What Is the Association Between Agency and Levels of Capability and Comfort in Musculoskeletal Care? A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: People who take active responsibility for their health demonstrate agency. Agency in the context of chronic illness management with disease-modifying treatments is commonly linked to adherence and confidence in care seeking. In musculoskeletal health, agency is commonly observed in the accommodation of conditions related to aging and reflected in studies of people not seeking care. The development of agency measures originates from the realm of medical management of chronic illness rather than that of musculoskeletal disease, which is often optional or discretionary. With growing interest in the universal adoption of agency as a performance measure for quality payment programs, there is a need to better understand how agency is measured across musculoskeletal conditions, and how agency may be a modifiable correlate of capability, comfort, mindset, and circumstances. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We systematically reviewed the evidence regarding agency among people seeking musculoskeletal specialty care and asked: (1) Are greater levels of agency associated with greater levels of comfort and capability? (2) Are greater levels of agency associated with better mental and social health? METHODS: Following the PRISMA guidelines, we performed searches on May 22, 2023, with searches spanning September 1988 (in PubMed and Web of Science) and September 1946 (in Ovid Medline) to May 2023. We included original clinical studies addressing the relationship between agency and levels of comfort, capability, mindset, and circumstances (by utilizing patient-reported agency measures [PRAMs], patient-reported outcome measures [PROMs], and mental and social health measures) involving adult patients 18 years or older receiving specialist care for musculoskeletal conditions. We identified 11 studies involving 3537 patients that addressed the primary research question and three studies involving 822 patients that addressed the secondary question. We conducted an evidence quality assessment using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) and found the overall evidence quality to be relatively high, with loss to follow-up and lack of reporting of sample size calculation the most consistent study shortcomings. The measures of capability varied by anatomical region. The Patient Activation Measure (a validated 10- or 13-item survey originally designed to assess a patient's level of understanding and confidence in managing their health and ability to engage in healthcare related to chronic medical illness) was used as a measure of agency in 10 studies (one of which also used the Effective Consumer Scale) and attitudes regarding one's management of musculoskeletal disorders in one study. We registered this systematic review on PROSPERO (Reg CRD42023426893). RESULTS: In general, the relationships between PRAMs and PROMs are weak to moderate in strength using the Cohen criteria, with 10 of 11 studies demonstrating an association between levels of agency and levels of comfort and capability. The three studies addressing mental health found a weak correlation (where reported) between levels of agency and levels of symptoms of depression and anxiety. CONCLUSION: The finding that agency in patients seeking care for musculoskeletal conditions is associated with greater comfort, capability, and mental health supports the prioritization of agency modification during musculoskeletal specialty care. This might include behavioral health and cognitive debiasing strategies along with strategies and services promoting self-management. Our work also points to an opportunity to develop agency measures better suited for discretionary care that more directly assess the cultivation of healthy mindsets, behaviors, and accommodative attitudes toward the discomfort and incapability experienced during aging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

Are There Racial and Ethnic Variations in Patient Attitudes Toward Hip and Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis? A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: It is not clear why people who identify as Black or Hispanic are less likely to undergo discretionary musculoskeletal surgery such as arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Inequities and mistrust are important factors to consider. The role of socioeconomic factors and variation in values, attitudes, and beliefs regarding discretionary procedures are less well understood. A systematic review of the evidence regarding mindsets toward knee and hip arthroplasty among Black and Hispanic people could inform attempts to limit disparities in care. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence, we asked: (1) What factors are associated with racial and ethnic variations in attitudes toward discretionary hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis? (2) Do studies that investigate racial and ethnic variations in mindsets toward discretionary orthopaedic care control for potential confounding by socioeconomic factors? METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase (last searched August 2023) for studies that addressed racial and ethnic variations in mindsets toward discretionary musculoskeletal care use was conducted. We excluded studies that were not published in English, lacked full-text availability, and those that documented patient approaches without comparing them to the willingness to undergo a discretionary procedure. Twenty-one studies were included-14 quantitative and seven qualitative-including 8472 patients. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used for quality assessment of included studies. The studies included demonstrated low risk of bias: five quantitative studies lacked detail regarding nonresponse bias and one qualitative study lacked details regarding the racial and ethnic composition of its cohort. To answer our first research question, we categorized themes associated with racial differences in mindsets toward discretionary care and recorded the presence of associations in quantitative studies. To answer our second question, we identified whether quantitative studies address potential confounding with socioeconomic factors. There were no randomized trials, so no meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: In general, self-identified Black and Hispanic patients had a lower preference for hip and knee arthroplasty than self-identified White patients. Black patients were more likely to regard osteoarthritis as a natural and irremediable part of aging and prefer home remedies. Both Black and Hispanic patients valued support from religion and were relatively cost-conscious. Black and Hispanic patients had lower perception of benefit, were less familiar with the procedure, had higher levels of fear regarding surgery and recovery, and had more-limited trust in care. Generally, Black and Hispanic social networks tended to address these concerns, whereas White social networks were more likely to discuss the benefits of surgery. Thirteen of 14 quantitative studies considered and accounted for potential confounding socioeconomic variables in their analyses. CONCLUSION: The observation that lower preference for discretionary arthroplasty among Black and Hispanic patients is independent from socioeconomic factors and is related to accommodation of aging, preference for agency (home remedies), greater consideration of costs, recovery concerns, and potential harms directs orthopaedic surgeons to find ways to balance equitable access to specialty care and discretionary surgery while avoiding undermining effective accommodation strategies. It is important not to assume that lower use of discretionary surgery represents poorer care or is a surrogate marker for discrimination. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

