radioactivity assessment. Metabolites were identified and quantified in plasma and urine collected. The PK of plasma components were determined, and the radioactive peaks of the most abundant plasma metabolites and urine metabolites were selected for analysis. Twenty-eight days after dosing, 94.0% of the administered dose was recovered as [3H]-somapacitan-related material, most of which was excreted in urine (80.9%); 12.9% was excreted in faeces, and an insignificant amount (0.2%) was exhaled in expired air. PK properties of [3H]-somapacitan-related material appeared to be consistent across plasma, serum and blood. Three abundant plasma metabolites (P1, M1 and M1B) and two abundant urine metabolites (M4 and M5) were identified. The total exposure of intact somapacitan accounted for 59% of the total exposure of all somapacitan-related material, P1 accounted for 21% and M1 plus M1B accounted for 12%. M4 and M5 were the most abundant urine metabolites and accounted for 37% and 8% of the dosed [3H]-somapacitan radioactivity, respectively. No intact somapacitan was found in excreta. Two subjects had six adverse events (AEs); all were mild in severity and unlikely to be related to trial product. The majority of dosed [3H]-somapacitan (94%) was recovered as excreted metabolites. Urine was the major route for excretion of somapacitan metabolites, followed by faeces, and exhalation in expired air was negligible. The low molecular weights of identified urine metabolites demonstrate that somapacitan was extensively degraded to small residual fragments that were excreted (fully biodegradable). The extensive metabolic degradation and full elimination of metabolites in excreta were the major clearance pathways of somapacitan and the key elements in its biological fate. A single dose of 6 mg somapacitan (containing [3H]-somapacitan) in healthy male subjects was well tolerated with no unexpected safety issues identified.

Growth hormone stimulates the collagen synthesis in human tendon and skeletal muscle without affecting myofibrillar protein synthesis.

In skeletal muscle and tendon the extracellular matrix confers important tensile properties and is crucially important for tissue regeneration after injury. Musculoskeletal tissue adaptation is influenced by mechanical loading, which modulates the availability of growth factors, including growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), which may be of key importance. To test the hypothesis that GH promotes matrix collagen synthesis in musculotendinous tissue, we investigated the effects of 14 day administration of 33-50 microg kg(-1) day(-1) recombinant human GH (rhGH) in healthy young individuals. rhGH administration caused an increase in serum GH, serum IGF-I, and IGF-I mRNA expression in tendon and muscle. Tendon collagen I mRNA expression and tendon collagen protein synthesis increased by 3.9-fold and 1.3-fold, respectively (P < 0.01 and P = 0.02), and muscle collagen I mRNA expression and muscle collagen protein synthesis increased by 2.3-fold and 5.8-fold, respectively (P < 0.01 and P = 0.06). Myofibrillar protein synthesis was unaffected by elevation of GH and IGF-I. Moderate exercise did not enhance the effects of GH manipulation. Thus, increased GH availability stimulates matrix collagen synthesis in skeletal muscle and tendon, but without any effect upon myofibrillar protein synthesis. The results suggest that GH is more important in strengthening the matrix tissue than for muscle cell hypertrophy in adult human musculotendinous tissue.

Multiple doses of pegylated long-acting growth hormone are well tolerated in healthy male volunteers and possess a potential once-weekly treatment profile.

OBJECTIVES: Recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) replacement therapy in children and adults currently requires daily subcutaneous injections for several years or lifelong. The current study examined safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response parameters after single and multiple doses of a long-acting rhGH preparation (NNC126-0083). DESIGN: Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, dose-escalating (0·02, 0·04, 0·08 and 0·16 mg protein/kg), sequential dose group trial. SUBJECTS: Forty adult Japanese healthy male volunteers (aged 20-45; body mass index: 18·0-27·0 kg/m(2)). Five groups (n = 8) were randomized to receive multiple doses of NNC126-0083 (n = 6) or placebo (n = 2). METHODS: Primary outcome was safety, and tolerability of multiple doses of NNC126-0083 compared with placebo. Blood samples for the assessment of pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics response [insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3)] were taken after multiple ascending doses. RESULTS: NNC126-0083 was well tolerated and not associated with any local injection-site reactions or lipoatrophy. Following administration, NNC126-0083 levels increased rapidly and remained elevated for several days, returning to baseline before each weekly injection. Steady-state PK was achieved after the third dosing. A more than dose-proportional exposure was observed at the highest NNC126-0083 dose (0·16 mg protein/kg). A strong dose-dependent pharmacodynamic response in circulating concentrations of both IGF-I and IGFBP-3 compared with placebo (P < 0·0001) was observed during the administration of all doses. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple administration of NNC126-0083 in healthy male volunteers indicates that NNC126-0083 has the potential for an efficacious, well-tolerated, once-weekly rhGH compound in the treatment of GH deficiency.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Once-Weekly Somapacitan in Children and Adults: Supporting Dosing Rationales with a Model-Based Analysis of Three Phase I Trials.

