Association of Postoperative Delirium and Parkinson Disease After Common United States Surgical Procedures.

INTRODUCTION: To determine the association of Parkinson disease (PD) and postoperative delirium following common surgical procedures. METHODS: We performed a retrospective database analysis of the National Inpatient Sample. We used a matched sample of patients with and without PD who underwent any of ten common surgical procedures in the US, 2005-2014. Primary outcome measure was postoperative delirium for patients with and without PD. Secondary measures included disposition, length of stay, and hospital costs. RESULTS: There were 3,235,866 patients receiving any of the ten most common operative procedures, 2005-2014. There were 35,743 patients with and without PD matched based on age, sex, elective admission status, Charlson Comorbidity index, and presence of dementia. Median age was 77 y (interquartile range 72-82), median Charlson Comorbidity index was 1 (standard deviation 0-2), 46.6% were female, and 46.8% were admitted electively. The three most common operative procedures were hip arthroplasty (28.5%), knee arthroplasty (16.1%), and percutaneous coronary angioplasty (14.9%). Postoperative delirium was present in 1519 patients with PD compared to 828 matched patients without PD (4.2% versus 2.3%; P < 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio of postoperative delirium for PD compared to the matched cohort without PD was 1.88 (95% confidence interval 1.73-2.05). Those undergoing spinal fusion (adjusted odds ratio 2.99, 95% confidence interval 2.06-4.38) had the greatest odds of delirium. For patients with PD, adjusted length of stay, adjusted hospital costs, and adjusted odds of postacute care facility discharge were greater compared to the matched cohort without PD. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PD are more likely to develop postoperative delirium and have a more complicated postoperative course with longer length of stay and greater hospitalization costs.

Modeling anxiety in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to construct a model for anxiety in PD and compare the relative contributions of PD-specific and -nonspecific general population risk factors for anxiety in this model. METHODS: Structural equation modeling of associations of risk factors with the anxiety outcome using a cross-sectional data set of 342 patients with PD were used. RESULTS: A model with acceptable to good fit was generated that explained 65% of the variance in anxiety scores. A previous history of depression and the severity of the depressive symptoms scored on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale were the only nonspecific variables with a direct effect on anxiety. The presence of motor fluctuations and disease-related decline in activities of daily living were PD-specific markers of anxiety. Nonspecific risk factors had a greater influence in the model than PD-specific risk factors. Standardized regression coefficients suggested that the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score was the most important contributor to the variation in anxiety. A post-hoc analysis showed that the effects of the following variables on anxiety levels were fully mediated by depression: sex; family history of depression; previous history of anxiety; cognitive status; difficulties in non-disease-specific activities of daily living; and severity of motor signs. CONCLUSION: In this cross-sectional study, we showed that nonspecific general population risk factors are more important markers for anxiety than PD-specific risk factors. Depression was the most prominent marker. PD-specific markers for anxiety appear to be more situational and related to off periods and disease-specific disturbances of activities of daily living.

National Randomized Controlled Trial of Virtual House Calls for People with Parkinson's Disease: Interest and Barriers.

BACKGROUND: Delivering specialty care remotely directly into people's homes can enhance access for and improve the healthcare of individuals with chronic conditions. However, evidence supporting this approach is limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Connect.Parkinson is a randomized comparative effectiveness study that compares usual care of individuals with Parkinson's disease in the community with usual care augmented by virtual house calls with a Parkinson's disease specialist from 1 of 18 centers nationally. Individuals in the intervention arm receive four virtual visits from a Parkinson's disease specialist over 1 year via secure, Web-based videoconferencing directly into their homes. All study activities, including recruitment, enrollment, and assessments, are conducted remotely. Here we report on interest, feasibility, and barriers to enrollment in this ongoing study. RESULTS: During recruitment, 11,734 individuals visited the study's Web site, and 927 unique individuals submitted electronic interest forms. Two hundred ten individuals from 18 states enrolled in the study from March 2014 to June 2015, and 195 were randomized. Most participants were white (96%) and college educated (73%). Of the randomized participants, 73% had seen a Parkinson's disease specialist within the previous year. CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals with Parkinson's disease, national interest in receiving remote specialty care directly into the home is high. Remote enrollment in this care model is feasible but is likely affected by differential access to the Internet.

Cognitive performance and neuropsychiatric symptoms in early, untreated Parkinson's disease.