A Small Number of Surgeons Perform the Large Majority of Uncommon Nerve Decompression Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Notable surgeon-to-surgeon variation in rates of uncommon surgery can reflect appropriate concentration of expertise with technically difficult or risky procedures that address problematic impairment due to objective pathophysiology. Examples include vascularized tissue transfer or transplantation to address complex tissue loss and release of bony elbow ankylosis. Perhaps more problematic is notable variation in straightforward, discretionary surgeries intended to alleviate pain, offered in the absence of objectively measurable pathophysiology, and without experimental evidence of benefit over placebo and other nonspecific effects. Evidence of concentration of this type of surgery in the hands of a few surgeons might point to inordinate influence of surgeon opinions on patient behavior. A study of variation in operations for upper extremity peripheral mononeuropathy has the potential to uncover potentially problematic variation. There are billing codes specific to common surgeries that can benefit patients with objectively verifiable neuropathies. And there are billing codes that represent less common nerve decompression surgeries that in many cases are offered in the absence of both objective evidence of pathophysiology as well as experimental evidence that surgery alleviates pain better than simulated surgery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked the following questions: (1) Among surgeons who billed a mean of at least 10 carpal tunnel releases (CTRs) per year in patients with Medicare insurance in the United States, how many also performed at least one less common peripheral nerve release and cubital tunnel release (CubTR) per year? (2) Among surgeons who billed a mean of at least one less common peripheral nerve release or CubTR on average per year, what is the median and range of the number of less common peripheral nerve releases and CubTRs and the relative proportion of these compared with CTRs per year? (3) Are there any differences in gender, specialty, and number of CTRs and CubTRs between surgeons who performed at least one less common nerve decompression and surgeons who, on average, performed none? METHODS: Using the Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners - by Provider and Service database, we identified surgeons who perform a minimum of 10 CTRs per year. Because this database has all surgeries billed to Medicare performed in any setting by individual surgeons, it is well suited to the study of surgeon-specific operative rates among Medicare patients. Among 7259 clinicians who billed one or more nerve procedure to Medicare between January 2013 and December 2019, we excluded 120 nonsurgical clinicians, 47 podiatrists, and 1561 clinicians who billed procedures as an organization. Among the remaining 5531 surgeons, 5439 performed at least 10 CTRs on average per year, which we considered representative of surgeons who include nerve decompression surgery as a part of their practice. Among these 5439 surgeons, we calculated the mean number of CTRs, CubTRs, and less common peripheral nerve releases (including decompression of a digital nerve, nerve in hand or wrist, ulnar nerve at the wrist, brachial plexus, and unspecified nerve) per year between 2013 and 2019. Decompression of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel, the ulnar nerve at the cubital tunnel, and, much less frequently, the ulnar nerve at the wrist typically addresses measurable neuropathy. The other nerve releases are often performed for illnesses characterized by pain that are defined, in part, by the absence of experimentally verifiable pathophysiology such as radial tunnel and pronator (or lacertus) syndromes. We counted the number of surgeons who billed an average of at least one less common peripheral nerve release and CubTR per year; the median and range of the number of less common nerve releases and CubTRs and their relative proportion among those subsets of surgeons; and differences in the number of surgeons who performed one or none less common surgery by gender, specialty, and volume of CTR/CubTR surgery. RESULTS: Of 5439 surgeons who performed a mean of at least 10 CTRs per year, 2% (93) performed a mean of at least one less common peripheral nerve release per year among patients on Medicare, 14% (775) at least one CubTR, and 1% (47) performed both. Surgeons who performed a mean of at least one less common peripheral nerve release per year performed a median (IQR) of 7 (3 to 17) per year (with a maximum of 153 per year), representing approximately one less common peripheral nerve release for every five CTRs. Sixty-five percent (4076 of 6272) of all less common nerve procedures were performed by the top 20 billing surgeons. Gender was not associated with doing one or more uncommon nerve releases (women 1% [6 of 413], men 2% [87 of 5026]; p = 0.84), but specialty was, with plastic surgeons leading (6% [20 of 340] compared with 1% [73 of 5087] for other types of surgeons; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The observation that a relatively small number of surgeons perform a large majority of the surgery for nerve syndromes conceptualized as accounting for arm pain suggests that most surgeons are cautious about ascribing pain to conceptual nerve compression syndromes and offering surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An approach to surgical care founded on ethical principles regards this type of notable variation as a signal of inordinate influence of surgeon opinion on patient behavior, suggesting that professional conduct may be supported by safeguards such as checklists that help guide patients to choices consistent with their values unclouded by surgeon beliefs, false hope, and common misconceptions.

Do Surgeons Experience Moral Dissonance When There Is Misalignment Between Evidence and Action? A Survey and Scenario-based Study.

BACKGROUND: Moral dissonance is the psychological discomfort associated with a mismatch between our moral values and potentially immoral actions. For instance, to limit moral dissonance, surgeons must develop a rationale that the potential for benefit from performing surgery is meaningfully greater than the inherent harm of surgery. Moral dissonance can also occur when a patient or one's surgeon peers encourage surgery for a given problem, even when the evidence suggests limited or no benefit over other options. Clinicians may not realize the degree to which moral dissonance can be a source of diminished joy in practice. Uncovering potential sources of moral dissonance can help inform efforts to help clinicians enjoy their work. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In a scenario-based experiment performed in an online survey format, we exposed musculoskeletal specialists to various types of patient and practice stressors to measure their association with moral dissonance and asked: (1) What factors are associated with the level of pressure surgeons feel to act contrary to the best evidence? (2) What factors are associated with the likelihood of offering surgery? METHODS: We performed a scenario-based experiment by inviting members of the Science of Variation Group (SOVG; an international collaborative of musculoskeletal surgeons that studies variation in care) to complete an online survey with randomized elements. The use of experimental techniques such as randomization to measure factors associated with specific ratings makes participation rate less important than diversity of opinion within the sample. A total of 114 SOVG musculoskeletal surgeons participated, which represents the typical number of participants from a total of about 200 who tend to participate in at least one experiment per year. Among the 114 participants, 94% (107) were men, 49% (56) practiced in the United States, and 82% (94) supervised trainees. Participants viewed 12 scenarios of upper extremity fractures for which surgery is optional (discretionary) based on consensus and current best evidence. In addition to a representative age, the scenario included randomized patient and practice factors that we posit could be sources of moral distress based on author consensus. Patient factors included potential sources of pressure (such as "The patient is convinced they want a specific treatment and will go to a different surgeon if they don't get it") or experiences of collaboration (such as "The patient is collaborative and involved in decisions"). Practice factors included circumstances of financial or reputational pressure (such as "The practice is putting pressure on you to generate more revenue") and factors of limited pressure (such as "Your income is not tied to revenue"). For each scenario, the participant was asked to rate both of the following statements on a scale from 0 to 100 anchored with "I don't feel it at all" at 0, "I feel it moderately" at 50, and "I feel it strongly" at 100: (1) pressure to act contrary to best evidence and (2) likelihood of offering surgery. Additional explanatory variables included surgeon factors: gender, years in practice, region, subspecialty, supervision of trainees, and practice setting (academic/nonacademic). We sought factors associated with pressure to act contrary to evidence and likelihood of offering surgery, accounting for potential confounding variables in multilevel mixed-effects linear regression models. RESULTS: Accounting for potential confounding variables, greater pressure to act contrary to best evidence was moderately associated with greater patient despair (regression coefficient [RC] 6 [95% confidence interval 2 to 9]; p = 0.001) and stronger patient preference (RC 4 [95% CI 0 to 8]; p = 0.03). Lower pressure to act contrary to evidence was moderately associated with surgeon income independent of revenue (RC -6 [95% CI -9 to -4]; p < 0.001) and no financial benefit to operative treatment (RC -6 [95% CI -8 to -3]; p < 0.001). Marketing concerns were the only factor associated with greater likelihood of offering surgery (RC 6 [95% CI 0 to 11]; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: In this scenario-based survey experiment, patient distress and strong preferences and surgeon financial incentives were associated with greater surgeon feelings of moral dissonance when considering discretionary fracture surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To support enjoyment of the practice of musculoskeletal surgery, we recommend that surgeons, surgery practices, and surgery professional associations be intentional in both anticipating and developing strategies to ameliorate potential sources of moral dissonance in daily practice.

Surgeons Have an Implicit Preference for Specific Disease Over Nonspecific Illness.