BACKGROUND: Somapacitan, a long-acting growth hormone (GH) derivative, has been well-tolerated in children with GH deficiency (GHD) and adults (healthy and adult GHD), in phase I, single- and multiple-dose trials, respectively, and has pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties supporting a once-weekly dosing regimen. OBJECTIVE: In the absence of a multiple-dose phase I trial in children with GHD, the aim was to develop a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to predict somapacitan exposure and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) response after once-weekly multiple doses in both children and adults with GHD. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models were developed from pharmacokinetic and IGF-I profiles in three phase I trials of somapacitan (doses: healthy adults, 0.01-0.32 mg/kg; adult with GHD, 0.02-0.12 mg/kg; children with GHD, 0.02-0.16 mg/kg) using non-linear mixed-effects modeling. Pharmacokinetics were described using a non-linear one-compartment model with dual first- and zero-order absorption through a transit compartment, with saturable elimination. IGF-I profiles were described using an indirect response pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model, with sigmoidal-effect relationship. RESULTS: The non-linear pharmacokinetic and IGF-I data were well-described in order to confidently predict pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles after multiple doses in adults and children with GHD. Body weight was found to be a significant covariate, predictive of the differences observed in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics between children and adults. Weekly dosing of somapacitan provided elevated IGF-I levels throughout the week, despite little or no accumulation of somapacitan, in both adults and children with GHD. CONCLUSION: This analysis of somapacitan pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data supports once-weekly dosing in adults and children with GHD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier numbers NCT01514500, NCT01706783, NCT01973244.

Assessing the Impact of Growth Hormone Deficiency (GHD) in Adults: Interpreting Change of the Treatment-Related Impact Measure-Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency (TRIM-AGHD).

BACKGROUND: This study's purpose was to assess the minimal important difference (MID) for the Treatment-Related Impact Measure-Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency (TRIM-AGHD), a patient-reported outcome measure assessing growth hormone deficiency (GHD) impacts. The measure was demonstrated to have adequate psychometric measurement properties, and be reliable and valid. For scores to be interpretable, the TRIM-AGHD must be responsive to treatment benefit and the MID in scores quantified. METHODS: A prospective, non-interventional, observational, clinic-based survey study of naïve-to-treatment adult GHD patients (N = 98) was conducted. Key assessments were at baseline and follow-up (between 4 and approximately 8 weeks), with weekly telephone monitoring post-baseline (last n = 34 patients). Responsiveness was evaluated using the effect size of change scores from baseline to follow-up. MID estimates were derived from distribution-based (half standard deviation [0.5 SD], standard error of measurement [SEm]) and anchor-based methods (patient global rating of change [PGRC]) using change scores from baseline to initial report of minimal improvement in GHD severity. Findings from each method were converged to establish an acceptable MID. RESULTS: Patients were mean age 49.7 years, 65.6% female, and 76.0% Caucasian. The TRIM-AGHD was highly responsive to treatment with the total score effect size being 1.38. For the total score, the 0.5 SD was 8.09 and the SEm was 2.66. The difference found using the PGRC was 20.43. The converged MID value for the total score was 10 points. CONCLUSIONS: The TRIM-AGHD is a highly responsive measure assessing AGHD treatment impacts. A 10-point change score is considered a clinically meaningful improvement.

Safety and convenience of once-weekly somapacitan in adult GH deficiency: a 26-week randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Somapacitan is a reversible albumin-binding growth hormone (GH) derivative, developed for once-weekly administration. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of once-weekly somapacitan vs once-daily Norditropin®. Local tolerability and treatment satisfaction were also assessed. DESIGN: 26-week randomized, controlled phase 3 safety and tolerability trial in six countries (Nbib2382939). METHODS: Male or female patients aged 18-79 years with adult GH deficiency (AGHD), treated with once-daily GH for ≥6 months, were randomized to once-weekly somapacitan (n = 61) or once-daily Norditropin (n = 31) administered subcutaneously by pen. Both treatments were dose titrated for 8 weeks to achieve insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) standard deviation score (SDS) levels within the normal range, and then administered at a fixed dose. Outcome measures were adverse events (AEs), including injection site reactions; occurrence of anti-somapacitan/anti-GH antibodies and change in treatment satisfaction, assessed using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9). RESULTS: Mean IGF-I SDS remained between 0 and 2 SDS throughout the trial in both groups. AEs were mostly mild or moderate and transient in nature. The most common AEs were nasopharyngitis, headache and fatigue in both groups. More than 1500 somapacitan injections were administered and no clinically significant injection site reactions were reported. No anti-somapacitan or anti-GH antibodies were detected. The TSQM-9 score for convenience increased significantly more with somapacitan vs Norditropin (P = 0.0171). CONCLUSIONS: In this 26-week trial in patients with AGHD, somapacitan was well tolerated and no safety issues were identified. Once-weekly somapacitan was reported to be more convenient than once-daily Norditropin.