UNLABELLED: This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence and correlates of cognitive impairment (CI) and neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in early, untreated patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). BACKGROUND: Both CI and NPS are common in PD and impact disease course and quality of life. However, limited knowledge is available about cognitive abilities and NPS. METHODS: Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) is a multi-site study of early, untreated PD patients and healthy controls (HCs), the latter with normal cognition. At baseline, participants were assessed with a neuropsychological battery and for symptoms of depression, anxiety, impulse control disorders (ICDs), psychosis, and apathy. RESULTS: Baseline data of 423 PD patients and 196 HCs yielded no between-group differences in demographic characteristics. Twenty-two percent of PD patients met the PD-recommended screening cutoff for CI on the Montral Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), but only 9% met detailed neuropsychological testing criteria for mild cognitive impairment (MCI)-level impairment. The PD patients were more depressed than HCs (P < 0.001), with twice as many (14% vs. 7%) meeting criteria for clinically significant depressive symptoms. The PD patients also experienced more anxiety (P < 0.001) and apathy (P < 0.001) than HCs. Psychosis was uncommon in PD (3%), and no between-group difference was seen in ICD symptoms (P = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 10% of PD patients in the early, untreated disease state met traditional criteria of CI, which is a lower frequency compared with previous studies. Multiple dopaminergic-dependent NPS are also more common in these patients compared with the general population, but others associated with dopamine replacement therapy are not or are rare. Future analyses of this cohort will examine biological predictors and the course of CI and NPS. © 2015 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Anxiety has specific syndromal profiles in Parkinson disease: a data-driven approach.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety symptoms are common in Parkinson disease (PD). Recent evidence suggests that anxiety syndromes as encountered in clinical practice may not correspond to the DSM-IV classification of anxiety disorders. OBJECTIVE: To examine the syndromal pattern of the anxiety spectrum in a large series of patients with PD, as determined with a data-driven approach using latent class analysis (LCA). METHODS: 342 patients with PD were recruited from referrals to movement disorders or psychiatry clinics at six tertiary centers. Participants were assessed with a structured psychiatric interview and specific scales rating the severity of anxiety, depression, cognition and parkinsonism. The main outcome measure was classes of patients with a specific syndromal profile of anxiety symptoms based on LCA. RESULTS: LCA identified four classes that were interpreted as "no anxiety or depression", "episodic anxiety without depression", "persistent anxiety with depression", and "both persistent and episodic anxiety with depression". Symptoms of persistent anxiety were almost invariably associated with symptoms of depression. There were significant differences between classes in terms of history of depression and anxiety, use of psychoactive medication, and on the Mentation and Complications sections of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PD show different syndromic profiles of anxiety that do not align with the symptom profiles represented by DSM-IV anxiety disorders and major depression. Accordingly, DSM-IV criteria for anxiety disorders may not be clinically useful in PD. The different classes identified here provide empirically validated phenotypes for future research.

Effect of best practice advisory on the administration of contraindicated medications to hospitalized patients with Parkinson's disease and related disorders.

Objective: To determine the effect of a Best Practice Advisory (BPA) on the ordering and administration of contraindicated dopamine blocking agents (DBA) to hospitalized patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and related disorders. Background: Patients with PD are more likely to require hospitalization and are at increased risk of complications. Administration of contraindicated DBA contributes to worsened outcomes in this patient population. Electronic medical record (EMR) warnings (also referred to as BPA) have been proposed as a way to prevent the administration of contraindicated medications. Methods: A BPA was launched in January 2020 within the University of Rochester EMR system, which alerts the provider when a contraindicated DBA is ordered in hospitalized patients with PD and related disorders. Patients with PD and related disorders hospitalized at two hospitals affiliated to the University of Rochester during a time period before (t1: 1/1/2019-1/1/2020) and after (t2: 1/8/2020-1/8/2021) the implementation of the BPA were included in this study. Epic SliderDicer was used to collect the data from the University of Rochester EMR. The number of patients who had contraindicated DBA orders and administrations in both time periods, and the number of patients who had the BPA triggered during t2 were obtained. We compared the results before and after the implementation of the BPA. Results: 306 patients with PD and related disorders were hospitalized during t1 and 273 during t2. There was significantly less percentage of patients who had contraindicated DBA orders (41.5% in t1 vs. 17.6% in t2) and patients who had contraindicated DBA administrations (16% in t1 vs. 8.8% in t2) during t2 (p < 0.05 for both comparisons). There was no significant difference between the percentage of patients who had contraindicated DBA orders in t1 and patients with attempted orders (BPA triggered) in t2 (p = 0.27). Conclusion: The results of this study increase the evidence of the potential benefit of EMR warnings for the optimization of inpatient medication management in patients with PD and related disorders. In particular, our results suggest that EMR warnings help reduce the administration of contraindicated medications, which is a known contributing factor for hospital complications in this patient population.

