Risk of Atypical HUS Among Family Members of Patients Carrying Complement Regulatory Gene Abnormality.

INTRODUCTION: Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is mainly due to complement regulatory gene abnormalities with a dominant pattern but incomplete penetrance. Thus, healthy carriers can be identified in any family of aHUS patients, but it is unpredictable if they will eventually develop aHUS. METHODS: Patients are screened for 10 complement regulatory gene abnormalities and once a genetic alteration is identified, the search is extended to at-risk family members. The present cohort study includes 257 subjects from 71 families: 99 aHUS patients (71 index cases + 28 affected family members) and 158 healthy relatives with a documented complement gene abnormality. RESULTS: Fourteen families (19.7%) experienced multiple cases. Over a cumulative observation period of 7595 person-years, only 28 family members carrying gene mutations experienced aHUS (overall penetrance of 20%), leading to a disease rate of 3.69 events for 1000 person-years. The disease rate was 7.47 per 1000 person-years among siblings, 6.29 among offspring, 2.01 among parents, 1.84 among carriers of variants of uncertain significance, and 4.43 among carriers of causative variants. CONCLUSIONS: The penetrance of aHUS seems a lot lower than previously reported. Moreover, the disease risk is higher in carriers of causative variants and is not equally distributed among generations: siblings and the offspring of patients have a much greater disease risk than parents. However, risk calculation may depend on variant classification that could change over time.

Kidney transplant in patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in the anti-C5 era: single-center experience with tailored Eculizumab.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) have long been considered ineligible for kidney transplantation (KTx) in several centers due to the high risk of disease recurrence, graft loss and life-threatening complications. The availability of Eculizumab (ECU) has now overcome this problem. However, the best approach towards timing, maintenance schedule, the possibility of discontinuation and patient monitoring has not yet been clearly established. STUDY DESIGN: This is a single center case series presenting our experience with KTx in aHUS. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This study included 26 patients (16 females) with a diagnosis of aHUS, who spent a median of 5.5 years on kidney replacement therapy before undergoing KTx. We compared the aHUS relapse rate in three groups of patients who underwent KTx: patients who received no prophylaxis, patients who underwent plasma exchange, those who received Eculizumab prophylaxis. Complement factor H-related disease was by far the most frequent etiology (n = 19 patients). RESULTS: Untreated patients and patients undergoing pre-KTx plasma exchange prophylaxis had a relapse rate of 0.81 (CI 0.30-1.76) and 3.1 (CI 0.64-9.16) events per 10 years cumulative observation, respectively, as opposed to 0 events among patients receiving Eculizumab prophylaxis. The time between Eculizumab doses was tailored based on classic complement pathway activity (target to < 30%). Using this strategy, 12 patients are currently receiving  Eculizumab every 28 days, 5 every 24-25 days, and 3 every 21 days. CONCLUSION: Our experience supports the prophylactic use of Eculizumab in patients with a previous history of aHUS undergoing KTx, especially when complement dysregulation is well documented by molecular biology.