Pharmacokinetic comparison and bioequivalence evaluation of losartan/ hydrochlorothiazide tablet between Asian Indian and Japanese volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the bioequivalence between the test and reference formulations of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide 50 + 12.5 mg tablet and evaluate the effect of ethnicity on pharmacokinetics properties of losartan, losartan carboxylic acid and hydrochlorothiazide on healthy Asian Indian and Japanese volunteers. METHODS: Randomized, open-label, crossover, bioavailability studies were conducted separately in healthy Asian Indian and Japanese volunteers. One tablet either of test or of reference product was administered after 10 hours of overnight fasting. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 48 hours for both the studies. Plasma samples were analyzed for losartan, losartan carboxylic acid and hydrochlorothiazide by a validated liquid chromatographic and mass spectrometric method (LC-MS/MS). The pharmacokinetic parameters AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, Cmax, tmax, and other pharmacokinetics parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles for both test and reference formulations of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide 50 + 12.5 mg tablets. Statistical evaluations were done to evaluate bioequivalence between generic test formulation (EPR0001) and Japanese reference product (Preminent®). RESULTS: Losartan, losartan carboxylic acid and hydrochlorothiazide were well tolerated by subjects in all periods of each study under fasted conditions. No serious adverse events were observed. The ratios of least square means for AUC0-t and Cmax and the affiliated 90% confidence intervals were within acceptance range recommended by PMDA. Marginal differences were observed in pharmacokinetic values of Asian Indian and Japanese volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: The results of these bioavailability studies indicate that the test formulation of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide 50 + 12.5 mg (EPR0001) tablets is bioequivalent to marketed Preminent® reference formulation in Asian Indian and Japanese volunteers, when administered under fasting conditions. Both test and reference formulations were well tolerated as a single oral dose when administered to healthy adult subjects under fasted conditions. Although Asian Indian and Japanese volunteers are ethnically different, results of these studies indicate that pharmacokinetic parameters of Asian Indian and Japanese volunteers are comparable to each other in terms of bioavailability of losartan, losartan carboxylic acid and hydrochlorothiazide. Similar least square means ratios were obtained in Asian Indian and Japanese volunteers demonstrating that a bioequivalence study conducted on Japanese volunteers seems to be substituted by Asian Indian volunteers' studies.

Combining benefits of an adrenergic and a muscarinic blocker in a single formulation - a pharmacokinetic evaluation.

A pharmacokinetic bioequivalence study was conducted in Asian subjects, to compare a fixed dose combination capsule single oral dose of alpha adrenoceptor blocker-Alfuzosin hydrochloride 10mg extended release and muscarinic antagonists-Solifenacin succinate 5mg against individually administered Xatral XL 10mg tablets (Alfuzosin) of Sanofi Synthelabo Limited, United Kingdom (UK) and Vesicare 5mg tablets (Solifenacin) of Astellas Pharma Limited, UK under fed conditions. Blood samples were collected pre-dose up to 72 h post dose for determination of plasma Alfuzosin and Solifenacin concentrations and calculation of the pharmacokinetic parameters. ANOVA was performed on the log (natural)-transformed pharmacokinetic parameters. A 90% confidence interval for the ratios of the test and reference product averages (least square means) were calculated for alfuzosin and solifenacin. The 90% confidence intervals obtained for alfuzosin for Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were 102.74-122.75%, 95.84-116.96% and 95.82-116.76%, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals obtained for Solifenacin for Cmax, and AUC0-72 were 89.55-97.91% and 90.47-99.38%, respectively. Based on the results, the fixed dose combination was concluded to be bioequivalent to individually administered products.

Establishing bioequivalence of racemic venlafaxine formulations using stereoselective assay method: Is it necessary?

A bioequivalence study for venlafaxine generic formulation was conducted as an open label, balanced, randomized, two-way crossover, single-dose study. In this study, a comparison of various pharmacokinetic parameters of venlafaxine hydrochloride 150 mg modified release capsules of Ranbaxy and EFEXOR®-XR 150 mg capsules of Wyeth, in healthy, adult, male, human subjects under fasting condition was performed to conclude bioequivalence. Venlafaxine and its major active metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODV) are racemates. The "(S)-(+)" and "(R)-(-)" enantiomers of venlafaxine and ODV are established as being active. Hence, subject samples were analyzed using nonstereoselective and stereoselective assay methods. Both (S)-(+) and (R)-(-) enantiomers of venlafaxine and ODV showed similar absorption and disposition. The 90% confidence intervals for venlafaxine, (R)-(-)-venlafaxine as well as (S)-(+)-venlafaxine were within acceptance range concluding bioequivalence. The results obtained by stereoselective assay were comparable to the nonstereoselective analysis, as sum of concentrations of (S)-(+)- and (R)-(-)-enantiomers of venlafaxine and ODV. The mean (S)-(+)/(R)-(-) ratios of the enantiomers of venlafaxine and ODV at various time points were consistent in the study subjects. Therefore, the estimation of venlafaxine and ODV using nonstereoselective assay method is effective in distinguishing formulation differences (if any) in bioequivalence studies in a cost-effective manner.