BACKGROUND: Many symptoms are not associated with a specific, measurable pathophysiology. Such nonspecific illnesses may carry relative social stigma that biases humans in favor of specific diseases. Such a bias could lead musculoskeletal surgeons to diagnose a specific disease in the absence of a specific, measurable pathology, resulting in potential overdiagnosis and overtreatment. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What factors are associated with surgeon implicit preference for specific disease over nonspecific illness? (2) What factors are associated with surgeon explicit preference for specific disease over nonspecific illness? (3) Is there a relationship between surgeon implicit and explicit preferences for specific disease over nonspecific illness? METHODS: One hundred three members of the Science of Variation Group participated in a survey-based experiment that included an Implicit Associations Test (IAT) to assess implicit preferences for specific, measurable musculoskeletal pathophysiology (specific disease) compared with symptoms that are not associated with a specific, measurable pathophysiology (nonspecific illness), and a set of four simple, face valid numerical ratings of explicit preferences. The Science of Variation Group is an international collaborative of mostly United States and European (85% [88 of 103] in this study), mostly academic (83% [85 of 103]), and mostly fracture and upper extremity surgeons (83% [86 of 103]), among whom approximately 200 surgeons complete at least one survey per year. The human themes addressed in this study are likely relatively consistent across these variations. Although concerns have been raised about the validity and utility of the IAT, we believe this was the right tool, given that the timed delays in association that form the basis of the measurement likely represent bias and social stigma regarding nonspecific illness. Both measures were scaled from -150, which represents a preference for nonspecific illness, to 150, which represents a preference for specific disease. The magnitude of associations can be assessed relative to the standard deviation or interquartile range. We used multivariable linear regression to identify surgeon factors associated with surgeon implicit and explicit preference for specific disease or nonspecific illness. We measured the relationship between surgeon implicit and explicit preferences for specific disease or nonspecific illness using Spearman correlation. RESULTS: Overall, there was a notable implicit bias in favor of specific diseases over nonspecific illness (median [IQR] 70 [54 to 88]; considered notable because the mean value is above zero [neutral] by more than twice the magnitude of the IQR), with a modestly greater association in the hand and wrist subspecialty. We found no clinically important explicit preference between specific disease and nonspecific illness (median 8 [-15 to 37]; p = 0.02). There was no correlation between explicit preference and implicit bias regarding specific disease and nonspecific illness (Spearman correlation coefficient -0.13; p = 0.20). CONCLUSION: Given that our study found an implicit bias among musculoskeletal specialists toward specific diseases over nonspecific illness, future research might address the degree to which this bias may account, in part, for patterns of use of low-yield diagnostic testing and the use of diagnostic labels that imply specific pathophysiology when none is detectable. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patients and clinicians might limit overtesting, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment by anticipating an implicit preference for a specific disease and intentionally anchoring on nonspecific illness until a specific pathophysiology accounting for symptoms is identified, and also by using nonspecific illness descriptions until objective, verifiable pathophysiology is identified.

Variations in 1-year Trajectories of Levels of Pain and Capability After Shoulder Arthroplasty Are Associated With Baseline Mental Health.

BACKGROUND: There is variability in the trajectories of pain intensity and magnitude of incapability after shoulder arthroplasty. A better understanding of the degree to which variation in recovery trajectories relates to aspects of mental health can inform the development of comprehensive biopsychosocial care strategies. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do pain intensities at baseline and the trajectories during recovery differ between groups when stratified by mental health composite summary score, arthroplasty type, and revision surgery? (2) Do magnitudes of capability at baseline and the trajectories during recovery differ between these groups? METHODS: We used a registry of 755 patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty by a single surgeon at a specialized urban orthopaedic hospital that recorded the mental component summary (MCS) score of the Veterans RAND 12, a measure of shoulder-specific comfort and capability (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score, which ranges from 0 to 100 points, with a score of 0 indicating worse capability and pain and 100 indicating better capability and pain and a minimum clinically important difference of 6.4), and the VAS for pain intensity (range 0 [representing no pain] to 10 [representing the worst pain possible], with a minimum clinically important difference of 1.4) preoperatively, 2 weeks postoperatively, and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Forty-nine percent (368 of 755) of the patients were men, with a mean age of 68 ± 8 years, and 77% (585) were treated with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Unconditional linear and quadratic growth models were generated to identify the general shape of recovery for both outcomes (linear versus quadratic). We then constructed conditional growth models and curves for pain intensity and the magnitude of capability showing mean baseline scores and the rates of recovery that determine the trajectory, accounting for mental health (MCS) quartiles, primary or revision arthroplasty, and TSA or reverse TSA in separate models. Because pain intensity and capability showed quadratic trends, we created trajectories using the square of time. RESULTS: Patients in the worst two MCS quartiles had greater pain intensity at baseline than patients in the best quartile (difference in baseline for bottom quartile: 0.93 [95% CI 0.72 to 1.1]; p < 0.01; difference in baseline for next-worst quartile: 0.36 [95% CI 0.16 to 0.57]; p < 0.01). The rates of change in recovery from pain intensity were not different among groups (p > 0.10). Patients with revision surgery had greater baseline pain (difference: 1.1 [95% CI 0.7 to 1.5]; p < 0.01) but no difference in rates of recovery (difference: 0.031 [95% CI 0.035 to 0.097]; p = 0.36). There were no differences in baseline pain intensity and rates of recovery between patients with reverse TSA and those with TSA (baseline pain difference: -0.20 [95% CI -0.38 to -0.03]; p = 0.18; difference in rate of recovery: -0.005 [95% CI -0.035 to 0.025]; p = 0.74). Patients in the worst two MCS quartiles had worse baseline capability than patients in the best quartile (difference in baseline for bottom quartile: -8.9 [95% CI -10 to -7.4]; p < 0.001; difference in baseline for the next-worst quartile: -4.9 [95% CI -6.4 to -3.4]; p < 0.01), with no differences in rates of recovery (p > 0.10). Patients with revision surgery had lower baseline capability (difference in baseline: -13 [95% CI -15 to -9.7]; p < 0.01), with a slower rate of recovery (difference in rate of recovery: -0.56 [95% CI -1.0 to -0.079]; p = 0.021). There were no differences in baseline capability or rates of recovery between TSA and reverse TSA. CONCLUSION: The observation that preoperative and 1-year comfort and capability are associated with mental health factors and with similar recovery trajectories reminds us that assessment and treatment of mental health is best considered an integral aspect of musculoskeletal care. Future studies can address how prioritization of mental health in musculoskeletal care strategies might reduce variation in the 1-year outcomes of discretionary surgeries such as shoulder arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