Effects of growth hormone in patients with tibial fracture: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate whether intervention with GH after tibial fracture enhances fracture healing. DESIGN: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 406 patients (93 women, 313 men, age: 18-64 years) with tibial fracture. METHODS: Patients were stratified by tibial fracture (open or closed) and allocated to placebo or GH treatment (15, 30 or 60 mug/kg daily, until clinically assessed healing or until 16 weeks post-surgery). Primary outcome was time from surgery until fracture healing and assessment of healing was done centrally and observer blinded. Patients reported for evaluation every 4 weeks until 24 weeks, and at 9 and 12 months. RESULTS: GH did not accelerate time to healing in the combined group of open and closed fractures. When separately analysing the closed and open fractures, a significant difference in time to healing was observed between treatment groups, exclusively in the closed fractures (P<0.05; subgroup analysis revealed that the 60 microg/kg group was significantly different from placebo). The relative risk of fracture healing for 60 microg/kg versus placebo during the 12 month was: all fractures, 1.16; 95% CI: (0.86; 1.57) (ns); closed fractures, 1.44; 95% CI: (1.01; 2.05; P<0.05); open fractures, 0.75; 95% CI: (0.42; 1.31) (ns). The estimated median number of days before fracture healing in closed fractures was 95 with 60 microg/kg versus 129 with placebo (95% CI: (94; 129) and (94; 249)) corresponding to approximately 26% decrease in healing time. CONCLUSIONS: In the overall group of open and closed tibial fractures, no significant enhancement of fracture healing was observed with GH, whereas in closed tibial fractures, GH accelerated healing significantly.

Understanding Treatment Burden for Children Treated for Growth Hormone Deficiency.

OBJECTIVE: Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) treatment for children requires growth hormone injections, typically administered daily until the child reaches adult height. Child GHD treatment burden is not well understood and no disease-specific measures exist to assess this burden. The purpose of the study was to explore GHD treatment burden for children and their parents by conducting concept elicitation interviews supporting a theoretical model of the impact of GHD treatment. METHODS: Four focus groups (in Germany) and 52 telephone interviews (in the UK and USA) were conducted with children/adolescents with GHD aged 8 to <13 years and parents of children with GHD aged ≥4 to <13 years. The purpose of the interviews was to understand the experience of GHD treatment from the child's perspective, and for parents, the impact of their child's treatment on themselves. Interview transcripts were analyzed thematically based on modified grounded theory principles. RESULTS: Interviews with 70 respondents who produced descriptions (n = 73) of patients experiences with GHD treatment (three parents spoke for two children each) were conducted. Analysis identified three major areas of GHD treatment burden for children: physical; emotional well-being; and interference. Parent burdens identified were: emotional well-being and interference. Modifiers such as treatment efficacy and duration, which may impact the degree of treatment burden severity, were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Overall treatment burden of child GHD is considerable for children and their parents. The concept elicitation and theoretical model can be used to develop a disease-specific outcome measure, which adequately reflects the burden of GHD treatment for children and their parents.

Effects of short-term caloric restriction on circulating free IGF-I, acid-labile subunit, IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs)-1-4, and IGFBPs-1-3 protease activity in obese subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Decreased levels of GH and total IGF-I have been reported in obesity. It has been hypothesized that increased free (biologically active) IGF-I levels generated from IGF-binding protein (IGFBP) protease activity could be the mechanism for the low GH release in dieting obese subjects. However, no published data exist on free IGF-I levels, acid labile subunit (ALS), or IGFBP protease activity in relation to GH release during a hypocaloric diet. The main purpose of this study was to determine free IGF-I, ALS, IGFBPs-1-4, and IGFBPs-1-3 protease activity in relation to 24-h GH release before and after a short-term very low-calorie diet (VLCD). DESIGN: Six obese subjects before weight loss, five after an average weight loss of 36.1 kg, and five age-and sex-matched lean controls underwent a 4-day VLCD. All subjects were studied on two occasions, once during normal basic diet and again during the last day of the VLCD (1.6 MJ). METHODS: Free IGF-I was determined by a non-competitive immunoradiometric assay. RESULTS: Free IGF-I levels decreased in concert with increased ALS and unchanged blunted GH release after a VLCD in the obese subjects. IGFBPs-1-3 proteolytic activity was found to be unchanged by hypocaloric diet in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that free IGF-I decreases after a short-term hypocaloric diet in obese subjects with no concomitant change in 24-h GH release. Circulating free IGF-I per se cannot be the main mechanism of the attenuated GH release in dieting obese subjects.