Complications and outcomes of hospitalizations for patients with and without Parkinson disease.

Objective: To examine complications and outcomes of hospitalizations for common indications for hospitalization among patients with Parkinson disease (PD). Methods: We identified and selected the ten most common indications for hospitalization among individuals ≥65 years of age using principal diagnoses from the California State Inpatient Database, 2018-2020. Patients with comorbid PD were identified using secondary diagnosis codes and matched one-to-one to patients without PD based on principal diagnosis (exact matching), age, gender, race and ethnicity, and Elixhauser comorbidity index (coarsened exact matching). We identified potentially preventable complications based on the absence of present on admission indicators among secondary diagnoses. In the matched cohort, we compared inpatient complications, early Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) orders (placed within 24 h of admission), use of life-sustaining therapies, new nursing facility requirement on discharge, and death or hospice discharge for patients with and without PD. Results: We identified 35,457 patients with PD among the ten leading indications for hospitalization in older adults who were matched one-to-one to patients without PD (n = 70,914 in total). Comorbid PD was associated with an increased odds of developing aspiration pneumonia (OR 1.17 95% CI 1.02-1.35) and delirium (OR 1.11 95% CI 1.02-1.22) during admission. Patients with PD had greater odds of early DNR orders [placed within 24 h of admission] (OR 1.34 95% CI 1.29-1.39). While there was no difference in the odds of mechanical ventilation (OR 1.04 95% CI 0.98-1.11), patients with PD demonstrated greater odds of tracheostomy (OR 1.41 95% CI 1.12-1.77) and gastrostomy placement (OR 2.00 95% CI 1.82-2.20). PD was associated with greater odds of new nursing facility requirement upon discharge (OR 1.58 95% CI 1.53-1.64). Patients with PD were more likely to die as a result of their hospitalization (OR 1.11 95% CI 1.06-1.16). Conclusion: Patients with PD are at greater risk of developing aspiration pneumonia and delirium as a complication of their hospitalization. While patients with PD more often have early DNR orders, they have greater utilization of life-sustaining therapies and experience worse outcomes of their hospitalization including new nursing facility requirement upon discharge and greater mortality.

Standardizing default electronic health record tools to improve safety for hospitalized patients with Parkinson's disease.

Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems are often configured to address challenges and improve patient safety for persons with Parkinson's disease (PWP). For example, EHR systems can help identify Parkinson's disease (PD) patients across the hospital by flagging a patient's diagnosis in their chart, preventing errors in medication and dosing through the use of clinical decision support, and supplementing staff education through care plans that provide step-by-step road maps for disease-based care of a specific patient population. However, most EHR-based solutions are locally developed and, thus, difficult to scale widely or apply uniformly across hospital systems. In 2020, the Parkinson's Foundation, a national and international leader in PD research, education, and advocacy, and Epic, a leading EHR vendor with more than 35% market share in the United States, launched a partnership to reduce risks to hospitalized PWP using standardized EHR-based solutions. This article discusses that project which included leadership from physician informaticists, movement disorders specialists, hospital quality officers, the Parkinson's Foundation and members of the Parkinson's community. We describe the best practice solutions developed through this project. We highlight those that are currently available as standard defaults or options within the Epic EHR, discuss the successes and limitations of these solutions, and consider opportunities for scalability in environments beyond a single EHR vendor. The Parkinson's Foundation and Epic launched a partnership to develop best practice solutions in the Epic EHR system to improve safety for PWP in the hospital. The goal of the partnership was to create the EHR tools that will have the greatest impact on outcomes for hospitalized PWP.

Change in the Parkinson Anxiety Scale correlates with change in other clinical measures of anxiety over time.

The Parkinson's disease (PD)-specific Parkinson Anxiety Scale (PAS) is an anxiety rating scale that has been validated in cross-sectional studies. In a study of buspirone for anxiety in PD, it appears that the PAS may be sensitive to change in anxiety demonstrating moderate-to-high correlation with participant-reported and clinician-administered scales.

Symptomatology and markers of anxiety disorders in Parkinson's disease: a cross-sectional study.