A Brief Mind-body Intervention Is Feasible and May Prevent Persistent Pain After Acute Orthopaedic Traumas: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 20% to 50% of patients develop persistent pain after traumatic orthopaedic injuries. Psychosocial factors are an important predictor of persistent pain; however, there are no evidence-based, mind-body interventions to prevent persistent pain for this patient population. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does the Toolkit for Optimal Recovery after Injury (TOR) achieve a priori feasibility benchmarks in a multisite randomized control trial (RCT)? (2) Does TOR demonstrate a preliminary effect in improving pain, as well as physical and emotional function? METHODS: This pilot RCT of TOR versus a minimally enhanced usual care comparison group (MEUC) was conducted among 195 adults with an acute orthopaedic traumatic injury at risk for persistent pain at four geographically diverse Level 1 trauma centers between October 2021 to August 2023. Fifty percent (97 of 195) of participants were randomized to TOR (mean age 43 ± 17 years; 67% [65 of 97] women) and 50% (98) to MEUC (mean age 45 ± 16 years; 67% [66 of 98] women). In TOR, 24% (23 of 97) of patients were lost to follow-up, whereas in the MEUC, 17% (17 of 98) were lost. At 4 weeks, 78% (76 of 97) of patients in TOR and 95% (93 of 98) in the MEUC completed the assessments; by 12 weeks, 76% (74 of 97) of patients in TOR and 83% (81 of 98) in the MEUC completed the assessments (all participants were still included in the analysis consistent with an intention-to-treat approach). The TOR has four weekly video-administered sessions that teach pain coping skills. The MEUC is an educational pamphlet. Both were delivered in addition to usual care. Primary outcomes were feasibility of recruitment (the percentage of patients who met study criteria and enrolled) and data collection, appropriateness of treatment (the percent of participants in TOR who score above the midpoint on the Credibility and Expectancy Scale), acceptability (the percentage of patients in TOR who attend at least three of four sessions), and treatment satisfaction (the percent of participants in TOR who score above the midpoint on the Client Satisfaction Scale). Secondary outcomes included additional feasibility (including collecting data on narcotics and rescue medications and adverse events), fidelity (whether the intervention was delivered as planned) and acceptability metrics (patients and staff), pain (numeric rating scale), physical function (Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire [SMFA], PROMIS), emotional function (PTSD [PTSD Checklist], depression [Center for Epidemiologic Study of Depression]), and intervention targets (pain catastrophizing, pain anxiety, coping, and mindfulness). Assessments occurred at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Several outcomes exceeded a priori benchmarks: feasibility of recruitment (89% [210 of 235] of eligible participants consented), appropriateness (TOR: 73% [66 of 90] scored > midpoint on the Credibility and Expectancy Scale), data collection (79% [154 of 195] completed all surveys), satisfaction (TOR: 99% [75 of 76] > midpoint on the Client Satisfaction Scale), and acceptability (TOR: 73% [71 of 97] attended all four sessions). Participation in TOR, compared with the MEUC, was associated with improvement from baseline to postintervention and from baseline to follow-up in physical function (SMFA, baseline to post: -7 [95% CI -11 to -4]; p < 0.001; baseline to follow-up: -6 [95% CI -11 to -1]; p = 0.02), PROMIS (PROMIS-PF, baseline to follow-up: 2 [95% CI 0 to 4]; p = 0.045), pain at rest (baseline to post: -1.2 [95% CI -1.7 to -0.6]; p < 0.001; baseline to follow-up: -1 [95% CI -1.7 to -0.3]; p = 0.003), activity (baseline to post: -0.7 [95% CI -1.3 to -0.1]; p = 0.03; baseline to follow-up: -0.8 [95% CI -1.6 to -0.1]; p = 0.04), depressive symptoms (baseline to post: -6 [95% CI -9 to -3]; p < 0.001; baseline to follow-up: -5 [95% CI -9 to -2]; p < 0.002), and posttraumatic symptoms (baseline to post: -4 [95% CI -7 to 0]; p = 0.03; baseline to follow-up: -5 [95% CI -9 to -1]; p = 0.01). Improvements were generally clinically important and sustained or continued through the 3 months of follow-up (that is, above the minimum clinically important different [MCID] of 7 for the SMFA, the MCID of 3.6 for PROMIS, the MCID of 2 for pain at rest and pain during activity, the MCID of more than 10% change in depressive symptoms, and the MCID of 10 for posttraumatic symptoms). There were treatment-dependent improvements in pain catastrophizing, pain anxiety, coping, and mindfulness. CONCLUSION: TOR was feasible and potentially efficacious in preventing persistent pain among patients with an acute orthopaedic traumatic injury. Using TOR in clinical practice may prevent persistent pain after orthopaedic traumatic injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Machine Learning Did Not Outperform Conventional Competing Risk Modeling to Predict Revision Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Estimating the risk of revision after arthroplasty could inform patient and surgeon decision-making. However, there is a lack of well-performing prediction models assisting in this task, which may be due to current conventional modeling approaches such as traditional survivorship estimators (such as Kaplan-Meier) or competing risk estimators. Recent advances in machine learning survival analysis might improve decision support tools in this setting. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the performance of machine learning compared with that of conventional modeling to predict revision after arthroplasty. QUESTION/PURPOSE: Does machine learning perform better than traditional regression models for estimating the risk of revision for patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty? METHODS: Eleven datasets from published studies from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register reporting on factors associated with revision or survival after partial or total knee and hip arthroplasty between 2018 and 2022 were included in our study. The 11 datasets were observational registry studies, with a sample size ranging from 3038 to 218,214 procedures. We developed a set of time-to-event models for each dataset, leading to 11 comparisons. A set of predictors (factors associated with revision surgery) was identified based on the variables that were selected in the included studies. We assessed the predictive performance of two state-of-the-art statistical time-to-event models for 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up: a Fine and Gray model (which models the cumulative incidence of revision) and a cause-specific Cox model (which models the hazard of revision). These were compared with a machine-learning approach (a random survival forest model, which is a decision tree-based machine-learning algorithm for time-to-event analysis). Performance was assessed according to discriminative ability (time-dependent area under the receiver operating curve), calibration (slope and intercept), and overall prediction error (scaled Brier score). Discrimination, known as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, measures the model's ability to distinguish patients who achieved the outcomes from those who did not and ranges from 0.5 to 1.0, with 1.0 indicating the highest discrimination score and 0.50 the lowest. Calibration plots the predicted versus the observed probabilities; a perfect plot has an intercept of 0 and a slope of 1. The Brier score calculates a composite of discrimination and calibration, with 0 indicating perfect prediction and 1 the poorest. A scaled version of the Brier score, 1 - (model Brier score/null model Brier score), can be interpreted as the amount of overall prediction error. RESULTS: Using machine learning survivorship analysis, we found no differences between the competing risks estimator and traditional regression models for patients undergoing arthroplasty in terms of discriminative ability (patients who received a revision compared with those who did not). We found no consistent differences between the validated performance (time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of different modeling approaches because these values ranged between -0.04 and 0.03 across the 11 datasets (the time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the models across 11 datasets ranged between 0.52 to 0.68). In addition, the calibration metrics and scaled Brier scores produced comparable estimates, showing no advantage of machine learning over traditional regression models. CONCLUSION: Machine learning did not outperform traditional regression models. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Neither machine learning modeling nor traditional regression methods were sufficiently accurate in order to offer prognostic information when predicting revision arthroplasty. The benefit of these modeling approaches may be limited in this context.

The Impact of Health Communication Research on Medical and Health Professional Education and Training.

In this essay, we review how health communication scholarship has been translated into various communication skills trainings (CSTs), we present four case studies of how health communication research informed the development and implementation of specific CSTs, and we reflect on how we can productively define "impact" in looking back as well as looking forward within this line of research.

Variation in Interpretation of Provocative Tests for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

PURPOSE: We studied variation in interpretation of specific symptoms during clinical tests for carpal tunnel syndrome to estimate the degree to which surgeons consider pain without paresthesia characteristic of median neuropathy. METHODS: We invited all upper-extremity surgeon members of the Science of Variation Group to complete a scenario-based experiment. Surgeons read 5-10 clinical vignettes of patients with variation in patient demographics and random variation in symptoms and signs as follows: primary symptoms (nighttime numbness and tingling, constant numbness and loss of sensibility, pain with activity), symptoms elicited by a provocative test (Phalen, Durkan, or Tinel) (tingling, pain), and location of symptoms elicited by the provocative test (index and middle fingers, thumb and index fingers, little and ring fingers, entire hand). RESULTS: Patient factors associated with surgeon interpretation of provocative tests as negative included pain rather than paresthesia during the Phalen, Durkan, or Tinel test and location of symptoms in the entire hand rather than the median nerve distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Specialists do not consider pain without paresthesia or a noncharacteristic symptom distribution as characteristic of carpal tunnel syndrome. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Awareness that elicitation of pain with Phalen, Durkan, and Tinel tests is regarded by specialists as relatively uncharacteristic of median neuropathy can help limit the potential for both overdiagnosis and overtreatment of median neuropathy as well as underdiagnosis and undertreatment of mental and social health contributions to illness (notable correlates of the intensity and distribution of pain).