Clonazepam quantification in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray tandem mass spectrometry in a bioequivalence study.

A rapid, sensitive and specific method for quantifying clonazepam in human plasma using diazepam as the internal standard (IS) is described. The analyte and the IS were extracted from plasma by liquid-liquid extraction using a hexane/diethylether (20 : 80, v/v) solution. The extracts were analysed by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS-MS). Chromatography was performed on a Jones Genesis C8 4 microm analytical column (100 x 2.1 mm i.d.). The method had a chromatographic run time of 3.0 min and a linear calibration curve over the range 0.5-50 ng/ml (r2 > 0.9965). The limit of quantification was 0.5 ng/ml. This HPLC/MS/MS procedure was used to assess the bioequivalence of two clonazepam 2 mg tablet formulations (clonazepam test formulation from Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd and Rivotril from Roche Laboratórios Ltda as standard reference formulation).

Pharmacokinetics of a fixed-dose combination of atorvastatin and metformin extended release versus concurrent administration of individual formulations: a randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, single-dose, crossover, bioequivalence study.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with a 2- to 4-fold increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). Combined therapy with an antihyperglycaemic agent and an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) is indicated for the treatment of diabetic patients at risk of CHD. Patients with type 2 diabetes are generally considered to be at equivalent cardiovascular disease risk to patients with established CHD, and should have low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels reduced to <100 mg/dL or by 30-40%. Atorvastatin is the drug of choice for lowering LDL cholesterol levels. Metformin is the first therapeutic option in type 2 diabetes patients who are overweight or obese because it may also prevent vascular complications and mortality. Hence, a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of atorvastatin 10 mg and metformin 500 mg extended release (ER) was developed for patients with type 2 diabetes with or without hyperlipidaemia. OBJECTIVES: This study set out to establish bioequivalence between treatment 1 (test) - atorvastatin/metformin ER 10 mg/500 mg FDC, and treatment 2 (reference) - atorvastatin 10 mg (Lipitor®) and metformin 500 mg (Glucophage® XR) administered concurrently as individual tablets. METHODS: The study was a randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, single-dose, crossover, bioequivalence study in 40 male subjects of Asian origin aged 18-45 years. The order of receiving the test and reference treatments for each subject during both the periods of the study was determined according to an SAS®-generated randomization schedule. The two treatments were separated by a washout period of 11 days. Blood samples were collected pre-dose and up to 72 hours post-dose in each period for determination of plasma atorvastatin/metformin concentrations and calculation of the respective pharmacokinetic parameters. ANOVA was performed on the lognormal-transformed pharmacokinetic parameters. A 90% confidence interval (CI) for the ratios of the test and reference product averages (least squares means) was calculated for atorvastatin and metformin to establish bioequivalence. RESULTS: The 90% CIs for atorvastatin and metformin were within the bioequivalence acceptance criteria of 80-125%. The 90% CIs obtained for atorvastatin for maximum plasma concentration (C(max))(,) area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to time of last measurable concentration (AUC(last)) and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC(∞)) were (88.11, 106.93), (91.18, 107.94) and (89.25, 106.60), respectively. The 90% CIs observed for metformin for C(max,) AUC(last,) AUC(∞) and AUC from time zero to 24 hours (AUC(24)) were (113.3, 124.0), (102.65, 117.97), (101.87, 116.82) and (102.44, 117.53), respectively. The two treatments were well tolerated by the study subjects. CONCLUSION: Atorvastatin/metformin ER 10 mg/500 mg FDC has similar bioavailability to the co-administration of separate atorvastatin 10 mg and metformin 500 mg tablets. The FDC tablets show similar safety and tolerability profiles to their individual components. Therefore, atorvastatin/metformin ER 10 mg/500 mg FDC tablets can be used safely in clinical settings to decrease the pill burden and increase patient compliance with therapy.

Comparative bioavailability of cefuroxime axetil suspension formulations administered with food in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the comparative bioavailability of two formulations (250 mg/5 mL suspension) of cefuroxime axetil (CAS 64544-07-6), administered with food, in healthy volunteers of both sexes. METHODS: The study was conducted using an open, randomized, two-period crossover design with a 1-week washout interval. Plasma samples were obtained for up to 12 h post dose. Plasma cefuroxime axetil concentrations were analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) with negative ion electrospray ionization using multiple reactions monitoring (MRM). From the cefuroxime axetil plasma concentration vs. time curves, the following pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained: AUClast and Cmax. RESULTS: The limit of quantification was 0.1 microg/mL for plasma cefuroxime axetil analysis. The geometric mean and 90% confidence interval CI of test/reference product percent ratios were: 106.1% (100.8%-111.8%) for Cmax, 109.4% (104.8%-114.2%) for AUClast. CONCLUSION: Since the 90% CI for AUClast and Cmax ratios were within the 80-125% interval proposed by the US FDA, it was concluded that cefuroxime axetil (test formulation, 250 mg/5 mL suspension) was bioequivalent to a reference formulation under fed conditions, for both the rate and extent of absorption.

