Self-report underestimates the frequency of the acute respiratory exacerbations of COPD but is associated with BAL neutrophilia and lymphocytosis: an observational study.

RATIONALE: Research studies typically quantify acute respiratory exacerbation episodes (AECOPD) among people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) based on self-report elicited by survey questionnaire. However, AECOPD quantification by self-report could be inaccurate, potentially rendering it an imprecise tool for identification of those with exacerbation tendency. OBJECTIVE: Determine the agreement between self-reported and health records-documented quantification of AECOPD and their association with airway inflammation. METHODS: We administered a questionnaire to elicit the incidence and severity of respiratory exacerbations in the three years preceding the survey among current or former heavy smokers with or without diagnosis of COPD. We then examined electronic health records (EHR) of those with COPD and those without (tobacco-exposed persons with preserved spirometry or TEPS) to determine whether the documentation of the three-year incidence of moderate to very severe respiratory exacerbations was consistent with self-report using Kappa Interrater statistic. A subgroup of participants also underwent bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) to quantify their airway inflammatory cells. We further used multivariable regressions analysis to estimate the association between respiratory exacerbations and BAL inflammatory cell composition with adjustment for covariates including age, sex, height, weight, smoking status (current versus former) and burden (pack-years). RESULTS: Overall, a total of 511 participants completed the questionnaire, from whom 487 had EHR available for review. Among the 222 participants with COPD (70 ± 7 years-old; 96% male; 70 ± 38 pack-years smoking; 42% current smoking), 57 (26%) reported having any moderate to very severe AECOPD (m/s-AECOPD) while 66 (30%) had EHR documentation of m/s-AECOPD. However, 42% of those with EHR-identified m/s-AECOPD had none by self-report, and 33% of those who reported m/s-AECOPD had none by EHR, suggesting only moderate agreement (Cohen's Kappa = 0.47 ± 0.07; P < 0.001). Nevertheless, self-reported and EHR-identified m/s-AECOPD events were both associated with higher BAL neutrophils (ß ± SEM: 3.0 ± 1.1 and 1.3 ± 0.5 per 10% neutrophil increase; P ≤ 0.018) and lymphocytes (0.9 ± 0.4 and 0.7 ± 0.3 per 10% lymphocyte increase; P ≤ 0.041). Exacerbation by either measure combined was associated with a larger estimated effect (3.7 ± 1.2 and 1.0 ± 0.5 per 10% increase in neutrophils and lymphocytes, respectively) but was not statistically significantly different compared to the self-report only approach. Among the 184 TEPS participants, there were fewer moderate to very severe respiratory exacerbations by self-report (n = 15 or 8%) or EHR-documentation (n = 9 or 5%), but a similar level of agreement as those with COPD was observed (Cohen's Kappa = 0.38 ± 0.07; P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: While there is modest agreement between self-reported and EHR-identified m/s-AECOPD, events are missed by relying on either method alone. However, m/s-AECOPD quantified by self-report or health records is associated with BAL neutrophilia and lymphocytosis.

Psychotherapeutic nursing as Advanced Clinical Practice for the promotion of mental health in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: To contribute to the recognition of psychotherapeutic nursing (PTN) as a regulated advanced clinical practice (ACP) in Spain, as is the case in other countries. BACKGROUND: Nurses are continually evolving to improve overall health outcomes. PTN has become a reality, with several authors describing it as an ACP. In Spain, psychotherapy is not officially regulated, which has led to a significant number of psychiatric nurses adopting an important ACP in this area without recognition. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: Evidence confirms that PTN possesses the attributes necessary to be considered an ACP. Nurses, like psychotherapists, independently address the complex needs of individuals and families within the context of therapeutic relationships, and there is a pressing need to advance formal processes of regulation and certification. DISCUSSION: PTN has evolved at different rates depending on local initiatives, policies and various professional interests. In Spain, it is crucial to evaluate its outcomes, recognise it as an ACP and develop training plans for its regulation and accreditation. CONCLUSIONS: Mental health nurses in Spain have a strong interest in PTN being recognised as an ACP. To this end, they should join forces with other partners, scientific associations and international bodies such as the International Council of Nurses (ICN) to make PTN an internationally recognised ACP. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Psychotherapeutic nurses could contribute to improving mental health outcomes, client satisfaction and health system efficiency, and their formal recognition is an opportunity to enhance their professional identity, competence and autonomy. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING POLICY: Nursing policy needs to be reoriented towards strengthening psychotherapy as an ACP. Synergies and alliances between international nursing associations and the ICN can promote its development and implementation, while research, education and leadership are essential to achieving official regulation and accreditation.