The Impact of a Computer-Based Interactive Informed Consent for Surgery on Decision Conflict.

PURPOSE: Informed consent for surgery can address the legal aspects of care while also being simple, informative, and empathic. We developed interactive informed consents and compared them with standard printed informed consents asking: (1) are there any factors associated with lower decision conflict or greater patient-rated clinician empathy including consent format? (2) Are there any factors associated with rating the consent process as informative, comfortable, and satisfying including consent format? METHODS: Ninety-four adult patients accepted an offer of surgery from one of three hand surgeons to address one of six common hand surgery diagnoses: carpal tunnel release, cubital tunnel release, trigger finger release, plate and screw fixation of a distal radius fracture, removal of a benign mass, including a ganglion cyst, and Dupuytren contracture release. Fifty-three patients were randomized to complete an interactive consent, and 41, a standard written consent. Symptoms of anxiety, depression, and unhelpful thoughts were measured. Patients completed the Decision Conflict Scale and the Jefferson Scale of Patient's Perceptions of Physician Empathy and rated the consent as informative, comfortable, and satisfactory on a scale of 0-10. RESULTS: Greater decisional conflict was slightly associated with greater patient unhelpful thoughts about symptoms and was not associated with consent format. A higher rating of comfort with the consent process was slightly associated with patient choice to proceed with surgical treatment, but not with consent format. Accounting for potential confounding in multivariable analysis, a higher rating of the consent process as informative was slightly associated with patient preference for surgical over nonsurgical treatment, CONCLUSIONS: The observation that an interactive consent form was not related to decision conflict or other aspects of patient experience suggests that such tools may not have much weight relative to the interaction between patient and clinician. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Efforts to improve informed consent may need to focus on the dialog between patient and surgeon rather than how information is presented.

A Systematic Review of Distinction of Colonization and Infection in Studies that Address C. Acnes and Shoulder Surgery.

BACKGROUND: After shoulder surgery, infection is often diagnosed in the absence of an inflammatory host response (purulence, sepsis). In the absence of inflammation, the more appropriate diagnoses may be colonization or contamination. We reviewed the available data regarding culture of Cutibacterium Acnes during primary and revision shoulder surgery and asked; 1. What is the prevalence of air, skin, and deep tissue colonization? 2. How often is an inflammatory host response associated with diagnosis of postoperative shoulder infection diagnosed on the basis of culture of C. Acnes? 3. Is there any relation between culture of C. Acnes and outcomes of shoulder surgery? METHODS: Three databases were searched for studies that address C. Acnes and colonization or infection related to shoulder surgery. We analyzed data from 80 studies addressing the rates of C. Acnes colonization/infection in patients undergoing shoulder surgery, evidence of an inflammatory host response, and relationship of C. Acnes culture to surgery outcomes. RESULTS: C. Acnes is often cultured in the air in the operating room (mean 10%), the skin before preparation (mean 47%), and deep tissue in primary shoulder arthroplasty (mean 29%), arthroscopy (mean 27%), and other shoulder surgery (mean 21%). C. Acnes was cultured from a mean of 39% of deep tissue samples during revision arthroplasty. C. Acnes was believed to be the causative organism of a high percentage of the infections diagnosed after surgery, 39% in primary shoulder arthroplasties, 53% in revisions, 55% in arthroscopic surgeries, and 44% in a mixture of shoulder surgeries. Infection was nearly always diagnosed in the absence of an inflammatory host response. Documented purulence and sepsis were not specifically ascribed to C. Acnes (rather than more virulent organisms such as S. Aureus). Diagnosis of infection, or unexpected positive culture, with C. Acnes during shoulder surgery is associated with outcomes comparable to shoulders with no bacterial growth. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence to date supports conceptualization of C. Acnes as a common commensal (colonization), and perhaps a frequent contaminant, and an uncommon cause of an inflammatory host response (infection). This is supported by the observations that 1) Unexpected positive culture for C. Acnes is not associated with adverse outcomes after shoulder surgery, and 2) Diagnosed infection with C. Acnes is associated with outcomes comparable to non-infected revision shoulder arthroplasty. We speculate that diagnosis of C. Acnes infection might represent an attempt to account for unexplained discomfort, incapability or stiffness after technically sound shoulder surgery. If so, the hypothesis that stiffness and pain are host responses to C. Acnes needs better experimental support.

Associations of Mental, Social and Pathophysiological factors with Pain Intensity and Capability in Patients with Shoulder Osteoarthritis Prior to Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Dutch Arthroplasty Register study.

BACKGROUND: Mounting evidence suggests that mental health accounts for greater variation in levels of comfort and capability than pathophysiology severity across a range of musculoskeletal conditions. Using nationwide Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) data, we tested the null hypothesis that none of the available mental, social, and pathophysiological factors are associated with variation in levels of comfort and capability among people with shoulder osteoarthritis prior to arthroplasty. METHODS: We included all adult patients who underwent primary total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis in the period 2014-2021 with complete measures of shoulder specific capability (Oxford Shoulder Score), pain intensity (10-point Numeric Rating Scale), general wellbeing (the EQ-5D 3-L), the grade of pathophysiology (Walch classification) and categorized social health based on a social deprivation index. In total, 1342 patients with shoulder osteoarthritis preparing for shoulder arthroplasty were included in a regression analysis to seek factors associated with variation in levels of pain intensity and capability. RESULTS: Greater pain intensity at rest was associated with greater symptoms of anxiety and depression (Regression Coefficient [RC] = -0.41; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 0.17 to 0.64; P = <0.01), and women (RC = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.11 to 0.66; P = <0.01). Greater incapability was associated with greater symptoms of anxiety and depression (RC = -3.2; 95% CI = -4.0 to -2.4; P = <0.01), an ASA score of III and IV (RC = -3.1; 95% CI = -4.8 to -1.4; P = <0.01), older age (RC = -0.098; 95% CI = -0.15 to -0.047; P = <0.01), and women (RC = -3.9; 95% CI = -4.9 to -3.0; P = <0.01). Neither comfort nor capability were associated with Walch classification or social deprivation index. CONCLUSION: The confirmation that variation in levels of comfort and capability among people preparing for shoulder arthroplasty are associated with mindset rather than a measure of glenoid pathophysiology points to the potential benefits of addressing mental health in musculoskeletal health strategies.

