Preserflo TM MicroShunt implantation combined with Ologen TM in primary and secondary glaucoma patients in a clinical setting.

PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of combining the Preserflo™ MicroShunt implant (MicroShunt) with a simultaneous Ologen™ implant in patients with glaucoma. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on consecutive patients with medically uncontrolled glaucoma who underwent MicroShunt + Ologen implantation as a standalone procedure or in combination with phacoemulsification (combined procedure). Success was defined as achieving an intraocular pressure (IOP) of 6-15 mmHg at 18 months post surgery, with a preoperative IOP reduction of at least 20%, and without (complete success) or with (qualified success) the need for antiglaucoma medications. The primary endpoint was the success rate. RESULTS: Forty-eight eyes from 47 patients were included, with 28 eyes (58.3%) undergoing the standalone procedure and 20 eyes (41.7%) undergoing the combined procedure. Overall, there was a significant reduction in preoperative IOP from 19.7 ± 5.8 mmHg to 11.4 ± 2.6 mmHg at 18 months ( P < 0.0001). In the standalone procedure group, preoperative IOP decreased from 21.5 ± 5.2 mmHg to 11.7 ± 2.5 mmHg ( P < 0.0001), and in the combined procedure group, preoperative IOP decreased from 17.1 ± 5.8 mmHg to 10.9 ± 2.7 mmHg ( P = 0.0002), with no significant difference between the two groups regarding final IOP. The mean number of antiglaucoma medications significantly decreased from 3.2 ± 1.1 to 0.3 ± 0.7 in the overall study population ( P < 0.0001). At 18 months, 40 eyes (83.3%) were classified as successful. Regarding safety, out of the total number of eyes, two (4.2%) experienced choroidal detachment without visual impairment, two (4.2%) had transient hyphema, one (2.1%) showed reactivation of a corneal herpetic ulcer, one (2.1%) had diplopia, and one (2.1%) exhibited a shallow anterior chamber during the first week. CONCLUSION: The combination of Ologen™ and Preserflo™ MicroShunt, either alone or in conjunction with phacoemulsification, demonstrated a favorable profile in terms of IOP reduction and safety.

Adjunctive bevacizumab in patients undergoing Ahmed valve implantation: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To report on preliminary findings of adjunctive subconjunctival bevacizumab (SCB) injections in patients undergoing Ahmed valve implantation (AVI) (New World Medical, Rancho Cucamonga, CA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institution's ethics committee. Patients were prospectively recruited during a 1-month period and randomized to receive AVI with postoperative SCB (days 1 and 7, n = 7) or AVI without SCB (n = 6). RESULTS: Baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) in the treatment (AVI+SCB) group was 19.4 ± 8.6 mm Hg, whereas baseline IOP in the control (AVI) group was 32.1 ± 17.7 mm Hg (P = .119). Final IOP was 13.8 mm Hg (n = 7) for the treatment group and 12.7 mm Hg for the control group (n = 5, P = .790). One eye in the control group required further glaucoma intervention at day 45 and was considered a failure. The pre-massage postoperative IOP was significantly lower for the treatment group only at day 45 (16.1 vs 26.0 mm Hg, P = .012). Mean post-massage IOP was significantly lower in the treatment group at day 15 (11.28 vs 17.16 mm Hg, P = .004), day 30 (11.28 vs 20.83 mm Hg, P = .015), and day 45 (12.16 vs 21.33 mm Hg, P = .001), and similar at month 3. Mean change in bleb area was 11.4 mm(2) in the treatment group and -0.4 mm(2) in the control group (P = .036 and P = .361, respectively, Student's paired samples t test). CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab was associated with a less aggressive hypertensive period as measured by post-massage IOP measurements, postoperative glaucoma medications, and cross-sectional bleb area by ultrasound. Further prospective studies are needed to better understand the utility of SCB at the time of AVI surgery.