Reversible Albumin-Binding GH Possesses a Potential Once-Weekly Treatment Profile in Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency.

CONTEXT: NNC0195-0092 is a reversible, albumin-binding GH derivative, developed for once-weekly administration. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to evaluate safety, local tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of multiple, once-weekly doses of NNC0195-0092, compared with daily GH. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a phase 1, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multiple-dose, dose-escalation trial. PATIENTS: Thirty-four GH-treated adult subjects (male, n = 25) with GH deficiency participated in the study. INTERVENTIONS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjects were sequentially assigned into four cohorts of eight subjects, randomized within each cohort (3:1) to once-weekly NNC0195-0092 (n = 6) for 4 weeks (0.02, 0.04, 0.08, and 0.12 mg/kg) or daily injections of Norditropin NordiFlex (n = 2) for 4 weeks with a dose replicating the pretrial dose of somatropin. A safety assessment was performed prior to initiating treatment at the next dose level of NNC0195-0092. Daily GH treatment was discontinued 14 days before the trial start. Blood samples were drawn for assessment of safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics (IGF-1 and IGF-binding protein-3) profiles, and immunogenicity studies. RESULTS: Numbers of adverse events were similar at the dose levels of 0.02, 0.04, and 0.08 mg/kg NNC0195-0092 vs daily injections of Norditropin NordiFlex, whereas the number of adverse events was greater at the highest dose level of NNC0195-0092 (0.12 mg/kg). NNC0195-0092 (area under the curve[0-168h]) and peak plasma concentration) increased in a dose-dependent manner, and a dose-dependent increase in IGF-1 levels was observed. IGF-1 profiles were elevated for at least 1 week, and for the 0.02-mg/kg and 0.04-mg/kg NNC0195-0092 doses, the observed IGF-1 levels were similar to the levels for the active control group. CONCLUSION: Four once-weekly doses of NNC0195-0092 (dose range 0.02-0.12 mg/kg) administered to adult patients with GH deficiency were well tolerated, and IGF-1 profiles were consistent with a once-weekly treatment profile. No clinically significant safety and tolerability signals causally related to NNC0195-0092 were identified, nor were any immunogenicity concerns revealed.

Dose dependency of the pharmacokinetics and acute lipolytic actions of growth hormone.

The sensitivity to GH is subject to substantial interindividual variations, which has been attributed to differences in age, sex, and body composition. We investigated 18 healthy nonobese men (aged 24-56 yr) on four occasions. The pharmacokinetics and acute lipolytic effects of GH were evaluated using iv bolus injections of either placebo or GH (1, 3, and 6 micro g/kg(-1)). Body composition was determined by computed tomography and bioimpedance measurements, and the lipolytic response was assessed through measurements of circulating lipid intermediates and adipose tissue microdialysis. The metabolic clearance rate was dose dependently reduced with increasing GH doses (57.2 +/- 5.1, 45.2 +/- 3.8, and 39.2 +/- 2.4 ml/min(-1) per meter(-2) following injection of 1, 3, and 6 micro g/kg(-1) GH, respectively, P < 0.001), and half-time was increased (14.2 +/- 0.6, 16.2 +/- 0.4, and 18.0 +/- 0.5 min, respectively, P < 0.0001). The pharmacokinetic variables were not correlated to age or body composition at any GH dose, but GH-binding protein was the major predictor of metabolic clearance rate following the two highest GH doses as indicated by multivariate regression analysis (r(2) = 0.55, P < 0.001 and r(2) = 0.35, P = 0.012, respectively). There was a significant dose-response relationship between injected GH and the subsequent increments in lipid intermediates, but the integrated lipolytic response was not correlated to GH pharmacokinetics, age, or body composition at any GH dose. Taken together, our findings suggest that differences in GH-binding protein concentrations, which possibly reflect GHR expression, determine GH pharmacokinetics rather than age or body composition per se.