Diagnosis of Mild-to-moderate Idiopathic Median Neuropathy at the Carpal Tunnel Based on Signs and Symptoms is Discordant From Diagnosis Based on Electrodiagnostic Studies and Ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: Although idiopathic median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel (IMNCT) is objective and verifiable, distinction of normal and abnormal nerves is imprecise and probabilistic. The associated symptoms and signs (carpal tunnel syndrome [CTS]) vary, particularly for nonsevere (mild and moderate) median neuropathy. Discordance between diagnosis of mild or moderate median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel using symptoms and signs and diagnosis based on objective tests is a measure of the potential for overdiagnosis and overtreatment. QUESTION/PURPOSE: What is the difference in the estimated prevalence of mild-to-moderate IMNCT using nonsevere signs and symptoms compared with the estimated prevalence using electrodiagnostic studies (EDS) and ultrasound (US)? METHODS: We used data from an existing cross-sectional data registry. To create this registry, between January 2014 and January 2019, we considered all new adult English-speaking people who had an EDS that included the median nerve or people with a diagnosis of CTS who did not have surgery yet. A small and unrecorded number of people declined participation. The cross-sectional area of the median nerve at the distal wrist crease using US in people who already had EDS was measured. People with a diagnosis of CTS underwent both EDS and US. The six signs and symptoms of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome 6 (CTS-6, a validated tool to estimate the probability of IMNCT using ratings of symptoms and signs of CTS) were recorded. This resulted in a registry of 185 participants; we excluded 75 people for obvious, severe IMNCT (defined as nonrecordable nerve conduction velocity, thenar atrophy, or greater than 5 mm 2-point discrimination). Three of the 110 qualifying patients had missing information on ethnicity or race, but we accounted for this in our final analysis. Without a reference standard, as is the case with IMNCT, latent class analysis (LCA) can be used to establish the probability that an individual has specific pathophysiologic findings. LCA is a statistical method that identifies sets of characteristics that tend to group together. This technique has been used, for example, in diagnosing true scaphoid fractures among suspected fractures based on a combination of demographic, injury, examination, and radiologic variables. The prevalence of mild-to-moderate IMNCT was estimated in two LCAs using four signs and symptoms characteristic of mild-to-moderate IMNCT, as well as EDS and US measures of median neuropathy. RESULTS: The estimated prevalence of mild-to-moderate IMNCT based on signs and symptoms was 73% (95% CI 62% to 81%), while the estimated prevalence using EDS and US measurements was 51% (95% CI 37% to 65%). CONCLUSION: The notable discordance of 22% between the estimated prevalence of mild-to-moderate IMNCT using signs and symptoms and prevalence based on EDS and US criteria, and the overlapping CIs of the probability estimations, indicate considerable uncertainty and a corresponding notable potential for underdiagnosis or overdiagnosis. When signs and symptoms suggest mild-to-moderate median neuropathy and surgery is being considered, patients and clinicians might consider additional testing, such as EDS or US, to increase the probability of actual median neuropathy that can benefit from surgery. We might benefit from a more accurate and reliable diagnostic strategy or tool for mild-to-moderate IMNCT; this might be the focus of a future study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Imposter Syndrome Among Surgeons Is Associated With Intolerance of Uncertainty and Lower Confidence in Problem Solving.

BACKGROUND: Feelings of imposter syndrome (inadequacy or incompetence) are common among physicians and are associated with diminished joy in practice. Identification of modifiable factors associated with feelings of imposter syndrome might inform strategies to ameliorate them. To this point, though, no such factors have been identified. QUESTION/PURPOSE: Are intolerance of uncertainty and confidence in problem-solving skills independently associated with feelings of imposter syndrome after accounting for other factors? METHODS: This survey-based experiment measured the relationship between feelings of imposter syndrome, intolerance of uncertainty, and confidence in problem-solving skills among musculoskeletal specialist surgeons. Approximately 200 surgeons who actively participate in the Science of Variation Group, a collaboration of mainly orthopaedic surgeons specializing in upper extremity illnesses primarily across Europe and North America, were invited to this survey-based experiment. One hundred two surgeons completed questionnaires measuring feelings of imposter syndrome (an adaptation of the Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale), tolerance of uncertainty (the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-12), and confidence in problem-solving skills (the Personal Optimism and Self-Efficacy Optimism questionnaire), as well as basic demographics. The participants were characteristic of other Science of Variation Group experiments: the mean age was 52 ± 5 years, with 89% (91 of 102) being men, most self-reported White race (81% [83 of 102]), largely subspecializing in hand and/or wrist surgery (73% [74 of 102]), and with just over half of the group (54% [55 of 102]) having greater than 11 years of experience. We sought to identify factors associated with greater feelings of imposter syndrome in a multivariable statistical model. RESULTS: Accounting for potential confounding factors such as years of experience or supervision of trainees in the multivariable linear regression analysis, greater feelings of imposter syndrome were modestly associated with higher intolerance of uncertainty (regression coefficient [ß] 0.34 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.51]; p < 0.01) and with lower confidence in problem-solving skills (ß -0.70 [95% CI -1.0 to -0.35]; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The finding that feelings of imposter syndrome may be modestly to notably associated with modifiable factors, such as difficulty managing uncertainty and lack of confidence in problem-solving, spark coaching opportunities to support and sustain a surgeon's mindset, which may lead to increased comfort and joy at work. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Beginning with premedical coursework and throughout medical training and continuing medical education, future studies can address the impact of learning and practicing tactics that increase comfort with uncertainty and greater confidence in problem solving on limiting feelings of imposter syndrome.

When Musculoskeletal Clinicians Respond to Empathetic Opportunities, do Patients Perceive Greater Empathy?

BACKGROUND: Patient use of verbal and nonverbal communication to signal what is most important to them can be considered empathetic opportunities. Orthopaedic surgeons may have mixed feelings toward empathetic opportunities, on one hand wanting the patient to know that they care, and on the other hand fearing offense, prolonged visit duration, or discussions for which they feel ill prepared. Evidence that action about empathetic opportunities does not harm the patient's experience or appreciably prolong the visit could increase the use of these communication tactics with potential for improved experience and outcomes of care. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Using transcripts from musculoskeletal specialty care visits in prior studies, we asked: (1) Are there factors, including clinician attentiveness to empathetic opportunities, associated with patient perception of clinician empathy? (2) Are there factors associated with the number of patient-initiated empathetic opportunities? (3) Are there factors associated with clinician acknowledgment of empathetic opportunities? (4) Are there factors associated with the frequency with which clinicians elicited empathetic opportunities? METHODS: This study was a retrospective, secondary analysis of transcripts from prior studies of audio and video recordings of patient visits with musculoskeletal specialists. Three trained observers identified empathetic opportunities in 80% (209 of 261) of transcripts of adult patient musculoskeletal specialty care visits, with any uncertainties or disagreements resolved by discussion and a final decision by the senior author. Patient statements considered consistent with empathetic opportunities included relation of emotion, expression of worries or concerns, description of loss of valued activities or loss of important roles or identities, relation of a troubling psychologic or social event, and elaboration on daily life. Clinician-initiated empathetic opportunities were considered clinician inquiries about these factors. Clinician acknowledgment of empathetic opportunities included encouragement, affirmation or reassurance, or supportive statements. Participants completed post-visit surveys of perceived clinician empathy, symptoms of depression, and health anxiety. Factors associated with perceived clinician empathy, number of empathetic opportunities, clinician responses to these opportunities, and the frequency with which clinicians elicited empathetic opportunities were sought in bivariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: After controlling for potentially confounding variables such as working status and pain self-efficacy scores in the multivariable analysis, no factors were associated with patient perception of clinician empathy, including attentiveness to empathetic opportunities. Patient-initiated empathetic opportunities were modestly associated with longer visit duration (correlation coefficient 0.037 [95% confidence interval 0.023 to 0.050]; p < 0.001). Clinician acknowledgment of empathetic opportunities was modestly associated with longer visit duration (correlation coefficient 0.06 [95% CI 0.03 to 0.09]; p < 0.001). Clinician-initiated empathetic opportunities were modestly associated with younger patient age (correlation coefficient -0.025 [95% CI -0.037 to -0.014]; p < 0.001) and strongly associated with one specific interviewing clinician as well as other clinicians (correlation coefficient -1.3 [95% CI -2.2 to -0.42]; p = 0.004 and -0.53 [95% CI -0.95 to -0.12]; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Musculoskeletal specialists can respond to empathic opportunities without harming efficiency, throughput, or patient experience. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Given the evidence that patients prioritize feeling heard and understood, and evidence that a trusting patient-clinician relationship is protective and healthful, the results of this study can motivate specialists to train and practice effective communication tactics.