Effectiveness, efficiency and efficacy in the multidimensional treatment of schizophrenia: Rethinking project. / Eficacia, eficiencia y efectividad en el tratamiento multidimensional de la esquizofrenia: proyecto Rethinking.

Schizophrenia is a clinically heterogeneous syndrome affecting multiple dimensions of patients' life. Therefore, its treatment might require a multidimensional approach that should take into account the efficacy (the ability of an intervention to get the desired result under ideal conditions), the effectiveness (the degree to which the intended effect is obtained under routine clinical practice conditions or settings) and the efficiency (value of the intervention as relative to its cost to the individual or society) of any therapeutic intervention. In a first step of the process, a group of 90 national experts from different areas of health-care and with a multidimensional and multidisciplinary perspective of the disease, defined the concepts of efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of established therapeutic interventions within 7 key dimensions of the illness: symptomatology; comorbidity; relapse and adherence; insight and subjective experience; cognition; quality of life, autonomy and functional capacity; and social inclusion and associated factors. The main conclusions and recommendations of this stage of the work are presented herein.

Terapia de presión negativa como tratamiento alternativo en el manejo de una úlcera vascular arterial de miembros inferiores / Negative- pressure therapy as an alternative treatment for managing arterial vascular ulcer of the lower limbs

Resumen Objetivo: Reportar un caso sobre el uso de la terapia de presión negativa como tratamiento alternativo en el manejo de una úlcera vascular arterial de miembros inferiores. Métodos: Por medio de la historia clínica, se revisó los registros previos de una paciente en un centro de atención médica de tercer nivel en Popayán, Colombia. Posteriormente, se realizó una revisión sistemática bibliográfica a través de las bases de datos de Pubmed, ScienceDirect y Scielo. Resultados: La terapia de presión negativa favoreció el proceso de cicatrización, permitiendo el cierre de la herida. Conclusiones: Actualmente, este sistema se considera un apoyo fundamental en el tratamiento de las heridas complejas, las cuales suponen un reto terapéutico importante.

Abstract Objective: To report a case about the use of the Negative-pressure wound therapy as an alternative treatment for arterial vascular ulcers presented in the lower limbs. Methods: The patient's records were reviewed based on her medical history in a tertiary referral care center in Popayan, Colombia. Subsequently, a systematic literature review was conducted through the Pubmed database, ScienceDirect, and Scielo. Results: The use of Negative-pressure wound therapy favored the lesion healing process. Conclusions: Nowadays, this system is considered as an essential treatment for complex wounds, which represent a major therapeutic challenge.

Eficacia, eficiencia y efectividad en el tratamiento multidimensional de la esquizofrenia: proyecto Rethinking / Effectiveness, efficiency and efficacy in the multidimensional treatment of schizophrenia: rethinking project

La esquizofrenia es un síndrome clínicamente heterogéneo que afecta a múltiples dimensiones vitales del individuo. Su tratamiento requiere un abordaje multidimensional en el que se deberían tener en cuenta la eficacia (la capacidad de una intervención para obtener el resultado pretendido en condiciones ideales), la efectividad (el grado en que se obtiene el efecto pretendido en condiciones de la práctica clínica habitual) y la eficiencia (el valor de la intervención con respecto al coste para el individuo o la sociedad). En una primera fase, un grupo de 90 expertos nacionales de todos los ámbitos, desde una perspectiva multidimensional y multidisciplinar de la enfermedad, definieron los conceptos de eficacia, efectividad y eficiencia en torno a 7 dimensiones clave: síntomas; comorbilidades; recaídas y adherencia; conciencia de enfermedad y experiencia subjetiva; cognición; calidad de vida, autonomía y capacidad funcional, e inclusión. Las principales conclusiones de esta fase se presentan en este trabajo (AU)

Schizophrenia is a clinically heterogeneous syndrome affecting multiple dimensions of patients’ life. Therefore, its treatment might require a multidimensional approach that should take into account the efficacy (the ability of an intervention to get the desired result under ideal conditions), the effectiveness (the degree to which the intended effect is obtained under routine clinical practice conditions or settings) and the efficiency (value of the intervention as relative to its cost to the individual or society) of any therapeutic intervention. In a first step of the process, a group of 90 national experts from different areas of health-care and with a multidimensional and multidisciplinary perspective of the disease, defined the concepts of efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of established therapeutic interventions within 7 key dimensions of the illness: symptomatology; comorbidity; relapse and adherence; insight and subjective experience; cognition; quality of life, autonomy and functional capacity; and social inclusion and associated factors. The main conclusions and recommendations of this stage of the work are presented herein (AU)