A single-dose, randomized, open-label, two-period crossover bioequivalence study comparing a fixed-dose pediatric combination of lamivudine and stavudine tablet for oral suspension with individual liquid formulations in healthy adult male volunteers.

Lamivudine (CAS 134678-17-4) is a synthetic nucleoside analogue with activity against HIV-1 and HBV. Stavudine (CAS 3056-17-5) is a synthetic thymidine nucleoside analogue, active against the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Lamivudine and stavudine in combination with other antiretroviral (ARV) agents are indicated for the treatment of HIV infection. As there are no suitable pediatric ARVs, adult fixed-dose ARVs are commonly used in children. This practice poses concerns about dose inaccuracy, which may lead to resistance or toxicity. A new fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet for oral suspension, containing lamivudine 40 mg and stavudine 10 mg has been developed. An open-label, balanced, randomised, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, single-dose, crossover bioequivalence study was conducted following administration of a fixed-dose combination of lamivudine and stavudine tablet for oral suspension (test formulation) and innovator products (reference formulations) in healthy, adult, male human subjects under fasting condition. Multiple blood samples were collected up to 36 h post dose. Plasma concentrations of lamivudine and stavudine were assayed using validated high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry analytical method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis and bioequivalence was assessed using a mixed effect ANOVA model. The ratio of the least-square means (FDC to individual products) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) for lamivudine and stavudine were all within 80.00-125.00%, suggesting a similar rate and extent of ARVs exposure in the bloodstream. The FDC and individual products were equally safe and well tolerated. The current FDC of lamivudine and stavudine is expected to provide a similar efficacy/safety profile as co-administration of the individual products, a better adherence to treatment, and considerable cost savings in the treatment of HIV in children.

Bioequivalence studies of tacrolimus capsule under fasting and fed conditions in healthy male and female subjects.

The bioequivalence of tacrolimus (CAS 104987-11-3) 5 mg capsules was assessed in two single-dose, open-label, randomIzed 2-way crossover trials with a minimum washout period of 14 days; one trial was conducted under fasting condition (n = 44) and the other one under fed condition (n = 48). Blood samples were collected over a 120-h period and concentrations were assayed using a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LCMS/MS) method. A non-compartmental method was used for calculation of pharmacokinetic parameters. Under fasting conditions, mean AUC(0-t), AUC(0-inf) and C(max) were comparable between the test (296 ng x h/mL, 318 ng x h/mL and 32 ng/ mL, respectively) and the reference formulations (289 ng x h/mL, 309 ng x h/mL and 33 ng/mL, respectively). T(max) was reached between 1.5 and 2 h post-dose. Mean AUC(0-t), AUC(0-inf) and C(max) were also comparable under fed conditions (154 ng x h/mL, 169 ng x h/mL and 7.6 ng/mL, respectively, for the test and 161 ng x h/mL, 176 ng x h/mL and 7.5 ng/mL, respectively, for the reference formulation). Under fed conditions, T(max) was reached between 5 and 6 h post-dose. 90% geometric confidence intervals were all within the acceptable 80-125% limit, suggesting bioequivalence between the generic product and the innovator product.

Comparative bioavailability study with two chlorpropamide tablet formulations in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was the assessment of the bioequivalence of two formulations (250 mg tablet) of chlorpropamide (CAS 94-20-2) in 36 healthy volunteers of both sexes. METHODS: The study was conducted using an open, randomized, two-period crossover design with a 3-week washout interval. Plasma samples were obtained over a 72-h period. Plasma chlorpropamide concentrations were analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) with positive ion electrospray ionization using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). From the chlorpropamide plasma concentration vs time curves, the following pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained: AUC(0-72h), AUC(inf) and C(max). RESULTS: The limit of quantification was 0.1 microg/mL for plasma chlorpropamide analysis. The geometric mean and respective 90 % confidence interval (CI) of Test/ Reference percent ratios were 93.99% (87.11%-101.41%) for C(max), 92.45% (85.96%-99.44%) for AUC(0-72h) and 90.30% (83.35%-97.82%) for AUC(0-inf). CONCLUSION: Since the 90 % CI for AUC(0-72h), AUC(0-inf) and C(max) ratios were within the 80-125%interval proposed by the US FDA, it was concluded that chlorpropamide 250 mg tablet (test formulation) was bioequivalent to the reference 250 mg tablet for of both the rate and extent of absorption.