Surgeons Receiving Information About Patient Language Reflecting Unhelpful Thoughts or Distress About Their Symptoms Identify Such Language More Often Than Those Who Do Not Receive This Information.

BACKGROUND: Unhelpful thoughts and feelings of distress regarding symptoms account for a large proportion of variation in a patient's symptom intensity and magnitude of capability. Clinicians vary in their awareness of this association, their ability to identify unhelpful thoughts or feelings of distress regarding symptoms, and the skills to help address them. These nontechnical skills are important because they can improve treatment outcomes, increase patient agency, and foster self-efficacy without diminishing patient experience. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this survey-based study, we asked: (1) Are there any factors, including exposure of surgeons to information about language reflecting unhelpful thoughts about symptoms, associated with the total number of identified instances of language rated as reflecting unhelpful thoughts or feelings of distress regarding symptoms in transcripts of patient encounters? (2) Are there any factors, including exposure of surgeons to information about language reflecting unhelpful thoughts about symptoms, associated with the interobserver reliability of a surgeon's identification of language rated as reflecting unhelpful thoughts or feelings of distress regarding symptoms in transcripts of patient encounters? METHODS: Surgeons from an international collaborative consisting of mostly academic surgeons (Science of Variation Group) were invited to participate in a survey-based experiment. Among approximately 200 surgeons who participate in at least one experiment per year, 127 surgeons reviewed portions of transcripts of actual new musculoskeletal specialty encounters with English-speaking patients (who reported pain and paresthesia as primary symptoms) and were asked to identify language believed to reflect unhelpful thoughts or feelings of distress regarding symptoms. The included transcripts were selected based on the rated presence of language reflecting unhelpful thinking as assessed by four independent researchers and confirmed by the senior author. We did not study accuracy because there is no reference standard for language reflecting unhelpful thoughts or feelings of distress regarding symptoms. Observers were randomized 1:1 to receive supportive information or not regarding definitions and examples of unhelpful thoughts or feelings of distress regarding symptoms (referred to herein as "priming") once at the beginning of the survey, and were not aware that this randomization was occurring. By priming, we mean the paragraph was intended to increase awareness of and attunement to these aspects of human illness behavior immediately before participation in the experiment. Most of the participants practiced in the United States (primed: 48% [29 of 60] versus not primed: 46% [31 of 67]) or Europe (33% [20 of 60] versus 36% [24 of 67]) and specialized in hand and wrist surgery (40% [24 of 60] versus 37% [25 of 67]) or fracture surgery (35% [21 of 60] versus 28% [19 of 67]). A multivariable negative binomial regression model was constructed to seek factors associated with the total number of identified instances of language believed to reflect unhelpful thoughts or feelings of distress regarding symptoms. To determine the interobserver agreement, Fleiss kappa was calculated with bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (resamples = 1000) and standard errors. RESULTS: After controlling for potential confounding factors such as location of practice, years of experience, and subspecialty, we found surgeons who were primed with supportive information and surgeons who had 11 to 20 years of experience (compared with 0 to 5 years) identified slightly more instances of language believed to reflect unhelpful thoughts or feelings of distress regarding symptoms (regression coefficient 0.15 [95% CI 0.020 to 0.28]; p = 0.02 and regression coefficient 0.19 [95% CI 0.017 to 0.37]; p = 0.03). Fracture surgeons identified slightly fewer instances than hand and wrist surgeons did (regression coefficient -0.19 [95% CI -0.35 to -0.017]; p = 0.03). There was limited agreement among surgeons in their ratings of language as indicating unhelpful thoughts or feelings of distress regarding symptoms, and priming surgeons with supportive information had no influence on reliability (kappa primed: 0.25 versus not primed: 0.22; categorically fair agreement). CONCLUSION: The observation that surgeons with brief exposure to supportive information about language associated with unhelpful thoughts and feelings of distress regarding symptoms identified slightly more instances of such language demonstrates the potential of training and practice to increase attunement to these important aspects of musculoskeletal health. The finding that supportive information did not improve reliability underlines the complexity, relative subjectivity, and imprecision of these mental health concepts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Are the Pathologic Features of Enthesopathy, Tendinopathy, and Labral and Articular Disc Disease Related to Mucoid Degeneration? A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Tendinopathy, enthesopathy, labral degeneration, and pathologic conditions of the articular disc (knee meniscus and ulnocarpal) are sometimes described in terms of inflammation or damage, while the histopathologic findings are often consistent with mucoid degeneration. A systematic review of the histopathology of these structures at diverse locations might reconceptualize these diseases as expected aspects of human aging. The potential benefits of this evolution might include healthier patient and clinician mindsets as well as a reduced likelihood of overdiagnosis and overtreatment resulting from greater awareness of base rates of pathology. QUESTION/PURPOSE: In this systematic review of studies of surgical specimens, we asked: Are there are any differences in the histopathologic findings of structural soft tissue conditions (mucoid degeneration, inflammation, and vascularity) by anatomic site (foot, elbow, or knee) or structure (tendon body, muscle or tendon origin or insertion [enthesis], labrum, or articular disc)? METHODS: Studies between 1980 and 2021 investigating the histopathologic findings of specimens from surgery for trigger digit, de Quervain tendinopathy, plantar fasciitis, lateral and medial elbow enthesopathy, rotator cuff tendinopathy, posterior tibial tendinopathy, patellar tendinopathy, Achilles tendinopathy, or disease of the hip labrum, ulnocarpal articular disc, or knee meniscus were searched for in the PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases. Inclusion criteria were the prespecified anatomic location or structure being analyzed histologically and any findings described with respect to inflammation, vascularity, or mucoid degeneration. Studies were excluded if they were nonhuman studies or review articles. Search terms included "anatomy," "pathology," and "histopathology." These terms were coupled with anatomic structures or disorders and included "trigger finger," "de Quervain," "fasciitis, plantar," "tennis elbow," "rotator cuff tendinopathy," "elbow tendinopathy," "patellar tendonitis," "posterior tibial tendon," and "triangular fibrocartilage." This resulted in 3196 studies. After applying the inclusion criteria, 559 articles were then assessed for eligibility according to our exclusion criteria, with 52 eventually included. We recorded whether the study identified the following histopathologic findings: inflammatory cells or molecular markers, greater than expected vascularity (categorized as quantitative count, with or without controls; molecular markers; or qualitative judgments), and features of mucoid degeneration (disorganized collagen, increased extracellular matrix, or chondroid metaplasia). In the absence of methods for systematically evaluating the pathophysiology of structural (collagenous) soft tissue structures and rating histopathologic study quality, all studies that interpreted histopathology results were included. The original authors' judgment regarding the presence or absence of inflammation, greater than expected vascularity, and elements of mucoid degeneration was recorded along with the type of data used to reach that conclusion. RESULTS: Regarding differences in the histopathology of surgical specimens of structural soft tissue conditions by anatomic site, there were no differences in inflammation or mucoid degeneration, and the knee meniscus was less often described as having greater than normal vascularity. There were no differences by anatomic structure. Overall, 20% (10 of 51) of the studies that investigated for inflammation reported it (nine inflammatory cells and one inflammatory marker). Eighty-three percent (43 of 52) interpreted increased vascularity: 40% (17 of 43) using quantitative methods (14 with controls and three without) and 60% (26 of 43) using imprecise criteria. Additionally, 100% (all 52 studies) identified at least one element of mucoid degeneration: 69% (36 of 52) reported an increased extracellular matrix, 71% (37 of 52) reported disorganized collagen, and 33% (17 of 52) reported chondroid metaplasia. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review of the histopathology of diseases of soft tissue structures (enthesopathy, tendinopathy, and labral and articular disc) identified consistent mucoid degeneration, minimal inflammation, and imprecise assessment of relative vascularity; these findings were consistent across anatomic sites and structures, supporting a reconceptualization of these diseases as related to aging (senescence or degeneration) rather than injury or activity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This reconceptualization supports accommodative mindsets known to be associated with greater comfort and capability. In addition, awareness of the notable base rates of structural soft tissue changes as people age might reduce overdiagnosis and overtreatment of incidental, benign, or inconsequential signal changes and pathophysiology.