Anxiety is understudied in Parkinson's disease (PD), which is not justified by the prevalence and impact of anxiety disorders on quality of life in PD patients. In this cross-sectional study, 342 patients suffering from idiopathic PD underwent a research-based assessment including DSM IV criteria for anxiety disorders, the Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HARS) and the beck anxiety inventory (BAI). Thirty-four percent (34%) of subjects met the DSM IV criteria for at least one anxiety disorder; 11.8% met criteria for multiple anxiety disorders; and 11.4% had clinically relevant anxiety symptoms without meeting the criteria for any specific anxiety disorder. Score profiles on the HARS and BAI differed significantly between the disorders, but these differences were associated with different scores on a limited number of items, and the respective symptom profiles were not readily interpretable. Female sex, the presence of motor fluctuations, as well as a previous history of an anxiety disorder were markers for anxiety disorders. The use of a mono-amino oxidase (MAO)-B inhibitor was associated with a reduced prevalence of anxiety disorders. Research into anxiety in PD is hampered by the questionable validity of DSM IV defined anxiety disorders in this population. A first focus for research should therefore be the identification of clinically useful anxiety presentations and their validation in PD.

Anxiety rating scales in Parkinson's disease: a validation study of the Hamilton anxiety rating scale, the Beck anxiety inventory, and the hospital anxiety and depression scale.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety is a prevalent and disabling condition in Parkinson's disease (PD). The lack of anxiety rating scales validated for this population hampers research into anxiety in PD. The aim of this study is to assess the clinimetric properties of the Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HARS), the Beck anxiety inventory (BAI), and the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) in PD patients. DESIGN: Three hundred forty-two PD patients underwent a standardized assessment including a structured interview for diagnostic and statistical manual diagnoses of anxiety disorders and completion of the HARS, BAI, and HADS. Inter-rater reliability of the HARS was assessed in 60 patients; test-retest reliability of the BAI and HADS in 213 and 217 patients, respectively. RESULTS: Thirty-four percent of patients suffered from an anxiety disorder, whereas an additional 11.4% had clinically significant anxiety symptoms in the absence of a diagnosis of anxiety disorder. Acceptability, score distribution, and known groups validity over different levels of anxiety were adequate. Inter-rater reliability for the HARS and test-retest reliability for the BAI and HADS were good. The HARS, but not the BAI and HADS, had a satisfactory inter-item correlation, convergent validity and factorial structure. For all scales, the positive predictive value was poor, and the negative predictive value was moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Given the adequate known groups validity of all three rating scales, each of these scales is likely to be useful in clinical practice or research for evaluation of symptom severity. Limitations in the construct validity of the anxiety scales in this study raise questions regarding suitability for their use in PD.

A trial of buspirone for anxiety in Parkinson's disease: Safety and tolerability.

INTRODUCTION: In Parkinson's disease (PD), anxiety is common, associated with lower health-related quality of life, and undertreated. The primary objective of this study was to determine the tolerability of buspirone for the treatment of anxiety in PD. METHODS: Individuals with PD and clinically significant anxiety were randomized 4:1 to flexible dosage buspirone or placebo for 12 weeks. Treatment was initiated at 7.5 mg twice daily and titrated based on response and tolerability to an optimal dosage (maximum 30 mg twice daily). The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who failed to complete the study on study drug. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, dosage reductions, motor function, dyskinesias, and anxiety. RESULTS: A total of 21 participants enrolled, 4 were randomized to placebo and 17 to buspirone (mean (SD) age 65.5 (9.8), 76.5% male, 88% on concomitant antidepressant or anxiolytic). In the buspirone group, 7 (41%) failed to complete the study on drug, 5 due to intolerability. The median buspirone dosage was 7.5 mg twice daily. No serious adverse events occurred. A total of 9 (53%) buspirone participants experienced adverse events consistent with worsened motor function. In the buspirone group, mean (SD) improvement from baseline to week 12 in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale was -3.9 (3.8) and Parkinson Anxiety Scale -7.1 (6.4). CONCLUSION: Tolerability concerns do not support moving immediately forward with a large-scale efficacy trial. However, concomitant anxiolytics may have affected tolerability and a signal of efficacy was seen suggesting that future studies of buspirone monotherapy be considered.

Erratum: Author Correction: Report from a multidisciplinary meeting on anxiety as a non-motor manifestation of Parkinson's disease.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/s41531-019-0102-8.].

Neuropsychiatric symptoms and cognitive abilities over the initial quinquennium of Parkinson disease.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the evolution of numerous neuropsychiatric symptoms and cognitive abilities in Parkinson disease from disease onset. METHODS: Prospectively collected, longitudinal (untreated, disease onset to year 5), observational data from Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative annual visits was used to evaluate prevalence, correlates, and treatment of 10 neuropsychiatric symptoms and cognitive impairment in Parkinson disease participants and matched healthy controls. RESULTS: Of 423 Parkinson disease participants evaluated at baseline, 315 (74.5%) were assessed at year 5. Eight neuropsychiatric symptoms studied increased in absolute prevalence by 6.2-20.9% at year 5 relative to baseline, and cognitive impairment increased by 2.7-6.2%. In comparison, the frequency of neuropsychiatric symptoms in healthy controls remained stable or declined over time. Antidepressant and anxiolytic/hypnotic use in Parkinson disease were common at baseline and increased over time (18% to 27% for the former; 13% to 24% for the latter); antipsychotic and cognitive-enhancing medication use was uncommon throughout (2% and 5% of patients at year 5); and potentially harmful anticholinergic medication use was common and increased over time. At year 5 the cross-sectional prevalence for having three or more neuropsychiatric disorders/cognitive impairment was 56% for Parkinson disease participants versus 13% for healthy controls, and by then seven of the examined disorders had either occurred or been treated at some time point in the majority of Parkinson disease patients. Principal component analysis suggested an affective disorder subtype only. INTERPRETATION: Neuropsychiatric features in Parkinson disease are common from the onset, increase over time, are frequently comorbid, and fluctuate in severity.

Report from a multidisciplinary meeting on anxiety as a non-motor manifestation of Parkinson's disease.

Anxiety is a severe problem for at least one-third of people living with Parkinson's disease (PD). Anxiety appears to have a greater adverse impact on quality of life than motor impairment. Despite its high prevalence and impact on daily life, anxiety is often undiagnosed and untreated. To better address anxiety in PD, future research must improve knowledge about the mechanism of anxiety in PD and address the lack of empirical evidence from clinical trials. In response to these challenges, the Parkinson's Foundation sponsored an expert meeting on anxiety on June 13th and 14th 2018. This paper summarizes the findings from that meeting informed by a review of the existing literature and discussions among patients, caregivers, and an international, clinician-scientist, expert panel working group. The goal is to provide recommendations to improve our understanding and treatment of anxiety in PD.

Lewy Body Dementia Association's Research Centers of Excellence Program: Inaugural Meeting Proceedings.

The first Lewy Body Dementia Association (LBDA) Research Centers of Excellence (RCOE) Investigator's meeting was held on December 14, 2017, in New Orleans. The program was established to increase patient access to clinical experts on Lewy body dementia (LBD), which includes dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD), and to create a clinical trials-ready network. Four working groups (WG) were created to pursue the LBDA RCOE aims: (1) increase access to high-quality clinical care, (2) increase access to support for people living with LBD and their caregivers, (3) increase knowledge of LBD among medical and allied (or other) professionals, and (4) create infrastructure for a clinical trials-ready network as well as resources to advance the study of new therapeutics.

Apathy and anhedonia rating scales in Parkinson's disease: critique and recommendations.

Apathy is a common condition in Parkinson's disease (PD) and is generally defined as a lack of motivation. It is associated with more severe cognitive dysfunction and a decrease in activities of daily living (ADL) performance. Anhedonia, the inability to experience pleasure, can be a symptom of both depressive and apathetic syndromes. The Movement Disorder Society (MDS) commissioned a task force to assess the clinimetric properties of apathy and anhedonia scales in PD patients. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify scales that have either been validated or used in PD patients. Apathy scales identified for review include the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES), the Apathy Scale (AS), the Apathy Inventory (AI), and the Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS). In addition, item 4 (motivation/initiative) of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and item 7 (apathy) of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) were included. Anhedonia scales identified for review were the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) and the Chapman scales for physical and social anhedonia. Only the AS is classified as "recommended" to assess apathy in PD. Although item 4 of the UPDRS also meets the criteria to be classified as recommended, it should be considered for screening only because of the obvious limitations of a single item construct. For the assessment of anhedonia, only the SHAPS meets the criteria of "Suggested." Information on the validity of apathy and anhedonia scales is limited because of the lack of consensus on diagnostic criteria for these conditions.