Is Pain in the Uninjured Leg Associated With Unhelpful Thoughts and Distress Regarding Symptoms During Recovery From Lower Extremity Injury?

BACKGROUND: Patients recovering from lower extremity injuries often interpret discomfort associated with increased use of the uninjured leg as a potential indication of harm. If expressed concerns regarding contralateral leg pain are associated with unhelpful thinking regarding symptoms, they can signal orthopaedic surgeons to gently reorient these thoughts to help improve comfort and capability during recovery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) Among people recovering from isolated traumatic lower extremity injury, is pain intensity in the uninjured leg associated with unhelpful thoughts and feelings of distress regarding symptoms, accounting for other factors? (2) Are pain intensity in the injured leg, magnitude of capability, and accommodation of pain associated with unhelpful thoughts and feelings of distress regarding symptoms? METHODS: Between February 2020 and February 2022, we enrolled 139 patients presenting for an initial evaluation or return visit for any traumatic lower extremity injury at the offices of one of three musculoskeletal specialists. Patients had the option to decline filling out our surveys, but because of the cross-sectional design, required fields on the electronic survey tools, and monitored completion, there were few declines and few incomplete surveys. The median age of participants was 41 years (IQR 32 to 58), and 48% (67 of 139) were women. Fifty percent (70 of 139) injured their right leg. Sixty-five percent (91 of 139) had operative treatment of their fracture. Patients completed measures of pain intensity in the uninjured leg, pain intensity in the injured leg, lower extremity-specific magnitude of capability, symptoms of depression, symptoms of health anxiety, catastrophic thinking, and accommodation of pain. Multivariable analysis sought factors independently associated with pain intensity in the uninjured leg, pain intensity in the injured leg, magnitude of capability, and pain accommodation, controlling for other demographic and injury-related factors. RESULTS: Greater pain intensity in the uninjured leg (regression coefficient [RC] 0.09 [95% CI 0.02 to 0.16]; p < 0.01) was moderately associated with more unhelpful thinking regarding symptoms. This indicates that for every one-unit increase in unhelpful thinking regarding symptoms on the 17-point scale we used to measure pain catastrophizing, pain intensity in the uninjured leg increases by 0.94 points on the 11-point scale that we used to measure pain intensity, holding all other independent variables constant. Greater pain intensity in the injured leg (RC 0.18 [95% CI 0.08 to 0.27]; p < 0.01) was modestly associated with more unhelpful thinking regarding symptoms. Greater pain accommodation (RC -0.25 [95% CI -0.38 to -0.12]; p < 0.01) was modestly associated with less unhelpful thinking regarding symptoms. Greater magnitude of capability was not independently associated with less unhelpful thinking regarding symptoms. CONCLUSION: A patient's report of concerns regarding pain in the uninjured limb (such as, "I'm overcompensating for the pain in my other leg") can be considered an indicator of unhelpful thinking regarding symptoms. Orthopaedic surgeons can use such reports to recognize unhelpful thinking and begin guiding patients toward healthier thoughts and behaviors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

There is Little or No Association Between Independently Assessed Communication Strategies and Patient Ratings of Clinician Empathy.

BACKGROUND: Quality of care is increasingly assessed and incentivized using measures of patient-reported outcomes and experience. Little is known about the association between measurement of clinician communication strategies by trained observers and patient-rated clinician empathy (a patient-reported experience measure). An effective independent measure could help identify and promote clinician behaviors associated with good patient experience of care. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the association between independently assessed clinician communication effectiveness and patient-rated clinician empathy? (2) Which factors are associated with independently assessed communication effectiveness? METHODS: One hundred twenty adult (age > 17 years) new or returning patients seeking musculoskeletal specialty care between September 2019 and January 2020 consented to video recording of their visit followed by completion of questionnaires rating their perceptions of providers' empathy levels in this prospective study. Patients who had operative treatment and those who had nonoperative treatment were included in our sample. We pooled new and returning patients because our prior studies of patient experience found no influence of visit type and because we were interested in the potential influences of familiarity with the clinician on empathy ratings. We did not record the number of patients or baseline data of patients who were approached, but most patients (> 80%) were willing to participate. For 7% (eight of 120 patients), there was a malfunction with the video equipment or files were misplaced, leaving 112 records available for analysis. Patients were seen by one provider among four attending physicians, four residents, or four physician assistants or nurse practitioners. The primary study question addressed the correlation between patient-rated clinician empathy using the Jefferson Scale of Patient Perceptions of Physician Empathy and clinician communication effectiveness, independently rated by two communication scholars using the Liverpool Communication Skills Assessment Scale. Based on a subset of 68 videos (61%), the interrater reliability was considered good for individual items on the Liverpool Communication Skills Assessment Scale (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75 to 0.81]) and excellent for the sum of the items (that is, the total score) (ICC = 0.92 [95% CI 0.87 to 0.95]). To account for the potential association of personal factors with empathy ratings, patients completed measures of symptoms of depression (the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System depression computerized adaptive test), self-efficacy in response to pain (the two-item Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire), health anxiety (the five-item Short Health Anxiety Inventory), and basic demographics. RESULTS: Accounting for potentially confounding variables, including specific clinicians, marital status, and work status in the multivariable analysis, we found higher independent ratings of communication effectiveness had a slight association (odds ratio [OR] 1.1 [95% CI 1.0 to 1.3]; p = 0.02) with higher (dichotomized) ratings of patient-rated clinician empathy, while being single was associated with lower ratings (OR 0.40 [95% CI 0.16 to 0.99]; p = 0.05). Independent ratings of communication effectiveness were slightly higher for women (regression coefficient 1.1 [95% CI 0.05 to 2.2]); in addition, two of the four attending physicians were rated notably higher than the other 10 participants after controlling for confounding variables (differences up to 5.8 points on average [95% CI 2.6 to 8.9] on a 36-point scale). CONCLUSION: The observation that ratings of communication effectiveness by trained communication scholars have little or no association with patient-rated clinician empathy suggests that either effective communication is insufficient for good patient experience or that the existing measures are inadequate or inappropriate. This line of investigation might be enhanced by efforts to identify clinician behaviors associated with better patient experience, develop reliable and effective measures of clinician behaviors and patient experience, and use those measures to develop training approaches that improve patient experience. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, prognostic study .